Thanks fellow Irish person. Yes you can still use tmux but I don't really do much work on servers.

What Linux distro are you using? It might be a missing dependency. I'm guessing it could be something to do with the autoconf package.

@@jamesmccabe3168 I'm using Artix Linux, there is a way to download theses dependencies? Or maybe install a new autoconf package...

@@renanmarin8758 I am not sure, I have never used Artix, I see its based on Arch Linux which I never use... other than read about it. My guess would be to install StumpWM from the Arch repository and then see if it pulls in the required dependencies or AUR. Then go back and see if the git version will build. Its also possible the latest Arch autoconf being bleeding edge could have updates to stop StumpWM from building. I am not an expert on Linux dependencies I'm afraid especially Arch based.

@@renanmarin8758 Also check you have automake package installed.

As you are using Debian I expect its an old version of Stump you are using possibly version 1.0.0. "float-this" and "unfloat-this" were added in early 2017 I think from browsing commits. Emmmm... you could try to patch StumpWM 1.0.0 code with the new code in tile-group.lisp and recompile to add the functionality. It seems a messy option to me. Is it really worth using stumpwm-base-16 for colors? I'm guessing its this repo github.com/tpine/base16-stumpwm? You could just add your own themes in an easier way maybe or try to solve the "select-theme" error in that repo. It would be more practical than patching in new functionality into old versions of StumpWM I'd imagine. I might take a look at that repo if I can get a chance. I only have very basic Lisp skills though.

Yes StumpWM is not for everyone, it has a small audience. Where it becomes interesting is when you begin to customize it to your own needs. It should be noted you can define any key combinations yourself. Also any command can be executed with any key combination you want.

☺️ Close one there...

No, not the latest version... well spotted. I originally started with a git version from March, I made the first half around of screencast around then and finished it in July or so. Life got in the way. I didn't include "Dynamic group" as there is still a pull request with a lot of commits waiting to be merged, so might cover that later. You can center message window with (setf *message-window-gravity* :center) Config is here: github.com/jamesmccabe/stumpwm-demo-config

Yes it can be hard to get into at the beginning. The Stump manual and Common Lisp resources are where I started. Also reading the Stump code in the github repository can be helpful. Its not as easy to find resources compared to other window managers. It probably only appeals to people with an interest in Emacs and Common Lisp. I hope to make a few videos on setting up a minimal config if I can find some time in the future.

@@jamesmccabe3168 I would definitely be interested in a video like that! I'm an Emacs user, and I see lots of people drifting to EXWM, but as cool as it is, I find it to be quite unpleasant to work with due to its technical limitations, so I've been looking at Stump as sort of an alternative to EXWM.

Today is the day. Bought a new computer and am going to install vanilla arch & stumpwm on this machine.

I haven't much of a setup at the moment, its basic enough but I will make a video on it in the future. I'm currently making a demo installation video. I'm busy with work, moving house next month... as well as working on my fathers farm at weekends so its all a bit crazy to find time for Stumpwm :)

Como foi tua experiência com stumpwm?

To be honest I have never used EXWM. The main difference would be, its an Emacs package written in Emacs Lisp which turns Emacs into a window manager. StumpWM is written in Common Lisp which is more a multi-purpose programming language than Emacs Lisp. StumpWM is a stand alone window manager and uses its own config. It doesn't rely on using Emacs. You could use any text editor. So you would have your window manager config and editor config all in the one config, if you used EXWM I assume... whereas with Stump you would have a separate config. I may look into it in the future but I would like to make some more StumpWM videos first as there are so few compared to Emacs and even EXWM. Ratpoison I have used... is probably more similar to Stump in general usage except its written in C and uses a text based config file. This video only scratches the surface of StumpWM, its a deep rabbit hole when I started writing stuff for my own config, checking internal source etc.

Stumpwm is actually better. I'm an emacs fanatic, however, with EXWM, it's single threaded, which means if one process hangs, the entire WM hangs, stumpwm is multi-threaded and it will run even IF one process hangs. I normally run with Stumpwm as the WM and emacs up showing a command line, from there I run everything (pretty much) in Emacs.