I put a metal detector over my trouser pocket every morning and i've yet to find anything in there, didn't used to be like that but just shows how much things have gone up in the last decade

They didnt have this technology in the 60s-70s

1st comment in a decade

“Fucking bastard” in the voice of lance

I don't tell the government when I find Saxon,Viking,Roman relics and i sell them on the black market.

Let me guess. He didn't get any of the coins..

"Find Liaison officer, Anna Booth, knew that this was a job for a professional archaeologist" So she called in a man.

i hate how they cut it short

Looks fake.

What a dick

wtf. This doesn't tell why they invaded at all

This bloody symbolism argument is so old hat now and so outdated. I would Imagine that once the pit was emptied, anyone passing could have chucked anything they felt like throwing away into that pit. Also finding one or two grains of barley in a pit does not mean that it was for storage. I think this whole theory needs revisiting. Alice is a babe by the way

How do you get a space suit like that without ending up poor?

this video is perfecto.. i see lots of people are asleep 💆

There goes my childhood

Why not?

The video is called "How to fake the moon landing", not "How they faked the moon landing". All these comments are irrelevant.

This comment section is cancer. These people put effort into this, showing you an alternative reality in which you may, or may not live in. So you're going to fuck about with the creators JUST for even QUESTIONING that it might not be real? Lets be real kiddos, no one knows. Believe what you want; Whether they did make it to the moon, or whether they didn't, it doesn't prove anything.

What utter bollocks. The dust around the studio astronauts boots behaves incorrectly for 1/6th gravity.

looks like utter shit..

Mabe in a human perspective, but wy dont arent the baby's buried again ?.

Awesome video.

Even though this video is very click-baity, I still like what you've done.

Could have been a birthing house. infant death was quite common.

how about make a video like "how to fake the video: how to fake the moon landing"? Will be so awesome huehuehue nice try! :v

Ahhhhh

What's next? The titanic never sunk? 9/11 never happened? DINOSAURS ARE FAKE? Fuck you.

Great info. like 'the biggest hoard of coins ever maaaaan ', wow, SO how many is the biggest? such a detailed video maaan, like i learnt so much like i wonder what was the fooking point of uploading the shit.

they is no wind in space

mintira the chegol man but the moon

I wonder how many more centuries we shall seach for ancient history and foundations... for what is really going on now, fake this and that, speculations and mistakes.

I think they had more professionalism from mason Disneyman and kubrick and tech as 'Fly-by-foil' gizmo, know lots of underwater stuff.

Nice try. They didn't have this technology back then.

All they have done is show how the Chinese faked their EVA stunts.

how to fake the moon landing, in 2014

How to fake the moon landing. Get pictures and footage from the real moon landing, create mediocre CGI video copy of that.

The moon landing did happen because the technology to produce a fake moon landing did not exist. NASA released thousands of pictures as well as the uncut video from Apollo 11 moonwalk (over 1 hour of uncut footage). The film technology of the time barely allowed for Kubrick's 2001 a space Odyssey (which relied on miniature that are obviously composited as well as cuts in the scenes not hours of uncut video). It is important to remember that this video was made using COMPUTERS which could not have possibly been used by NASA to fake this. Also, we know that America had the technology to go to the moon because of countless nuclear ICBM tests and other space missions. There isn't a single piece of evidence for a fake landing that isn't contradicted by fact (shadows can appear to be in different directions from one light source bc of lens abrasions or the landscapes affect on light, Kubrick could not have faked the landing with the technology of the time, stars do not appear on film when the foreground is brightly lit, optical illations presented by the quality of the black and white film can lead to crosshairs appearing to be behind an object when in reality are in front, the van allen radiation belt is only lethal in cases involving long term exposure) Additionally, NASA employed thousands of scientists, engineers, and mathematicians for the moon landings and, to date, not a single person who directly worked on the moon landing has claimed that they were a hoax, or offered any evidence to prove this. If it was a cover up it was certainly the best cover up of all time (they must have just killed all the scientist or held their families hostage so no one would talk). Certainly spending millions to just monitor everyone the scientists came in contact with was easier than actually going to the moon. FINALLY, several of the Apollo missions left behind retroreflectors (which reflect light back at the same angle it enters) and powerful lasers can be fired at retroreflectors on the moon and a return signal will come back to earth.

Crummy work. Doesn't look convincing. No dust kicking. Zero-g looked even with computer (!) no-where near 2001. FAIL

This is the best thing i h ave found nowadays.. There is a site: tinyurl.com/free-gems-easy Gave me free G ems, you can get up to 99999, and is simple

This is the best thing i h ave found nowadays.. There is a site: tinyurl.com/free-gems-easy Gave me free G ems, you can get up to 99999, and is simple

Paulo Victor having a steady source of grain to provide the northern provinces was alot more important than you think, considering the high price of transportation and potentials risks of transporting through the weather, over sea, and bandits throughout gaul and germania

@ JMac, you really need to do some basic research on the romans, then you would know that the romans found human sacrifice to be appalling. one of the biggest problems rome had with carthage as well and why they were one of romes most hated enemies, after the celtic gauls in the republican period

The big question is WHY fake the landing. Likely answer: we learnt there was something there that spooked us off, yet the public needed justification for the tax monies spent.

it seems ever video on your channel has no evidence yet lots of bull shit .

looks like some water drip down the rock and created dents in the rock , there is no pigment found , so this must be a craving ,. how ever i don't see it , people clearly making stuff up , there is notting there , this is just nonsence .

Here is a comment by someone who doesn't believe in Moon landings and it made a lot of sense: "If the world was like we are led to believe it is, what you say would be true. But at the top the same elite are the main movers and shakers, it is no secret that the Russian revolution was largely sponsored by Wall street. Russian leadership needed America as a credible ideological enemy, and the US even more so needed Russia-it's good for business. That apart, on a purely practical basis, it was known by the US that Gagarin's first orbit of the Earth was not the first, and that he didn't even land in his capsule, but landed by parachute a mile away, and the US kept quiet about that. Another practical consideration is that at the time of Apollo the US was heavily subsidizing USSR's food supply with free grain shipments to them, they would be shooting themselves in the foot to blow the whistle. True that science is often worldwide, but most of those scientists are in the pay of government or big corporations, why would they jeopardize their career and salary by stepping into the field of propaganda busting Consider if the US had blown the whistle on Gagarin, it would make the Russian people lose faith, and likewise if the Russians had blown the whistle. This would inevitably be to the detriment of "real" scientists on both sides, when it came to being funded. Richard Feynman was one of a kind when it came to being an independent scientist, and he had, amongst other things, this to say about NASA: "It would appear that, for whatever purpose, be it for internal or external consumption, the management of NASA exaggerates the reliability of its product, to the point of fantasy." "NASA owes it to the citizens from whom it asks support, to be frank, honest and informative. And so that these citizens can make the wisest decisions for the use of their limited resources for a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations - for nature cannot be fooled."-R. Feynman in report. I had intended in the last few weeks just to find out if the Moon landing story was true, as it was something I hadn't questioned before. I found that it was so ingrained in me that it was true, that even when it became obvious it was a scam I still had something in me that said it was true, just goes to show that propaganda and indoctrination is far more powerful than the truth in forming beliefs." ===================================================== What the FUCK was the main point of the MOON LANDINGS? JUST a BIG THEATRICAL SHOWS at the EXPENSE OF THE TAXPAYERS. Was it not for scientific enlightenment and to advance the human kind into space? Governments all over the FUCKING world are LIARS. They use and abuse their power for political gain. You are watching and listening to LIARS on TV and RADIO. You are all being brainwashed to think and act the way they want you to. Turn that STUPID BOXES OFF and find the TRUTH for yourself. HALF of What you don't know about your own government can traumatize you for LIFE. Very good show. Man could not even manufacture a proper Camera, never mind have the Technology to send a Manned craft to the Moon through Van Allan's belt. Why is there no Satellite or Space Station higher than 400 miles above Earth. a Well documented and plenty proof in this video that Man was NOT on the Moon, never mind what Google "Moon" shows you. All those Satellite mapping of the moon was done by NASA unmanned satellites and Doctored to show such to cover the Great lie A human would need 8 feet of lead to be protected from the radiation. If they went to the moon, why didn't they use the same type of suits to clean up 3-mile island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima?

it's most likely the Gauls brought that stuff to Britian as they migrated there from france , and most likely kept trading with the Briton/French /Guals

It makes perfect sense that it was a brothel, Dorchester-On-Thames is just over the hill to the North, there was a fort there, and I suspect the presence of another at Abingdon. Also, the Thames was a major thoroughfare, lots of boat traffic.

I know the moon landing was real and all, but this video is still pretty cool.