je to super. je někde zbytek epizod?

The theory of many world interpretation is a product of intuitive thinking of Hugh Everett. We have to analyze that what he proposed is a theory that is most plausible (if not precise) to explain the collapse of the wave function. He did not propose a law or principle which is as empirical as the scientific methodology. When we want to embrace the postulates of these brilliant thinkers, we should be philosophical and neither be pseudoskeptics nor destructive critics.

Weinberg says "the philosophical implications of QM are unsatisfactory ". I say because that is the end of atheistic science and a manifest win for theism. Muhahaha

I agree we need a theory that is relative to the nature of everyday life! Could the wave particle duality of light and matter in the form of electrons be forming a blank canvas that we can interact with forming the possible into the actual? In such a theory each photon oscillation only occurs once forming what we see and feel as the passage of time with each photon electron coupling or dipole moment forming an uncertain future ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π.

read abut deterministic quantum mechanics at www.researchgate.net/publication/316622547_Quantum_Telegraph_equation_New_matter_wave_equation

It can't be the same laws for the observer because it's the observation that takes it from wave form..

vlnění častice a co když řeknu že mě to ale vůbec nezajíma?

For a completely different, simple logical understanding of the results of particle 2 slit experiments, you can try my video: "Particle 2 Slit Experiments Explained By Paul Marostica". To find my videos, search: matter theory marostica.

Bohmian Mechanics...

Vše souvisí se vším, jako třeba v D2 prostoru pavučina svými vlákny. To nás v blahé paméti na ČVUT FEL dávno už učili materialističti filosofové. Když nějaký studentík se tehdy drze zeptal, aby ponížil výklad materialistickěho filosofa, jak třeba souvisí babička se střešní taškou, zněla pohotová odpověď prednášejícího: "třeba tak, že při pádu se střechy trefí taška babičku přimo do hlavy". Východní (idealistické) filozofie mluví o karmě a darmě. Řekl bych, že zákony kauzality platí pro celý svět, nejen pro mikrosvět, jen je člověk neumí tak primitivně, jako tomu je v makrosvětě, předem snadno odvodit anebo definovat. Ačkoliv, ani to už dnes tak úplně neplatí, viz pokusy se vzájemnou interakcí dvojice leticích fotonů donucených prolétnou polarizační mřížkou.

Díky za připomenutí něčeho co mohlo díky mému působení v rozhlase vzniknout.

Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe, someday, someday, someday, someday......... 90 years from the formulation of QM and all they have is the above. Probabalism and wave-function collapse upon observation is THE LIMIT - Bohr was right...because he was both SENSIBLE and...HONEST.

Hi , A particle moving in a transmission medium. Kinetic energy of a particle ( charge) moving at the velocity of v has two different values: Kinetic energy of a particle ( charge) Tkin id =mc^2 [ln |1-v/c|+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] in direction of motion of a particle ( charge) It is realy as Newton´s kinetic energy, where v is velocity of a particle ( charge) . Kinetic energy of a particle ( charge) Tkin ad = mc^2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] against direction of motion of a particle ( charge) It is realy as Maxwell´s electromagnetic wave energy, where v is velocity of a particle ( charge). Corrected Third Newton's law of motion : All movements in physics are based on principle of action - reaction and on velocity of stable particles ( e-, p+,n0, D, He-3, α ). Action, as a motion of stable charged particles ( e-, p+,n0, D, He-3, α ), is characterized speeds up in source along ellipse or quasi- elipse ( excentricity e -> 0 ). Action creates unstable particles ( leptons μ−, τ−, baryons, mesons ), bosons W +, W-, Z (= particles = β electrons moving at nearly the speed of light )in direction of motion of stable particles ( e-, p+,n0, D, He-3, alfa ). Reaction creates into transmission medium, the electromagnetic waves, as unstable “particles” - neutrínos νe, νμ, ντ , mesons π0, π+ , π- , η , K and gamma rays (=waves of extremely high frequency >1019 Hz ) - against direction of motion of stable particles ( e-, p+,n0, D, He-3, alfa ). Accompanying activity of reaction on movement of stable particles in the transmission medium are waves, or “unstable particles“ respectively , i.e. neutrinos and mesons. Extraordinary proofs: [32] viXra:1506.0207 submitted on 2015-06-29 01:42:05, (188 unique-IP downloads) New Trends in Physics CD Rom /book, Elementes Pictures, Spheres in Nuclei, Forecasted Nuclei [31] viXra:1504.0082 submitted on 2015-04-10 05:16:10, (80 unique-IP downloads) One Blink of Electron is the Basis Amount of Kinetic Energy 6.62606957x10-34 Js [30] viXra:1503.0056 submitted on 2015-03-07 19:18:06, (110 unique-IP downloads) Confirmation of the Theory Under Discussion Wave-Particle Duality as Kinetic Energy Against and in Direction of Motion in Discussion Group Theoretical Physics !!!! Eureka !!!! [29] ViXra:1502.0184 submitted on 2015-02-21 05:23:36, (174 unique-IP downloads) Einstein's Theory of Relativity Can not Explain ... [28] viXra:1501.0199 submitted on 2015-01-21 04:39:51, (194 unique-IP downloads) Corrected Newton´s Laws of Motion [27] viXra:1501.0198 submitted on 2015-01-21 04:47:40, (83 unique-IP downloads) Principles for the Theory and Its Agreement with Experiment [26] viXra:1501.0197 submitted on 2015-01-21 04:58:33, (179 unique-IP downloads) Wave - Particle Duality as Kinetic Energy Against and In Direction of Motion. [25] viXra:1412.0131 submitted on 2014-12-06 14:12:09, (126 unique-IP downloads) Improvement of Classical Physics [24] viXra:1412.0125 submitted on 2014-12-06 02:24:29, (108 unique-IP downloads) Kinetic Energy According to Einstein and According the Latest Knowledge [23] viXra:1411.0533 submitted on 2014-11-21 11:33:37, (118 unique-IP downloads) Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field is Asymmetrical. [22] viXra:1411.0531 submitted on 2014-11-21 11:46:11, (70 unique-IP downloads) Form of the Interference Field is Non-Linear [21] viXra:1411.0530 submitted on 2014-11-21 12:08:28, (74 unique-IP downloads) Kinetic Energy of a Charge Moving at the Velocity of V Has Two Different Values [20] viXra:1409.0090 submitted on 2014-09-12 06:18:51, (235 unique-IP downloads) Three Objections to Modern Physics [19] viXra:1408.0185 submitted on 2014-08-27 07:41:44, (88 unique-IP downloads) Protons Are Perfectly Stable or Their Lifetime is Enormous [18] viXra:1408.0133 submitted on 2014-08-20 05:06:15, (157 unique-IP downloads) Please Read my Articles in More Detail. [17] viXra:1405.0355 submitted on 2014-05-29 12:55:30, (113 unique-IP downloads) Movement Principles of Ufo [16] viXra:1405.0334 submitted on 2014-05-27 16:07:44, (192 unique-IP downloads) [15] viXra:1405.0308 submitted on 2014-05-25 01:51:26, (113 unique-IP downloads) Who is Right? [14] viXra:1405.0307 submitted on 2014-05-25 01:57:30, (205 unique-IP downloads) What is Quark? [13] viXra:1405.0237 submitted on 2014-05-14 05:14:55, (90 unique-IP downloads) L.vlcek Vixra, Getcited, Book, CD, Conferences 14.5.2014 [12] viXra:1404.0471 submitted on 2014-04-28 11:29:47, (118 unique-IP downloads) Superheavy Spherical Nuclei. Island of Stability [11] viXra:1404.0369 submitted on 2014-04-17 01:31:59, (190 unique-IP downloads) Neutrino Oscillations [10] viXra:1404.0279 submitted on 2014-04-16 03:58:50, (309 unique-IP downloads) Physics is Easy [9] viXra:1404.0273 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:09:57, (202 unique-IP downloads) Particles, Waves and Trends in Physics [8] viXra:1404.0268 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:16:15, (137 unique-IP downloads) Physics is Beautiful [7] viXra:1404.0261 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:23:08, (90 unique-IP downloads) Introduction to my Two Articles Physics is Easy and Physics is Beautiful [6] viXra:1404.0253 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:33:01, (133 unique-IP downloads) Orbit Radius and Speed of the Sun Around the Center of Gravity of the Solar System [5] viXra:1404.0248 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:41:18, (80 unique-IP downloads) Spectral line Hα [4] viXra:1404.0246 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:47:42, (124 unique-IP downloads) Shortened Great Table of Elementary Particles [3]viXra:1404.0243 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:53:01, (206 unique-IP downloads) Great Table of Elementary Particles [2] viXra:1404.0238 submitted on 2014-04-16 05:03:33, (107 unique-IP downloads) Movement Principles of the Fast-Spinning Bodies [1] viXra:1404.0130 submitted on 2014-04-16 03:43:54, (151 unique-IP downloads) Nuclear Fusion Critical examination of fundamentals in physics www.trendsinphysics.info/ academia.edu tuke.academia.edu/LubomirVlcek L. Vlcek, : New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1996, ISBN 80-85665-64-6. Presentation on European Phys. Soc. 10th Gen. Conf. - Trends in Physics ( EPS 10) Sevilla , E 9. -13 September 1996, www.trendsinphysics.info/ THE NEW COORDINATE SYSTEMS IN PHYSICS AND MAGIC NUMBERS

the coppenhagen interpretation =/= many worlds interpretation

To say that there is anything to be called reality requires the whole be defined as existing, probability one, which is apparently divisible to infinity. So within infinity the probability of division into exactly half is possible, which naturally results in a distribution of every combination of "even" separation by this distinction and the same applies for every other chosen factor to infinity. Therefore the property of combination and permutation in compound connection to the connecting probability of one whole has the fractal framework underlying all structure, which appears to be a holographic projection. Choosing two sits to project light or any other quantum objective onto a screen automatically chooses the "evenness" result of the image of the whole and its complimentary opposite or reflection. Ie the process of division, mirroring, interconnecting and compounding, is basic physics and chemistry. The Copenhagen Interpretation description is a necessary step to make sense of complexity.

@5:57 My own view is that for the present we're stuck with the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Uh .. we don't have anything better .. uh .. it maybe that we would find some way that we'll feel comfortable with it. I'm not comfortable with it. Uh .. or it maybe that QM will change in some way. I mean that the theory, not just the interpretation but the theory itself will turn out to be a little different. Unfortunately it's very hard to imagine a theory which is close to QM .. We know that any new theory will have to be very similar to QM 'cause QM works so well so the corrections must be small. It's very hard to find a theory which is nearly QM but is not exactly QM. I have tried and I haven't succeeded in doing that.

Dost dobrý dokument, který by si zasluhoval lepší rozlišení než 240p...

Copenhagen is incomplete at best and most likely flat wrong. The "shut up and calculate" of QM has taken us about as far as we can go. It has been a remarkably useful method, but we need to better understand the underlying dynamics if we wish to make further progress.

Perhaps the knowing collapsed into the mind/universe and became omniscient

A co je na tom tak záhadného? Indičtí mystici věděli už před tisíci lety že realita je iluze, že vše ve vesmíru je jednota a že vědomí (včetně absolutního/kosmického vědomí) je základ všeho. Z něho povstává hmota a život.

Here is the problem as I see it. The role of observer cannot be defined. If consciousness cannot be explained and an observer is conscious, then the observer cannot be explained either. Since we don't know what consciousness is, we have no way to state absolutely that an electron is not conscious. If one electron is conscious, possibly a group of electrons would share a collective consciousness. The different outcomes an undefined observer witnesses might be di librate deception. I would suggest, experimenting with different types of observers to try and find a case where the results seen are different from what scientists see.

prof. DeWitt v 49.30 nehovori o naruseni principu priciny a nasledku, ale o naruseni principu "Occamovy britvy", coz je pravidlo logiky ve smyslu, ze nejjednodussi vysvetleni jevu je nejpravdepodobnejsi. Jeste To Merricus: da se to brat taky tak, ze hustota pravdepodobnosti ma tvar vlny :o)

One thing I've never understood about the Many Worlds Interpretation is this: Aren't the people who hold to this theory the same materialists who demand that every effect have a cause and every process a mechanism? What could possibly be the physical cause or mechanism by which a whole new universe splits off every few nanoseconds?

Where can I see this entire film? The link in the description is dead.

What a great.

If god is all-knowing, how can he think?

I'm sorry Prof. DeWitt, but if you have zero evidence that planets exist in distant galaxies then you can't legitimately claim they do. That's an odd way to defend "Many Worlds". (@7:14)

Co za něco stojí je málo shlédnuto a vůbec nekomentováno. Smutná vizitka nás lidí. Aspoň já děkuji za toto video.

Aeroplanes are fake. There's a firmament up there.

skvělý jako vždycky!

Senzační. A ta latina!

Ak mozem prispieť. tak moj nazor ze castica sa nesprava ako vlna ale ako castica. To ze castica nelety len 3D priestorom ale inimi dalsimi priestormi ktore mi nevnimame a nie ako v dokumente inich svetou ale je len jeden svet jedna realita z inými priestormy napríklad mozme mat ako podla teoriji super strun az 11 priestorov a elektorn prelieta cez vsetkych jedenast a meranim mu urcime smer v jedom rozmery a tedi sa obiavi takze ak elektron leti bez merania prelieta cez vsetky priestory a nevidime ho ako bod ale ako vlnu ale ako nahle narazi tak sa zmeni na bod lebo meranim mu dame smer v danej dimenzii .a kedze merame v nasich v 3 dimenzii tak pristane v nasej dimenzii.

Je krása jak fyzika konečně dokáže připustit kvantovou mechaniku, která přímo souvisí s přírodou-vesmírem-námi-mnou :)

Myslím,že by se dalo souhlasit s tím,že se elektron v jednom okamžiku může vyskytovat na více místech současně,ale fakt mi vadí do jakých absurdit zacházejí (více světů ve kterých mluvíte s jinými lidmi) to je prostě přitažené za vlasy,proč nemohou jen přidat čtvrtý prostorový rozměr?,příliš malý pro člověka ale dost velký pro elementární částici,to by snad nevyžadovalo další dimenze,protože to pak připomíná fantasmagorické a hlavně nedůvěryhodné přehánění,jen myslím že by mohly trochu ubrat.

Tohle je tak přiblblí dokument až mě je na blití! Jak je možný že nevědí zda li je světlo vlna či částice?! Jak je možný že já to vím! Proč se nikdo ksakru neptá zda li je zvuk částice či vlna ..hmm?! To vás nezajímá?! (To je přeci jasný že vlna ty idiote přeci ne!) ANO přesně tak .. je to vlna, ale po čem se ta vlna asi šíří ..hmm? No a jsme u toho! PO ČÁSTICÍCH ŽE! Co že to znamená?! No že světlo je vlnění částic vy hovada! Stejně jako zvuk a to bez rozdílu! A Einstein je idiot prvního kalibru,jediný důvod proč u mě nespadl úplně na dno je Relativita. Nikola Tesla byl největší frajer! A ten řekl (s čímž já na krev souhlasím) že rychlost světla není nejrychlejší! Protože relativita to sama vyvrací tak nevím co ten šašek s vypláznutým jazykem blbnul.

Mi stále uniká, že aký je ten mechanizmus, prečo sa elektróny správajú ako vlny.

Veľmi pekný dokument.

Vynikající dokument, díky!

Parani film!

Naozaj dobre !

Fantastický dokument

Good question. If in the begining of the universe quantum events ocurred, then why is the universe " real "?. What caused the collapse the probabilities?

The Copenhagen interpretation can describe everything using the same physics; you just need to add a Universal wavefunction (Which you can do in the CI!) if the wavefunction is real then the theory is non-local. According to the physicist Michael C. Price, The real problem is that it’s observer-dependent and due to the Kochen-Specker theorem the Universe doesn’t exist in the classical realist sense, not until you collapse the wavefunction. Who then observed the Big bang?

BRAVO!!! BRAVOOOOOOO!!!!