Same concept for all planes no matter the type! I am an Airbus fan myself ✈️
@FilipinoIdk781Ай бұрын
The hell is wrong with boeing💀
@lakshyapawar5810Ай бұрын
I thought it was a fuel dump 😮
@Aviationist369Ай бұрын
No worries! That's a very common misconception actually. Subscribe for more similar content ✨
@ljgalaxyАй бұрын
So it is just fancy gas
@Aviationist369Ай бұрын
@@ljgalaxy😎 sassy fancy gas
@mounirbensahal539Ай бұрын
It more lively a vacuum which sucks the air inside the turbine with a very high speed to fly when the chopper or helicopter act like a ventilator or spinning blades to left over two different concepts 😮
@truckstreestoysАй бұрын
Try passing through Burbank lol
@Aviationist369Ай бұрын
Haha, agreed, Burbank is a combinational nightmare, short runways, mountainous areas and occasional bad weather.
@Simonj110Ай бұрын
Hi, Just a quick correction. The aircraft shown is USAF not RAF. Kindest regards!
@Aviationist369Ай бұрын
Thank you for your feedback, it is much appreciated. Apologies for that error, it has been corrected.
@RonaldoSui-g5tАй бұрын
Fighting falcon*****
@ASAP_ChannelАй бұрын
Is this a lead custodian
@Aviationist369Ай бұрын
They are typically neither head nor lead custodians, but part of the ground crew.
@h.y1855Ай бұрын
Still in service in iran
@fra93ilgrande2 ай бұрын
👹🔥🛩️🦅🇺🇸🔝😈
@shravan-j6k2 ай бұрын
Everyone knows that idiot
@LmaoobrogotclippedIdklol2 ай бұрын
Cool!
@loadfactorr2 ай бұрын
epic!
@mypokemon2 ай бұрын
YEAH ALL THESE FEATURE WAS PACKED FOR THE 90'S ITS A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT RETRO FLIGHTS. ITS A PIECE OF SHIT NOW ANYWAYS
@joseph-k4e2 ай бұрын
All parts can b found @ Sanford and Son Salvage. As the old adage goes, spend 1 billion dollars, a neuro makes $20. Don't b offended, the ni@@ers get it. LOL😅😅😅😅😅
@chazcarson89162 ай бұрын
if built today the spit would called an intercepter fast heavily armed adgile but no real range constantly has to return base to rearm and refuel
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
@@chazcarson8916 Spot on! The Spitfire was designed as a short-range interceptor for high frequency interception against incoming waves of raids rather than being an escort for long range bombers. It is more of a defensive fighter.
@Moneymike292 ай бұрын
Biggest waste of money American military has ever spent
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
Why do you say so?
@MarsWolf812 ай бұрын
Not true! We just haven't needed it yet!
@Moneymike292 ай бұрын
@@Aviationist369 the United States government won’t let that plane overseas in military combat because they’re scared it’ll get taken down or possibly copied by other nations. It’s only been in 2-3 missions outside of American territory. What’s the point in spending billions on possibly the most capable plane in the world and keeping it in American airspace for “training” flights all the time. It’s stupid
@Moneymike292 ай бұрын
@@MarsWolf81 that’s not true. See my above comment.
@fra93ilgrande2 ай бұрын
@@MarsWolf81RAAAAAAAAAH! 🔥🦅🇺🇸👹🛩️
@watercoolernmd2 ай бұрын
Ми26 😂😂😂
@pcka122 ай бұрын
I bet the Ukrainians would just love to get their hands on a squadron of these aircraft!
@jonathanvince81732 ай бұрын
The Typhoon is the only aircraft capable of matching the Russian fighter of mach 3 with the new Rolls Royce engines that are unknown but economical compared with the rest of the worlds engines especially at high speed.
@domoskovacs71692 ай бұрын
"When you hear that unmistakeable baaaaaart"
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
@@domoskovacs7169 😂😂😂
@davidsharpe65242 ай бұрын
If you hear that brrrrrt....... you weren't the target.
@funny_joke_goes_here44062 ай бұрын
A highly ineffective vehicle with a higher blue-on-blue tally than all other U.S. aircraft ever combined. It was outperformed at its only job (frontline support) by the Aardvark, a plane built for an entirely different role, as the F-111 was deployed on half the sorties and scored double the confirmed kills, making it 4x as effective. That would be the equivalent of the Lancaster Bomber outperforming the Spitfire in a turn fight. It would be utterly embarrassing. But inter-corps politics will remain inter-corps politics, so unfortunately this outdated piece of flying scrap will remain airborne for the foreseeable future…even though they’re now more expensive than F-35s…which are just better…
@funny_joke_goes_here44062 ай бұрын
And the GAU-8 struggles to penetrate the armour of early Cold Wars tanks in perfect conditions, in combat it can maybe make a crew shit themselves but it’s not turning anything larger than a BMP into ‘Swiss cheese’.
@davids25012 ай бұрын
So... they call it the warthog because, like feral swine, it can withstand explosive and armor-piercing rounds and fly low and slow even with half a wing blown off? This video has given me a whole new respect for wild pigs. I had no idea.
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@stickyb95992 ай бұрын
We should never retire this plane. It's 50 years old and can still destroy Collums of Modern Tanks
@funny_joke_goes_here44062 ай бұрын
No it can’t, this was proved back in the 70s against 50s tanks, it was highly ineffective against a column of tanks that were not moving, firing or concealing themselves on a bright summer’s day even though the A-10 was allowed to make as many passes as it needed. It performed extremely poorly, taking out a single tank and immobilising 2 more if I remember correctly. Of the 20~25 tanks that were laid out…
@cthoadmin74582 ай бұрын
The fart of death.
@spinerflame79222 ай бұрын
No brrrt sound in the short, i got catfished
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
Haha, sorry about that, check out this pure A-10 compilation with real Brrrrrt sounds. Right at 0:36 seconds kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKLYlJacm52srac
@gabrielalicea85552 ай бұрын
God bless the A10
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
Amen 🙌🙌
@Nepprah2 ай бұрын
It’s had a lot of friendly fire incidents too. It’s effectiveness as a whole is being called into question actually.
@Finn-f4i2 ай бұрын
Great video ❤
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
@@Finn-f4i Thank you very much for your positive feedback! I am happy to hear you enjoyed my content ❤️
@Finn-f4i2 ай бұрын
@@Aviationist369❤
@LiberPater7772 ай бұрын
*Thunderbolt II
@acklodab2 ай бұрын
yea so whys it called the warthog
@HoundDogMech2 ай бұрын
Cause it UGLY, Like a WART HOG as Jets go,
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
It is called the “A-10 Warthog” for its aggressive look and often painted with teeth on the nose cone.
@dickslocum2 ай бұрын
The A7 folks who were with the Short Little Ugly F+++er. said it is even uglier and the only thing it is good for is putting 30mm holes in tanks. and started calling it a HOG which soon became WartHog. TRUE STORY from Myrtle Beach AFB one of the places they had fly off compaction.
@funny_joke_goes_here44062 ай бұрын
Because the gun sounds like a Warthog. It’s as simple as that. Nothing to do with the ‘aggressive look’ And the teeth being painted on the nose has been in service since WW1, it certainly did not give the A-10 its name.
@AP-bc7mg2 ай бұрын
It's literally a gun with wings, the plane was designed around the gun.
@twomorningsbackfromyesterd12402 ай бұрын
I've enjoyed this.
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
Thank you for your feedback, I'm glad you liked my content!
@2bikemikesguitartopics1452 ай бұрын
It's pronounced I K O
@skylane18282 ай бұрын
Dead reckoning keeps one sharp.
@AliceConstantinica2 ай бұрын
First
@varietygamingstudios83792 ай бұрын
Maybe because when using instrument flying rules or ifr pilots must be super accurate as lives are on the line
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment! IFR is used when the Pilots eyes are no longer sufficient, IFR is very dependent on instrumentation and does require high accuracy and attention. Please check out my full video on VFR flights with real trip footage.
@joshuasuggs23792 ай бұрын
Trust your instruments
@musicmaster46732 ай бұрын
or maybe the earth is flat and everyone is lying to you.
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
Everything is possible 😝
@joshuasuggs23792 ай бұрын
Is so dumb that people who really know everything about the “ flat earth” are just top notch trolls. It’s the people who believe them that are the morons.
@e621.Enjoyer2 ай бұрын
Don't even try it bro
@canadiangoose14512 ай бұрын
Lol
@Kingdj112 ай бұрын
Thanks for the information
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
@@Kingdj11 I am glad you liked it! Please support us by subscribing, it is very much appreciated.
@Fasterdg1Playzbabft2 ай бұрын
Bro also found the ai video add
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
What do you think?
@Fasterdg1Playzbabft2 ай бұрын
@@Aviationist369 w
@tallyhorizzla33302 ай бұрын
Air New Zealand flight 901 crashed into Mount Erebus Antarctica in 1979,killing all passengers and crew. It was 20 hours before the wreckage was found and almost a week before anyone arrived at the scene to begin recovery of the remains. There is a very good reason no one flys over Antarctica. Technically there are flights over Antarctica,but only on the very fringe on the west coast, from Perth Western Australia to Santiago Chile.
@Leosarebetter2 ай бұрын
The company air new zealand was culpable and responsible for that tragic event. They even tried to blame the pilots. I avoid air new zealand wherever I can.
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
I'd say it's poor flight planning along with other authoritarian issues.
@christopherboyle7742 ай бұрын
why is there a eurofighter typhoon at 18 seconds ?
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
@@christopherboyle774 Just a filler, it's a little hard to get relevant footage due to copyright material. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
@Ravenseven72 ай бұрын
F15
@tonyp28652 ай бұрын
Give them to Zelenskyy if they are so good.
@Aviationist3692 ай бұрын
He'll take them haha
@Real__ATF2 ай бұрын
The F-15 was built for air superiority. It was the most advanced and toughest jet of it's time, and, most would argue it's still the toughest. The F-15 excels in all 3 categories of attack, air-to-ground, air-to-air, and air-to-ship. With the MiG-29 having a whopping loss of a 16:28 kill/loss ratio, the F-15 comes in superior in all aspects.