can you tell me how to improve the gain of a tapered antenna on sub-6 GHz frequency?
@davemoore58583 ай бұрын
Where were you when I was at Radio School? :O)
@leo9408064 ай бұрын
Good analysis, thank you for the video. from your hand drawing, I understand the the dipole antenna become thicker and thicker and at the end it become the entire ground plane with the short circuit in parallel. so the Raspberry Pi use the entire ground plane as the radiating element. It is quite inspiring to me.
@salvalatorre40437 ай бұрын
Thanks!!!
@AdityaMehendale9 ай бұрын
Hi, couple of suggestions, if I may: 1) The ferrite backer also increases the coupling factor 'k' --> not just "shielding". 2) FEMM (takes ~ 4 hours to learn) Free, though not open-source. --> can quickly calculate the coupling factor 'k' for any arbitrary geometries of coil-pairs --> Plug 'k' into (e.g.) LTSpice --> (My optimization-workflow) --> Great Success!
@pjbevel9 ай бұрын
Thanks for the notes. For ferrite increasing the coupling, do you have any intuitive or quick math type explanation for this? I'd like to understand better. I've always found k to be an odd metric, I've been most interested in the coupling efficiency or power transfer ratio.
@AdityaMehendale9 ай бұрын
@@pjbevel The coupling factor is a number signifying the fraction of "flux lines" that loop through the receiver coil vs. all the flux-lines emanating from the transmitter-coil. In an ideal transformer, all the flux lines from the primary coil reach the secondary coil, so the ratio (hence the k-factor) is _one_ . Every other coil pair has a lower k-factor, the lowest absolute value being zero (i.e. no coupling). This is purely a matter of geometry and magnetic reluctance (the same 'ideal' transformer, but without its ferrite core, would have a lower k), and has nothing to do with N_turns, impedance, or resonant capacitors, or circuits being tied to the Tx/Rx coils. The only exception being a third (or fourth or fifth) "repeater" coil being placed between the Tx and Rx coils, but in that case, it is really k1*k2*... In presence of a ferrite backer, the flux lines preferentially travel via the backer, as it provides a path of lower magnetic reluctance, thereby having a larger fraction of the emanated flux-lines reach the Rx coil.
@jonboro2000 Жыл бұрын
And what size coax are you using there?
@jonboro2000 Жыл бұрын
It seems the ground plane has been extended by the length of your cable, attached test equipment, etc. Could the ground plane be "broken" using ferrites?
@MehmetErbilgin Жыл бұрын
You have prepared a very educational video. Thank you.
@hugoleung8146 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so muchhhhhhhh for the explanation and especially the website of maxwells!!! Never found so much interest and keep digging now!
@RSP13 Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@TheDutchGuyOnYT Жыл бұрын
Thx, it’s a clear explanation
@joaopaulocoelho5401 Жыл бұрын
hi. Can you further explain how did you measure VSWR at 1:37? What VNA have you used and how it was connected to the pigtail you just soldered. Thank you
@abrahamwang4021 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, sir!
@sleeve8651 Жыл бұрын
Succinct ! Sorry I'm late to the party ! This is fascinating ! Best ever ! Thank you ! 👍😉
@methods-SE Жыл бұрын
I think the guy who runs this channel died
@jackcoffey6018 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this and the website. You are a great dude!
@gooddeedsleadto7499 Жыл бұрын
Without a doubt FFT has its application in various fields, as an example I used to do vibration analysis on large centrifugal compressors to identify peaks at different multiples of frequencies to pin point the problem, mechanical looseness, bad bearings,misalignment, bar operations etc causing the problem, this effectively controls the operations of large refrigeration system the plant uses for filtering out large quantity of wax in lubrication oil processing. I also found great use of FFT in structural dynamic analysis in mechanical engineering applications. Vibrations is an important area of mechanical engineering and FFT is essential ingredient of vibrations and structural dynamic Analysis of mechanical systems.
@Electric_Sherlock Жыл бұрын
Sorry, but I must disagree with people in this thread. Your video does not do a good job of explaining. The website does a better job. You are still using “technical” terms in your video. And sometimes you jumble or misrepresent terms and/or their definition.
@gingarrison104 Жыл бұрын
is the polarization direction useful?
@miketoreno83712 жыл бұрын
Thx for the website and videos. God bless
@kaih63612 жыл бұрын
I have to say "wow". Thank you for your explanation.
@abrahamwang40212 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@OMNI-Infinity2 жыл бұрын
OMG I finally found someone with the same pen grip as me, except that I'm right handed.
@johnwest79932 жыл бұрын
Excellent! You teach understanding, not mystery math. That's a very rare commodity in RF engineering. I know little more than arithmetic, but I want to at least generally understand what's happening with different sorts of antennas, how, and why. I want to be able to look at an antenna and know why it is the way it it is, what it's best for, and what would make it better, not calculate the number of photons leaving the antenna at any given radiation angle as a function of ground conductivity. On the other hand, I have no use for the plethora of, "How to stand up your 'Super Duper Magnum Sidewinder Eliminator III++' antenna for killer DX," sorts of KZbin videos. In less than 9 minutes you came very close to nailing everything I wanted to know about slots except for 2 things, what the narrow-side width of the slot should be and why, and what effect, if any the size of the flat metal surface has. Are currents flowing on it further away from the edge that decrease resistance and increase the antenna Q, or can this all be done just as easily with wire and obtain the same result?
@carlinconnell77152 жыл бұрын
Excellent and useful video
@rajeev_kumar2 жыл бұрын
Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism has already been proven wrong.
@peterb76152 жыл бұрын
ok thanks I'll take the website down
@kmchen94702 жыл бұрын
thanks for your bravo explanation. I have no knowledge about antenna, but you make it simple and easy to understand.
@mahendraprasadyadav8062 жыл бұрын
Sir One help is required how to RLC ckt drwa of aperture coupled microstrip patch antrnna
@johnmurphy1162 жыл бұрын
Very good. Studied physics a long time ago and had forgotten the elegance of it all. Excellent.
@louisepatch68782 жыл бұрын
How long does the battery last
@bertoooish Жыл бұрын
Depends on what settings you turn on, small battery last about a week , larger battery about 3 weeks , again depends on what you set it on
@jianhaowu73682 жыл бұрын
Nice one Dr. Bevelacqua
@crazyfox552 жыл бұрын
I never would have thought that you could short any antenna that's very unintuitive to me.
@pjbevel2 жыл бұрын
Almost all antennas in consumer electronics are self shorted. The short makes for a low loss inductor that helps compensate for capacitance of trying to make an antenna as small as possible (close to other metal).
@mjodr Жыл бұрын
It seems weird when you see it presented this way, but also I'm starting at my two loop antennas and they are essentially one big short, lol.
@daltonwilliams62972 жыл бұрын
As an electrical engineer this would have been awesome to hear in Emag in college. You’re absolutely right I can do all the math but didn’t fully understand what the equations meant. Thanks for this video!
@zlac2 жыл бұрын
This antenna is actually not that bad, definitely fit for purpose. What if it was more centered to actual frequency? Seems like it is dead center on 2.4GHz instead of 2.44, VSWR would be under 2 through the whole bandwidth in that case. I wonder if measuring multiple samples would give you a whole range of center frequencies from 2.4 up to 2.5 or something...
@mjodr Жыл бұрын
I think it's because the component values are hard to match exactly. There were probably many tradeoffs made along the way, between the plane in the PCB to what caps were available, to the routing around other components on board, etc. They probably got to this stage and said "Meh, good enough." Can confirm, good enough, because my two Zero's have run great for a long time.
@ProjectIncubus2 жыл бұрын
Hi man, I'm working on my telecom masters thesis and I came across your page wanting to understand a bit more about it. Have you wrote any papers or journals that about wave propagation that I can read and cite?
@BranchEducation2 жыл бұрын
Hey Pete, I would like to work with ya on some educational engineering videos on antennas- I went learned a ton from your antenna-theory website, but can't find out where to contact you. Nm- just found it, dropping you an email.
@iasonasgram2 жыл бұрын
🔥
@stevematson48082 жыл бұрын
If you were a real math teacher, You'd make it seem more complicated.
@stevematson48082 жыл бұрын
Just kidding. It's actually genius to be able to put a complicated subject in a nut shell. Your efforts are much appreciated 👍.
@JussiTuukkanen2 жыл бұрын
Thank you - especially for the website
@SteveWrightNZ2 жыл бұрын
Its good to hear from you Pete!
@SteveWrightNZ2 жыл бұрын
It's really great to be listening to your antenna theory stuff again! Always leaves me thinking..
@intexclouds96072 жыл бұрын
I just read the concepts you presented on your website.....concepts were very neat and engagingly presented. Much thanks.
@fguizini2 жыл бұрын
Would you please have the formula to calculate de transmitting frequency of the antenna using the number of spiral, distance between one turn to another and diameter of the cable or wire used to construct the antenna? The intent is construct one for amateur bands (28, 21, 7.5 and 3.5 MHz. Thanks. PU2-UBB
@xoox8702 жыл бұрын
The reason why the Magnetic Field Divergence must be equal to zero is easily understood by looking a iron particles in a magnetic field which shows that ALL magnetic lines of flux that emerge from the source MUST return to that source ! Where as Electric Fields can radiate and diminish based upon the inverse-square law (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law)
@xoox8702 жыл бұрын
For the Maxwell equations, the divergence equations are all SCALAR (non-vector) results ; the curl equations are all VECTOR (non-scalar) results. Also the (4) basic Maxwell equations are the work of Oliver Heaviside that reduces the original Maxwell equations from (20) equations with (20) variables down to the form we know of today as the SIMPLIFIED Maxwell equations with (4) equations and (4) variables (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Heaviside#Innovations_and_discoveries).
@Tacereus2 жыл бұрын
What would the effects be of having a spiral radial on a vertical antenna?
@jacobvandijk65252 жыл бұрын
@ 1:02 Currents in a wire flowing in opposite directions??? in my opinion, this has never been observed in nature, but in Pete's world everything is possible. Pete likes to keep things simple for himself. KZbin shows the best of mankind. Haha. This looks more like it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y3eafIyChJl1ock
@peterb76152 жыл бұрын
always great to hear from a fan! thanks!
@jacobvandijk65252 жыл бұрын
@@peterb7615 You're welcome. Keep on confusing people, mate ;-)
@kevinrtres Жыл бұрын
Thanks, that's an Excellent reference - much better explanation and so much more understandable.
@jacobvandijk6525 Жыл бұрын
@@kevinrtres You 're welcome. Good luck!
@lepton0992 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot, i understand the real importance of maxwell' equiations.......