the boiling river is similar to a hot spring the jungle can kill you in a thousand ways those tribes live in the outside world just not the modern world no modern technology there

The heat ray walkie-talkie building got those degaggers for sure very high digares

Umm... I'm from Winnipeg... I don't remember the stadium roof collapsing like that... mostly because our stadium didn't have a roof. ;)

39:53 there’s a mistake here. I love the video however. Also where’s all the comments? 🤯

Really good video. Pure engineering porn 😊

A new NONE AI science video? count me in!. But I would say, please stop the sensational headlines you've used to title some of your other videos which I can see as suggestions on the right of the screen. Sensational headline titles make your channel look like an AI one which immediately get dismissed by those genuinely interested in this type of content.

"...for humans to organise the chaos of the universe?" Sure, but It's also the way we break up the day so we arrive at restaurants simultaneously for lunch! You'd absolutely need an atomic clock to measure the difference in time between an observer on the ground and an astronaut travelling at very high speed because even after months in space, the difference would be far less than 1 second. In fact, I used the equations and can tell you exactly - moving at 70,000mph for 2 months gives a time difference of just 0.028 seconds to a stationary observer! You say chaos.. But, I don't think the universe is all that chaotic though. It has it's own clockwork mechanisms built into it. Like the orbit of the planets, the spinning of a pulsar and the slow rotation of galaxies. The chaos isn't at human scale, anyway, the disorder is really at the subatomic scale. After you get over the implications of general relativity, I think it makes perfect sense that time is relative to the observer. A universal clock would cause more problems that it solves.

So glad I found this. Amazing!!!

Time doesn't 'stretch or warp'! It is abstract! It only exists in our mind. You even admit this! You cant 'bend' an abstract. Time is a much misunderstood concept. Bear with me, it needs unpacking: Time is profoundly simple (though misunderstood). The ONLY empirical evidence of 'time passing' is change (including change of spatial position aka motion). Look around you - the Universe expands, the Earth spins, tides turn, life breathes, clocks tick, atoms vibrate, photons flash etc etc. All change events, change series. Everywhere. Ubiquitous, undeniable change. We think we perceive time passing, we think we experience time passing; but look around you, we actually see change happening, we actually experience change happening (we age because of complex bio-chemical change). Quintillions of change events happening all around us. Undeniable ubiquitous, profoundly simple evidence. Time is how we reference Change. Change is empirically, evidentially real. And Time is a homonym, i.e. a word with two core definitions - we need to differentiate them:- 1. Time is the dimensions of change. We calibrate change rate using standard units of Time (e.g. miles per hour). We index change events by using standard units of Time ( i.e. dates, times etc). Dimensions are abstract frameworks (or mental models) that allow us to reference an underlying objective reality. Time references, calibrates and indexes change. 2. Time is the collective 'flow' of change events. We think we perceive Time passing, what we actually see if change happening. Collective nouns are abstract nouns. Change is real. Time is abstract. So Time, one word two core definitions, both reference the underlying reality of change. And Change is, by definition, reference frame specific. So, not one arrow of time, but a quintillion arrows of change. Not one universal, single ill-defined 'thing' called time, but quintillions of individual change events. And TIME IS NOT "deeply attached to space". Space is also a word with multiple meaning (it literally means 'emptiness'). You never differentiate. In the context of the XYZ-axis , Space is simply a three vectored model for refencing STATIC (relative) spatial position. Why STATIC? Because there is no fourth dimension for change....Space, the XYZ-axis, has no change vector. Enter Time, the dimension for change and hey presto, Spacetime, the dimension of changing relative spatial position, aka the dimension of (relative) MOTION. Space and Time ONLY 'interact' in the context of MOTION!!! You can't 'bend', 'stretch', or 'warp' abstracts - but you can have a continually changing reference frame that you are trying to shoe-horn into a unitary lateral framework....there is no universal Time 'thing'. There is, empirically, just quintillions of change-events. Time is abstract, change (e.g. motion) is the underlying reality...and it can be both compound (macro-state) or quantum (micro-state)...it depends on the reference frame... I hope this helps www.time-defined.com

Lies. This anomaly did not leave our solar system, it actually landed on Antarctica, you can actually see it on google earth.

I'm not convinced that it was anything more than an astroid from the kuiper belt.

You're assuming it started and never stopped. More likely rain came more and more frequently, for longer and longer each time, until it just didn't stop. Not as abrupt or dramatic as what you've painted, but still...CRAZY!

7:18 Weird, I'm suddenly hungry for ancient supercontinents.

Just think of how human activity is making life better. We may be wiping species out but new, better adapted ones will arise as a result of our activity. So really the eco-freaks are anti-life. They want everything to stagnate and stay exactly the same forever.

Was the entire planet an ocean

same it's insane. keep it up sub and like

How this channel only has 1k subs... i think i just found a Gem... this channel will hit 2M subs in couple of years.

Nice video! Obligatory Liked and Sub’d 👍▶️

The universe began with entanglement!.

Dummy, Time was and is a concept measuring distance and SPACE. There was Space, But We can not measure more... So, you conjecture. However, What is beyond what we can see, is the cosmos that has expanded beyond our sight. what was, is still, and we can not know what we can not measure.

God created the universe.

Trying to find the point of origin is like trying to find a starting point for a rotating globe. Infinite possibility. Yet zero answer.

What if our universe is a particle coming in and out of existence in some other universe

God rules

the thing is if one can believe this madness , then why cant you believe in the existence of GOD,,, and he is the driving force behind it all !!

Yeah, those are valid reasons for seeing aliens, couldn't be that we're massively unstable.

How can the universe be flat 🤯

universe can have no edge. All space and time originated in the big bang. It can expand or contract or do whatever but there is no beyond... the same way there is nothing North of the North pole.

I am beyond staggered that "scientists" and people in general still believe that universe started at some point and expands ever sense... I guess that was and still is easier way to explain something that they know nothing about so theory was invented and stays till this day. The big bang theory. And yet non of them can say what was before. They just can`t seem to come up with viable theory that can be excepted by people. Unbelievable bunch of bs to try to explain something that just simply exists and we are here by pure accident. Nothing more, nothing less

Steve. That is what is beyond the visible universe. Just one big dude named Steve.. You can totally Google that.

Some say the universe is expanding into nothing, so how does nothing exist? I think it's just darkness without life planets or galaxies.

Good vid, but don't worry none of us can even fathom the time and space even in our solar system. Figure out the tiny rocks used for the pyramids and other base structures here. The expansion you explain is way to large for a normal person to understand. Thanks anyway

thank you for this video. your voice is very calming and i love hearing about space. this was exactly what i was looking to watch tonight :)

Same old lame ballon analogy. If the current universe represents a deflated ballon measuring 2 inches in circumference, and a future universe represents an inflated ballon measuring 12 inches in circumference then the universe has expanded into 10 inches of something outside of the universe. Simply saying everything has become farther away is ignoring and avoiding the question like usual.

Well, now because of this video am I not only afraid my house is haunted but now I’m freaking out wondering if my house is invaded by aliens and I just can’t see them 😂😂😂

Astronomers would not think ”this is terrifying” and mystify the reality. It is a void with no explanation yet, not a place full of monsters or an object that will pull us in.

You got the pronunciation of the name wrong all the two hundred times you said it and the spelling too, among with the Kardashev scale and the size it would have if the observable universe was the size of earth. Boötes void. Ö is not O.

too bad the CMB is utterly fake and utterly disproven

AI generated trash video

Its Reapers, Reapers are lurking in the abyss.

Thanks for the breakdown! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?

And Dyson sphere theory is as dumb as it can get. To suggest building a sphere around the sun that person has no comprehension the absolute enormous size of a sun.

Deliberately cloaked that amount of vast space?! 😂 I think people need to comprehend how vast space is. Even light cannot comprehend how vast space is.

Great video don't pay attention to the criticisms of certain ignoramuses Nicolò From Venice

That fact that nothing is that big vs just having some massive Object there makes it way more scary

what would happen if a (theoretically manned) spacecraft flew through a pulsar beam? does it emit enough radiation to be lethal? distance is probably a big factor, like laser pointers light becoming more diluted the further you go. i'm assuming near the middle or base of the beam though

It might be better if you showed the pictures when you talk about them and play the sound of the Venus surface that was recorded. Instead of talking about it.

Sound would be intensified by the higher pressure. Maybe like under water.

great content and presentation from your video

Excellent video. Same as the bizarre lights occasionally seen on Mars. Human beings r extremely ignorant because of course both Venus & Mars is possibly home to it’s own life forms. Titan is also a interesting place.