Nope. It's stable and it works. Focus on the problem you are solving not so much the how.

JS seems to be slowing down. People realize that it's no efficient to do JS and not many people need front and back. PHP remains a big market player

No, actually I think almost every (non-biased) person would say that we're just talking about very very small syntax differences. Also, you can improve the first version by using <?= instead of <?php echo. So unless you're afraid of question marks for some reason, I don't see how the second approach is that much more aesthetically pleasing than the first :)

@@DaDaBIK maybe Gen whatever before Z like old stuff, Who knows ? i'm sure they are not biased too ... if wasting more 15 minutes total a day trying to make my eyes relax to read an if statement where everything starts with < inside an html template was worth it i would agree with you

@@yamix-tr I wouldn’t rely on the overused "Gen-Z vs. the rest of the world" argument to justify this, especially considering that template engines are a very old concept in the PHP worlds, with systems like Smarty dating back to 2001.

Right you are!

would like to, but I just don't use statamic so it wouldn't be fair to do a comparison

The variables don't have any identifier and the tabs without brackets do make it harder to read. But a major issue is just how you include files

Yes. Except this clown makes light of a complex issue. Some people pointed out scenarios where his statement is not true. Also no one is stopping you from having extremely simple template where backend is doing 90% of the labor. I did not code in many years, but I see what technology has to offer and nothing changed fundamentally in the last 20 years. I would still use Smarty today and I would still write my own framework from scratch. But if I was doing something very simple where it is possible to use an off the shelf product I would pay someone else to do it. I rather go fishing.

funny enough though ... you can do $multiply = fn ($a, $b) => $a * $b; in php ... well at least you can add types in php "natively" $multiply = fn (float $a, float $b): float => $a * $b; 😅

Hum... I only saved it as a standard quality assuming most people watch it on their phones. Will save it next time in HD if you guys want to see the code. It's been around since 7x, but to all the PHP haters who give examples of messy code, IT IS NEW to them otherwise they would show case it. The {$file_name} is an example of how you do not have to use the dot concat with strings.

yeah... too bad we already used the 'dot' for concating strings. On the flip side we don't use the + to concat strings which can be a bit confusing as it adds numbers in PHP and 1 + "1" is also 2... :P

@@lionelthetechlead8839 yeah just wish it was a single character, for as much as you need to grab properties it is fatiguing. I don't write php every day so I'm sure I would get used to it but it's enough to annoy me when I need to use the language. Otherwise it's a great and productive lang.

@@thommccarthy1139 yeah, if it really get up there you could try binding a shortcut to a single character and then tab to create the ->

I recommend you start with an agile process. Pay someone to do mock ups via figma of your idea and ask people if they will 'pre sign up' with a google form. You'll then get a feel about the demand of your product and the next stages.

@@lionelthetechlead8839 A viability study is required. you are right. I made the mistake of thinking that because so many people had already contacted me with the intention of taking classes with me, that this would be enough to justify a website. Thank you very much.

@hebermachel4117 just mvp is enough. Can you deliver something manually over Google drive that they will pay for. If yes then start!

This is a mistake I made assuming that those in the know will tell other people. Perception is reality and you can brainwash people just by repeated saying the same untruth. There are countless dev, investors, co-founders and startup people who make this judgement without even trying it out themselves. That's why I'm here!

@@lionelthetechlead8839 I think you be more useful teaching architecture for sme and startup like solutions, hints on decision making for php related tech stack on such projects, etc, sharing senior experience and helping others to grow.

and practice 25 hours a day ling ling

Woah unfortunately we can't kick own goals. It maybe bulky but it sure has a strong marketing team behind it. I've said the same about WP, but it's stronger than ever. So since we're all on the same side there's no need to fight. I personally like Yii2 because it's like what you said, uncomplicated and has a lot of power to get things done.

That's correct. If you reuse your own code it's a framework. Just your own.

As the PHP.net official response covers, the Icov must be called inside the application and supplied with inputs that cos the buffer overflow. This mainly covers users input as an indirect call within the application would probably be fixed as part of a halted script. Yeah the other Tech Lead was actually a great source of insights into the industry many years ago and only in the last 2 years has that channel become extremely clickbait and scammy after his divorce, which is kind of sad. I've had the position of Tech Lead even before that channel was up. Despite that channel, Techlead is a respected positive within the industry of someone who leads the devs and tech stack, like the Captain of the ship. Not only do you manage a tech of devs but you need to work with management and ultimately make decisions on the tech side as well. It's a different perspective than a developer or code teacher.

​@@lionelthetechlead8839 ​ indirect calls can come from third party libraries, builtin extensions or third party extensions which people use, even just looking at builtin things if you follow the path of imageftbbox you'll find it can lead to iconv. While the hype around it is much more then it should be, that's not to say you aren't indirectly using it iconv is typically something business logic code would call but more lower level code. The other tech lead I never saw put out much of use, was mostly self promotion, repeating known things, and causing drama, he was never really respected at least not in the circles that I've been in, him scamming people came as no surprise to many people. He got a weird group of followers I suspect mostly because of the toxicity the internet seems to follow it and drama.

Go for it

Always check the php.net as the foundation take up these issues quite quickly.

... say my name...

@@lionelthetechlead8839 techlead no.8839

All this sky falling. Do you think it's a 8/10 venerability?

Anything non-default or unlikely to exist by a slight drift from the default should be capped at a 5/10 CVE rating.

Agree didn’t even know about this encoding existing. I think mostly affected systems would be ones in China that need to import data from external sources and specifically use the iconv ?

Exactly. What I don't like is that they splash it as a warning and then product managers and executives see it and conclude that PHP is so dangerous. When it is not. I dun see any follow up on this issue especially from PHP foundation. Worst they call it an 8/10. I have never seen this function in my life!

@@lionelthetechlead8839 Just to share, my previous company was acquired by a large company and now they retain us and one of our original apps is made of PHP, and all of their apps are made of Java, the funny thing is, they cannot kill our product because its still giving revenue and when it comes to infra its still solid. And then there's the vulnerability issue I think last year? the Log4j issue. Every application in the company started panicking. And we are just laughing about it because my team are just chilling haha. And our app is still going strong. We even have a plan to upgrade the PHP version to the latest one. And take note. One of their Java app is trying to catch up to our functionalities because even though our app is made of "PHP" it's a very large application. I can attest that php can do very large applications. And not to brag, our app is fast when it comes to processing. It really goes down on how you optimize your application regardless of the tech stack. These crazy tech videos that tell you this, ant that. seems doesn't experience working in a very large corporations. with lots of governance going on where security for the applications is a must and is very strict.

Every technology goes through the reverse exponential curve. Web tech is the same. People are still using an apple or an android. That hasn't changed for 10 years because the tech is stable.

Drinking too much Java and taking PHP. Starting to rust

Do it! In fact, why don't you find a leetcode question do it and then send it to me and I'll do a video doing it as well.

woah... there's some things to unpack there. First when you say server and let JS takeover, JS is still running on the server and running backend functionality. In fact JS is simply running the V8 engine that's compiling JS so it is handling things on the server side. Now one of the greatest myths out there is about multithread and blocking. PHP is single thread and blocking. However, Apache and Nginx which are the webserver that sit on top of PHP and Nginx are multithread. Not only that but they are written in C which is a much low language and more powerful on the server side. So if you have 200 users to the server, they'll all be served at the same time. Now what you are thinking on the request side where you squeeze a bit more performance on a single request, which you can just add some frontend JS to make another call to the PHP webserver and make use of the async frontend powers of JS.

@@lionelthetechlead8839 Sorry about the confusion on the JS / server side portion. I meant let the server do the heavy lifting - as in PHP. I’m definitely not letting JS do any heavy lifting. It has enough to do in regards to rendering views. Regardless, your video is spot on about PHP not being dead. It’s not and hopefully not ever be.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/qYOtZ3qPnqiqoassi=wbindLE3qfYal-f6 I'll go straight to a framework because it's so powerful