Thanks for designing this with fat old “bad knee” pilots in mind. The entry/exit ease appears to be the best in GA.
@doncatchpole14 сағат бұрын
Enjoyed. Looking forward to seeing the complete new bird.
@KeithFeickert2 күн бұрын
Will plans be available for us poor people who don't have $65,000 lying around? 💸
@ferstlesqueКүн бұрын
Wittman Tailwind!
@bryancotton727922 сағат бұрын
@@ferstlesque You beat me to it - the Tailwind would fit the bill!
@SoloRenegade19 сағат бұрын
you don't have to spend all $65k in one go
@CraigVanSickleAK2 күн бұрын
It's been fun to watch your progress. Thanks for sharing.
@PatrickDuffy-u3s2 күн бұрын
What's the target price for the quick build? Will the estimated finish price be < 100k?
@SonexLLC2 күн бұрын
All indications is that the kit price will be similar to the Xenos Motorglider. Assuming 100hp AeroVee Turbo engine, that puts minimum build cost at around $65,000 complete, including our standard kit price. Quick Build Kit upgrade will add about $15,000: www.sonexaircraft.com/documents/cost_worksheet.pdf
@KeithFeickert2 күн бұрын
💸
@stubryant91452 күн бұрын
All indications are pointing to a stellar design fitting market demand very well. If I could, I absolutely would! Seems perfect to me.
@wilfredotour32 күн бұрын
I'd like to see an under fuselage attached pod to house a retractible landing gear setup. Perhaps mechanical lever actuated with a hand crank mechanism for redundancy. Might get 20 more knots out of it or at least reduce drag enough to then add some drag under the wings by installing jettison fuel tanks so that the current fuel tank doesn't have to sit on your lap or directly inside the cockpit. This jettison system m ight be interconnected with the BRS system just in case the BRS is activated outside of the safe deployment parameters, as in, too low or too slow. Anytime that a crash or forced landing without power is imminent it might be a good thing to be able to jettison the fuel tanks. It reduces the weight allowing for slower stall speeds hence less impact energy and more survivability, and it takes away the dangers of a fire.
@stubryant91452 күн бұрын
I was surprised to learn that stats for a front center fuel tank are nowhere near as bad as many imagine.
@bryancotton727922 сағат бұрын
None of this makes any sense!
@Officer_Boat19 сағат бұрын
@@bryancotton7279 bot, that’s why
@SoloRenegade19 сағат бұрын
dumb bot comment
@mofayer2 күн бұрын
Sounds like it will be a hit! There's not much choice for affordable, cross country speed capable high wing kits out there.
@John-DanielBeaunaux3 күн бұрын
I wasn't able to attend the webinar as I had a work schedule conflict. I'm grateful you posted it and I look forward to watching this update on the High Wing!
@TailwheelTimes10 күн бұрын
Awesome job on the model!
@lawrencw111 күн бұрын
As a retired technology teacher using scale models first before full blown iterations is how we taught the engineering design process. Can’t wait for the HW production to start! 🙏🏻
@SonexLLC11 күн бұрын
Be sure to tune-in to our EAA Homebuilders Week webinar next week to get all the latest on "the real one." pages.eaa.org/WBN2025-01-30SonexHighwingUpdate_LP-Registration.html
@stubryant914511 күн бұрын
No that was the real thing, but where did the giant people and gym come from??? (Yes, this was 'mean', but also funny)
@engledbosch222811 күн бұрын
That was mean 😀
@pfd_mark_taylor11 күн бұрын
Booo
@fredericborloo191014 күн бұрын
Whaw, very snappy after the hesitation stopped during right spin.
@ThisPartIsAndrew26 күн бұрын
Sonex Highwing looks like a pinewood derby car I built during Boy Scouts and it makes me like it all the more
@ThisPartIsAndrew26 күн бұрын
VW engine use and the maintenance involved is so fun and simple with the right tools, I love this concept. Especially the turbo. It's like the Parker Teenie Two for a new generation.
@MannyCamRSАй бұрын
Please take my money. NOW.
@PatrickDuffy-u3sАй бұрын
Awesome work by Sonex and Casey, I met Casey in Tucson recently and hope to bring my Sonex Aerovee turbo to his field soon.
@TheRealChetManley2 ай бұрын
This is still the best sonex video made...
@amjadbawa33552 ай бұрын
❤
@normanpaterson3 ай бұрын
Best video of the decade, still watching... i need to get one and get type rated...
@normanpaterson3 ай бұрын
9k mean sea level, that little jet took it on? let me watch vid, sick concept...
@normanpaterson3 ай бұрын
They all had perfect landings! My WW2 Lancaster bomber father told me in his late 90's he's a young boy trapped in an old man's body!
@_Albatros_GG3 ай бұрын
what is the cost of such a copy?\
@georgepettas32675 ай бұрын
Fuel from sea level to FL400? (11 times and you reach JFK from Shannon)
@georgepettas32675 ай бұрын
2 pilots and you go transatlantic
@georgepettas32675 ай бұрын
THIS WORLD WILL BE FULL OF SEMI U-2s
@danko65826 ай бұрын
Well done for having a tailored training programme. Personally, I'd prefer the glider, but the mini jet looks fun.
@tafaragadze64326 ай бұрын
So this man is just casually flying at 16 000 feet without any kind of oxygen?
@philmonat93527 ай бұрын
Awesome flight.
@mshamrok7 ай бұрын
do you sell plan?
@SonexLLC7 ай бұрын
Plans for the Onex are not sold separately from the kit, and the plans do not have "scratch building" details. The Onex is a kit built aircraft only.
@markthomas24367 ай бұрын
I love it!
@tedstriker7547 ай бұрын
It seems the Aerovee and the Revmaster are one in the same engine.
@markthibault85798 ай бұрын
Excited to see the Highwing prototype. It looks like an awesome choice for those of us who prefer the wing on top.
@jamiecaudill59158 ай бұрын
❤
@jamiecaudill59158 ай бұрын
Switching to guns!
@haverelmink9 ай бұрын
I just put a deposit down on an AeroVee-powered Sonex. I have some apprehension about the AeroVee, but feel much better about it after watching this presentation!
@Bill-iu7fn9 ай бұрын
enjoyed thank you
@aprianto19859 ай бұрын
Great flight test
@Nemesis26469 ай бұрын
- I am truly impressed by the effort and work you are providing on this plane project, but I have a slight criticism. It is a plane with straight wings. It is true that it gives the plane stability at slow speeds, but it is not made for maneuvers. - The simplest example is at 5:30 You can notice that the wing was affected in a different way than the fuselage, and if it was affected with a greater force, it could have been damaged and would have caused an efficiency problem. I did not have the opportunity from all angles to monitor the behavior of the wings during aerobatics, but I advise you to change the shape of the wings to ensure that no problems occur in the future, so wings Such as Delta Wing Shape or Swept Wings It will give the plane stability at high speeds, as well as strength and endurance during maneuvers and aerobatics. - I liked the idea of V-shape tail I believe that because of it, the plane was able to make all these movements, but if you decide to follow my advice, it is better to keep it in its shape with the addition of horizontal stabilizer flat with the surface of the delta shape wings or just put a twin tail dont forget to make all the horizontal stabilizer work as an elevator . - If you could give me some authority to study all the information you have collected on this project, I can direct you to the best choices for making an aircraft that reaches tremendous speeds and is also stable, whether at low or high speeds, while ensuring its efficiency in maneuvers and aerobatics, without forgetting the safety of the pilot and passengers. - All of this information that I presented came from my experience in the field of aviation engineering, especially Soviet aircraft such as the Su-30MKA and Sukhoi Su-27, also training ones like Yak-130 and L-39 . . But I do not have any certificates in the field of aviation. Only as an amateur I used to approach the places of these aircraft to study their shape and how they work with such solidity and fluidity, while asking questions to those in charge of the military and civilian facilities. I also had real-life experiences by flying alongside the pilot to see and observe how each piece worked. From planes. - in the past two years, I have been working on a project to manufacture a small aircraft, meaning enough for one person, but with the ability to reach a speed goal of 800 km per hour and a smooth ability with ease of control, which means stability. Then I can work on Range and Economics. . The problem is that I do not have the tools with which I can achieve my goals, such as a CNC milling machine, or even a place to set up my experiments in. Therefore, I gave up on my dream, but my interest is still based on it. You have truly inspired me, and I said, “If you are unable to reach your goals due to lack of conditions, just help Those who want to reach it and have the conditions available to do so.” - Thank you, with all due respect. I wish you every success in the future.
@jamiecaudill59159 ай бұрын
❤
@jamiecaudill59159 ай бұрын
❤
@tylerflyer3029 ай бұрын
Thank you for another fantastic presentation!
@grabir019 ай бұрын
Best video ever.
@Lester-te3vb10 ай бұрын
WOW!! What a ride. Enjoyed your video very much.
@GeorgeStar10 ай бұрын
The tail wheel puts a lot of stress on the rudder that can tear the rivets apart causing catastrophic failure in flight. kzbin.info/www/bejne/epC0aZyMfc1-ldU&pp=ygUNc29uZXggZmFpbHVyZQ%3D%3D
@z3r3pmoto2 ай бұрын
Read the top comment of that video. The issue was caused by a modified tail-wheel. "The most likely reason for this failure is the NON-STANDARD, NON-SONEX tailwheel pushrod. The top-mounted pushrod on this aircraft was prying the the rudder drive rib down. The kit-provided pushrod and installation has the tailwheel pushrod mounted UNDER the drive horn. This was a builder modification that was not thought out. Many builder modifications and "improvements" lead to unintended consequences. We see it all the time"
@johncollins488810 ай бұрын
Please give the cost of your planes. I live in Niceville, FL. BUT have a BS from Lawrence,Appleton Wisconsin in Physics in 1961.
@SonexLLC10 ай бұрын
Hello John, you can find all current pricing on our web site: www.sonexaircraft.com/