I dunno, but it seems on point... The thing is that I've never seen this much flickering, but I like it

@@evilangel_1919 yeah! I read something on the forums a while ago that the jitter is more realistic- jammers denying range fix

@@Wheelman_PCAS I'm sure there was a bug with the jamming before 4.37u4 but they fixed it with the last patch. Anyway it's incredible work they're doing

Siamo in tanti italiani che giocano, se lo prendi ci trovi sul discord della community di Post Scriptum Italia!

And without guided munitions it's the only way to hit a moving target

@@evilangel_1919 well you could use mavs or lgbs but I like to call them babysit weapons because you have to 'babysit' them to make them hit😂

@@Gold_Roberto yea but I need more wings to carry all the mavericks I need 😂In this case I was getting shot on purpose, to train myself to evade these bastards 🤣

On the RWR? Can't fly without...

Just waiting for 4.38

@@evilangel_1919 is this a mod of Falcon 4? Or a completely diff game? I've never seen it before your vid popped on my feed

@@dingusbingus7463 it's a mod of falcon 4.0, but it's completely different from the original game, better in every way

Just buy falcon 4.0 and download the BMS mod

Yea, but you need to burn through his ECM

I don't know nothing in programming, but a depth of field mask should do the trick. This way you can tune the view distance with blur, but we need a dev for this

@Dee-Jay I tried something using ReShade, just as a mere proof of concept. There are some issues: you cannot use MSAA (I believe because ReShade can't read the depth map when MSAA is enabled), the blur isn't confined within the NVG circle (you need to apply DOF only within a circular mask), and the JHMCS is affected by the blur, but I think in reality, you cannot use both together. kzbin.info/www/bejne/a3qaeq2gebeFnbc

Thank you!

It's my own missile

At least you're not hearing "tanker is entering turn" 😂

@@evilangel_1919 🤣🤣🤣

It's different... Dcs offers great graphics, lots of aircraft, easy pvp multiplayer. Bms offers better ai, bigger theaters, deeper systems simulation, the incredibile dynamic campaign (in single, in co-op multiplayer or even pvp if there are community servers available). Dcs is a bit more arcade, with the focus on cinematics and variety, bms is a deep dive into the air combat pilot world, with manuals of hundreds of pages to read.

@@evilangel_1919 I will check bms, since recent update DCS have a lot of performance issue and that just piss me of.

@@NeiloF18 That's nice! For starting I recommend youtubers like Aviation Plus or Fisgas Fighties which have very good tutorials, and check the Falcon Lounge on Discord, that is full of nice people (dev included) that can help you in everything. And don't forget the huge manuals in the Falcon BMS directory

@@evilangel_1919 But isn't DCS still realistic enough that actual fighter pilots use it for training? Also, what about that F-22 that snuck up behind the two Iranian F-4s? Clearly he was within close enough distance to bump his wingtips against theirs and yet their radars couldn't see him!

​@@WinVisten I don't know what happened in detail, but even a C-130 can approach a fighter from behind and not be seen on the radar. DCS offers a lot of realism inside the cockpit, but it depends on the plane, and their F-16 is very lacking. I know that the USAF is training with the DCS A-10, and I can understand why, but their training is limited to specific tasks, and I'm sure they don't train by flying in an online server doing deathmatches (which is 90% of DCS flying). Offline campaigns are all scripted and become boring after a while, whereas the BMS dynamic campaign still shines after hundreds of missions.

Really? I've never tried, but I think, in the context of BMS, it's just nitpicking, there are no real use cases

@@evilangel_1919 I agree, but it would be nice little detail

@@evilangel_1919 would be cool for enemy sams/fighters to try and intercept it

​@@vincentvoncarnap Absolutely, but I suppose there are some technical difficulties in implementing that due to how BMS works (the bubble, the 2D screen, etc.). I would prefer the devs to focus on other more useful things.

@@evilangel_1919 the bubble?? im not sure i understand

The F-16C block 40/42 or in this case RSAF F-16D block 52+

Yea, the f-22 is a monster, ingame and in real life. But I think the j-20 could be a worth opponent, it still has a good stealthiness and the pl-15 is a scary missile

They may even build a nice plane, but the strength of western air forces lies in the interconnection of complex systems. AWACS, tankers, ground radars, drones, even naval and ground forces are capable of sharing information in the same datalink. We can launch a missile without a radar lock, only via datalink! You need to build the same system net, a stealth plane is just one little link in the long chain.. Good luck for all of this!

@@evilangel_1919 God damn you really think non-allied forces aren't fully net centric? Bought to you by the geniuses who think Olympic bans win wars and whose submarines only have tomahawks for attack missiles.

So the enemy is a pirate now 👍🏻

Actually I'm "cheating", because I'm playing and recording in 1080, but to have a better video compression from youtube, I'm editing in 4k. I'm playing with a rx6600 at 60 fps (I have a 60hz monitor)

@@evilangel_1919 Amazing!!!! thanks

There is such a wide variety of vehicles that every time I find one I haven't seen before, it feels like I'm playing Pokémon

How do one do that?

@@rakamora2266 what do you mean? Those are the ai ground forces that engage each other, seen through the targeting pod

How one use the camera views to look at ground/air battles while parked at the ramp. I'm aware of the external views. But not how one watch warfare on the other side of the map.

@@rakamora2266 i dont remember exact buttons. But i do remember you need to hold shift, alt or ctrl. Whilst clicking one of the camera buttons. If i remember correctly its the normal number keys. I believe if you press 6, you can look at your own fired weapon. If you press shit+6 you can look at a weapon fired by a friendly unit. If you press ctrl+6 you can look at a weapon fired AT you, if you press alt+6 you can look at fired enemy weapons.

see you on the next episode of JAWS!

So I was the stealth one!

@@evilangel_1919 You're always one step ahead of the enemy

​@@haxue only in the clips I'm sharing 😂😂

Yea, I did it on purpose! Those big fat boys are easy to outmaneuver in dogfight, their strenght lies in bvr combat

I usually play with some friends in my mother language, but who knows, maybe one day!

Standard Korea, near the west coast

1)This sim is old, but awesome 2)Msfs is great but the payware f-16 is terrible 3)Yea, sure xD

BMS bad? Are you high?

@@evilangel_1919 Don't listen to him, BMS is awesome as an F-16 sim. I'm more of a DCS fan, but BMS is really notable for it's flight model and systems modelling, and is not that demanding as DCS is. And yes, MSFS is trash

I actually really like msfs, as visual is incredibile and there's some super nice aircraft in the market, not the f-16 though.. Bms is the best thing ever if you couldn't join the air force

@@evilangel_1919 Truuue, it's just my own prejudice about all the civilian traffic flight simulators. I'm a guy kink on a military simulations, you know :D

You get it by default... In falcon bms

​@@evilangel_1919👍thx

It's 100% fubar

Block 40/42

The fun one 😂 block 40, with F110-GE-100 engine

@@evilangel_1919 Thanks, I really like the HUD they put in it.

@@PervonHarke yea I think it looks cool, even better at night with the flir on it

Yea, manpad defending the powerplant (I should have changed the rtb route early in the mission planning)

​@@evilangel_1919in this game are the manpad firing soldiers visible?

@@olivere5497 yes, but they are so much hard to spot that you almost never see them

@@evilangel_1919 are all troops visible as low poly figures?

@@olivere5497 yes, watch this kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3ykpGpojJaZb7Msi=bFFj2DB0NHro2MGy&t=131

Like movie wise? Nolan/Villeneuve.. Not Michael Bay 😂

You can download it from here www.falcon-bms.com/ 100% virus free, if the antivirus blocks you some files, it is false positive

@@evilangel_1919 But you need the original first.

@@jakobole he said "aside from having to buy falcon 4.0", yea you need falcon 4 before bms

The vast majority of models have the classic WAC HUD (Wide Angle Conventional, I think it's called). If you're playing in the campaign, you can choose different squadrons from different air bases, and some have the F-16CM Block 40 with the WAR HUD (Wide Angle Raster). You can also create your own missions outside of the campaign, choosing whatever you want, in the Tactical Engagement section.

F-16CM block 40

@@evilangel_1919 So then the CM Block 50 went back to the smaller HUD?

@@gogosupinsky7534 yes, the large WAR hud is used to display the flir image of the navpod, like the strike eagle

Nah BMS is the Block 40

This is the WAR hud of the usaf block 40, but bms is not limited in block 40 or 50.. There are so much versions all a bit different

@@J_JetClips thanks!

I should make a chill out lo-fi taxing compilation though..

It's the growl of the ir missiles, in dgft mode you have both the gun and the sidewinders hot

@@evilangel_1919 Yeh, I playedF4SP and F4AF back in the day, and early versions of F4BMS. Must be just the sound through my speakers . . . lol

@@BuggSmasher maybe you're referring to the growling when the weapon cue is looking at the horizon, it's more rougher and distorted when there's not a clear ir source (and I don't think that was like this in the old falcon days). My settings are also the standard ones, which replicate the sounds heard through the helmet

I think flying low is a bit outdated in terms of doctrine, but it's so much fun and challenging!

Based vtol vr player