I have no idea myself.

Thank you!

I swear I've been able to get it to ignite the SSMEs before liftoff before.

"All our knowledge - past, present, and future - is nothing compared to what we will never know." -Konstantin Tsiolkovsky

Looks interesting! I'll consider it for a future video.

Firstly, you may just be the only person to actually like my voice; thank you! Secondly, I have no intentions of stopping.

Thank you!

Yes, my voice is indeed that weird.

@TheOrbitingBrick fair enough, it's certainly unique.

Assuming that my translation of the phrase is correct, as I believe it is an expression of support, thanks!

It truly is. Unfortunately, it seems the main way to get it was through the forums, which seemingly are no longer accessible.

To be truthful, the main reason I didn't remove the effect was because I assumed the raid would be interesting content. However, it very much failed at being that.

@@TheOrbitingBrick It was something I'll give you that lol

Thank you! To find a 2.5x scale KSRSS, go here: gitlab.com/ksrss/KSRSS

@@TheOrbitingBrickthank you, yh I been looking but it’s nothing there 2.5 size? So still there?

@@zachhodges9311 The download is 2.5x scale, it's just not labeled as such.

@@TheOrbitingBrick okay thanks

I noticed that during testing, but I felt that removing it would completely ruin how the aircraft flew.

@@TheOrbitingBrick imo, all you need to do is FLIP the inline cockpit upside down, it'll also allow you to pilot the aircraft in such a way to offer a inverted launch

(Thus getting rid of the issue altogether

@@40notfound702 I never thought about doing that. I'll consider it for future vehicles.

Unconventionally suggestion, I'll consider it!

I know, right? The mod and its creator can be found here: modrinth.com/mod/create-northstar

There's still going to be some orbiting occurring, but that's definitely a way to view it!

Well, the first video regarding that will be released tomorrow (hopefully)!

Thank you! I didn't add an OX-STAT because I felt it would ruin the appearance of the orbiter. Regarding future videos, due to burn-out I'll be on hiatus for a few weeks and upload non-KSP videos, but I'll return once I want to play KSP again.

Thank you! I'll definitely find time to showcase any new parts that get released.

Thank you! However, I'll be taking a break from KSP for a few weeks due to burn out; please see the latest post in the community tab of my channel for more information.

Firstly, thank you! Secondly, I've currently got no motivation to play KSP and will likely take a hiatus for a few weeks, but I'll likely return to this type of content eventually.

@TheOrbitingBrick KSP can be tedious some times, I regularly take breaks from kerbal that can, it's normal, and doing so generally leads to new ideas for new rockets poppingupin your head. I would like to give you some ideas for builds for when you return to KSP: maybe you could try building a 70's style lunar station with a bigger scale version of the LEM to supply a lunar colony, or you could also try to build an Apollo style mission to Mars (if you haven't found out yet, I'm a big fan of the Apollo program and the space race in general).

@@franciscoborrashidalgo7776 I really would like to try out more of the Apollo Applications stuff in BDB, and your ideas are really good! I'll keep them in mind.

I used the large heatshields from the mod Sterling Systems to form the main part of the craft. I then used the offset tool and cubic octagonal struts to place the cockpit and attachment point for the rest of the fuselage

@@TheOrbitingBrick interesting.

I completely missed that, sorry. I'm unsure how I messed that up.

Thanks!

Thanks! I've been doing fine, how about you?

????

Thanks! I've done sea launch a few times before, just search on my channel for it. However, I could incorporate it into my next video.

@@TheOrbitingBrick maybe a large multi module ISV-style colony transport ship to Duna/Laythe?

@@Typical_Cyclist I've always wanted to do something like that; might be a future video.

I don't know.

What does that have to do with the video or the content ?

@@justsomestuff4172 is this seriously something that needs an explanation? It’s the commentary over the video. It has ***extreme relevance***.

Yeah, I see what you mean.

Firstly, thanks! I'll admit that most of my videos are just intended to explore the concepts of these interesting rockets, with little regard for what actually would get funding. Secondly, the main reason I didn't use the Saturn IB is that I had done it before.

@TheOrbitingBrick For being a simple concept of a bigger Skylab it is petty good and somewhat realistic, although I know it's not your aim to create something 100% feasible. Don't worry about the Saturn IB thing, it's always fun to experiment with new things in KSP, and that's kind of the thing you're supposed to do. Comments aside, I would like you to do a similar video about a bigger Salyut station. It would be interesting to think about what the soviets would have come up with to continue competing with the US in space.

@@franciscoborrashidalgo7776 Bigger Salyut sounds like an interesting idea, I think I'll do that! However, if I do bigger Salyut, then the next logical step would obviously be larger Mir.

@@TheOrbitingBrick If you ever do a bigger Salyut, I would like it to be asembled in orbit like the MIR instead of being launched in a single launch like skylab as it was the method the soviets ended up applying with their space program

@@franciscoborrashidalgo7776 I've already done a multi-launch bigger Salyut with my Salyut 7 video, but then again there's other paths to explore.

Alright, will do.

In the moment, it for some reason reminded me of the Voyager-19 ending (unrealistic space horror game), despite me never having played it.

KSP Robotics are KSP Robotics, what can I say?

Lol

Nikita Sergeyevich Kerman*

It’s still not particularly smart, but you can get away with a lot more today if you call it “iterative testing”

@@casualology. Yes, engines now have way less chance for failure and even if one engine fail it's not exploding rocket.

Say that to elon musk

@@MozartAmadeus-fm5dd He is not using engines from 60s

@@genrystikman9340 yes I know, but he is using 33 of them

?

@@TheOrbitingBrick to being a success

​@@Little908It didn't get that close to working irl but it could have worked if Korolev had survived his surgery and cancer together with (pretty likely) signing a "work together" treaty with Chelomei.