Thank you for watching!

Thank you

You mean a 24fps movie with a shutter angle of 180 degrees and 48 fps with 360 degrees shutter angle

Ok, soyboy

Yeah I think at this point audiences are probably ready for something new - but the caveat is that it does look different from 24fps and feels less ‘cinematic’, so there will be some getting used to it

@@theartofimmersion new generations are consuming more media in high framerate; yt and games, thus the adjusting process is becoming less of an issue as we go. Soon we will reach the point, where hfr will be considered the correct experience by majority. As it simply will be what they get fed their whole life.

He already mentioned that (5:05).

but because of the shutter speed, there was less motion blur in 24 fps, witch made it feel strange and unnatural

Thanks!

Thanks so much for watching and thanks for the kind words. Your analysis is spot on, and I agree with your take on ROTS being too much at times. Wipes work best when you don’t notice them. I prefer ROTS’ wipes for their inventiveness though - to me they feel very Star Wars-y in their madness, like Lucas is really going for it. I also think in terms of the documentary style that while that is Lucas’ style in general, there is still a deliberateness to it in his approach. I forget exactly where I read this - I think in Rinzler’s book (which was an inspiration for a lot of this video) - that it was more than just his style, and reflected a desire to help immerse the audience further into the world. But I could very well be wrong, so I’ll see if I can find it. At any rate thanks for watching and commenting, I really appreciate it. As you can see this channel is very new so it’s a treat for me to get an informed response to one of my videos, even if in disagreement with some of my points. Is there anything else you’d like to see me cover Star Wars related?

@@douglasmcginness1648 You definitely aren't wrong about Lucas' style being for immersion, it's just that it isn't something he only worries about for Star Wars. I personally very much agree with this approach as well, nothing takes me out of a movie more than when instead of being invested in what's happening I just say "That's a cool shot". This happens regardless of if it's an epic Shakespearean tragedy in space with magic or if it's a movie about guy going out to have breakfast. I do have one thing that seems to be overlooked in Star Wars. Since George makes his movies so traditionally, when he uses camera techniques that are common but sparingly used by him, he gives them a new meaning. The shots were a characters lower body moves past the screen and obscure the character in focus (there's probably a name for this but I don't know much filmmaking lingo) in TPM is an excellent example. I'll hereby refer to it as "The Judgement Shot". The first time it's used is in when Qui-Gon makes the deal with Watto for Anakin's ownership. The next time this is used is right before Palpatine makes the suggestion to get rid of Valorum. The last time it's used is when Qui-Gon meditates behind the laser gates. Which would be his final moments of peace before his demise. All of these moments are seemingly insignificant events that lead to terrible circumstances, with the dealmaker in the foreground and the person who's fate is being decided in focus. The freeing of a slave leads to mass genocide against the Jedi, a senator for a single system making a simple suggestion to one Queen leads to the conversion of a democratic Republic to a Dictatorship, the death of a single Jedi leads to the Jedi being toppled by one of their own. Each one a decision made for someone else. This is coming from a shot that's pretty standard among most movies, but George gives it his own meaning and does it in a way that isn't obtrusive into your experience watching it if you never realise this. There's more, probably most notably being the dolly shot from the side that's used in duels when characters channel the dark side from 6 onwards. Of course, you don't have to do a video on that, I say go do what you enjoy making above all else. Whatever video you put out will be great, I'm sure. The fact that _I_ have more than 8x your subs is a travesty in of itself.

Totally agree - a del Toro led project, with only two movies, would have probably been amazing. I would have loved to have seen a del Toro take on Smaug - he could have done something really creepy and cool with it.

@@theartofimmersion to be honest, it doesn’t matter who was directing. Jackson isn’t to blame for these movies’ flaws. It was studio meddling which made him turn it into a trilogy