English + Nook

Пікірлер

@fil-kanophilanthropist9988 Ай бұрын

Need is not a modal verb. As far as I know😅😂. Need is a regular verb lol. Where’s ur face 😮. Pls show up. I’ve been studying English but I’ve never encountered that “ need” is a modal verb lol😂😅 Which are the modal verbs? Will, would, can, could, may, might, shall, should, must, ought to are the modal verbs in the English language. What kind of verb is "need to"? semi-modal Need to' is used when we are using the semi-modal 'need' as a main verb. It expresses requirements. For example: I need to change the sheets.

@elijahheyes9061 Ай бұрын

Спасибо

@LuisGonzalez-iz8pt 2 ай бұрын

Honestly speaking this makes me sick and tired. As an English teacher, I consider this is not favorable for students. You need to focus on the message not on those mistakes. Even Native speakers make mistakes. I speak other languages and I have experianced how natives speakers make mistakes in all those languages. Remember that the main goal is communication. No more fighting please!

@helenbrown2447 2 ай бұрын

You are free to give advice, I am free to reject it. All the best.

@Klopcyna 2 ай бұрын

Kevin makes mistakes himself but I still apreciate his videos where he corrects other people's mistakes especially Marina's mistakes. I think Marina should be banned from posting youtube videos where she attempts to teach us English or whatever that is she speaks

@user-js2rg4xg6m 2 ай бұрын

Куда делось слово clever

@helenbrown2447 2 ай бұрын

Оно всё также на своём месте.

@OlegikZov 3 ай бұрын

Полезно

@Ludmila.N 3 ай бұрын

А разве нельзя сказать :This is she?

@helenbrown2447 3 ай бұрын

Формально это правильно, но почему-то принято говорить her (объектный падеж)

@user-hs7xx6sd2w 3 ай бұрын

а разве this is her это не значит: это её ?

@helenbrown2447 3 ай бұрын

Это её - This is hers.

@talkertolk 4 ай бұрын

nobody needS

@helenbrown2447 4 ай бұрын

"Nobody needS" is said when NEED is not a modal verb. When it is modal, then it should be "Nobody need"

@vladimirbaloyan440 4 ай бұрын

Dave is an English teacher , however, Dave being a Native speaker, does make such mistakes OMG.. As far as I know after the modal verbs there must follow any verb not a noun, Need, to me , is not a modal verb 'cuz we can say ''I need you'' which cannot be used in any of other situation ''I can/will/should/ must (or whatever) + a noun

@helenbrown2447 4 ай бұрын

For the sake of honesty, I must admit that "need" is a semi-modal verb. But as a modal verb it is used in negative sentences or interrogative ones only. "You needn't worry" "Need I say more?"

@helenbrown2447 Ай бұрын

@@olenaadams4797 тролль ты так как никаких аргументов у тебя кроме трындежа

@OlegikZov 4 ай бұрын

Подробно получилось

@ilyaalexeev7845 5 ай бұрын

Пруфы из учебников или хотя бы на сайты, где это объясняется?

@helenbrown2447 4 ай бұрын

С чего вы взяли что в учебниках всё объясняется?

@ilyaalexeev7845 4 ай бұрын

@@helenbrown2447 с того, что если вы выдвигаете некую теорию о функционировании языка, то будьте добры подтвердить её авторитетными источниками. Иначе это языковое шарлатанство.

@fredylopez2477 5 ай бұрын

I completely agree with you, that's what I was taught about modal verbs, you don't have to use the word "TO" after them. I think the verb "need" is used mostly as a main verb, not as a modal verb. When Dave said that in his video, well, his comment got me confused and I said to myself, well, there must be some truth 'cause Dave's a native English speaker and he knows what he's talking about. I know we all make mistakes but I never thought that Dave could make that kind of mistake, maybe some other more complex mistake but not as simple as that one.

@frankduval3031 5 ай бұрын

Дейв сказал полную чушь.

@Ultra_kapibar_abibas 7 ай бұрын

Почему сылка на это видео была в комментах видео о голосах исторических лидеров

@wagnerjunior6524 7 ай бұрын

You're wrong.

@helenbrown2447 7 ай бұрын

Go ahead and adduce some evidence that I am wrong.

@arecoder 8 ай бұрын

You need to provide a grammar reference (e.g. grammar book or link) not just your logical explanation. Otherwise you're going to puzzle learners. 😕

@randall2737 4 ай бұрын

I don't think he will, because I dont think it exists😂 Edit: I meant to say I don't think he will, because I dont think it will exist😂

@NS-neversaynever 8 ай бұрын

Объясните пожалуйста мне, как русскоязычному человеку, разницу. Я настолько понимаю логику will в обеих частях предложения, что мне трудно понять значение предложений где will только после запятой. Переведите оба варианта, пожалуйста.

@helenbrown2447 8 ай бұрын

1) I will give you the food, if you give me the money. = Я дам тебе еду, если ты дашь мне денег. (Сначала мне дают деньги, потом я даю еду) 2) I will give you the food, if you will give me the money. = Я дам тебе еду, если ты мне дашь денег (потом). (Сначала я даю еду, а потом мне дают деньги)

@NS-neversaynever 8 ай бұрын

@@helenbrown2447 то есть действие второй части предложения это не условие, а следствие вот этого самого if, поэтому и время используем будущее, так?

@helenbrown2447 8 ай бұрын

@@NS-neversaynever как по мне 2-я часть (то есть if-часть) это условие, а 1-я часть это следствие. Как бы там ни было, запомните: 1 Формула: Подлежащее + future simple, if + present simple = Действие второе (по хронологии), if действие первое (по хронологии) (На русском оба действия переводятся будущим) 2 Формула: Подлежащее + future simple, if + future simple = Действие первое (по хронологии), if действие второе (по хронологии) (На русском оба действия переводятся будущим). Проанализируйте мои примеры и заметьте какое действие за каким идёт. Вся суть сводится к тому, что там разный временной порядок действий.

@NS-neversaynever 8 ай бұрын

@@helenbrown2447то есть, если попробовать применить вами сказанное, получается: If you give me the money, I will buy some bread. - сначала деньги, потом стулья/хлеб. If you will give me the money, I will buy some bread. - сначала куплю, а потом вернёшь деньги. Если всё так, то спасибо вам за пояснение. Я всегда рада узнать что-то новое о языке.)

@letshigh99 7 ай бұрын

Это обычное спряжение времён present+future когда мы хотим связать 2 действия в будущем в последовательности

@EvgueniaSavvin 8 ай бұрын

You are not right. It is not a matter of logics. It WILL happen something in the FUTURE( as a result) if the condition is met BEFORE IT, that is in the PRESENT. Dave said about it.

@helenbrown2447 8 ай бұрын

You are totally missing the point. Have a look at these examples. 1) I will buy food if you give me the money 2) I will buy food if you will give me the money. These two sentences mean different things and both of them are correct. You say: if the condition is met BEFORE IT. Now, think of a situation in which the condition is met AFTER (not before). That's what I am talking about and that's what my second example demonstrates and that's the point of this video.

@EvgueniaSavvin 7 ай бұрын

My point is Dave is right.He fixed a propriete mistake that Marina had maked then. Your point is let's change the meaning of the case. For what? She sad what she sad. In that case she has to use a propriet rool. Dave said about it. Do you want change the rool? For another case use another rool. Grammar mistakes often change meaning of the sentences If we should guess what each youtuber wants to say?

@helenbrown2447 7 ай бұрын

@@EvgueniaSavvin This is what Dave said:” In the if-clause you never, ever, ever, ever, never put will, just never.“ His statement is wrong and you can't change it.

@pashu16af 8 ай бұрын

Well, unfortunately, you're wrong. I bet you know what an "auxiliary verb" means. So, the structure of the conditional remains with "will" only in the part without "if" (after the comma), even if the verb "will" is put after "if". Why? Because "will" after "if" is just a verb which has its own non-auxiliary modal meaning. In this case, "will" means repetitive action, intention or willingness depending on the context. It's like saying never put "do" where "does" should be, and then there is: "She doesn't do her homework," where "do" is not auxiliary. There are a lot of verbs with actual in-use meaning, including the non-auxiliary "will". Obviously, Dave meant the auxiliary "will". Moreover, in fact, there is no future tense actually in English. I bet you know it. "Will" is in present form. In your explanation, you assume that "will" in both cases is auxiliary; otherwise, you wouldn't start this "order" thing. There is no order you mentioned.

@helenbrown2447 8 ай бұрын

Hi pashu! This is what Dave said:” In the if-clause you never, ever, ever, ever, never put will, just never.“ He didn't elaborate on the classification of “will”. He simply said “will”, which implies both the ‘auxiliary will’ and the ‘modal will’. Actually, it’s you who brought up the point of ‘will’ having two statuses a) auxiliary b) modal. Yes, it’s true. Will can be either an auxiliary verb or a modal verb. But I can’t see how your remark changes my point or how it remediates the wrong statement which Dave made. Let me give you an example to make a case for the usage I present in this video. 1 I will take this pill, if this pill will make me feel better. - the two wills are auxiliary. Do you think the sentence is wrong? Not, at all. The second will i.e. “if this pill will make me feel” is an auxiliary verb and it doesn’t convey a repetitive action, or intention or willingness. It conveys a probability. Do you see why this is wrong “I will take this pill, if this pill makes me feel better?”

@d.c.v.6 8 ай бұрын

That's total bull....

@helenbrown2447 8 ай бұрын

Any constructive points? Otherwise, it doesn't sound convincing.

@randall2737 4 ай бұрын

@@helenbrown2447 would you care to offer a reference for the gramatical structure which you are advocating for? Some reputable source explaining English future conditional that confirms your point?

@aprasovsky 8 ай бұрын

You should have written your script and read, so that you don't sound being whether ve-e-ery insecure in WHAT you say or hesitant because you're not sure HOW to say that in English.

@helenbrown2447 8 ай бұрын

I agree, it would have sounded better. But I decided to speak off-the-cuff. I think I managed to get my point across. On top of that, I seem not to have made many mistakes. My main spectator was Dave and he understood my message perfectly well. But keep it a secret, don't want others to know...)))

@OlegikZov 8 ай бұрын

Я вам написал на имейл

@demon.93 8 ай бұрын

Его попросили, если по русски

@OlegikZov 8 ай бұрын

Не обязательно его попросили. Ему сказали тоже верно

@helenbrown2447 8 ай бұрын

"Его попросили" не отменяет легитимность "ему сказали". Оба варианта правильные. Его попросили открыть окно. Ему сказали открыть окно. И я склоняюсь к тому, что He was told ближе к "ему сказали".

@OlegikZov 8 ай бұрын

Я думал что это означает Он сказал

@OlegikZov 10 ай бұрын

Да дейв попал впросак со своей категоричностью

@davesenglish 10 ай бұрын

LOL, so my response is just never going to show up, is it lol.

@helenbrown2447 10 ай бұрын

Dave hi! Your other response has never come into my sight. This response (of yours) is the first one I have ever seen.

@elidrake8898 8 ай бұрын

@@helenbrown2447you made a fool of yourself

@helenbrown2447 8 ай бұрын

@@elidrake8898 Can you bolster your statement? I haven't seen Dave's criticism of this video. Seems like a fool is someone who can't bolster their point with any arguments. Do you agree?

@OlegikZov 11 ай бұрын

Полезно.

@OlegikZov Жыл бұрын

Хорошая тема.

@OlegikZov Жыл бұрын

Спасибо, интересно.

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер