I don’t know anything about that, but she was stalked and threatened. By her ex-boyfriend on social media, a couple or few years ago.

When did that happen, I never heard of that.

@@o_huskywolfdean7 2021 maybe? There were articles about it. She knocked him off his motorbike then got out and berated him before driving off. edit: 2017. She yelled at him for denting her porsche.

@@JDoe-gf5oz Uh, ok. I see.

Beat up a black woman for being uppity.

Beaten up a women who was black and said racist stuff whilst being drunk

Okay first of JDoe no, she went to a nightclub her and Nicola to be girls and have some fun, they were talking to some other girls and got to hanging out, Nicola and Cheryl went to the bathroom where the bathroom attendant was, who was selling sweets n things like that but anyways, Cheryl wanted 5 lollipops two for her and Nicola and 3 for the girls they met, she was going into her purse to get the change to pay the bathroom attendant and the attendant punched her, Nicola was there and saw what happened, Cheryl told her to go and get security, Cheryl did retaliate and hit her back and by that time security had come and taken them back to their VIP spot with the girls they met as well. She explains the whole situation in her book.

Are they not sitting on chairs behind...they would be taller than that if standing ..

And don't let me start with the comments ( some of them made in 2022) WOW! 'She was drunk and young' She's no racist... The lady was being aggressive , she didn't give her lollipops...

@@biokomalabo9468 you clearly don't know the details of the case. Racism was no part of that night. The club itself made up that she used a slur to sell a story. That's why she wasn't charged for racism

@@Adam-zh4hm So it's OK the beat up someone as long as you don't say a racist word. I think you are the one who clearly do not understand.

@@biokomalabo9468 when did I say or even slightly imply that? I think your reading comprehension is a little off sir..

@@Adam-zh4hm I am still trying to understand you. If you don't see anything abnormal in that video, you are part of the problem.

You’re just hating and judging her, because the person she punched was black. But if that person was white, you wouldn’t even give a fuck or care about. Only care about the other person, because she was black. But if that person was right like I said, you wouldn’t even give a shit. Always playing the racist card.

@@o_huskywolfdean7your a clown stop being captain save a Hoe you simp she’s a racist and talentless

you could be right but a lot of people take advantage of getting that one moment in time ,,,she did think that the lollipops were free and she was drunk ,,,, and very young ,,,, but that bathroom attendant probably knew who to start a fight with

If yall actually read her book she explains exactly what happened, she was going into her purse to pay for 5 lollipops and Nicola was with her in the bathroom, and the bathroom attendant hit Cheryl first.

@@ElenaLitzenberger-sh3mc dream on. Cheryl the little thug loved to fight.

Yup she is just a disgusting racist bully

Awwww poor Cheryl NOT

How that make her racist, by her married one?

@@Sammy.H.Redwood Isn't he gay and she was just his beard?

Seriously dude, the toilet attendant attacked Cheryl first. Even in the investigation, there were 2 other witnesses who said that the toilet attendant made aggressive gestures. She doesn’t need to apologise.

I wouldn't have apologized either if the attendant attacked me first either.

@@Meee22222 People just hating on her, because the person she got in a fight with was black. But if the other person was white, no one would give a shit or care. Because the person she got a fight with was black person, they are picturing and making her as a racist person. But like I said if the person she got fight with, was white no one would even care. People just playing the racist card here.

@@tofu9069 >aggressive gestures >attacked her first Does not compute.

Would you say the same if a man did it?

I have a colleague at work who knew her back in the day. She said she was quite a scrapper in her youth, often getting into fights after drinking shit like diamond white, at the Metrocentre, with a bunch of other girls. But then, there was a lot of poverty back then and not much to do. I guess the fight in the toilets was a carry over from that. I don't believe she's racist and she was young. People grow up and change, especially if given opportunities like she had. I don't think that should be held over her for life, especially if she's not behaved that way since.

@@shanefolan Plenty of men have done shit like that and hardly anyone bats an eye. It's almost expected of boys, especially back then. It was only the big deal it was because she was female, there was a racial element to it (found not guilty of that) and in a new group that had a huge amount of publicity surrounding them.

@@sammurray327 '' Plenty of men have done shit like that and hardly anyone bats an eye. '' I struggle to think of any men from a clean-cut pop band who is a role model for kids attacking a black toilet worker and witnesses saying there was racism and them getting away with it. Take That, 1 direction, Boyzone, etc were generally always on their best behaviour. Robbie William only really went off the rails after Take That and having said that he never did harm to others-more himself. ''It's almost expected of boys, especially back then.'' What does that even mean? Brian Harvey[a man] boasted of taking drugs back in 97 and was fired from East 17[a youth-targeted band]. He was also crucified by the media and it ruined the band's image across the media. I'd consider what Cheryl did as much worse as he only talked of his like for drugs-yea it's bad but condoning drugs isn't a crime like her conviction. Again, I struggle to think of any male celeb predominately marketed at kids carrying out such an act of brutality. ''It was only the big deal it was because she was female, there was a racial element to it (found not guilty of that)'' She actually was not found 'not guilty' of that. The bouncer who had heard the racist abuse had spoken to the press before the court so her defense got it thrown out for contempt of court. It was suggested in court (by the defense no less) that the PR persuaded the bouncer to sell a story to the newspaper (probably for financial gain was their angle), which he did do. This allowed the court to dismiss the bouncer's witness statement as contempt of court and the evidence couldn't be used. And no it was not a big deal because she was a woman- had any male member of youth targetted bands like s club 7, 1 direction, etc done similar they'd have been crucified.

@@sammurray327 ''But then, there was a lot of poverty back then and not much to do.'' Sounds like excuse-making or victim-blaming. Like when people blame sexual assault on how women dressed or how they flirted and how the men couldn't possibly have helped themselves. Eh no-Poverty is no excuse for being a thug and what does ''not much to do'' even mean? Cities and towns full of bowling alleys, cinemas, arcades, etc are full of crime and there is plenty to do. What exactly are you suggesting there should be for them to do? She lived in Newcastle-a city, lots more t do there than loving in many of the small towns and villages of the UK. ''I don't believe she's racist and she was young. People grow up and change, especially if given opportunities like she had. I don't think that should be held over her for life, especially if she's not behaved that way since.'' I think you are missing the point. She was convicted of assault. She has never apologised for this. She has always claimed self-defense (despite the courts not agreeing with her) and has always laughed it off and sort of tried to come across as some sort of victim (poor me, I was celebrating my number one and didn't know what a toilet attendant was:cry:). It's very hard for people to let it go when she shows no remorse for it and still claims self-defense, without explaining why it was self-defense. She laughs it off as a drunken altercation and she says that she will teach her kids to do the same thing, which is fine (self defense) but until she can explain in detail why what she did was justified, some people will always think of her as the drunk girl, who high on her own ego, lashes out at the wrong person. Cheryl was convicted of assault and until she explains otherwise, her claims of self defense sound hollow. Her detractors don't bring up her mistake because she has done her time and moved on, they bring it up because she has the image of a sweetheart, who won't accept responsibility for something she did and something she laughs off every time she is asked about it. If she was asked and she said "yes I was drunk and I acted in a way that wasn't right, I apologised, did my time, have never done it again and would always say that Violence is Never the Answer" then I think Cheryl could have won a lot of respect. As it stands, still promoting the whole "self-defense despite the conviction and this is what I would teach me kids to do", just makes her look like an angry chav. Self defense, from my angle, is when another person does or says something that would cause you to retaliate/ defend yourself. Cheryl has claimed self defense but brushes it off as an altercation. Surely if it was really self-defense, she would be able to give a clear account of why she left a woman with severe injuries and she came out unharmed?

Cheryl physically assaulted a black cleaning lady in a nightclub and gave her a black eye

@@greyLeicester Was Cheryl in her senses when she did this?

@@shsh._- it was said at the time that she called her a 'black b!tch' so the accusation was more serious as race hate is worse than just gbh/assault.

@@beanstaIkjack But was she drunk?

@@shsh._- I don't see what that has to do with anything other than possibly another charge for drunk and disorderly. If you were drunk when you raped someone, it doesn't mean you get let off.. If I get drunk and punch a woman in the street in the face, being drunk doesn't make it ok

and gender

She didn't get away with it she was charged with assault and carried out the punishment given her, whatever that was. For a first offence assault doesn't always mean spending time in prison if that is what you mean by 'getting away with it'. She was accused of committing a racially motivated attack and cleared of it. She was the victim in the sense of that accusation. She was cleared on the racism charges but the woman still pursued it for financial gain, hoping to sue her. That's why she's playing the victim. Although I do have to say the first time I watched this I wondered if Cheryl has a hint of sociopath in her... I love her but still not sure haha! At the time it seemed that at the point where she was being sued the press and public warmed to her, what with her only being 19 years old and at that stage unlikely to have seen huge profits from being a popstar. I personally would rather be punched in the face than accused of being a racist. I also find her family background is a relevant factor in assessing her lack of remorse for the woman she punched. Her brother was sent to a young offenders institute for stabbing someone when he was 13 and she was only 11. That's why she can't understand why it was made into such a big deal. Her perspective of being taught to stand up for herself means no remorse if that's what she felt like she was doing, or if she felt threatened. People are still talking about an incident which she more than redeemed herself from through her kindness to others throughout the rest of her career, that means she didn't get away with it.

@@mapsandstuff2923 Just because she was cleared didn't mean she was automatically innocent no smoke without fire 🔥, also the fact she hooked up with a black footballer after seemed fake and a PR stunt to not look racist.

@@caramelbilquees there's also no smoke without lawyers. If she had said anything racist in a busy club how were there no witnesses confirming it? Did Nicola lie at some point? She was there. A racist charge on top of assault would get far more compensation for the victim. Cheryl was a nobody at the time. Had a couple of singles with a reality TV group. She wouldn't have been rich enough to pay off all the witnesses, the judge and the jury. Plus surely by now if there was a big conspiracy someone would have said something. Also marrying someone for a PR stunt 🤣🤣🤣🤣. Did she remain celibate for 4/5 years or did she employ gigolos and prostitutes? Then she dated a dancer that didn't interest the public much. If you watch any interviews after Ashley's cheating, she would have to be the greatest actress that's ever lived to fake all the nuances of her discomfort at talking about it.

@@caramelbilquees She married him though so I don't think she got with Ashley Cole as a PR stunt .. get real.... it wasn't for his money or status either as she wad doing great in her own right....

She punched a black woman in the face. What happened is the black woman was selling lollipops, and Cheryl just took one. When the woman asked for her to pay, she punched her in the face, and called her a 'black bitch.'

@@dannys5704 bloody hell 😳 why are they treating her like a sick patient or something here 😳

@@dannys5704 you mean the toilet attendant hit Cheryl first then punched in self-defence 🙄

We have all done stupid things while drunk. I was really drunk one time, and I attempted to steal the gents Calvin klien aftershave from the selection the toilet assistant had on display. It was a terrible decision which alcohol has a large contribution to. We've all done stupid things, eh!

@@tofu9069thank you was about to say 😂😂

BS

Because Chris brown was in another country. Diff countries diff rules. Also, Chris is a man l. Not saying that it's right but its reality.

She punched a black woman in the face. What happened is the black woman was selling lollipops, and Cheryl just took one. When the woman asked for her to pay, she punched her in the face, and called her a 'black bitch.'

WELL SAID

it wasn't a scrap,it was a 1 sided attack, would you say Chris brown got into a scrap with Chris brown? plus she had the kid with a white man.

scrapper and attacker are 2 different things.

🙄

no the other band members were just as racist, as is the interviewer!

Other girls were doing with the pr told them to do-interview was framed to divert attention from the truth.

@@shanefolan🐎 💩🖕

I think by that point she’d had enough of the publicity over it. I think she was genuinely sorry to a degree but mostly sorry she had to face the negative publicity and consequences. We’ll never know the definitive truth. Sophie blamed Cheryl, Cheryl blamed Sophie. Unfortunately I do suspect Nicola lied to get her sympathy. In any case, Cheryl was stupid to go out getting pissed and landing herself in this awkward situation. Big deal, they were celebrating going to No.1 in the charts. Doesn’t mean you go and get shit faced to that extent. In any case it wasn’t a good look for Cheryl and I can’t really blame people for disliking her after that. That being said, the accusation she’s just a common chavvy lout is a bit unfair. I highly doubt any of the other four girls were intimidated by Cheryl. She’s foolish yes, stupid definitely. But I don’t think she’s an inherently violent woman, I think people just see a working class Geordie and immediately brand her white trash. Which is nasty.

It still is

@@fullmoon2151 No she talks posh broad geordie Like me and proud of it...

Yes! I saw another interview of them talking about it and everyone’s like, “Awe, poor Cheryl! She’s so upset and sympathetic” I’m sitting here like, “Their PR team needs a raise”

They turned her into a victim from villain overnight. But she did hold her hands up and plead guilty.

@@Bertiesghost I almost threw up when Michael McIntyre called her the angel of the north

@@Bertiesghost She didn't hold her hands up to shit-she said to the end it was ''self defence'' etc and that was rejected in court.

I am so sorry to say that Sarah passed away recently from breast cancer.

I think Sarah is alot prettier when Fiona Philipps as Fiona Philipps looks like a witch when Sarah doesn't

@@MsVictorcrumbs I was gonna say Fiona is much older like by 20 yrs and yeah Sarah's prettier,...but no need to be so nasty and cxxxy bout it

no it doesn't.