It is not parallal universes.. It's are bubble touching each other.. Ask me

⭐️✨✨🌙

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and join the premium list while spots are still available! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.

I hope this is true because I gotta believe Some version me out there lived a good life I should say it better life.

If the universe we exist in is Truly infinite multiple versions of us exist in this universes Local space time No need for another universe Really

I enjoyed that, keep going ✌️

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and enjoy the exclusive gifts mentioned in the video! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.

I know about Vulcan. It's where Mr. Spock comes from.

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and enjoy the exclusive gifts mentioned in the video! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.🌟

More AI generated vapid content...

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and enjoy the exclusive gifts mentioned in the video! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.🌟

good shiit

Human expectations of time is WRONG! Thanks 5:30

Realy I like this video so so interestyng

Cycles of time most certainly exist.

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and enjoy the exclusive gifts mentioned in the video! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.🌟

There is no time, just movement. If a tiger is repeatedly going around a block, we make up the concept of time to avoid running into the tiger. On the other hand, movement of atoms can speed up or slow down in various settings, like gravity. Probably, the conservation laws implies the total aspects of physics in a given discreet "something" is a constant, so moments CA speed up, slow down or appear to speed up or slow down because of other total factors, like how much space is being produced, maybe the total energy of that space, etc.

The vase is not 'the universe' though

Time exists.. I wish they'd quit saying this and just put it into perspective. Space is timelessness...cold is all that exists. Tyson lies and says cold doesn't exist. There are deliberate reasons this paradox exists..its not a paradox or unimaginable at all. it's simple as hell to understand. Scientists are geniuses with no common sense. That's why they can't comprehend.

Prove it

Thought does that exist

Time doesn’t exist yet it took me 10 minutes to watch this video.

Of course time does not exists and you need simple common sense to realize that. Time is human construct for human understanding to measure age of certain moments from one to another and differentiate between them by having tabs on them. Delete human kind from the equation of this universe and then no concept of time actually exists for anything or anyone to calculate.

To answer the question of whether time can exist without light, we need to consider the fundamental nature of time and its relationship to light and other physical phenomena. Given: 1. Time is a dimension that allows for the ordering of events and the perception of change. 2. Light is an electromagnetic phenomenon that travels at a finite speed, setting a limit on the maximum rate of information transfer in the universe. 3. The speed of light is a fundamental constant in our current understanding of physics, being a key component of Einstein's theory of special relativity. Proof: 1. In Einstein's theory of special relativity, the speed of light (c) plays a crucial role in defining the spacetime interval (ds) between two events: ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 Here, dt represents the time interval, while dx, dy, and dz represent spatial intervals. 2. The spacetime interval is invariant under Lorentz transformations, which means that all observers, regardless of their relative motion, will agree on the value of ds^2. 3. If we were to hypothetically set c = 0 (i.e., remove light from the universe), the spacetime interval would reduce to: ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 In this case, the time component (dt) would vanish, and the spacetime interval would only depend on spatial separations. 4. However, this hypothetical scenario would lead to a fundamentally different universe where the concept of causality and the ordering of events would break down. Without a finite speed of information transfer, there would be no limit on the propagation of signals, and events could influence each other instantaneously across arbitrary distances. 5. In such a universe, the notion of "before" and "after" would lose its meaning, as there would be no way to establish a consistent ordering of events. The flow of time, as we understand it, would be fundamentally altered or cease to exist. 6. Furthermore, many physical processes and interactions that depend on the finite speed of light, such as the propagation of electromagnetic forces and the dynamics of particles, would be drastically different or impossible in a universe without light. 7. Therefore, while it is possible to mathematically conceive of a universe without light by setting c = 0, such a universe would have fundamentally different properties and may not be physically realizable or consistent with our current understanding of time and causality. Conclusion: Based on the given assumptions and our current understanding of special relativity and the role of the speed of light in defining the spacetime interval, it can be argued that time, as we understand it, cannot exist in a universe without light. The finite speed of light is a crucial factor in establishing the causal structure of the universe and the ordering of events that give rise to our perception of time. In a hypothetical universe with no light (c = 0), the concept of time would be fundamentally altered or cease to exist, as there would be no limit on the propagation of signals and no consistent way to establish the flow of time. However, it is important to note that this conclusion is based on our current understanding of physics and the specific assumptions made in the proof. As our scientific knowledge evolves and new theories emerge, our understanding of the relationship between time and light may be refined or extended. Moreover, the concept of time itself is still a subject of ongoing philosophical and scientific debate, with questions regarding its fundamental nature, its emergence from quantum gravity theories, and its role in the universe's evolution still being actively investigated. As with any scientific inquiry, it is crucial to approach these ideas with an open and critical mindset, ready to update our understanding as new evidence and insights come to light. The study of time and its relationship to light and other physical phenomena is an ongoing journey of discovery, requiring a combination of theoretical analysis, experimental investigation, and philosophical reflection.

their is frequency and we mean by time frequency

"Un-I-directional." Ditch the AI reader and get a real narrator, FFS.

At 2:04 the video shows the Earth rotating in the wrong direction. Thank you dear scientist.

Time and light do not exist, author Jed mckenna

Dude... photons do take time to reflect off objects and travel to your eye... Perception and existence are separate things. Even if we don't actually know true one way speed of light, it still has to emanate from a source then reflect off objects then travel to our eye then process in our brain as the object we see. 🤔 Unless photons are actually observers, the fact that their viewpoint is zero is meaningless. The dilation effects we see, experience and have measured even are indications that we're setting our understanding of time on the wrong parameters. It may make more sense to set absolute at speed of light (which we can't measure one way due to the relativity issue). Just because we can't empirically measure and prove it doesn't mean it's not there, we're just missing critical information that we either haven't discovered yet, or it exists outside of our system (the universe) and is therefore inaccessible 🤯🙂‍↔️🙂‍↕️ Russell gave Gödel the Principia Matematica to prove that there are things, which are true, that cannot be tested or proven using only the information within the system (or in math known as a set). Time just may be one of those things for our set:(system:[universe]&|:). Please like if u got that 😉 That's hard to accept only if you're attempting to evade the inevitable logical conclusion and implication of a master programmer. Sets, systems, require creators. We haven't managed to observe any sets start up yet that didn't need at least one of us to make it start working 🥹 It's okay if there is a master programmer or builder, and it isn't a matter of 'filling gaps' with flying spaghetti monsters 🤣 it is a simple matter of just looking at this place and measuring the level of mind required to just slightly understand it, like only the fringes of it really. Time is a thing, it just may (probably) not be exactly what we understand it to be. You aptly noted at the beginning that we're basing our measurements off oscillating events within the system... and I gest that it is not necessarily the correct events as did you. It is a very well put together video and clearly took a significant amount of time. Your explanations and discussions were exceptionally clear and understandable. The arguments contained are compelling to say the least, thank you very much 😀🤔🙂‍↕️ (u got a 1 up from me 😉 liked it, looking forward to others) Emoticons are important to me for tone, please forgive if you think they're childish. I believe written communication takes incredible precision to correctly communicate emotions, feelings, tones and attitudes... and I'm just not that precise with English.😢

nice video

nice video.......keep it up!!!!1

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and enjoy the exclusive gifts mentioned in the video! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.🌟

Pls make video on Ours Solar system, I am very much interested, where it is a beginning

Wish i could study black holes

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and enjoy the exclusive gifts mentioned in the video! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.🌟

Hmm. Were there any dots on the balloon? Was it a screen or slide or something with dots on it in front of the balloon? It seemed to stay in place when the balloon moved up & down.

Great video. Thank you 👍

Thanks

Ai crap Pleae ban..

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and enjoy the exclusive gifts mentioned in the video! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.🌟

The one issue with this thought experiment as an explanation of quantum mechanics is it basically takes the perspective of "YOU don't know, so even though the cat definitely knows whether it is alive or dead, your lack of knowledge manifests the superposition of possible states." If I wear a poison-proof suit and climb in the box to observe the cat, then before the box is opened, what would you say the state of the cat is: alive, or dead? The cat is definitely being observed, so there is no notion of "both." It is definitely only one. But because YOU don't know, then you believe it to be in a superposition, and when I climb out and tell you it was alive the whole time, you must rewrite your own history to say it did not become less dead when I climbed out of the box. It became less dead when the particle did not decay. This, I assume, is where the thought experiment breaks down, because quantum mechanics collapses when ANYONE observed the result, living or dead, because that observation disruptively interacts with the particle and causes the collapse.

Why a cat though. lol why not the turtle experiment

I like the simplicity and informative way you present. Definitely a like and sub. Thanks from Sweden

superb

This is why Schrodinger's cat has become the darling of the Gaia channel. The cat is not both alive and dead until observed, nor does QM or Schrodinger himself imply this is the case. Unlike an atom, a cat is not a two-state system. If, instead, we waited a few days to open the box, an alive cat would be visibly thinner and malnourished. On the other hand, a dead cat would be showing signs of advancing decay. Thus, we would know the fate of the cat had already been decided long before we decided to look inside. The moment the atom did or didn't decay, the wave function had already collapsed. In fact, this was Schrodinger's entire point which he intended not as a description of quantum mechanical reality, but as a refutation of the Copenhagen interpretation.

✔ Start your space journey! 🚀 Subscribe to our newsletter and enjoy the exclusive gifts mentioned in the video! 👉 cosmic-quest.com/ ✔I invite you to join our community, share your thoughts, ask questions, and embark on this cosmic adventure together.🌟

So fckn amazing

You deserve more views and followers, great content, congratulations!

Great video. Much appreciated.