Always choose to contract out our reliable and certified drone services and/or another provider who are able to help you get going. In house programs are very risky as there are many moving parts to a legal RPAS operation. Since RPAS cannot be used on most jobs, it make little sense to invest the large capital for an in house drone program and all the support systems as well:) Call us at 250 507 6421!
@Aleksinda14 күн бұрын
Thanks! it's always interesting to see the projects realized and their continued existence👍
@saull926 күн бұрын
Brilliant !! Too bad the CDC doesn’t do this.
@ytcmb24 күн бұрын
They are
@VictoriaAerialАй бұрын
Want the float configuration? Contact and order patented design from us.
@unkydimmy2572Ай бұрын
I bought a Grade A 3.1ez during an October sale because iGO was sold out of Grade Bs. When it arrived, I noticed a lot of small scrapes and marks on the bike. Although they didn’t affect performance, they seemed contrary to the claim that Grade A refurbished bikes have little to no blemishes and are in like-new condition. Additionally, the bike wasn't running well, with excessive mechanical noise, poor shifting, and loud braking sounds. When I reached out to customer service, expressing that I felt I’d received a Grade B bike at a Grade A price, they offered to cover a brake and derailleur tune-up for up to $125. I requested instead to be refunded the price difference between Grade A and Grade B 3.1ez bikes from the sale. Over a week ago, they asked me to send photos of the issues, which I did immediately. I followed up on the next business day and several times since, but it appears I’ve been ghosted. Despite this, I still think it’s a solid bike. I enjoy riding it, and it will be great for winter commuting. However, I did not receive the Grade A version, and customer service dropped the ball when I didn’t immediately agree to their first offer.
@VictoriaAerialАй бұрын
New H5N1 mutations factor humans kzbin.info/www/bejne/kJCxoZ99rdl5b6ssi=QtKLRs0yod2_IBmw
@agusgt52962 ай бұрын
Bagusss
@jamescarlos91432 ай бұрын
Great aerial photography of this ship. 😊
@danielsnyder35633 ай бұрын
non evasive?
@VictoriaAerial2 ай бұрын
We don’t have to step on the roof to inspect or harm the gutters?
@almon57983 ай бұрын
Why there’s music in the back ground?
@hendamq89654 ай бұрын
Ok ... how much ?
@InfrastructuraRomania4 ай бұрын
Very interesting! 👍👍👍
@ForTheGreys4 ай бұрын
How do you start a career in building and roof inspection using thermal technology? There are certain certifications ive seen, but is that it? or is there a required background beyond that?
@stepanstovpyak34015 ай бұрын
is that DJI 3T ?
@DonJoyce6 ай бұрын
A compelling argument for hiring a professional firm. Well done.
@DonJoyce7 ай бұрын
Nice work! Very professional!
@katandmousetrap7 ай бұрын
Hello from a fellow drone enthusiast. Facebook chose me to show your reel to. Or am I in KZbin? 😜❤ what’s on your tripod? I think you can use a Brytee!
@markbollen80527 ай бұрын
Are you sure you're complying with all legal aspects? the 100 mtr rule for buildngs and vehicles seem to be being breached in your video.
@VictoriaAerial7 ай бұрын
The 30 meter is and old rule. It is now 5 meters from persons unrelated to the advanced operation.
@markbollen80527 ай бұрын
@@VictoriaAerial thanks for the clarification. Been a while since I flew a drone commercially (pre covid). Should've said 100 ft... not mtrs.
@SWAV5208 ай бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3XMgaZpgtt-ocU Check out how close this drone gets to the power lines while in Active Track. The end is the craziest part.
@raindrop23099 ай бұрын
How’s the battery monitor? On mine it can read one or two bars, but it still be blue on the battery. I get very erroneous readings.
@VictoriaAerial9 ай бұрын
Not bad. IT does reflect reality for the most part. I tr and deep cycle it regularly
@VictoriaAerial9 ай бұрын
Drones for land survey applications kzbin.info/www/bejne/gHOpp2eKis-Ngc0si=ny7gfLSV9RsMZyh4 LiDAR equipment
@VictoriaAerial9 ай бұрын
See our drones for land survey applications kzbin.info/www/bejne/gHOpp2eKis-Ngc0si=ny7gfLSV9RsMZyh4
@VictoriaAerial9 ай бұрын
Hire us for LiDAR land survey work. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gHOpp2eKis-Ngc0si=ny7gfLSV9RsMZyh4
@Iceking0079 ай бұрын
Why does the emissivity indicate water penetration? Could this also just not indicate poor insulation with a sealed water tight membrane?
@VictoriaAerial9 ай бұрын
Like bottled water, water holds heat efficiently after sundown.
@tihoprskalo77199 ай бұрын
What software do you ponies use❔ There was an advertisement on KZbin too with camera simulation 🖖🏻🖖🏻
@Phuong.Nguyen-10 ай бұрын
So coo
@DarthFurball10 ай бұрын
15 sec?
@DanielleGarcia-z6j10 ай бұрын
What mapping tool is this?
@VictoriaAerial10 ай бұрын
Drone deploy
@DanielleGarcia-z6j10 ай бұрын
Can you export to GIS or other mapping software's? @@VictoriaAerial
@VictoriaAerial9 ай бұрын
@@DanielleGarcia-z6j absolutely
@precision_aerial10 ай бұрын
I use the 350 and L2 unit also daily . Even though you can hot swap your batteries it is recommended that you do a full power down to switch your batteries. Errors can occur with the equipment so its still best practice to power down the drone on battery swaps. Keep up the content. Have a great day.
@Pablo_M9810 ай бұрын
Dirt berms along the trees has a high chance of killing the trees.
@360DroneMappingLLC10 ай бұрын
Awesome stuff. We have really enjoyed our L2
@martinlagemaat902711 ай бұрын
Hello David, If you flew the L2 over a forested area, is it possible to be able to measure from the data the diameter of the trees at ground level?
@VictoriaAerial10 ай бұрын
I believe so.
@DanielViviano11 ай бұрын
Great video...thanks
@peternyc11 ай бұрын
Excellent video. I see the line of water to the street, by the wooden fence and the telephone pole is established and carries a lot of water. The first video you made about this property did not have the established line of water. Seems like you could line the bottom of the line with stones to prevent erosion and direct/contain the water as well.
@peternyc11 ай бұрын
The determining factor for all the choices you made was that your property has slope to begin with. Given this, you've done a beautiful job. Imagine if you had a completely flat property with zero slope. Then you might have had to use professional help, which is hard to find.
@DonJoyce11 ай бұрын
Cool video, David!
@aaronschmidt7127 Жыл бұрын
What certifications do you have to perform/analyze thermal imaging? How often do you have your thermal camera certified/calibrated? What drone licensing do you need for this?
@VictoriaAerial11 ай бұрын
Advanced TC certification.
@thetilo8682 Жыл бұрын
interesting video! But the "pilot" jumpsuit is killing me!! 🤣😆 Please don't do this - it just looks silly!
@VictoriaAerial11 ай бұрын
I don't wear it often... but why not? UAV pilots wear them. What do you suggest... jeans and T shirt? It is a flight suit.
@TheMistakenGarden Жыл бұрын
This is an interesting thing. I wish I could do something simple like this to get the rain way from my yard.
@juliehorney995 Жыл бұрын
Wonderful! Did you calculate the amount of runoff from your roof in a typical rain event? Perc rate of your soil? Looks like these contributed to the extensiveness of these swales, rain gardens, and spillways. Love the rocks to slow the flow of water. How about some berries in thar too? So cool beans!
@jongardner8264 Жыл бұрын
"PromoSM" 😔
@willcall9431 Жыл бұрын
I’ve seen a 2 foot D section of a Cherokee wing with drone parts stuck in the wing and a gapping hole. A Cherokee on a good day is a 130 knot aircraft depending on powerplant. Of the wing skin the D section portion of the leading edge is the strongest portion of the wing. For a drone to penetrate that like a BB gun through a soda can is alarming. Now put an all wood wing in the mix like an A model Mooney with an 140 knot cruise and it’s possibly a death of the pilot and any passengers they may have on board. I’m both a drone “ operator” and a fixed wing pilot and this scenario gives me chills.
@jeffcoffey5442 Жыл бұрын
Can you explain what you mean by drone inspections being "non evasive" do you mean "non invasive"?
@VictoriaAerial11 ай бұрын
It is not deceptive. It works... but invasive is the thrust. The roof is not subject to more damage by stepping on the structure.
@pinzgauernorcal Жыл бұрын
as long as everyone respects airspace this should not happen
@greghardy9476 Жыл бұрын
Not to mention the toxicity of those fumes
@AndrejPodzimek Жыл бұрын
Yet another flawed experiment yields flawed results. No surprise there. Since the 2018 Gatwick hoax, the systematic crackdown on the RC hobby has been plain stupidity at its worst. Or perhaps just dumb envy at its worst: “Look! This person can independently build and fly something! How so?! I can’t do anything like that! Therefore it must be banned!” That’s the kind of “logic” we are dealing with. General aviation with its hundreds, if not low thousands od fatalities every year is in no position to lecture the zero-fatality RC hobby on safety.
@VictoriaAerial Жыл бұрын
it's a new threat
@DonJoyce Жыл бұрын
Two interesting facts i discovered in my follow up investigation (refer to my videos): The police report gives a different, but precise, lat long for the collision based upon the flight log, about 800m west of the spot the TSB report states. Second, the green dot collision position in the TSB report coincides with the actual crash location on the ground, confirmed in the police report and an eye witness i talked to who saw over a dozen police vehicles invloved in the debris search. The crash was between a Montessori school and a senior's resource centre on Leslie St!
@larryblanks6765 Жыл бұрын
This is the exact reason why quadcopters need required RID platform rc planes don't need them. We don't fly as high as quads do. If you're in a plane, you're traveling too fast to see a quad. And it can destroy a wing.
@AndrejPodzimek Жыл бұрын
Wrong. First, RC planes can and do fly way higher than multicopters ever could. It’s a simple matter of energy density and flight efficiency. Second, neither of them should be at disallowed altitudes when operated properly. Multicopter and plane operators alike have the same responsibility to follow the rules, albeit not the same power to violate them - planes are way more “dangerous” in this regard. Third, the experiment in the video is known to be extremely flawed, because multicopters simply don’t fly at altitudes where the plane’s collision speed would be that high. A real-life collision would occur at speeds at least twice lower, i.e. 4 times less energy would be dissipated in the collision etc. Fourth, general aviation has a lot to learn from the RC hobby community in terms of safety; it would be great if general aviation had zero fatalities year after year (like multicopters and RC flight in general), but that’s obviously not the case at all.
@SpaceStickwithSpaceTick Жыл бұрын
It really sucks that a few absolute morons are causing the FAA to crack down on the RC hobby, a hobby that has been largely unregulated with no problems for the last 40 years. Now even if you build your own drone and always respect the limits given to you by a laanc app, you still have to spend 100 dollars to give away your exact position to anyone who wants it. I have to put a 19 gram 100 dollar RID chip on my 200$ 200 gram drone if I want to take pictures of a wedding. That is just stupid. Enforce RID on ready to fly drones, leave the rest of us out of it. Not to mention how vague the actual laws are. It is completely legal to mount a RID module that outputs a femtowatt of power on a mismatched antenna, as long as it is technically transmitting. FAA did nothing when given suggestions by the hobby community. Plus, if they really cared about safety, they would have us transmit something cheap, like a 900 MHz cw tone or something that could be used to identify drones from birds on radar systems near airports. Why do they need the GPS coordinates and take off coordinates? So they can prosecute someone who brought down a plane? Someone doing that intentionally is not going to have RID. A person who built there own drone is not going to be dumb enough to fly at altitude near an airport. Which leaves DJI, aka ready to fly drones. A CW tone associated with drones would be incredibly cheap and you could actually force all flight controllers to have it built in, making it almost impossible to disable. But no, make us foot the bill for this terribly written and designed legislation.
@yodaiam1000 Жыл бұрын
I think advance certified pilots flying for organizations like the RCMP are more likely to find themselves in a collision with a manned AC. Basic certified pilots and pilots flying recreationally have the luxury of staying away from risky areas. However, worldwide, there have been very few collisions. It is one of the safest forms of flight especially considering the number of flying hours. Of course, RPAS pilots should not fly dangerously or irresponsibly even though it is relatively safe. What is more ridiculous is TC taking the exception away from RC pilots on designated flying fields. TC actually made the airspace less safe by encouraging the dispersion of more drones in the airspace. I think this RPAS pilot was not fined very much. If it was a civilian RPAS pilot with an even less severe infraction, they would have been fined a lot more. I think he was fined as non-commercial/non-corporate entity and was only fined for one infraction which was ridiculous. The fine structure is highly punitive but the RPAS pilot seemed to suffer minimal consequences.