VIDA E MORTE É ESSE ABSURDO PARA NÓS NÃO PARA DEUS.
@nsp74Күн бұрын
αυτος ο λαμπρος ανθρωπος ηταν ενας θησαυρος για τον Χριστιανισμο
@Jeffersonsantos.12 күн бұрын
No final somos todos calvinistas, pois tudo já testa determinado. O livro está fechado.
@dfoxx636118 күн бұрын
This Bible lesson from Dr. Steve Lawson was life changing for me and my husband. I have listened to this message twice on Roku, the KZbin channel. I will listen to it again. I am forever grateful and thankful to Pastor, Dr. Lawson for his accurate teaching and love for all of us believers in Christ. My husband and I plan on listening to all of Dr. Lawson's Bible lessons. He is a gift from God and his love for the Lord exudes from his very being. We are so happy we came to know Dr. Lawson. He is in our prayers because we need him and his gift for teaching the holy Scriptures. May the Lord continue to bless Dr. Lawson.
@JakesArchive11 күн бұрын
He was caught having a 5 year long affair. Type his name in Google search.
@FernandoHenrique-d6r20 күн бұрын
Que surra que esse arminiano levou. Eu tinha visto esse vídeo há muitos anos atrás, agora estou assistindo de novo.
@tkhawmpau925424 күн бұрын
What an inspiring Xmas message! PRL! brother !
@gabrieltoledo858426 күн бұрын
Um idiota
@nuggetoftruth-ericking748928 күн бұрын
This was interesting.
@asesarnaldo486629 күн бұрын
Se o objetivo é mandar todos para o céu, então parem de evangelizar, e todos vão por causa da do perdão da inocência.
@KimberlyLBrownАй бұрын
Dr. Lawson has been outted but truly his messages were still sound. Pray for him and in the mean time i will keep watching his sermons. They were what helped me in my conversion 3.7 years ago. To God be the glory for ALL and evermore.
@stefandjurovic6690Ай бұрын
I came to faith thru this video. As a result I entered three and a half years of a faith filled with anxiety because of the unfortunate wording of the preachers. I never felt like I met the condition for Jesus to accept me. The wording makes it sound that the condition for Jesus to accept us is at bottom a changed behaviour, and not a changed genuine desire. Jesus never seemed as the good guy. God used them, but the devil did too, a lot.
@stefandjurovic6690Ай бұрын
To add, I literally felt like Jesus hates me day in day out, because of my inability to change my behaviour. It felt like he was only waiting for me to not measure up. Even on my "good" days, I felt a lot of fear because a mistake was just around the corner. I felt like I just pleased somebody who hated me, like I could have some relief because I was temporarily on the good side of a tyrant.
@dfoxx6361Ай бұрын
This Biblical sermon has changed me and my husband's life in the best way possible. We have listened to this sermon several times and learned something new each time. We thank the Lord for Biblical teacher, Dr. Steve Lawson. We are excited to know Dr. Lawson and look forward to listening to more of his sermons. We will also purchase his books because his gift as a Biblical teacher is phenomenal.
@juliematthews539Ай бұрын
Psalms Chapter 5
@Andy-m8bАй бұрын
No, White is an evil false teaching calvinist sociopath. He's NOT a blessing.
@framboise595Ай бұрын
Another man shaming sermon regarding sex ... Another man shaming sermon blaming MEN for their natural sex drive . As if we women were asexual ! How hypocrite really ! The Bible never speaks this way. There is NO man shaming in the Bible because God , the good God , the only one who is good , knows how to speak to his sons . The book of Proverbs warns young men against sexual immoral WOMEN ..how curious Mr Washer ..women ?sexually immoral ? Women praising free sex and I do what I want with MY body style ? Women praising free sex and scorning marital sex ( the bulwark against sexual immorality) ? Women ? But women are blameless , sinless you know ... The Book of Proverbs warns men against those kinds of women BUT God who is good ( unlike those preachers) always gives his sons a compensation . Thus , he directs them to the WIFE of the youth ( Proverbs chap 5 v 18) in order to have his sexual thirst released and fully quenched. The will of God as sanctification does not mean in anyway forced ascetism and constant abstinence. Sanctification is closely related in the Bible as being ONE FLESH and as 1 Thessalonians 4 :4 says , for a man to KNOW how to 'control his own vessel ' which is in Greek , to take a WIFE . If so many men today resort to porn or other sexual outlets , it is because they have no clue how to possess the WIFE's body ( 1 Thessalonians 4:4) That disorder , shame and confusion comes from the SATANIC teachings given to women for decades. The most Satanic teaching is this one ' MY BODY MY CHOICE '. That devilish slogan has crept into the marriage bed and GOD knows it , but so many preachers just pretend not to know ( God knows why they act this way ) . 1 Corinthians 7:5 is perfectly in line with Thessalonians 4:4 as it says that the wife has no power over her own body but it is the husband who has (vice versa). Because of that demonic slogan pushed ( and God knows I don't lie) and encouraged by many non inspired preachings today , the marriage bed has become a sexual desert and Satan is jubilating. The married woman is told by those charlatans (if Washer is of their number , then he is really a joke , but God only knows) that they DO have a right over their own body and their husband has NONE . NONE. NONE NONE. This infamy goes hard against the whole biblical teaching of sanctification and sexuality and gives way to more and more sexual immorality of all kinds. Poor Mr Washer who is sick of hearing men complain ... how loving really ! how compassionate ! Those preachers are the ones who teach us women that terrible LIE , leading to mass marriage breakdown ..but then they blame men again and again for trying to find another sexual outlet because they have been disempowered , emasculated and kept away from their wife's body . Of all the so called Christian teachings I've heard on YT about sexuality , it looks as if a MARRIED man was constantly in a stressful stage of conquest towards his wife (makes sexual advances and she has the authority to say yes or no , which is 100% satanic) rather than a restful stage of possession ( Thessalonians 4:4 / Proverbs chap 5 v 18) and of sexual fulfilment. No need to blame men Mr Washer . Blame your fellow preachers who teach us women that infamous slogan combined with hard core unsubmission and the subtle concept of 'free will' . If you want to blame men ; sir , blame them for not disciplining their own rebellious wife and take control and possession of their body ONCE FOR ALL .. oh no you cannot ! It would be ABUSE .!! ABUSE ! the magic word that neuters a husband for life ...
@MsJacmackАй бұрын
This man is a real preacher….the devil knew he had to stop him from spreading God’s truth….BUT the devil is a liar …..he is spreading the gospel more via his mistake/public sin…. May his repentance come out of this and like Tony Evan’s, continue preaching the gospel‼️.
@jwashingtonparkerАй бұрын
Some/many yes. Some/few no. Salvation is by faith, apart from deeds of the law.
@RepentStudiosАй бұрын
What a message that is now in the perspective of this man who is living in sin. I hope this man takes heed to his own warning
@davidblakely1282Ай бұрын
He should have listened to his own sermons.
@paulring86Ай бұрын
A falsely defined word lead to a false theology. Lawsons poor and unbibical definition of Sovereignty conflict with the Bible in many ways; and would make God out to be Un-Holy. We now know what a wicked, unbiblical teacher Lawson is, but we should have already seen his theology was false.
@taylordaniel1408Ай бұрын
Woof. Folks, God bless you. Please try a few John Behr videos and lectures on how the early church read scripture for all the relevant (and lifegiving and great fruit producing) that was left out of this. I used to listen to White and think “I don’t like it, but I don’t know if there’s a good rebuttal to it.” Now, I’m happy to say and see that going deeper and broader in the Christian tradition has led to that earlier thought being (though I still have compassion for it) laughable!
@thecutworxАй бұрын
This should be takin down. Steve Lawson is a prime example of 2 Timothy 3:6-7
@Geo_not_Neo53812 ай бұрын
YOU INCLUDE THE CHURCHES THAT ARE ALSO REBELLION AGAINST GOD AND HIS ANOINTED ONE. THAT IS WHY THERE'S NOT A PREACHER ALIVE TODAY THAT WILL CONTINUE TEACHING THE WORD OF GOD THEY WILL ALL BE REMOVED TRUST ME. 35:19
@Geo_not_Neo53812 ай бұрын
Psalm 2 is speaking about the branch the elect one of the Most High. He says psalm 2 is speaking about JESUS. How can that be if JESUS said he is the vine and we are the branches. Its simple psalm 2 is not about JESUS and you you believe him then you're under the enemy spell.
@sinnersaved10332 ай бұрын
Were in satans little season..
@Khathutshelo_N2 ай бұрын
Amen!!!
@shanerust69692 ай бұрын
This message was a blessing to hear. Thank you
@jwashingtonparkerАй бұрын
Yes, thank you
@danilodan68342 ай бұрын
Paul Washer, um dos melhores expositores da Bíblia da Bíblia na atualidade.
@gabrieltoledo858426 күн бұрын
Ele só fala merda
@paulvanderveen43092 ай бұрын
I'm not watching an hour of garbage by hypocrite Steve Lawson! The narrow way is simple Trust in Christ based on what he did for you. These Calvinist hypocrite Pharisee devils like Steve Lawson preach damnable heresy by claiming works are evidence your saved. Truth of the matter is you can be just like Hitler and Osama Bin Laden without ever repenting of your sins and still make it to heaven if you've trusted in Christ's finished work on the Cross !!!
@jwashingtonparkerАй бұрын
After listening to many hours of Lawson, what you're saying is not fully true. Yes he wrongly mixes in false lordship salvation, but ultimately that is not what he is saying. It is complex, and yes the gospel should not be To be a DISCIPLE we must forsake all and follow Christ. One can only begin that once they have been born again through faith alone.
@pnow7772 ай бұрын
amen the bible says "God loves us BECAUSE WE FIRST LOVED HIM" If we want God to love us, WE MUST WORK FOR IT. And then its not even guaranteed. Can I get n Amen in the comments for my sound teaching? No one understand the truth of God more than me! Maybe Myron
@ShaneMulligan-n7h2 ай бұрын
Amen
@DanielAlves-cy8iz2 ай бұрын
É apenas uma hiperbólica, tanto que depois a Bíblia vai dizer que os filhos de Israel se casaram com as mulheres amalequitas, ora, quer dizer que eles se casaram com pessoas mortas? De maneira nenhuma! Inclusive, tem um texto que fala que Hitler matou todos os judeus! Homens e mulheres, jovens e adultos, velhos e jovens, e até mesmo criancinhas de peito e que não restou nenhum descendente vivo em Israel e que Israel foi eliminado da face da terra e que não mais existem! Ora, Israel ainda existe? É claro que sim! É apenas uma figura de linguagem! As pessoas tem que entender que é a Bíblia é Deus falando com sotaque humano! É igual quando alguém fala: Estou morto de cansaço! Isto não quer dizer que os mortos se cansam!
@markcyphus32922 ай бұрын
If the solas are true they contradict each other- if something is “ alone” there can’t be anything else- besides something invented some 15 centuries into Christian history and nowhere stated in Scripture is just manifest nonsense.
@GaryRichardson-x9x2 ай бұрын
Thompson John Anderson Donald Martin Steven
@say10..2 ай бұрын
So God only loves some of the things that he created and is angry at some things that he created. Well...... he created it
@GlassmannScriptorium2 ай бұрын
E um ponto complicado de se explicar pq satanaz so faz aquilo que Deus permita que ele faça, ou seja Deus esta sempre a frente de toda a iniciativa, Entao seu a biblia diz que Deus endureçeu o coração do faraó significa que Deus de fato fez ou que Deus permitiu que satanaz assim o fozesse, se a segunda estiver correta entao satanaz pode endurecer o coração de qualquer um assim como o Espirito Santo pode quebrantar o coração de qualquer um, sendo a Biblia a palavra direta de Deus significa que Deus de fato quiz dizer aquilo independente do desconhecimento teologico do autor, pq Deus nao usou pessoas dotadas de conhecimentos teologicos para escolher os autores de sua palavra, vailati esta errado no seu ponto de vista e escancarando a porta para se pregar um monte de absurdos e heresias a respeito do texto sagrado, e esse pseudo teologo ja falou muita besteira por ai para abrir as portas para o liberalismo, falar que o autor errou por desconhecer entao podemos abertamente que todos os autores podem ter errado em algum momento logo a biblia deixa de ser a palavra de Deus e passa a ser palavras de homens assim ele destroi toda a autoridade da biblia, e por isso que vailatti esta alterando abertamento muitos textos biblicos onde diz claramente uma coisa e ele faz o texto falar totalmente o contrario do que o proprio texto diz claramente e vailatti faz muito isso o que o granconato fala ele mostra na biblia mas o vailatti tira tudo de fora da biblia usando costumes da epoca, historias etc ou seja seu ponto de vista vale mais que a palavra escrita nas escrituras, e pessoas assim tem um leque aberto para pregar toda especie de heresia possivel.
@godschild92763 ай бұрын
I’m hooked to his teachings. I can’t say the scandal was good but it worketh good for me in that it brought me to his teachings. I’ll keep listening to him and pray for him. When men like him falls, it’s a disaster to the body. Steve, you will rise again!
@repent.sinner2 ай бұрын
Amen
@ДмитрийДепутатов3 ай бұрын
Martinez Helen Gonzalez Dorothy Lewis Michael
@Sherlock2453 ай бұрын
I now have massive skeptisim for all preacher shouting loud on truth . My trust on them been betrayed. PREACHED MORAL TRUTH = LIVED HYPOCRISY 😵
@godschild92763 ай бұрын
Well, it is the same scandal that brought me to this page. One thing you can’t take from him is the proper hermeneutical exegesis he does. Besides, who amongst us has not fallen? He who has no sin must cast the first one!
@Sherlock2453 ай бұрын
@@godschild9276 under that reasoning will you study under Hitler? He was Chrisitian and fallen. Oh how about some one accuse of sexual crime?? What has disqualified all his teaching is that he has not repented and went to hiding over 5 year relationship with a young women. He won't repent I been saying this for. Whole week now.
@ovando483 ай бұрын
Praying for Steve Lawson 😢 and his family.
@jorgealberto1983a3 ай бұрын
You are still my favorite pony even if you don’t win another race.
@ovando483 ай бұрын
This message still true today and to God be the glory. God uses sinful men, fallen men, but GOD promises are forever, for those who repent, and put their trust is Christ alone.
@ClammyTutani3 ай бұрын
Yes, yes, yes, the fear of the Lord is the secret to a stable Christian life. What a wonderful message by Dr Lawson
@smacdiesel3 ай бұрын
Does adultery keep you out?
@Ivanos-p4n2 ай бұрын
What does going through the narrow gate cost you?
@jwashingtonparkerАй бұрын
No it doesn't
@DennisIsadore3 ай бұрын
Dead people CANNOT make themselves alive.
@a.gwhiteley18553 ай бұрын
It is not surprising that Richard Dawkins says he doesn't have a formed view on free will. If we are seriously saying that all our thoughts are determined by the mindless forces of the material universe, such that our thoughts could not have been other than they are, how can we know any of our thoughts to be true or false, since we could not possibly have thought differently? The entire distinction between truth and falsehood disappears. This means we cannot know our denial of free will to be true or false either. The denial of free will is the denial of reason, science and all human understanding. The difficulty Dawkins and Krauss have is that the reality of free will calls into question, putting it mildly, the reductive materialism which lies behind their denial of it, but which is at the heart of their whole approach.
@rrickarr3 ай бұрын
September 2024: this. man is a compkete hypocrite. He preaches all this GOOD NEWS that he has fallen far short of.
@deeperlife56893 ай бұрын
Limited atonement is a response to an ‘all or not all’ question about the atonement. It seems to me that this is a bogus question in many important respects. There are a lot of assumptions bound up in the question that need to be unpacked and examined. Both the limited and unlimited views of the atonement are misplaced, because they are putting emphasis on only one portion of God’s salvific work, instead of taking in the vast, universal scope of redemption described by Scripture
@brother.chirchir3 ай бұрын
Sovereign election is beautiful. The Sovereignty of God, is the beauty of God, is the love of God
@YourFriendlyAlan3 ай бұрын
What is wrong with this statement: 4:47 “If naturalism is true there's no reason to say that naturalism is true, you're just forced to say that” - Greg Bahnsen The statement suggests a contradiction within the concept of naturalism. Here are some points that could be considered problematic or unclear: 1. Circular Reasoning: Saying "if naturalism is true, then you must accept that it is true" can come off as circular. It assumes the conclusion (that naturalism is true) without providing independent justification. 2. Epistemological Basis: The statement implies that naturalism's truth requires an uncritical acceptance, which can undermine the philosophical basis for naturalism itself. Naturalism typically emphasises evidence, observation, and reason as its foundations. 3. Lack of Critical Engagement: The phrase "you’re just forced to say that" suggests a lack of agency or critical thought. Philosophical positions, including naturalism, are generally subject to debate and critique. A robust discourse allows for questioning and exploring the implications of any belief system. 4. Implying Determinism: The statement may inadvertently suggest a deterministic view of beliefs, implying that one cannot arrive at different conclusions based on evidence or reasoning, which contradicts the nature of philosophical inquiry. In summary, the statement could be seen as overly simplistic and dismissive of the complexities involved in accepting or rejecting philosophical positions like naturalism.