Physics Dr. Tlais

Пікірлер

@omerege3495 Күн бұрын

thanks dr talis

@FatimaMsheik-o9x 8 күн бұрын

if you please I want to ask a question how did you use the rule of the force on the electric field which is K|q||q|/d^2 while the rule of electric field is F/q0

@PhysicsDrTlais 7 күн бұрын

Hi Fatima: here we are talking just of the electric field created by a point charge. Let's say a point charge q1, this charge will create at a point (A) an electric field E1=k|q1|/r^2. Till now we do not have any force. because the electric force needs two charges. If we put for exemple a charge q2 at the point (A). so we get the electric force which is equal to FA=|q2|xE1 = |q2|xk|q1|/r^2 = k|q1||q2|/r^2

@FatimaMsheik-o9x 7 күн бұрын

@PhysicsDrTlais thank you dr. Is this the course P1101 electricity and magnetism for Lebanese University?

@nunnoconego8574 23 күн бұрын

thank you, really good explanation of the projection arrows for angular momentum

@9lama898 Ай бұрын

You are life saver thank you so much 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷

@freefireprozxy9272 3 ай бұрын

Thanks for your efforts 🎉🎉❤

@thebigbang5244 3 ай бұрын

😊😊😊thank you doc

@LishwamuPeter 6 ай бұрын

Thank you though it's not clear. Today I'll be writing the exam imagine 😅

@StevenKalumba-o7f 6 ай бұрын

Am here Zambian

@OscarKanyimbo 6 ай бұрын

Anyone from Zambia 😂🇿🇲

@just_jbunny 11 ай бұрын

يعطيك العافية دكتور🤍

@brinomumba2747 11 ай бұрын

Good job👍

@khandaa005 Жыл бұрын

thank you sir

@dilrubaacpnar6811 Жыл бұрын

Great

@21stcenturyyoutuber99 Жыл бұрын

How did you do the integration😢

@janeortega6733 Жыл бұрын

Thank you haha Im actually reviewing the chapter 8 problems for our exam.. this is very helpful

@kokokoko-ih6ef Жыл бұрын

Thank you I could not understand it from my professor

@ShreyaSingh-hi6ob Жыл бұрын

Good explanation 🙏🙏

@jayjain1033 Жыл бұрын

Nice lecture 👍

@PhysicsDrTlais Жыл бұрын

By mistake!!: We cannot cancel π at 27:20 Thank you for your remarks

@adnanahmadknowledgevideo Жыл бұрын

Thanks for your explanation Sir

@misnomer2022 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for the help, the only thing that I would add is showing the continuous charge distribution equations to understand where lambda comes from.

@zaid_0046 Жыл бұрын

Thx doctor

@notsure6675 2 жыл бұрын

How did u get these results, i did the same but i got different results

@KamelKamel-uf7fk 2 жыл бұрын

Vas dormir pfff j'ai commencé a suivre je coupe au soupir !

@Shouqss1 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you ❤❤❤

@GS-cq6ci 2 жыл бұрын

Gravity

@enriquitocornites6163 2 жыл бұрын

Where that 9.8 came from?

@PhysicsDrTlais Жыл бұрын

Gravity

@omerege3495 Күн бұрын

bruh

@hatim7769 2 жыл бұрын

can you tell me how( z-1 )mp cancel with (z) mp??????

@PhysicsDrTlais 7 күн бұрын

when you simplify the factor (Z-1)mp = zmp - mp , et this zmp will be canceled with - zmp because zmp - zmp =0

@chancewoosley3165 2 жыл бұрын

think you incorrectly cancelled pi in the second and third calculation

@PhysicsDrTlais Жыл бұрын

thank you

@lisalindhe7687 2 жыл бұрын

Great, thank you!

@freetime4699 2 жыл бұрын

I appreciation You video guys

@abdulmalikahmed5520 2 жыл бұрын

what is the name of the book doc?

@agrojacobsainton9959 2 жыл бұрын

Jai un exercice pareil , pouvez vous m'aider svp?

@agrojacobsainton9959 2 жыл бұрын

Salut

@Awaisgigyani7 2 жыл бұрын

from which book this example is taken?

@QuranAndSunnat313 2 жыл бұрын

pi is not with lambda l,how it gets cancelled ?

@PhysicsDrTlais Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@mudasirhussain3197 2 жыл бұрын

Book name plz?

@abdalhalimalzohbi6159 2 жыл бұрын

continue

@بليغصبري-خ3ش 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you

@sidharthdash999 3 жыл бұрын

Really helpful sir thanks 🥳🥳

@taoussyouness9808 3 жыл бұрын

Mafhamt waloo

@chinmaymohanty3934 3 жыл бұрын

Sir where are you

@PhysicsDrTlais 3 жыл бұрын

tell me sir

@MrDeyvid34 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks man, very useful!

@zaighammehmood2776 3 жыл бұрын

sir can i get ppt of this lec??

@PhysicsDrTlais 3 жыл бұрын

Not PPT, But PDF If you want, contact me: [email protected]

@TheAnimammal 3 жыл бұрын

Dear Sir, you are mistaken. Physics is mistaken. We have been making a stupid mistake. It is not possible to affect the magnitude of the velocity substantially by applying a perpendicular (even very near perpendicular) force which is what is being applied. We have been convinced because we saw something "spin faster", but if you actually evaluate the prediction and take measurement, you will find that it is in fact angular energy (Rotational kinetic energy, except that it is conserved instead of angular momentum) that is conserved. Take your example which is the same mathematically as a typical ball on a string demonstration. Please see the calculation in my thought experiment here: www. baur-research.com/Physics/MPS.pdf I know that you are biased and dogmatic, but I ask that you consider the possibility that you are wrong because there is no other reasonable explanation for this contradiction. Friction is not a reasonable explanation. We are not discussing an unlimited experiment. We are discussing an prediction that is supposed to happen within the second that you pull in the string. Please do not shoot the messenger. It is not my fault that there is a stupid mistake. I am just obliged to point it out.

@insafb796 3 жыл бұрын

J'ai très bien compris merci !!

@hamzeismail9086 3 жыл бұрын

تستاهل والله

@hamzeismail9086 3 жыл бұрын

حملة توصيل قناة الأستاذ زين ١٠٠ مشترك

@sabinefocken3566 3 жыл бұрын

Hi! This video is really smart! I have been trying to find for a awesome KZbin vid that breaks down the topics in this KZbin video. 🧑‍⚕️Your explanation actually reminds me of the channel from this insightful Doctor Ethan! Ethan's videos are knowledgable and he helped me on my exams. He is an insightful Doctor in the UK and he explains health symptoms! Go watch his page out and give the medical student a like here! ➡️ #DoctorEthanKZbin

@PhysicsDrTlais 4 жыл бұрын

Correction: drive.google.com/file/d/1K1I1zb10UBHH5bgi2OO-Y3Rfn-intZf_/view?usp=sharing Please Check this link to see the correction

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер