She could have mentioned very clearly she got 7 women pairing out of 9. All what she is saying unfair pairing .I could not understand it either what unfair pairing is she referring to until someone on chat clarified it !

😀😀😀😀

😃😃

I gotta say, this trap is terrible, you will almost definite be down a piece, assuming your opponent isn’t under like 600

Good

✌🏻

sir please explain the tactic used or where the player blundered in the video

😮😮

Good Game ji

Sahil Rana 🫡📈🔥

😀😀

Hackett Street

The issue is important but the way she addressed it was unprofessional and disrespectful for Lalith Babu.

what a d!ck this guy is!

Wtf

bro played so bad 💀💀

Is there gambling on these games?

My legend idol nakamura

finally a chess video with no commentary!!!

Video 234 of commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique video I watch in 2022.

Maurice handled that well

This incident is long over but just wanted to say the number of times she talked about creating "better games for the chess fans" shows her class... Maybe this is why she can't get to the very top... too focused on other people rather than herself...

Men and women are separated in tennis since the female body on average has less muscle than the male one so it's not fair for them to play against each other. So mixed doubles exists in tennis to force playing men and women. The fact they have mixed doubles in chess implies they think women are inherently disadvantaged at chess, so making sure the teams have one woman and one man keeps the teams fair. But in this day and age it should be common knowledge that women are just as smart as men and so there should be no need for mixed doubles chess. Doubles chess suffices.

If I understand correctly, after the second claim, black should simply have played one move, stopped the clock and claimed for a draw? In fact, he could have even played the second move and stopped the clock before white captured with mate? But instead he didn't think he had to? Maybe the arbiter said something like 'you must play one more move before it is a draw'?

What the what the 🤣

Jesus christ. Im gonna steal this, but im gonna leave a like because im not an asshole

They should popularize it. That will draw more crows. have open doubles, women doubles and mixed doubles.

if no capture and no pawn moving for 50 times for each player then its draw. regardless if you are in winning position or not.

Oh no, my queen. Anyways.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jYqko5-AjN2Emtk

When the Chess game is over, the Pawn and the King go back to the same box -- Irish saying kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZ-9mqVtrt2soNU

Its just you and your opponent at the boardand youre trying to prove something -Bobby Fischer kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZ-9mqVtrt2soNU

Tactics is knowing what to do when there is something to do; strategy is knowing what to do when there is nothing to do - Vishwanathan Anand kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZ-9mqVtrt2soNU

its draw !!

Legals mate

In a gambit you give up a Pawn for the sake of getting a lost game --Samuel Standige Boden kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZ-9mqVtrt2soNU

Vishy vs Gary Kasparov kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZ-9mqVtrt2soNU

Immortal Rated Chess GrandMasters kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZ-9mqVtrt2soNU

"hE wAs LoSiNg hUndRedS oF TiMEs" That also means you were incapable and not skilled enough to beat him all those "hundreds of times". So, stop roasting yourself. 😂🤣🤣 Both, players were dumbasses and on top of that extremely smug.

I think Magnus misunderstood Maurice. Or maybe something is going on behind the curtains that we plebs do not understand.

Chess version of frederik

oh no, my queen

Whose who

damn this guy is a real condescending prick

You forgot Eric Rosen.

Not funny at all, as the commentators mention clearly. Not only players can blunder, but also arbiters, that's what happened here. Both draw claims from Flores have been made correctly. He was having the move, stopped the clock and called the arbiter. The first draw claim after 139. Rf1 was correctly refused, only 47 moves each without capture or pawn move have been played. The second draw claim after 142. Ke6 was incorrectly refused. Exactly 50 moves each without capture or pawn move have been played. Last capture or pawn move was 92. Kxd4. So we have move sequence Black/White from 92 Black / 93 White up to and including 141 Black / 142 White, exactly fifty moves each. If you don't believe me, you should believe a FM (Umumba_thereal): www.chess.com/news/view/karjakin-wins-world-blitz-championship-9527?page=10, "but I meant the 2nd claim that should have been accepted without any further move ". Moreover, after resuming the game, it seemed he applied again for the draw, only without stopping the clock. I wonder if he filed a complaint after the game, for such a complaint must result in a draw. The game is stated as a win for Adly, so maybe no complaint was made. On top of all, there are two threefold repetitions in the game. Of course, this is impossible to claim, but Flores defended well and deserved the draw. After 116.Rh5, Flores could have claimed threefold repetition (after 116.Rh5, 114.Kc6, 112.Rh5). Notably, the 116th move from Flores also results in threefold repetition (after 116...Nc3, 114...Nc3, 112...Nc3), so Adly could have claimed, who had no interest, of course. To check, one can click on the 116th move by White in www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1857800. It will print "Three time repetition claimable, Black to move Last: 116.Rh5".

Si pudieras resubirla pero ya usando otro mecanismo o cimentado seria mejor

I thought your video was great I can't believe only me and some one else liked it

at 1:06 white has a checkmate move with rook on H8

:(