Kind of impossible considering the Albinoni motif was written in the 20th century by an Albinoni scholar who only used Albinoni’s bass line in the Adagio. This Duphly on the other hand, was actually written in the 18th century.

Piano wasn't a good fit for this piece

I think this particular piece was composed during the 1770s, that would have been during the Galant and Classical era. I find it hard to ascribe any one era to WFB - his compositions span the gamut from very traditional baroque all the way to this proto-romantic polonaise, which sound so tender and expressive. If you enjoy this, I highly recommend listening to all of the polonaises, the keyboard fantasias, the 8 fugues, the viola duets, and the flute duets - there is much more of course, but those are my favorite compositions.

Ermm what was this uwu ass quote

Did Duphly forbid rubato ?

Bruv “for a piano” sound like instrument racism

It might just be the acoustic of the room, the post processing and the youtube compression all combined, which causes it to be muffled. I still think the harpsichord sounds better for this piece.

believe it or not, not everybody has immediate access to harpsichords

@@littlekreeper8918Then they should stick with piano pieces if they only have a piano.

@@matthewcooper4248 its just such a weird mentality to have, ive played cello pieces on the piano before. Like genuinely whats the big deal? Calm down, just out of spite im going to start playing rameau's entire discography on piano

@@matthewcooper4248What is your logic here. “No! People can’t enjoy a piece on another instrument because it’s not originally on there and doesn’t sound like it originally did!” Stop being elitist and shut the fuck up

Why?