Technology & a Digital Age
2:24
28 күн бұрын
Meet Dr. Danny Zacharias
2:21
4 жыл бұрын
Meet Dr. John McNally
2:33
5 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@Reseng0411
@Reseng0411 4 күн бұрын
Excellent learning from Dr wright❤
@emmanueldrofenu613
@emmanueldrofenu613 9 күн бұрын
God bless you more
@devoradamaris
@devoradamaris 24 күн бұрын
BEAUTIFUL🫂 Chicago, IL.
@michaelfalsia6062
@michaelfalsia6062 25 күн бұрын
Ancient heresies never die. And Dale is certainly doing his part keeping Satans work alive. Tragic, eternally tragic. Revelation 6:12-17; 29:11-15 are indeed terrible warnings of what is to come.
@fawaka5006
@fawaka5006 Ай бұрын
Rev. Dr. Moss is such a blessing and light! 🙏🏿💜
@credenzabelladonna-fatale2487
@credenzabelladonna-fatale2487 Ай бұрын
This "God in some sense" recalls Dr Evan's "in a certain qualified sense"-how is that saying anything? In multiple senses, some unqualified, an apple is a tomato. In the sense that they start with "st", stoicism is string theory is step-dancing is strangulation.
@matthewarmstrong4999
@matthewarmstrong4999 Ай бұрын
Just as relevant today as it was when it was spoken.
@utlot9785
@utlot9785 2 ай бұрын
Very good
@lindac2554
@lindac2554 2 ай бұрын
So good
@markrichter2053
@markrichter2053 2 ай бұрын
“Many of you will already know Prof Bart Erman. But let me now give him a proper introduction………” such Pompous pseudo academic formality is so tedious, especially when read with such stultifying meticulosity!! 🥱 Yes we know Bart! And we we’re hoping not to have you read out his exhaustive bio because we know we’ll be here all day. 😮
@lukemedcalf1670
@lukemedcalf1670 3 ай бұрын
I mean, this is nothing new. I bet the objections Bart has, and the defenses Craig has are the same as they were 2000 years ago. Interesting nonetheless.
@cooporlando
@cooporlando 3 ай бұрын
Seems like a lot of useless debate. Go spend time with your families.
@susyhebner2456
@susyhebner2456 3 ай бұрын
I agree with Dan, I bought into some of Bart’s theories. Have recently been listening to Dan & have my peace back again.
@fisterklister
@fisterklister 3 ай бұрын
However, historians and bloggers are now increasingly questioning whether the man called Jesus actually existed at all. He may be no more a historical figure than Hercules or Oedipus.
@1moderntalking1
@1moderntalking1 4 ай бұрын
J Walton is a bit of a heretic!
@CDK008-hm3ue
@CDK008-hm3ue Ай бұрын
Your face is a heretic.
@joshtaylor1646
@joshtaylor1646 4 ай бұрын
Nice to hear my Grandfathers/ grandmother's voice and see them, ❤️
@tulpas93
@tulpas93 4 ай бұрын
For Craig, this debate took place on Jan 19th, or the 20th, or the 18th. To insist that one or more of those dates is inaccurate is merely a wooden interpretation of the event. 😅
@markrichter2053
@markrichter2053 2 ай бұрын
😂
@tulpas93
@tulpas93 4 ай бұрын
First 20 min is a mixture of an argument from authority, an ad populem, with a dash of what I think of as the "veracity of Spiderman" argument (we know Spiderman to be a real superhero because of how accurately his chronologicalers represented New York City and the lifestyles of those who lived there at the time. The first 20 minutes were completely squandered. 😢
@markrichter2053
@markrichter2053 2 ай бұрын
Took the words from my mouth
@calebsanchez4429
@calebsanchez4429 5 ай бұрын
30 years later, this is more relevant than ever
@adeodata6364
@adeodata6364 5 ай бұрын
That is such an amazing change of perspective! First time listening to Dr. Wright... I'm going to buy several of his books. Thank you! 💜
@johnpetkos5686
@johnpetkos5686 5 ай бұрын
Dale Martin cites incorrectly?
@josephcade3541
@josephcade3541 6 ай бұрын
God doesn't allow evil you do you get punished for it it's that simple
@roberttaylor2607
@roberttaylor2607 6 ай бұрын
I very much appreciated listening to the lecture. Thank you.
@skiamach6208
@skiamach6208 7 ай бұрын
Regarding the example of Jairus's daughter. only when speaking of the Bible would the story as written in Matthew and the story as written in Mark be considered inconsistent. It is more than a little nitpicking. Mark by the way does not have Jairus say that his daughter is "ill". The phrase used is that his daughter was "at the point of death". And Mark has the servants meeting Jairus and Jesus while they are still traveling to Jairus' home. Matthew does not have that event. He leaves out a few other details as well. Basically, Matthew compacts the story. In both, the daughter is dead before Jesus reaches the home and Jesus goes to her anyway. In both their travel is interrupted, and in both Jesus brings the girl back to life. I don't see the contradiction. It is quite reasonable to think that the father was imagining the worst, and when he met Jesus he may have said "my daughter is dying and she may have already died (while I was travelling to you)". I find it odd that skeptics are more literal in their interpretations of the Bible than I, a conservative Christian, am.
@endofscene
@endofscene 6 ай бұрын
Do you think ‘Matthew’ was using ‘Mark’ as a source, or that he wrote his gospel independently?
@skiamach6208
@skiamach6208 6 ай бұрын
@@endofscene Mark was likely one of his sources. [I say it cautiously because for a long time Matthew was considered to be first and Mark was thought to be an abridgment of Matthew. Scholarly consensus changes.] But Matthew clearly had other sources. Those that think the author of Matthew may have been an eyewitness, would say that Matthew copied some things from Mark as a matter of convenience or as a starting point. There is also an argument that both Matthew and Luke recognize some kind of "authority" (for lack of a better word) behind Mark. The tradition is that Peter was that authority behind Mark. So, they do not contradict, but only expand upon.
@vejeke
@vejeke 5 ай бұрын
The question at hand is whether Jairus' daughter was dead when he approached Jesus. Yes and no, depending on which Gospel you read. Bart Ehrman's decision to highlight such an insignificant contradiction in the Bible is strategic. He understands that for those who are psychologically incapable of acknowledging the myriad contradictions within the Bible, presenting a clear yet minor one might just be the key to open their eyes. However, most of the time it does not work, and the person resorts to forgetting or to any rationalization.
@skiamach6208
@skiamach6208 5 ай бұрын
@@vejekeIf you are going to make a semantic argument, which is what you are doing, then be more precise in your semantics. We can be fairly confident (from both accounts) that Jairus' daughter was indeed dead when Jairus approached Jesus. The question is "Did Jairus know that his daughter was dead when he first approached Jesus?" The answer I gave above is that he did not know with certainty, but suspected/worried that she was. In Matthew he expresses it with certainty and in Mark he expresses it with initial uncertainty (that becomes confirmed shortly after their initial meeting). Ehrman contradicted Mark (using your reasoning) when he reports that Mark says Jairus' daughter was ill. This not only is not what Mark says, it is a guess at what caused the daughters death. [Her death could have been caused by an injury rather than an illness.] Now I do not know how far Jairus travelled to get to Jesus, but to say "my daughter is at the point of death" would have a very different meaning if he only travelled 5 minutes than if he had to travel for 5 hours. But neither gospel gives that distance traveled. But given that they did not have motor vehicles back then I suspect it would be more likely 5 hours than it would be 5 minutes. The gospels do not, nor any of the New Testament, pretend to be an exhaustive verbatim account of every event or every dialogue that its books describe. No one, not even conservative Christians, believe that is what the New Testament writer's claim. Only skeptics present the New Testament in such a stilted way in making their straw man arguments.
@vejeke
@vejeke 5 ай бұрын
@@skiamach6208 I'm not making the point you think I am. I'm actually saying that Ehrman points out a clear but minor contradiction because he understands that those who struggle to accept any contradictions in the Bible are less likely to engage in the kind of rationalization you're doing now, especially over something that's ultimately trivial. "dying", "at death’s door", "at the point of death", "at the last extremity", etc. Those, and the Greek text on which they are based, are expressions said about someone who is still alive, not about someone who has already died. So clearly depending on which gospel you read the daughter of Jairus was either alive or dead when he came to Jesus. People who are willing to accept that fact may come to realize the many, many other contradictions in the Bible. People who are not willing to accept that fact will most likely not see any other contradictions whatsoever, nor will they come to be able to do so. That's the reason why Bart is so nitpicky in this case.
@norbertjendruschj9121
@norbertjendruschj9121 7 ай бұрын
I can´t see the problem. According the Bible god did so many monstrous deeds, that nobody in his right mind can call him loving or good.
@norbertjendruschj9121
@norbertjendruschj9121 7 ай бұрын
Can´t see the problem. God allegedly did so many monstrous deeds according to the Bible that I can´t see how anyone can claim he is a loving being.
@dorianmodify
@dorianmodify 8 ай бұрын
No Jew believed any being he or she was equivalent to Yahweh. There are many (new) PhD theses about what constitutes a "divine" being. When the Witch of Endor, in Kings, conjures the shade of Samuel, she says she sees a "divine being". That IN NO WAY meant the shade was equivalent to Yahweh. Jesus NEVER claimed to be a divine being, and his disciples never bought that crap.
@MegaDonzee
@MegaDonzee 8 ай бұрын
Ugh, Stackhouse, the sex pest! Just another Christian pervert!
@ellie698
@ellie698 8 ай бұрын
What's up with the sound quality?
@tulpas93
@tulpas93 4 ай бұрын
Uh! If only you could do the sound for all you tube videos! Oh well.
@ellie698
@ellie698 4 ай бұрын
@@tulpas93 I'm not a sound engineer. But they needed one
@tulpas93
@tulpas93 4 ай бұрын
@ellie698 Sounded just fine to me (considering what I paid to listen to it), and it seems to me you have more of an ear for this kind of thing! Sounds engineering might be great for you! Good luck in whatever you do!
@Alex-uy7pc
@Alex-uy7pc 8 ай бұрын
"some of my best friends ate lawyers" 😅😂
@Philusteen
@Philusteen 8 ай бұрын
Prof. Ehrman is a rare gift.
@johncalvino4508
@johncalvino4508 9 ай бұрын
I love this
@darapdiengdoh2179
@darapdiengdoh2179 9 ай бұрын
What is the evidence to show that the new testament we have today is the same with what the original author has written.
@tedgrant2
@tedgrant2 9 ай бұрын
As we all know, the universe is broken because man sinned. Heaven, on the other hand is perfect, because there are no men. It follows that only women go to Heaven !
@williamcarter7977
@williamcarter7977 10 ай бұрын
"In some way"! 😇😎😉
@philipbuckley759
@philipbuckley759 10 ай бұрын
this guy is in his own world....just read the text, and take it, at face value...
@philipbuckley759
@philipbuckley759 10 ай бұрын
in the beginning God created the heavens, and the earth....so time, in the beginning, space, the heavens, and material things.....the earth....these three things came into existence at the same time....what is so strange, here...
@rmwilliamsjr
@rmwilliamsjr 10 ай бұрын
Is the chapel message on the tower available?
@AcadiaDivinityCollege
@AcadiaDivinityCollege 10 ай бұрын
Not on youtube, but you can find it on our podcast here: soundcloud.com/acadiadiv/immanuel-god-with-us-dr-john-walton
@joannfinocchietti444
@joannfinocchietti444 11 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing beautiful
@cristaofilosofo2756
@cristaofilosofo2756 11 ай бұрын
@tedgrant2
@tedgrant2 Жыл бұрын
What can we know about Jesus, the son of God ? For example, where did he sleep and shop ? How often did he clean his teeth ?
@mybuckhead
@mybuckhead Жыл бұрын
All scripture should be judged by if it is kill, steal and destroy it is of Satan. If it is love, it is from the Father, Jesus dad. John 10:10. Twist it anyway a person wants to, but this does not change the Bible.
@debunkingthefundamentalist
@debunkingthefundamentalist Жыл бұрын
There is no evidence that says he did. None of the so called witnesses to the resurrection is verified with signed authorship. This is what I constantly keep calling out the apologists on in my own vids. Authorship of witnessed signature. The earliest texts written were decades after the fact, 30 years at best. This screams urban legend. At least Joseph Smith had 11 actual signatures of verified people who existed. I think they are lying but at least they say they were there. You have none for the resurrection and constantly the apologist uses the circular reasoning of using bible texts to prove the bible which is a huge fallacy. They do not win with us skeptics with this sort of bad speculation. Cheers, DCF
@BibleSongs
@BibleSongs Жыл бұрын
Ehrman says here that Mark presents Jesus as a merely human messiah, but in his debate with Licona he admits that Jesus is divine in the Gospel of Mark,
@tomasrocha6139
@tomasrocha6139 8 ай бұрын
I think he's said Jesus himself does not claim to be God in Mark, not that the author does not perceive him as God.
@peterphipps2346
@peterphipps2346 Жыл бұрын
I have benefitted and still do benefit from Dr Griffiths' ministry. He came several times to mid Wales to preach a series at the Keswick in Wales convention. I vaguely remember his series on Romans (60+ years ago), 2 Corinthians, Job and Luke. He gets to tghe thought flow of a passage and communicates it. He must be getting near 100 by now. Maybe someone would encourage him that his ministry has been faithful and fruitful.
@TheWpelt
@TheWpelt Жыл бұрын
As President Trump has said: a story is not untrue just because it did not happen.
@AbdulHannanAbdulMatheen
@AbdulHannanAbdulMatheen Жыл бұрын
👏🙂
@Grey-Elder
@Grey-Elder Жыл бұрын
There are too many inconsistencies of copies of copies of copies I could go on and on but WHY?
@davidadams2750
@davidadams2750 Жыл бұрын
Given everything we now know about the vaccines as factual, how can Dr Strang still stand behind them and go so far as to call it “Gods gift”???
@zombillyboogie9370
@zombillyboogie9370 Жыл бұрын
For those interested in further reading on the subject at hand I would like to suggest Grant Osborne’s book “The Hermeneutical spiral”. It is in my opinion the best book available on the subject of Hermeneutics.