K2 panther is the real beast from the east.

I hope you are doing well Koala!

The Type-99 is probably more-or-less on par with a T-90. It's not an Abrams, a Leopard, or a Challenger 2.

As far as the gun being "more than needed" IMO you still can't remove the dread factor. That being the dread of troops going up against that, and being Germany, they'd be fools not to have taken notes on the effect the Tiger had on Ally troops. Dropping moral just at the mention. There is no way this is not taken into military thinking.

A Swede told me they haven't had reporting names for drones becuase they weren't sure how they will be used, intercepted, and what is the refresh rate on new airframes.

Do Timestamps....would make this Video so much better. Books also have Chapter Markers.

I personally served on one of the in port of novorosyjsk, Ash river and Sweden…

what was respectful about waiting to publish this? im not sure why publishing this would be disrespectful.....unless were all supposed to pretend russia never did anything cool or effective until after the war is over. its funny how ak went from being ''way better than our baby m4's'' to being dog crap over night just because CNN said were on zelinsky's team

Hahaha! Aged well

If only tank turret tossing were an Olympic event. Tanks and war horses 😅 are outdated

MiG K/D ratio are 10 : 2 where those 10 hits were scored in the Iran and Iraq war, and if you know no Western aircraft were able to destroy any MiG 25 in air combat during the Gulf War beacuse they were just so fast. But the MiG 25 did score one hit and that too a British Torando, which was immediately repaired after the War. Plus him saying the West wasn't terrified is completely false, and you will get the reason on the Mustard video of MiG 25 and F-15. The West specifically the American was terrified beacuse they found the Soviet has technology of next generation fighter in 1967 when they were just designing it, forcing them to fast forward the F-X program that ultimately became the F-15.

Check out Gates of Hell: Ostfront - the most realistic real-time tactical combat game and the most played WWII game in the world! 🔥

Russian history ... All of it. Imperial, Soviet, modern... is designing cheap, unreliable, and dangerous shit. Manning it with the least qualified conscripts possible. Managing and maintaining it by corrupt bureaucrats. But as long as the equipment runs the 2km it needs to on May 9th every year, it is considered a glorious win to Rossiya.

Spend the bag on drones, Tanks are dinosaurs now.

The main content of this video is pretty accurate, but the premise is not. The "Big Seven" is an American moniker for the Soviet army's vehicle fleet, not something that the Soviets themselves intended. It also frankly isn't an accurate description of the Soviet Army, and I don't think a video about the Soviet Army should be entirely based on contemporary American analyses. Just looking at the tanks as an example, the T-72 wasn't the primary main battle tank of the Soviet army, nor was it a "conscript" tank. The entire Soviet Army's lower ranks were filled with mostly conscripts, and that included the ready divisions in areas with priority to funding and manning levels such as the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany (GSFG). The T-72 was originally conceived as something the Soviets could cheaply churn out during a war, and eventually, due to its simplicity, saw widespread adoption, but never came close to replacing the T-80 or T-64 before the Soviet Union fell. The GSFG in particular only used T-64s and T-80s. T-72s would only see service in Germany with the East German, and even then it was the T-72M export variant, which at that point was obsolete compared to modern MBT designs, especially the newer M1A1, T-72B Obr 1985, and T-80U when they were introduced. The T-64 would only be replaced in Russian service by upgraded T-72 and T-90s after the Soviet Union collapsed, and the T-80 still remains a large component of the Russian tank fleet. The ZSU-23-4 Shilka isn't the only anti-aircraft defence that a Soviet army formation would have below the division level. The Soviets also had the Strela-1 (SA-9) and Stela-10 (SA-13) carried on an MT-LB chassis that were organically attached to battalions. In 1982, The ZSU-23-4 was being replaced by the newer 2K22 Tunguska (SA-19). In 1986, the 9K33 Osa (SA-8) would slowly be replaced by the 9K330 Tor (SA-15). At the division level, you would see mobile SAMs like the 2K12 Kub (SA-6) and later the 9K37 Buk (SA-15) Also, "BMP" is just the Russian abbreviation for what we call in English an "IFV." The different vehicles with the designation "BMP" differ quite radically from one another, and thus shouldn't be grouped together as one family of vehicle. It would also be inaccurate to depict any BMP as the workhorse of Soviet motor rifle units. While many regiments would be outfitted with IFVs towards the end of the Soviet Union, there were still plenty of regiments that used APCs like the BTR-60 for troop transport, and the "work horse" vehicle that would service frontline units by delivering reinforcements and supplies would the MT-LB family of vehicles, i.e. the Soviet analog to the American M113.

Muricans couldnt ID a fucking Land Rover or the union jack.

That 155mm destroys literally anything that it shoots.

Ok so if most of you are here for fox 1-4 then f1 is a sparrow f2 is a sidewinder f3 is an aamraam and f4 is guns

i feel like this video is missing, just, a written list

T72 is crap too

Pioneros CHATARREROS.

Red Dawn?

Good video don’t really appreciate getting a 50 seconds of unskipable adds thoe

This strikes me as an underperforming unit given the role it is supposed to operate in. Cool name, but underwhelming performance and capability on paper. Love how my tax dollars are being spent....

Great. Doesn't protect you from the wifey though.

They should put one of those grenade launchers on the top of this thing

I don’t like where modern armored vehicles are going. Every year it becomes more and more expensive as a military toy than a real combat unit. There is no point in having a super nanotechnological tank if it is constantly being repaired due to technical grinding. The production chain is unable to keep up with developments. The price of the tank is not the main problem, but the key problem is technological complexity. Some military personnel, and not to mention ordinary people, have forgotten that military equipment is a consumable item. Why does a tank need a UAV, it’s a useless thing, a tank is part of the system. If there is no system, then it is the fault of the army, not the tank

useless in era of drones

I feel like the only bad take here is suggesting the T-14 would be a better investment. Maybe they should have just stuck with the new T-80 😂

guys keep in mind, the guys at Rheinmetall wouldnt chose a bolt for a project like this without running 100 tests on it. IF it uses the hull or parts of a leo2. itll be because theres nothing better that works in combination. The leo2 hull is great at 34:05 THIS feeling in an exercise....coming over the hill and seeing the tracers and everything....thats so sick

I forgot

The way the turret fly off is crazy, hate to be inside one of those things

8:34 HEY! THATS CHEATING!!!

It's faster and with a higher service altitude than the F-35. Not bad.

2:20 ironically, I clicked on this video because I have the BMPs in War Thunder. I just don’t have the BMP-2M(?) Its a squadron vehicle that is pretty good with thermals and some other interesting gadgets

Its all russian kit whats not to love, myself being an ex squaddie expected to face hordes of these things back in the 80's we learned to respect the fact that no matter how many you killed many more would take their place, and indeed a T72 killed an abrams tank recently in ukraine so the 80's kit is still usefull, love to all thing russian from a brit.

The F-8 only had 2 gun kills during the Vietnam war. The F-105 had 26 gun kills. I know the nickname is "Last Gunfighter," but it really was a missile fighter that had a gun along for a ride.

Why Russia's T-90 is Cheap Useless Junk! | Your Favorite Tank Sucks #2 omg just look at this so much hate in this title

Every tank burns like lepoard abram itd... So they all suck

Good😊

Who are the new DCS players here lol

Watch, we're going to see something like a Boeing M2A1 EX "Trumpster" tank

Every DCS guy is watching this!!!

Which tanks have apcr

HALO SCORPION 🗣️

Personaly heat shells are the best at low tier if you know where to aim

and humanity is back to arrows and javelins which APFSDS basically are

Funny how people think that Russia is still communist🤣