Sadly, it's out of our hands - only the devs can fix such places/assets.

It's Manzi btw haha

@@sergeantbash Aaaaah, Manzi! Daaamn it's been a while. I miss our old EASY times.

Thanks ;) . About the lag - yup, it was a match against the Chinese so we were playing on a midground server but all of us still had the lag cause of the still pretty high ping. But these days I guess I am more concerned about the constant stutterings and framedrops, caused by the extremely bad HLL's optimization.

@@sam_15_svk90 Ah that explains as to why it didn't seem like the enemies were benefiting a lot from a ping benefit.

Thanks, because I didn't so much :D . Somehow I didn't enjoy it much.

Hi there. Unfortunately, with HLL it is the way that no matter how strong PC rig you have, you will always have the stuttering/framedrops as everybody else. The game has been badly optimized and after the Team17 took the project over, their updates made it even worse (initially the stutterings were present only on a few selected maps but then it has spreaded to all of them).

In a good or bad way? :D

In any case, this was a competitive match and all the MGs were stationed in predetermined positions as often as possible. Destroying the spawnpoints if any in sight, was the task of the other infantry otherwise MGs wouldn't have any use if running around.

@@sam_15_svk90 I know I'm also playing and planning in Seasonal. Regards

@@matzitiD You belong to WTH, don't you? Good luck in the remaining seasonal matches man! It's over for us, but I am still a WTH fan so keeping fingers crossed for you guys :) .

@@sam_15_svk90 yes Im a WTH player, thx!

BF clone? Nothing is farther from the truth than that!

If you would have done at least a little bit of research you would know better.

Hahaha, I probably could. :D But I am going to keep it as it is.

The game will likely never really die I believe, but its quality will be as low so no new veterans will be made in it, only short term players - they will stay only until they notice all the problems, bugs and quality issues.

HLL logic works in mysterious and quite illogical ways... as always xD

oh my... youtube did it by itself, will fix

Nah, nothing. And since the original devs (Black Matter) are leaving HLL now, it is pretty clear that there will not be any kind of response ever, sadly. That "taking into consideration" were just empty words and that's where it is going to stay for good. However I have already decided that I will be moving off to Resolve as soon as it will be possible, I do not rly care about HLL anymore.

@@sam_15_svk90 yeah, I saw that game. As far as I understand it is created by HLL veterans? Guess their behavior would be much better as they have experienced how it feels to ruin someone's expectations. I might be moving of there too

@@dmitrirodzik Yeah, those guys are coming from the HLL comp scene. Resolve may not be (and legally even can't be) just a fixed HLL's copypaste, but it has all the potential to take the HLL's throne of best WWII dedicated shooter as it will provide opportunities to both the casuals and realism oriented players (plans for more extensive server-side settings to modify the game's realism/arcadeyness so to speak). Unlike HLL, which caters the casuals in the 1st place pretty much and has no options to change anything. The Resolve's lead dev Miley keeps listening and actively discussing most of the stuff and he is changing the game's features on the go, based on how good/bad they work during the tests and playtests. There are more dev-helping guys around Miley, but according to what they say, he did most of the game by himself. Taking that fact into consideration is just incredible when looking at the results so far.

Thanks, I miss the map a lot though :( . Good old SMdM v1.

Thanks, and yeah me too, 1 time wasn't enough :D . Especially since the fps were low due the CPU cap - if it wasn't there, the experience would have been much better. During the 1st few minutes (before the scheduled test start) our fps were so high, but then after the server restarted in order to start the test at the scheduled time, it was average like 20 fps. You may have missed it, but at least you will have so much better 1st impression experience when you get in next time. ;)

I remember that ;) Looks like you found another place where it is possible to spawn inside some room without a way out xD ... so HLL-ish as ever.

@@sam_15_svk90 It was first time happening to me :D

Yep, and it makes a problem when the SL is nameless (I have seen several of those over time as well). Not a common thing to have both, but a game should be bulletproof against such stuff because it happens and may happen again.

Thanks, made it to broaden my empty nets :D but hoenstly didn't know anybody was actually watching. And about Resolve yeah, me too! :)

Thanks and yeah, it is the safest place for the satchel to put without being noticed if I get killed when they check the tank afterwards. It costed me a few lives in other matches sometimes because takes longer to aim at the correct spot when the tank lowest plate is too low, but still pays off more. However, I believe that if those tanks were not 1-manned, I could have easily got killed. The only fully crewed one was the panther I killed the crew at after they hopped out. Was lucky :) . Oblivious solo-tankers are the easiest prey in HLL. What is your opinion about my fast-fwd parts used instead of a cut? When looking at it again, I am starting to think I overdid it a bit xD . Nothing to see in those fastest ones anyway.

@@sam_15_svk90 The fast forward parts showed that the footage was recorded from the same match and showcased that you need to redeploy to be effective in hll but in the end I don’t think they added to the video. The destruction list was enough to show that all the footage was from the same match, I was going to start counting the friendlies who ran into your satchels but luckly that was only one 😊It didn’t bother me tho since they weren’t too long or loud. I used a few fast forwards when I made fps vids but I think cuts from action to action or a series of short cuts is better for the viewing experience when trying to show fast time progression, if it doesn’t relay important information the viewer needs to know I don’t use it. My UI is always on because I need it to follow the match while spectating a scene but that also gives the advantage that the viewer can see how much time has passed between cuts.

@@T4tum Yep, that's what I thought as well now. Wanted to have the full uncuted match, didn't use the best way for it. Will just cut it next time, leave the not-so-fast fastFWDs which are watchable, especially since for being able to see when what happened I use the timestamp in the top left corner without the need of in-game UI. Video will be smaller as well without them unecessary parts. Thanks for the feedback!

Thanks a lot man :) . But well, I am not a real youtuber. I am not doing anything extra to get or keep an audience, I don't even know how... would need a plan/strategy for it. Doing these vids to serve just more like a reminder in case of need, for all those who think otherwise.