Z is not up and down Y is

Hi mate ! I've been trying to learn manim too. Your animations are too good ! Can you please make a tutorial about how to make that cube which has particles moving randomly in it. Thanks ! And the explanation was also too good ! Always fascinated by math and such animations

🔥🔥👏👏

Very good video.. The explanation and the animation, both were good..

You can use Font "CMU Serif" like 3b1b Text()

Cool that you used Manim to make this!

why haven't I found you before :_( , this is excellent work.

To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Varniex/. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.

Brilliant. Never stop making videos on manimGL workings. You're the best. It also makes me curious in your working + voiceover + video editing setup. If you could make a video on that, it would be highly appreciated. 🥂

This is an enormous amount of work. Thank you for sharing! I'm curious though as what are you using to compile? When I do animations with manim/python even 2-3 minutes of animation takes a really long time compile the whole animation. How are you compiling and testing your animations? Thank you.

this is amazing

Awesome work. I tried installing your code base with Manim 1.7.1 version. Some script files are giving errors as you are using a custom folder and a manim_imports file. What configuration changes do i need to make? Also, in the 3rd file, parametric curve class is being referenced but there is no corresponding import for that

The probability depends on the data on which it is calculated. If the colour of the first drawn is given, that information will have the obvious effect on the calculated probability for the second colour. If the colour of the first drawn is not given, that lack of information will have the obvious effect on the calculated probability for the second colour. Always state the data on which you are calculating your probability.

2 days of suffering and it's done. Finally, I've installed it. Using conda and requirements.txt to make dependencies. I've made yaml with this requirements and have created new environment for manimGL.

It's interesting way of tutorial making like you may read instructions by yourself. Any problems? So you should read how to solve them. Nice one!

what there is a time-oscillating driving factor but no cubic term?

Interesting to see that the flow of "phase space fluid" seems to still be constrained within a finite area even though the model is nonlinear and chaotic. The plot doesn't stretch and warp infinitely weirdly and expand way outside

Very cool animation, I would appreciate it if you can share the code for my study Sorry I can't donate, I don't have a visa card

Wonderful Video!!! What did you use for audio recording and did you do any post processing of audio?

how you animate your videos ?

Hello, what version of manimgl are you using ?

Thanks mate

To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Varniex/. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.

Very nice video

Very well Explained...Excellent Animations..👍

ManimGL is the best Version ❤

Thank you for creating such sincere videos. Your teaching combines both simplicity and elegance. Respect!

A simple intuitive idea to guess the answer to the original question is to notice that if 50% of balls are red, then the probability of getting two balls of the same colour is exactly 50%, and for any other ratio it's higher, reaching 100% at both 0% and 100% red balls.

( sum_(n=0)^100 1/101×n/100×(n - 1)/99)/( sum_(n=0)^100 1/101×n/100) This is the expression I put in wolframalpha that explains the whole thing. I admittedly didn't get this first, because I just simply found the general probability for each case, which is n/100 * n-1/99 for finding a red ball and then another red ball, and then n/100 for finding just a red ball. But the mistake I did was that I did not consider that it was conditional, and that the cases are uniformly distributed. So, after figuring that out, I found out that really, what I should have done is add up all the probabilities together for which when 2 red balls are found across all 101 cases divided by for when 1 red ball is found across all 101 cases. The 101 cases are on its own a "third layer of probability" which I failed to consider + the conditional. So with that in mind, I set out that. P(second ball is red | first ball is red) = P(first and second ball are red)/P(first ball is red) = sum from 0 to 100 of 1/101 * n/100 * n-1/99 divided by sum from 0 to 100 of 1/101 * n/100 = 2/3 I might work out the sum manually, but essentially I figured that the sum's meaning is 1/101 (probability of selecting a certain case) * n/100 (probability of selecting a red ball out of 100 balls) * n-1/99 (probability of selecting a second red ball out of 99, due to discarding), added over n from 0 to 100 (total probability of selecting 2 red balls across all cases) divided by 1/101 (probability of selecting a certain case) * n/100 (probability of selecting a red ball out of 100 balls) added over n from 0 to 100 (total probability of selecting 1 red ball across all cases)

key word "randomly" picked a ball and it was red. So that boosts the likelihood of the events with more red balls in the collection, since you got a red ball after picking a ball randomly. if you just said picked out a red ball knowingly (assuming that it means n=0 wasn't chosen), then instead of n=0-100, the question would be the same n=0-99 in which case it would be the same probability

how do you make the character? I mean the blue character at 3:50, thank you

Voice and way of speaking is not good.

For the first question, I imagined that each set was a row of balls sorted with all greens on left and all reds on right. When they are stacked sequentially, there is a triangle of red balls opposite to a triangle of green balls. I cut the stack horizontally in half, with fewer red balls on top and more red balls on bottom. This cuts the "red triangle" into a similar triangle in the top half of 1/2 the height, 1/4 the area. If the top half contains ~1/4 of the total red balls, and the bottom half contains ~3/4. So there is a ~3/4 chance that the first red ball will be in one of the sets with 50 or more red balls. For larger N, it matters less that picking a red ball subtracts a red ball from the remaining set.

Unknowingly, I made a mistake using Red and Green color combination for the first few seconds of the video. And, in the rest of the video, I used Red and Blue Color for differentiating between two balls.

0:50 You logo animation is very cool.

Cool animations

Brother, can you create a course to learn manim for beginners Because your explanation is beautiful and understandable ? 🤍

Watching a Manim Tutorial made using Manim to Teach us is What i liked a lot.

My manim installation doesn't have a "ParametricCurve" class. Also, if I google search for it, I don't find anything.

bro, you make good videos but for gods sake dont add music while you talk, it is frustratingly irritating.

This is a very good tutorial. This helps me a lot.

If no one said it yet, I'm telling you brother! you are genius 💫

Love it mate! I am just getting started with Manim and these videos really helped! I don't really like the CE version as it renders the thing everytime. Grant's version far superior and the OpenGL really makes a difference!

yoo i need a teacher like you sir <3