Watching this one again, waiting for new stuff Mr. Butler!
@thetorch941Күн бұрын
This is farcical nonsense based on some guy 'Hubble'who lived many years ago who created a LAW based on his own imagination and now taken as FACT. Utter nonsense!
@Lil_StomachacheКүн бұрын
Is that planet smiling on the thumbnail!
@NgọcChâuBùi-q5dКүн бұрын
JASON GROUP WANTS TO KILL ME BY QUANTUM GHOST IMAGING
@NgọcChâuBùi-q5dКүн бұрын
I LOST BABY
@dalecarpenter8828Күн бұрын
And there is no one accreation disc !!!
@KingBee-v5rКүн бұрын
Sum BS rite here.
@YogSothКүн бұрын
So happy to see a new chapter!
@waltjames407Күн бұрын
Of course Hubble's constant is no longer constant under certain conditions, for the same reason F=ma only works on certain scales of time and size....because, like Camelot in Monty Python & the Holy Grail, "it's only a model."
@SnackFatson2 күн бұрын
Is everything behind JADES GS z14-0 blue shifted?
@SnackFatson2 күн бұрын
If negative charges create an amplitude, and positive charges create a momentum, is the ‘positive’ amplitude of the Lyman photon a negative amplitude? I don’t understand what the y-axis is.
@vishalkumarspaceshuttle43842 күн бұрын
Chupar 😂😂❤
@Robin-nm1is2 күн бұрын
🎉FRESH🎉
@jackychan46402 күн бұрын
Thanks for this video.Happy Holidays and Happy Coming New Year to you.
@GraemeWight-wx3xz2 күн бұрын
Was that Schmidt guy who used the 100 inch the same schmidt who teamed up with cassegrain ? I shall look it up. 😊
@GraemeWight-wx3xz2 күн бұрын
The answer is both yes and no. It was the boys at mt wilson who married the two technologies into the folded optics with corrector lens during wwii.
@jamesheath75962 күн бұрын
Superb series.
@jamesheath75962 күн бұрын
Superb series of videos.
@chevy5Gen2 күн бұрын
❤
@jeffreygreene10422 күн бұрын
A billion years is almost nothing in the cosmos. Hard to wrap your head around. Just imagine the trillions of life bearing planets in all these galaxies, and all the amazing different forms of life.
@danhove2 күн бұрын
The Hubble Constant. How time and data changes our perceptions with realities. Quantumly speaking metaphorically. Or just just another dimensional shirt of our local void. Got to LOVE science. I do. :)😊
@richardgraham11673 күн бұрын
Great to live in a time with such great astronomers and telescopes seeing way into the past. Photons just keep streaming in, after having travelled billions of years in order to get here.
@ChrisTCAP3 күн бұрын
Educating and engaging. Relaxing yet intense facts shared from a calmimg voice. Thank you.
@latif.laroussi3 күн бұрын
Can't wait for the long version of it. It's always such a joy to watch your videos Dr
@russellarson46903 күн бұрын
Best channel on youtube
@PFworth3 күн бұрын
What a spectacular gift! Merry Christmas!
@alanparikh40593 күн бұрын
Merry Christmas, David Butler, and thank you for yet another lovely gift.
@constpegasus3 күн бұрын
I just ordered that time magazine. Not far from the day I was born.
@boiledgermanfood3 күн бұрын
A Christmas video? What a treat.
@PhilipWeberAB3 күн бұрын
I love your videos David. Well narrated, and thorough, while being easy to follow. Keep them going! Also, Merry Christmas to you and your family!
@Ro-ni7nm3 күн бұрын
I can't wait for the next segment 😍
@beefgoat803 күн бұрын
Merry Christmas everyone!
@amymonroe18183 күн бұрын
How far or how big is it? It doesn’t really mean much does it?
@brasidas333 күн бұрын
This guy is making this all up.
@williamwalker393 күн бұрын
Relativity is wrong! When are scientists going to wake up and look at the experiments and theory that prove that the speed of light is not a constant speed as once thought, which has been verified by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *KZbin presentation of above arguments:kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZazlX1tq7iErLM *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023:vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper:www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997
@richardgraham11673 күн бұрын
Thanks for the Christmas Eve data dump. Keep up the excellent work, Dr. Butler.
@juangsalazar81284 күн бұрын
July 27th? that was my birthday! I love these video books. Thank you so much!!
@VijayGopalG-er6vm4 күн бұрын
Very very important matter unfortunately commentators voice accent not good
@howfarawayisit4 күн бұрын
It's a one man show. No commentator, no video.
@WillyBluefield5 күн бұрын
Very well narrated, tasteful background music, and overall a fine presentation.
@Peter-ni2ql5 күн бұрын
Use on of my names it automatically connects 🤷🏼 same as drugs, love, music, knowledge, tactics, etc...
@Peter-ni2ql5 күн бұрын
One of*
@michaelpipkin99425 күн бұрын
14:00 The Wolf-riot star looks like it should be named the Michael Bay star.
@atomicplanets82265 күн бұрын
Mercury is actually Venus' moon.
@SnackFatson5 күн бұрын
I have an idea: A solid-state mirror for james webb 2 with overlapping light cones and gelatinous diamond buffering onto diatomic Bose-Einstein condensate.
@grahamwhittle19716 күн бұрын
My head hurts just after listening to this its to mutch im happy looking at the moon at night from my window 🪟 in England.
@myname11376 күн бұрын
All this, and we have still managed to invent religion in which god is very concerned what we do when naked. Or how many times we show our ass to a guy bending behind us ... 😒😏
6 күн бұрын
Sounds a bit like Charlie Sheen
@JerryThomas-xc7ur7 күн бұрын
This guy is making everything boring.😴
@JohnShields-xx1yk7 күн бұрын
That point of S2's orbit around the black hole is fascinating, the mechanics of our galaxy is amazing.