useless! instead of narrating what he's doing, the guy just makes a few inaudible comments and grunts.
@xitheris175819 күн бұрын
I like how, each time they introduce a new development, they actually show people doing their work. Makes it more human.
@wennyardanaАй бұрын
what about d7 ???
@threeuniquefingersАй бұрын
Thank You Algorith lord for gifting me this GEM!
@waleedalqubati3849Ай бұрын
Thank you for making it easy and clear🙏
@Ahmed-de8qnАй бұрын
Nice explanation Sir
@NYCJFK2 ай бұрын
Very useful lecture thank you
@dopeee12 ай бұрын
tooooooooooooo good explanation
@smoulderingdog2 ай бұрын
Apologies if am mistaken, but I believe you used the phrase "40 micron" at 10:43, referring to the nominal size, and I believe you meant 40 mm. It is still fairly clear because when you make the addition (40 + tolerance amount), it is converted to mm.
@user-qg3qy7yk5b2 ай бұрын
이야... 근본 그 자체인 것 같습니다!!! 감사합니다
@klazzera2 ай бұрын
absolute braindead move, do it again
@BrianSomai2 ай бұрын
thank you
@GrittyGuapo3 ай бұрын
This is a great video no cap
@user-fe8nr4rt8j3 ай бұрын
Awesome Explanation
@horsetowater3 ай бұрын
Thanks Steve Mould for the signposting!
@ankurpatel53713 ай бұрын
Very NICE information....Love From India
@johnhoyle63903 ай бұрын
metal structure crystal forms
@dave17wilsonable3 ай бұрын
That was a great video. It explains grain structure very well
@ToxicallyMasculinelol4 ай бұрын
I've had this explained to me at least 10 times but I never understood it until now. this video is so well made. what the hell happened to our pedagogical abilities? educational videos are absolutely worthless nowadays. I envy people who were educated in the 20th century.
@burtvincent12784 ай бұрын
Wow, thank you. I learned a lot!
@dylanbrady3394 ай бұрын
I love you mahn🥹
@barishsahu46524 ай бұрын
Thanks the Concept of Shear failure is cleared by this explanation.
@mohamadalinagafdari73844 ай бұрын
Good drawing tol
@thetoniest4 ай бұрын
lol
@vikash-royal4 ай бұрын
I never seen better video as this
@dakshpurohit15234 ай бұрын
Very important concept 😮😮
@campbellsmith54844 ай бұрын
Great explanation
@muraliprithivirajan64234 ай бұрын
Simple and very useful..
@SirCharlesNjonjo5 ай бұрын
good illustration
@raymelrodriguez45625 ай бұрын
Thank you!! Great video!
@AliBarazande-fd9ds5 ай бұрын
which sites can I find such a quizes?
@ardianardiansyah16215 ай бұрын
What if the DJ asked?
@smashedgaming57925 ай бұрын
Im just waiting for hi im troy maclure
@Malonpankun6 ай бұрын
Thank you for your hard work. It's a great help to my study.
@constanttensiongpr85466 ай бұрын
Great Video! Could I use a part of this video in a paintless dent removal class? Mike O’Grady
@salimtech95456 ай бұрын
I undestand steel with this vidéo is the best vidéo ever
@queremq6 ай бұрын
the best video about this topic!
@ashokraval71776 ай бұрын
Thanks to teach easy
@ashokraval71776 ай бұрын
I can understand - mins 18 BM. Not seen BM diagram.
@xsimonx26756 ай бұрын
Wer schaut das Video in 2023?
@rubiba77046 ай бұрын
Leik wenn ihr das auch in 2023 Schaudt
@MS-_-48917 ай бұрын
How do you draw it (if at all) in autocad? If not, do you simply add notes/commentary or is there a standard way of dimensioning your drawing....?
@taddmajercin84547 ай бұрын
*promosm*
@thevegg32757 ай бұрын
Also, at minute 27:05 wouldn’t it be better for the perpendicular feature frame to say a perpendicular .020 A arrow B? Like this … Prp sym | .02 in | A>B |
@thevegg32757 ай бұрын
And once again at 10 minutes and 25 seconds there is a call out of perpendicularity of .060 of A to something …it doesn’t specify what surface A is supposed to be perpendicular to. It could be any surface on the part and no one would know which one. wouldn’t it be far,far better to put the other surface C in the feature frame kind of like this // | 0.06| A>C| Is this not 100 times more clear? ?
@thevegg32757 ай бұрын
Also, at minute 9:30 you said, that surface A must be perpendicular within .2 mm of surface B but the call out doesn’t specify anything for A to be perpendicular to Why did you guess surface be as opposed to some other surface?
@thevegg32757 ай бұрын
Hello, thank you for the quiz I have a question at minute four minutes and 49 seconds you have a word parallelism pointing to the outer surface of a feature cylindrical cross-section, and you’re saying that that Has to be parallel to the inner surface of datum C. My question is, should the word parallelism not be pointing to the inner surface of that feature that has the cross-section?
@halonothing17 ай бұрын
I watched this video years ago and enjoyed it every bit as much this time as I did back then. You'd be amazed how much you forget from educational material even after a day or two. Never mind several years.