Thank you so much, finally understand what my teacher means!
@Abkuyper Жыл бұрын
hope he can teach general chem, bio, physics or mcat lecture.. so helpful and very deep and broad understanding of science
@Abkuyper Жыл бұрын
wouldn't it be that water is less stable than o2, h2 because water is structured (more order) than o2, h2 flying around
@kidung469 Жыл бұрын
Could dilution of sample cause negative absorbance? I think I diluted the samples I was measuring, but not my blank (which contained a buffer solution). If so, how should I adjust for that negative absorbance value...
@ab21234 Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir ...now I clarified what went wrong...❤
@joan-b-empire576 Жыл бұрын
Thank you from Cameroon 🇨🇲🙏
@singhnanda2 жыл бұрын
Hello Sir, good to see your video after a long long time. I am from India. When I was in my M.Sc (6 years back) I used to see your video, especially classes on Enzyme. That helps me so much. Then I searched a lot on the internet but could not find more videos. Keep posting new videos of your classes, that will help students. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
@dobergeron2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, greatly appreciated! :)
@veereshverma93392 жыл бұрын
on dilution isn't concentration is decreased than original one
@DominicBergeronPhD2 жыл бұрын
Sorry....I don't know what you mean
@Willow-pt7bk2 жыл бұрын
exactly what I was looking for! Thanks a lot!!
@hopemasalu42573 жыл бұрын
i wish for such a prof
@IllChannel3 жыл бұрын
Glad I came across your video I now have a better understanding of this procedure. But as an insipiring analytical chemist, can you ever detect 0 ng of "stuff" or whatever is being sampled?
@pharmasolutionpakistan76683 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/door/clJKlJplPCcFNKd-HzSwgA
@vitokonte3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@fabioverdi62913 жыл бұрын
Help with a question ????? A compound absorb light in 227 nm. The standard curve calibration for the compound is Abs = 372x + 0,6432 which the concentration is g/100mL. The technique was analytical standard adding from fluoxetine hydrochloride (C17H18F3NO.HCl - molar mass = 345,79 g/mol). So determine the concentration in mol/L from the analysed solution. Show all calcs progression.
@dobergeron3 жыл бұрын
Looks like this is an exam question... is it? :)
@fabioverdi62913 жыл бұрын
@@dobergeron yes. and i jumped it. Full quesion: Standard addition is an analytical technique of extreme importance to an analyst, as it eliminates the interfering effect in most determinations. Fluoxetine is widely used as fluoxetine hydrochloride, also known as Prozac®. This is indicated in the treatment of depression, associated or not with anxiety. This compound absorbs ultraviolet light at a wavelength of 227 nm. It has in its structure a stereocenter, being a chiral drug. It is known that only the (R) -fluoxetine isomer has activity, while the other enantiomer has no pharmacological action and there is no evidence of toxicity to the organism. In an industry, when performing the Fluoxetine analysis, the following analytical calibration curve was obtained, in which the concentration is in g / 100 mL: Abs = 372 CFluoxetine + 0.6432. Knowing the analysis was performed according to the standard addition technique and that the molar mass of fluoxetine hydrochloride (C17H18F3NO.HCl) is 345.79 g / mol. Determine the mol / L concentration in the analyzed solution.
@fabioverdi62913 жыл бұрын
@@dobergeron I thinks i need to use this equations but i dont know how. S=k.Ca y = m*x + b Y = S x = Vs m = k . Cs / Vt b = k.Cx.Vx / Vt It's a friend whom sent me and i couldn't to do it. I researched i found this 3B4 equation. ( www.mathcentre.ac.uk/resources/uploaded/3b4printableversion.pdf ). But i dont know the source from y value which has been used. I have the alternatives but idk which is the correct: 2,25x10-5 mol/L 5,58x10-5 mol/L 5,0x10-5 mol/L 9,69x10-5 mol/L 3,08x10-5 mol/L
@dobergeron3 жыл бұрын
As a professor myself, I don't think I should comment on your question. I'm sorry, ask your prof... I'm really sorry but I can't give you the answer. There are a lot of resources available, you can do this. Isolate each variable and look how to solve. Hint: look at extinction coefficient... ;)
@andreagalyn3 жыл бұрын
You have taught this so well. I am so grateful you are recording your lectures for all of us.
@franksmildyears73233 жыл бұрын
If Jordan peterson was a chemist
@xtg69853 жыл бұрын
LIFE SAVER IN 2021!
@muntahafazal2373 жыл бұрын
Great explanation.
@miloskomazec90223 жыл бұрын
"worse than hurting cats" lol 7:05
@missseidu3 жыл бұрын
Don't tell me I didn't tell you, IT'S ON VIDEO!!!!😂😂😂😂
@mohammedqasim48713 жыл бұрын
شكراً /. Thanks ❤️
@rickssevilla48454 жыл бұрын
OMG u answered what I'm looking for my thesis 😍thank u
@BiologyGoals4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for helping with this concept sir
@almaanmani73614 жыл бұрын
Sir, how we plot graph for adsorption of chitosan..?
@DominicBergeronPhD4 жыл бұрын
does adsorption of chitosan absorb at any wavelength compared to non adsorbed? (I assume the aDsorption word is not a typo, very different from aBsorption...
@almaanmani73614 жыл бұрын
@@DominicBergeronPhD please guide in this regard...
@DominicBergeronPhD4 жыл бұрын
@@almaanmani7361 you need to be more specific. Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what your question is. Really sorry....
@almaanmani73614 жыл бұрын
@@DominicBergeronPhD sir, when we plot graph between absorbance and concentration then what's the effect of dilution I mean if absorbent is dilute then more absorbenc yes or not ? nd how will we form a standard solution....?
@dobergeron4 жыл бұрын
@@almaanmani7361 a .more diluted solution will give you lower absorbance values, that's Beer's law. I'm not sure with chitosan, I never worked with it, but in order to make a calibration curve you will need to make several solutions of chitosan and read the corresponding absorbance at a specific wavelength. Make sure you cover a wide range of concentrations and be aware of the limitations of your instrument
@abdualqaderaladeeb57074 жыл бұрын
how to check enzyme activity by UV ?
@DominicBergeronPhD4 жыл бұрын
you need a substrate or products that absorb uv light
@pharmasolutionpakistan76683 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/door/clJKlJplPCcFNKd-HzSwgA
@daisyclaire94504 жыл бұрын
Omg ! This really helped. You are great professor . I wish I had one like you . Thank u so much for this .
@kathys2544 жыл бұрын
Well done!!
@NiHnet4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This helped me a lot.
@DominicBergeronPhD4 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped!
@haraprasanmishra89474 жыл бұрын
Heavenly...
@nyawirawaithaka49934 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much sir. Great explanation!
@DominicBergeronPhD4 жыл бұрын
Most welcome!
@angesomgebregziabher194 жыл бұрын
To the point! Thank you!
@rawadmrad59554 жыл бұрын
Dear , I have this calibration curve may you explain it, it is in the link below: www.nwpii.com/ajbms/papers/AJ20180303.pdf
@almaanmani73614 жыл бұрын
Sir, how we plot graph for adsorption of chitosan..?
@walaabdeljawad14394 жыл бұрын
thanks
@martinfederico72695 жыл бұрын
good prof
@vyshnavsivasankaran58865 жыл бұрын
Sir I have coated one polymer on one of the metal oxide nanoparticles.after completion of coating process,i washed it with water to remove uncoated polymers.Now i have to know how much polymer is coated or how much left out?Is it possible to find out this using UV Vis spectroscopy techniques,please reply sir
@pradeepsarkate20904 жыл бұрын
what is weighting factor
@pritikaagnihotri53305 жыл бұрын
Hindi me bna dijiye
@Markzhirkov5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. This helps so much!!
@acceptinglife64915 жыл бұрын
Yo, my professor needs to take lessons from you on how to teach this topic
@aliabdullah38965 жыл бұрын
Dear you have made an exemplary efforts. Really admirable efforts.
@qiuhuihe11005 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Drushkaa5 жыл бұрын
Very clear systematic explanation thank you!
@tiibrahim57145 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir
@catherineava79375 жыл бұрын
GOOD JOB!
@crazyexpriementknig5435 жыл бұрын
Aluminum test practical in Hindi water sample dikhao.
@prajwabhosale9326 жыл бұрын
why do we need the unknown's in the middle ? Is it not possible to extrapolate the best fit line if the absorbance of the unknown is greater than standard concentration or substitute the absorbance in the unknown Mr. @Dominic Bergeron, Phd
@DominicBergeronPhD5 жыл бұрын
True! But you can always dilute your sample to make sure it fits within the available data. Knowing the dilution factor will let you calculate the exact value. It's that simple!
@danielhain18206 жыл бұрын
LOL he seems on edge
@annahebert36096 жыл бұрын
so When R2 is 0.25, the equation of the trendline DOES NOT apply well to all of the data points
@DominicBergeronPhD6 жыл бұрын
If R2 is less than 0.9, it might not apply at all because the relationship might not be linear. It certainly doesn't apply if R2 is 0.25!