Our Lord is one composite nature, fully human and fully God, just as the Holy Ecumenical Council of Ephesus I confirmed. If we say, like the tome of Leo, that the human nature is what accepted suffering while God the Word essentially was on standby, our salvation fails. By separating the natures with each properly working, we stumble at the crucifixion of the Lord of Glory.

@@MinaDKSBMSB 2 natures co-mingling in 1 Theanthropos, co-equal and co-eternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit. 3 Persons in one Godhead.

@@paulk8072 commingling is rejected in our fathers (and in your fathers as well if you are of the Byzantine/melkite rite). His humanity and divinity are made one composite without mingling, confusion, or alteration in the ineffable manifestation of God the Word Incarnate. He made the two into one and they are no longer two, but one (just as he stated with husband and wife being one flesh, and that no man should separate what God has joined together).

@@MinaDKSBMSB I should have said that the two natures are in hypostatic union rather than "co-mingling."

Amen and God Bless!

Christ Has Risen! ☦️❤️☦️

@@mirelaalina4050 indeed he's risen

You’re talking about a council that proclaimed Ibas and Theodoret Orthodox. A letter from Ibas was actually read at Chalcedon stating “I don’t envy Christ because I can be God just as much as He.” Ibas was declared Orthodox after reading this! And this council restored Theodoret who is quoted in his refutations against St Cyril “Christ did not suffer. The man did.” Chalcedonians then went on to anathematize them at later councils. Ganaddius proclaimed Nestorian doctrine with pride under the wing of Chalcedon. Nestorious himself rejoiced upon reading the Tome of Leo saying “This is what I’ve been saying all along.” Truth is, Chalcedonians can’t hide from this shame, disgrace, and embarrassment anymore. Those who divide the Incarnate Logos in two are the ones in need of repentance.

God bless you hawey❤

Please show me where it says in the Tome "Apart from His divinity , He went up on the Cross". Either you're lying of you've been lied to, this is what the Tome actually teaches : "So again He showed the wound in His side, the marks of the nails, and all the signs of His quite recent suffering, saying, "See My hands and feet, that it is I. Handle Me and see that a spirit has not flesh and bones, as you see Me have ;" in order that the properties of His Divine and human nature might be acknowledged to remain still INSEPARABLE: and that we might know the WORD NOT TO BE DIFFERENT FROM THE FLESH, in such a sense as also to confess that the ONE SON OF GOD IS BOTH WORD AND FLESH." Like Fr Antony said, there was hostility from both sides, quit appealing to emotions.

you should fast

We completely understand if someone is suffering from pain that they would need to rest and sit. That is completely acceptable

Indeed. Have you read the ‘tome of Leo’ by any chance? It’s a document written by the heretical pope leo that all chalcedonians accept.

@@tjdronex1113 What's heretical about it?

@@Luis-kn4pm “The activity of each form is what is proper to it in communion with the other: that is, the Word performs what belongs to the Word, and the flesh accomplishes what belongs to the flesh. One of these performs brilliant miracles; the other sustains acts of violence. “ Here’s the problem. Describing the activities of each nature in such way that blurs the mystery of the union of natures sets up a dichotomy similar to what Nestorius preached. Nestorius said the Virgin Mary is Christokos (The birthgiver of Christ) not Theotokos (the birthgiver of God) because God can’t be born. In other words, divinity can’t be born. In other words, according to Nestorius, the two natures of Christ must be maintained separate and divided. Nestorius insisted on this dichotomy ignoring the fact that in the Incarnation, the union of the natures prevails over dichotomous division. He goes on to list miracles belong to divinity and emotions belong to the flesh. He says, “So, if I may pass over many instances, it does not belong to the same nature to weep out of deep-felt pity for a dead friend, and to call him back to life again at the word of command, once the mound had been removed from the four-day-old grave;” Again, he is going on the assumption that when anyone says “same nature” or “one nature” it must mean one and only nature or one and only one hybrid nature. He fails to recognize that one can mean one nature in a different manner than he assumes. It’s almost as if he went on a mission saying the Son of man weeps for his friend and the Son of God raises him from a four-day-old grave. This is no different than Nestorius who said the Virgin gave birth to the man Jesus Christ, not God. By the way, as Leo moves down his list of miracles done by the divinity and events done by the flesh, he just has to slip an allusion to Rome’s supremacy when Peter called the man Jesus “the Christ, the Son of the Living God.” Leo writes, “He [Peter] thoroughly deserved to be declared “blessed” by the Lord. He derived the stability of both his goodness and his name from the original Rock,” This in itself is not the theme of Leo’s Tome but it illustrates Leo’s intentions of his Tome.

Heretical to do that.

Of course. So Miaphysitism of course is the belief that Jesus has 1 nature that is fully divine and fully human. This is not too different from us humans who have a body and a soul, yet we are still 1 nature as we have 1 will. We must also recognise these natures never mixed nor separated not even for the twinkle of the eye. Now that we have this definition. Why is it significant? That’s because God truly took our humanity on and United it with his divinity so that we may be saved. Jesus is the bridge to salvation. “Whoever believes in my shall not perish, but have eternal life”. Now how does this relate to suffering? On the Cross His Divinity did not part from His Humanity. However, in Its unification with His Human nature, the former had let the latter to suffer with no intervention whatsoever, thus making the redemptive act of suffering quite genuine. This state of play is expressed by the Lord Jesus Christ's words: "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?" The words "and was buried" indicate that His Body had died. That death was the price of sinfulness of the whole world. In that death, His Human Soul left His Body, though His Divinity never separated from either His Soul nor His Body. The Soul , unified with Divinity, went to Hades and announced the Good Tidings to the dead, opened up the gates of Paradise, and let them in, together with the thief on the right side. The Body, united with Divinity, stayed in the tomb without becoming decomposed.

you csn go Coptic orthodox church or Ethiopian orthodox Tewahido church both are same.