Zimbabwe? You mean Rhodesia.

@tnoomsk5897 Rhodesia? Zimbabwe. It's the same country and it's my home. I was born long after Independence The Rhodesian days were great but it's the past now. We must look to the present to create the future we wish to live in that benefits all living beings, for the highest good of all living beings.

Keep dreaming Celt 😂

@@DumbTurtlz Wait and see anglo.

You're not wrong

UKs had Pakistanis and Indians since the 60’s, it’s just that London has had a taste of it now they’re all talking about it now. Us northerners have had all this crap for decades. Also did you forget 7/7 bombings? We’ve already had it before Europe.

@@ChampChamp2024 - Stop being naïve UK, you are under attack: A country requires a birthrate of 2.1 to 2.3 children per woman in order to barely maintaina healthy population growth. None of the modern western countries except Israel, #57 with 2.9, is anywhere near that. Of first world countries in Europe, France (#120) is closest with 1.8 children per woman, while the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Iceland, Montenegro and Sweden are all tied with the United States (#141) at 1.7 children per woman. The UK is at 1.6. at doesn't tell the whole tale. The number of Muslim immigrants that are populating European countries right now pushes that figure higher but among traditional Christian Europeans it is lower. The actual rate among traditional-culture UK women is probably actually about 1.3 or lower. The population of the U.S.A. and traditionally Christian European countries is aging out. Christians, Jews and many other religions are having fewer children due to women making the choice to work instead of having children and a family, due to extensive use of birth control measures and due to abortions. Muslim women within those populations though, average 4 to 6 children each and that number increases as those countries allow more and more illegal immigrants coming from troubled countries in the middle east and Africa to incrase. It's been shown that these immigrant Muslim populations resist assimilation into their host nation cultures. In fact, in some European countries, after only about two decades of the inflow of immigrants from the middle east and Africa, those countries are dealing with massive protests run by radical Islamists who are demanding that those immigrants be allowed to have their own separate system of Sharia law. Violence against women by immigrants offended by exposed hair, knees or faces has become common and criticism of Islam has actually resulted in the beheading of a teacher by an Islamic fanatic. Sweden, fed up with violence brought to their countries by radical Islamists, has halted immigration and is beginning of deportation of some radical Islamists in an attempt to stop this, but Sweden may have acted too late. It's estimated that of the entire Muslim population in the entire world, 800,000.000 souls count themselves as radicalize Islamists and that number is growing. If only 1% of those radicalized Islamists were to decide (and more than 1% may have already done so) to radicalize, and become part of a massive passive underground army that's growing and waiting for western countries to age out, that hidden army would be at least 8,000,000 strong and would keep on growing as more radical Islamist migrate into western countries, refuse to assimilate local culture and begin grooming western children to favor Islam above Christianity. So, while the Muslim population continually grows larger and western men and women decide less and less to have children, the majority of Christians and those of other religions besides Muslims, is aging out across the west and, in years to come, those traditionally Christian countries will find themselves with an ever-increasing population aged 60 and older and an insufficient number of offspring of fighting age able to man their armies. When this happens, those countries may find themselves unable to resist an eventual radical Islamist takeover of the west. What has happened in Europe needs to be a lesson for the U.S. and the UK. Sweden may have slowed down the eventual elimination of traditional Swedish culture by new restrictions but, they haven't stopped it, and if the U.S. and the U.K. don't recognize this danger now, those countries too may eventually find themselves in an untenable position. The children or grandchildren of non-Islamic cultures may find themselves, decades from now, in the fight of their lives to keep freedom of religion, freedom of speech, equal rights for women, and all other western values, while radical Islamists seek to take over western civilization and wipe all other cultures and forms of religion, including any moderate variation of Islam, from the face of the earth.

I still sing it this way.