I am very sorry to anyone who felt pain from my attempt to impersonate. One reason I never thought I could sing was because of fakes like this guy. I've been holding back. I actually love the few tunes I attempted including Tom Sawyer on the Assange video, but he is basically doing falsetto on the speaking voice. He gives it away in this song above when he dropped character towards the ending. I could have been a pro musician if I had understood falsetto. I was born with natural ability to nail center of notes through autism. That's why I kept singing. I needed to remove any doubt in my mind about having autism. And to add, sorry for my indulgence, I don't respect the satanic freemason crap showing up in most or a lot of bands.

​@@TokyoShemp *And That's Why They're One Of The Top 3 Touring Bands Of All-Time (44 Years) & You're Nothing - A Zero, Which Is Why Tools Like Your Pitiful Channel Can't Understand What True Musicians Are. Okay, Now Delete My Message & Go Away, Hacks. Or, Get Back To Me After You're In A Band With The Same Members For 43 Years, Never Breaking Up, Have Multiple Ambassadors Medals, In The Hall Of Fame, & Sold More Albums Than The Stones*

They were 1%'ers feasting off of the system and a fake voice. Probably only Tom Sawyer was elite solid for freemasonic chart rising.

ah, you edited, yeah but at least I wasn't a sellout satanist junkie with tardive dyskinesia using a synthetic voice.

Being in a band for 43 years is a dictionary definition for money grab.

I just did the spirit of radio and found it so difficult to not sound bad or confused for stretches. Rush is turning out too complex for me. I need melody that a voice or memory can easily handle. I do try to use different octaves, so sounds don't cancel each other. My two main skills seem to be range and staying in tune. I was in school band decades ago for trumpet and baritone horn, self taught vocals a couple years ago. I was always in tune somehow. Must be the mysterious perfect pitch. I will try that song. Thanks for the suggestion. I will have to listen to it over and over and try to make it sound good.

@@TokyoShemp dude that spirit of radio chorus is no joke it aint easy but different strings i think is pretty interesting little lower in pitch than most of his vocals kinda like entre nous

@@damagedband4819 I liked Different Strings a lot, although somehow not at first until the pattern of notes kicked in. I am a bit embarrassed by being so screechy in this one above and then spirit of radio. I thought of simply deleting this, but now there are comments here. Yes, I had to retreat from trying to mimic Geddy's voice. He's great at falsetto and original with it. To me, it feels like a kazoo. I can be in tune, but it doesn't sound good. If I retreat to baritone, then the autistic music savant idea takes shape. Or the idea that we band members were better than we thought as kids or even older people with bands, you guys were better and closer to greatness and people like Rush than you may have thought of yourselves.

Sorry, I only saw this comment by accident and then by clicking new comment. I was using it as hyperbole, but Rogan is symbolic of what is pushing a few people into some bad activity. Like I say Stern killed Plato. I mean it the nudge way. HA Goodman probably got some chumps to go down to Washington on behalf of Trump's election claims. As for actual content, I don't care what they say. Once something is proven, that's it. They are cointelpro and breaking the law. I used to care about social issues and so-called news but now believe it is pointless. I think that it's all state-sponsored nightmarish reality and that I proved it over and over again starting about 16 years ago on social media. Why can't we see Rogan and his guests at the same time? Why when I slow down video and crop eyes, it shows they are 100% scripted, case closed? Why should anyone participate in social media one bit when this is all criminal and managed as entrapment? We should own YT and all the tech companies for what they fvcken did and do to us. I don't believe we can change the system, but I'm certainly proud of having let those assholes know they didn't get away with shit to go with their tweaked out faces and demented consciousness. I think it's funny scum in control of medium are deformed and in the toilet and that I was able to get that message across to quite a number of them possibly even Rogan himself. But I do recommend people don't do what I did and that I'm only vocal like this because it already happened to me. They can't do anything to me anymore while the opposite seemed to kick in that I can do to them like to warn people, warn anyone left like Max who can't see they are taken for rides to dead ends.

Edward Snowden was on Joe Rogan about 4 years ago... when did he hint that Rogan was an intelligence op?

What are you pointing out regarding aspies focusing in on soft sounds as keenly as loud sounds?

@@jtzoltan My bad. In the video, I messed up the words. I call them Snowden documents and don't really care too much about Snowden himself. I think he's a chump who gave the secrets back to them through paid fake Greenwald. Joe Rogan, I meant, is one big example of what the Snowden documents were referring to.

@@jtzoltan I have autism. It doesn't matter so much whether a sound is loud or soft for it to become overwhelming. I have pure listening issues for autism. I was undiagnosed for most of life so am probably good for info on it from that angle. It became a special interest until realising I am a primary source of it.

that was my sense of humor, a sarcasm. the internet structure has been built like a solomon's temple, one avatar at a time with up to fifty sock puppets and hidden military funding through signature reduction. they must be using ai to write up scripts. i have her on mute but assume she is faking interest in some stupid internet niche. not one big channel or anywhere covers that all of social media is military funded with hidden teleprompters. stats are dropping everywhere across the board, imho, from what it seems to me. daily mail got stupid. reddit conspiracy is under five hundred page views. they tanked just after the kid burned himself to death because of them and that forum. Anyone remaining probably quit. Maybe stats everywhere are being faked. Rogan doesn't seem to get the page views he used to. I think most people are net savvy so to speak and realise the internet is 100% garbage with nearly every offering full of it, fake, conformist, stupid, not worth anything, etc.. the internet is worse than nearly anything else done to pass time. search engines are done. it's creepy. the whole thing is creeping everyone out. I laugh at anyone looking at a smart phone in public. supermarkets and stores with cameras can f themselves. Joe Biden is probably a pedophile. Trump is bad news too. President is only a little part of it anyway and fake pushed as a difference maker. the military and freem asons are to blame for everything. The tech companies should be sued and turned into utilities for f'ing with all of us and urinating on the ideas of free speech and democracy.

Yeah, it was the good old nudge even if the outcome obviously wasn't Howard's intention. We all do it inadvertently or when having a bad day, but nearly all of us have zero reach by design and will never matter, will never have a real vote nor say in public matters. We're meant to sit back and listen to Rogan and Stern and whomever else sanctioned to speak to masses and leave the internet comments/social media to the experts in cointelpro to entrap and arrest perceived threats to the status quo.

Jew knight!

I think that was probably done on impulse to stay in flow of medium, not thinking mean people were violent threats, so a what the heck I'll convert them to niceness and remain pertinent to entertainment world. Yes, she was naive in not realising the psychological threat from a Howard Stern.

I think I follow a few of your abbreviations. JD= Jimmy Dore Call=A Call for an Uprising.... I searched hacking the headlines which seems to be a youtuber named Dominique DiPrima. Never heard of her. I don't know a Nasty Ned. The search results say he's a musician. But yes, I agree if not mistaken in your implications that everything on social media and medium is a joke, and then paid jokes called influencers attempt to further block lives by simulating/promoting actions and outcomes (from Snowden documents) based on the fake social reality forced on viewers and readers. Internet is much more oppressive than television, yet t.v. wasn't exactly healthy either and based on conditioning citizens into becoming malleable manipulated sheople. One couldn't carry a television while walking around and actually living, not being filled with content every fricken second. TV and radio was bad, but at least it could be used as background chatter. Some of us are not distracted with music or whatever going on. As I have aged, I have become more acquainted with silence. It used to be difficult. Silence can be scary sometimes. But it got easier over time and now I love silence as the default. But I have autism and we are all unique.

Thanks jfob

sorry, what's jfob?@@mariegardner4637

Also, I first learned of the all encompassing scope of these things from viewing videos of yours, especially when you discussed what you went through back in the blog days. You definitely helped realize the framework needed in which I could make sense of many of the hazy suspicions and half formed theories I'd had bouncing around in my head, from just having witnessed and noticed so many instances of contradictory and nonsensical behavior to what these virtual ventriloquist dummies would claim as their ideals and goals

"helped me realize"

@@earlpipe9713 Thanks for the kind words above. I think if someone takes social media at face value, they run the risk of being manipulated and even worse if there is participation. I cannot comment too much on before 2000, but by showing up in 2006-07 and accepting this as real life spontaneous or otherwise similar to offline existentialism, I fell right into the timing of it being revealed through Netvocates, the Valerie Plame story, weather mitigation theory, Moulitsas DKos exposed as CIA and probably especially the election fraud thing built off of 2000 Gore-Bush. I was still accepting social reality as fluid with the Bernie Sanders run in 2016. Right, so if anyone has any questions especially on the Breitbart, Larisa Alexandrovna Raw Story, Rauhauser, uhm, Speedway Bomber guy, Weinergate, SWATgate, any of that, I somehow found myself being played into it. The people who went after Assange, Barrett Brown and Jeremy Hammond also f'ed with me. Once I realised there was no media for help or in other words, that social reality could no longer be accepted, I suppose that's when I became mr. anarchy philosopher wannabe. Going to a shrink starting a few years ago has helped tremendously. It takes time for stuff to kick in. Even a few months ago, I was still habitually staring at them and getting irritated. Basically, shite has kicked in well for me since finding out I have attention deficit and something called aphantasia. It helps to know what one is experiencing. The same goes for the medium. So, even before internet, this was an obvious topic. McLuhan made a lot of sense, as did Fromm. I don't think they get much publicity. Alan Watts gets pushed, though. I sense the grand cons pira cy is to consume us all in regards to anything one organically adds to social media. Like in Snowden documents, it says blend, merge amongst other power points. C. Wright Mills called it circumscribing. Noam Chomsky and some other guy talked up manufacturing consent, but I am fairly sure that credit should go to the Frankfurt School, which just so happens to be a divide and conquer "conspiracy story" point. Free speech without reach is meaningless. Without reach sounds unconstitutional pertaining to freedom of association. Ventriloquist dummies. Yes. I called them human typewriters. I'm glad at least one other person seems to agree that by slowing down the videos and cropping out eyes, one can see exactly what they are up to. I want it common knowledge, but the internet is rigged and this goes nowhere.

The Call for an uprising dude uses a voice filter and deleted everything from years ago, but you think leaving a comment suggesting otherwise is so enlightening.

It wasn't a fluke she died after going on his show. I agree with you. Saying he killed her was hyperbole and click bait. What you know is what everyone knows.

because you're a paid fake

Sorry about that. I'll try to go louder without distortion.

It sounds loud for me. I'm listening again. Maybe you need to clear out ear wax?

Oh yeah, second half it's like I'm trying to sound soft and cool like Howard Stern. Sorry, that was nonsense.

Thanks. Can you provide the source or some proof? Of course she killed herself (in my opinion and reflection) and probably because she was exposed as cointelpro or otherwise had become incapable of continuing work as a 'social containment influencer node'. I didn't mean to contribute to her death, but truth is truth. Adrian Lamo killed himself. It wasn't my intention when tweeting him, but it's not like I cared about him or Debbie one bit. I couldn't care less if bad shite happens to any creep fvcking with us psychologically through internet. They are bullies and deserved to be reverse bullied. I make no apologies and do not back down that they are 100% scripted. I proved it. And I'm egoless or wtf anyway, so the truth exists on its own. I was bullied by these people (their predecessors) and no media outlet ever reported my actual experience despite it happening in public and easy to see. I exposed internet fake news (BradBlog/Brett Kimberlin, Raw Story, Daily Kos and more) and then they went after me. Debbie Lusignan was part and parcel of the same scam exposed by Snowden. That's why I exposed her. It wasn't just about autism/adhd and hyperfocusing. The internet's not falling apart because of me. All I could do as a loud perhaps obnoxious (oops) social media participant was supply some dents. I can't truly gauge how many people are aware of the idea those "livestreams" are all 100% scripted. I do see there is general talk centered on the negativity of social media and/or the dangers of AI. One can perhaps easily grok the shite disclosed by Snowden and Assange, but will they also see there is no means by which to democratise internet and that this is a mere trap controlled by the machine for lack of a better word and hat tip to Metropolis for coining the machine idea. And then I start thinking, oh, that explains what Pink Floyd did. They co-opted Syd Barrett's artistic energy while stealing the machine idea from a back in the day SciFi silent movie.