As a fixed wing IFR pilot, dual autopilot means one pilot channel & one copilot channel. Understand what helicopter 4-axis AP is. What does Airbus mean by dual-duplex 4-axis AP i.e whar does the duplex refer to? Duplex electrical bus? Thanks.
@Loneranger6707 ай бұрын
Beautiful fighter jet, brilliant pilot, corrupt and ineffective government.
@izil1fe8 ай бұрын
Probably the most beautiful helicopter ever made..
@alexs.4340 Жыл бұрын
120kts ias :(
@salaheddinebouteldji2873 Жыл бұрын
هذه الطائرة حينما يرى شخص غبي أدائها المبتذل في الحركات البهلوانية يظن أنها مبتذلة لكنها من أحسن الطائرات المقاتلة المتعددة الخدمات
@heli-crewhgs52852 жыл бұрын
What is the registration of this aircraft?
@m.a.saviation41952 жыл бұрын
That kulula 737 ZS-ZWD Ive flown on that same 1 before in 2013.looks alot different now with the white nose and double winglets
@helicopterovirtual-msfs62542 жыл бұрын
linda aeronave
@marcusjohn66542 жыл бұрын
You just have to love Airbus
@peksu872 жыл бұрын
What did you do with those upper switches at the 1:40?
@davux32 жыл бұрын
First he touches the instrument panel light and changes it from DAY to NIGHT. if you look at the 3 main MFDs you will see they dim when the pilot does this. Next he almost touches a switch which can be for either seat belts or no-smoking signs. He doesn't move it though. Next he changes the pax/cargo light switch from OFF to PAX.
@barrys13423 жыл бұрын
Great videography Much appreciated thanks As a former 35mm anti aircraft gunner I can say very well done on your ‘marksmanship’ 🤩
@pngnadzab3 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait for mine to be delivered…. HypePerformanceGroup mfs2020
@GrumpyAustralian3 жыл бұрын
I was last at Virginia Airport some 50 years ago!
@LockOnNow3 жыл бұрын
Don't get me, wrong guys, i am not saying that the Grippen is a bad plane. It's just I am dreaming of the days when the SAAF Mirages III CZ, and Mirages F-1 CZ, AZ as well the Cheetahs all in their beautiful camouflage colors flow over the skies of South Africa those were the days.
@christiaanroets54833 жыл бұрын
Voel assof die swede geweet het wat ons wil he...
@lawrencemartin11133 жыл бұрын
Is it just me, or does it appear to be that someone is in the car waving? Really hope not!!
@rynopot98503 жыл бұрын
SPARTAAAAAN ! ! ! ! The first SAAF display pilot in SA to do the 4 point hesitation roll.
@tmanf223 жыл бұрын
Why the gloves?
@justwayne47853 жыл бұрын
Keeps hands from slipping due to sweat.
@andyu693 жыл бұрын
I see the problem. He turned the wheel in the direction of the grass.
@kennethaliantluanga13703 жыл бұрын
5 bae hawk t2 aircraft give me i need
@tuantakur23393 жыл бұрын
You forget to... secure the headset Holder
@hansinPH48084 жыл бұрын
The F16 has for almost half a century been the plane to beat. Since the 70s when it came it has been a success, both as an air superiority fighter due to very good aerodynamics and a very good T/W ratio and also as a striker aircraft due to the high payload it can carry. It is a plane loved not only by the pilots but by most all with some insight in this industry. Just looking at the specifications of the F16 it seems that it is equal and in some aspects better than the Gripen but nothing can be further from the truth. And this is more or less independed on version of both F16 and the Gripen. Depending on configuration and version the F16 has an equal or higher T/W ratio, but one needs to consider the wing load and the drag too. The Gripen has much lower drag and far lower wing load. The transonic area is much narrower for the Gripen and it can reach supersonic speeds on dry thrust while carrying a full A2A armament and an external fuel tank even for the A version even if it is just on the limit (Mach 1.1) Gripen E Mach 1.2. Even though the Gripen in some aspects lacks the TWR of the F-16 it can match or nearly match the climb rate thanks to low drag. When curving Gripen hardly lose any energy which makes it a serious adversary in any merge against any modern fighter including the Typhoon and the F-22. The T/W ratio might not be impressive on the Gripen but in combination with the extremely good aerodynamics, low drag and low wing load it can turn inside anything in the air today, The F16 is no match. How about BVR? The latest F16 Block 70 has all the bells and whistles identifying it with modern “4+ gen” fighter and is on some arenas (India) competing with the Gripen E and even seems to win that race. Which only show how little capability is involved in theses affairs compared to politics. The block 70 is a CPR on a plane that no longer can compete with modern fighters in the air superiority arena. It is limited to the NATO armament and will likely not be upgraded to include any development of those. Gripen on the other hand can be configured to almost any armament on the market, NATO or not. In the occasions where they have been flying against each other in exercises as Red Flag and here in Scandinavia the Gripen has no problem holding the F-16 off. During Red Flag 2006 in Alaska one Gripen A pilot knocked down five F-16 block 50+ during close combat. During that exercise Gripen never lost any areal encounter or failed their mission objectives. It was the only fighter that performed all planned starts, while others were sitting on the ground waiting for the weather to clear up. The evaluation was that Gripens capacity needed to be revaluated. And no disrespect to other pilots, they are equally trained and in a Gripen would be performing equally well. During a combat exercise with the Royal Norwegain Air Force, 3 Swedish Gripens went up against 5 RNAF F-16's. The Result was 5-0, 5-0, 5-1 after having flown 3 rounds. However the F-16 is still compatible on the Striker arena, here it can show as a good, robust and reliable striker which for the size can carry a considerable payload, much more than the Gripen. The Gripen can however compensate this with a significant shorter turnaround time, which for a strike mission is never more than 20 minutes, performed by a technician and 5 conscripts in a parking The F16 has for almost half a century been the plane to beat. Since the 70s when it came it has been a success, both as an air superiority fighter due to very good aerodynamics and a very good T/W ratio and also as a striker aircraft due to the high payload it can carry. It is a plane loved not only by the pilots but by most all with some insight in this industry. Just looking at the specifications of the F16 it seems that it is equal and in some aspects better than the Gripen but nothing can be further from the truth. And this is more or less independed on version of both F16 and the Gripen. Depending on configuration and version the F16 has an equal or higher T/W ratio, but one needs to consider the wing load and the drag too. The Gripen has much lower drag and far lower wing load. The transonic area is much narrower for the Gripen and it can reach supersonic speeds on dry thrust while carrying a full A2A armament and an external fuel tank even for the A version even if it is just on the limit (Mach 1.1) Gripen E Mach 1.2. Even though the Gripen in some aspects lacks the TWR of the F-16 it can match or nearly match the climb rate thanks to low drag. When curving Gripen hardly lose any energy which makes it a serious adversary in any merge against any modern fighter including the Typhoon and the F-22. The T/W ratio might not be impressive on the Gripen but in combination with the extremely good aerodynamics, low drag and low wing load it can turn inside anything in the air today, The F16 is no match. How about BVR? The latest F16 Block 70 has all the bells and whistles identifying it with modern “4+ gen” fighter and is on some arenas (India) competing with the Gripen E and even seems to win that race. Which only show how little capability is involved in theses affairs compared to politics. The block 70 is a CPR on a plane that no longer can compete with modern fighters in the air superiority arena. It is limited to the NATO armament and will likely not be upgraded to include any development of those. Gripen on the other hand can be configured to almost any armament on the market, NATO or not. In the occasions where they have been flying against each other in exercises as Red Flag and here in Scandinavia the Gripen has no problem holding the F-16 off. During Red Flag 2006 in Alaska one Gripen A pilot knocked down five F-16 block 50+ during close combat. During that exercise Gripen never lost any areal encounter or failed their mission objectives. It was the only fighter that performed all planned starts, while others were sitting on the ground waiting for the weather to clear up. The evaluation was that Gripens capacity needed to be revaluated. And no disrespect to other pilots, they are equally trained and in a Gripen would be performing equally well. During a combat exercise with the Royal Norwegain Air Force, 3 Swedish Gripens went up against 5 RNAF F-16's. The Result was 5-0, 5-0, 5-1 after having flown 3 rounds. However the F-16 is still compatible on the Striker arena, here it can show as a good, robust and reliable striker which for the size can carry a considerable payload, much more than the Gripen. The Gripen can however compensate this with a significant shorter turnaround time, which for a strike mission is never more than 20 minutes, performed by a technician and 5 conscripts in a parking lot somewhere in a pine forest as close to the battlefield as possible. When it comes to reliability and accessibility Gripen has no match on the modern arena. Also here, even if the payload is not as high it can carry almost anything that is available on the market. The Gripen will be able to do this with an app. Of course some testing is required but not in any level compared with other fighters. Also here Gripen has showed in exercises that it can without AWACs support get battlefield awareness due to the Link 39 P2P system and undetected complete mission objectives and efficiently defend itself if necessary. Gripen is not a stealth aircraft but it is very difficult to detect. In the last role as reconnaissance fighter Gripens performance in Libya showed that is more than reliable, available and always completes the mission objectives. It came down to Libya as a tactical resource but very soon was lifted up as an strategic. Also here it showed how adaptable the plane is, how easy it is to maintain and is always available. One C130 can carry all the equipment necessary to support four Gripen during a month of overseas missions. The Gripen is more expensive to purchase than the F-16 but is half the cost to fly. The choice if you have no political bias is a no-brainer in favour of the Gripen. So how does the Gripen compare to the F-16? It is simply superior. F-16 is an excellent of the shelf fighter if you for some reason can´t afford Gripen and must buy US made, but it is time to put it in a museum. If the customer must buy US I would look at Super Hornet, Super Eagle or if you want to get ripped of the F-35. Yes the F-35 will probably be superior in many aspect but the cost to fly it will kill any defence budget short of the US."
@pedrosabino87514 жыл бұрын
Good choice Brazil.
@speechtherapy17854 жыл бұрын
Amazing 👌😍
@goldenboyi19894 жыл бұрын
RIP Kobe.we will never forget
@hansmania70414 жыл бұрын
That is some really nice footage from the cockpit. What camera was used for that?
@rynopot5 жыл бұрын
Great video Mnr. Griesel. Love die sunset en die HD kwaliteit saam met dit. EN daardie tyd v d aand wys die afterburner ook mooi.
@kenbrand89725 жыл бұрын
Nice helicopter but the bell 429 is quieter and a whole lot smoother
@newspilot024 жыл бұрын
May be true but the 429 is a dog! The 145 blows its Doors off in performance.
@kenbrand89724 жыл бұрын
newspilot02 not necessarily, because the 429 was designed specifically for ems work. The pilot’s love the smoothness especially for patients. And vip’s love it for the same reason. It’s mostly because of the rotor head which is spherical while other helicopters use a rigid rotor head which creates too much vibration especially when turning.
@newspilot024 жыл бұрын
We have an H145 and demoed a 429 before that. With full fuel the 429 o ly has 500 useful load. It's a turd in the wind! We can still get full fuel and 5 people in our H145.
@kenbrand89724 жыл бұрын
The bell 429 usefull load is 2755lbs . Full fuel is 1371lbs making useful load after full fuel 1384lbs not 500lbs
@newspilot024 жыл бұрын
Are going by numbers posted by Bell on the internet or an actual 429 and it’s WB? The one we had demoed was 500# useful. Not saying you’re wrong just my experience was not what you are saying or what Bell claimed. But to be fair Airbus thinks way too highly of their product and are excessively overpriced.
@tuppy10435 жыл бұрын
in birmingham
@tuppy10435 жыл бұрын
i saw where we go plane spotting
@_aidid5 жыл бұрын
But why? Accidentally?
@pathfinderexo57883 жыл бұрын
No on purpose
@dismoptism55415 жыл бұрын
Jeez you were not kidding about ultra smooth! It's like watching a flight simulator. The flight attendant even sounds as if she's fallen asleep during that approach.
@BrianPSpurr5 жыл бұрын
Well done Gerard!
@asheshinfinite37665 жыл бұрын
This helo seems to have a much lower HUD panel than others in it's category, giving it excellent visibility to it's pilots!
@lluvik24505 жыл бұрын
i love the sound the gripen makes when it's coming in your direction, it's way more pronounced in person. it's almost as if you can hear it sucking in air, then the sound turns and you just hear the pure roar of the jet. love that
@heavygustav5 жыл бұрын
Good SOUTH AFRICA
@MC-tt2ee5 жыл бұрын
Very good video! Fantastic light. And a terrific performance of pilot and aircraft, nice!
@dennisquijada87145 жыл бұрын
The PAF will have this planes!
@matthewolivier28835 жыл бұрын
Pakistani air force?
@humpreygarduque82205 жыл бұрын
@@matthewolivier2883 Philippine AirForce..
@salvadorceriaco68573 жыл бұрын
Best Gripen JAS39C/D MS20. for Phil. PAF.
@coledeines93545 жыл бұрын
epaulets... seriously douscher?
@3204clivesinclair4 жыл бұрын
Cole Deines A requirement in certain countries. Private or commercial.
@heli-crewhgs52852 жыл бұрын
This is an offshore aircraft. Uniforms with epaulettes are standard. It’s about professionalism - clearly, you don’t understand the concept!
@sandisomazibuko18895 жыл бұрын
which country is that?
@sandileshezi43525 жыл бұрын
Lanseria International Airport is situated north of Randburg and Sandton to the north west of Johannesburg, South Africa.
@sandilekhoza82034 жыл бұрын
SA
@KimJakab6 жыл бұрын
Väldigt intressant och bra skriven diskussion om Gripen och dess förmåga i nedanstående länk! wisemanswisdoms.blogspot.com/2014/09/gastinlagg-gripen-e-vs-jsf.html
@natiqalsudani95886 жыл бұрын
Really I feel proud,that Linköping city produces Gripen 39E
@FredrikElgstrand6 жыл бұрын
Nice display, great filming!
@jaredkruger97506 жыл бұрын
Well done sir
@MrLordwrecker6 жыл бұрын
At about 2:08 the damn thing goes nose up then 90degrees left bank wow.
@tahititoutou38026 жыл бұрын
I don't know whether it is the plane or the pilot, but this display seems lame compared to what Russian pilots can to with a Sukkhoi! kzbin.info/www/bejne/pWHXo6J3op2omrM
@stefanpersson64754 жыл бұрын
Yeah.. what that Russian pilot is doing is dumping all his speed. Do that in a combat situation and you're dead within 5 seconds.
@lowpassfilter95694 жыл бұрын
@@stefanpersson6475 In a dogfight, which is rarely the case these days, it is useful. They learned from the swedes doing the cobra back in the 80's. But in the terms of avoiding a SAM the SU-35s movements isn't that helpful. I'd rather be in a Gripen avoiding a SAM missile, at least from what information has come forth about the two planes.
@christiaanroets54833 жыл бұрын
don't have 1000's of birds to burn son......here in sa we bring a knife to a gunfight....
@RaviShankar-pd3gy6 жыл бұрын
Wow !!! Spectacular
@rynopot98506 жыл бұрын
Lovely quality video camera. You should rename the video to sunset display though - the afterburner is clearly visible and may get a few extra eyes on this clip. Also invest in a Fluid tripod - they are expensive but will help tremendously with shake. Last thing - one tip - when i film these guys, I zoom in when they are far out, but as they get closer , I zoom out - it's impossible to keep them in view properly. And play around with zoom - sometimes getting too close spoils the shot a bit - a vital error I made a 1000 times. Hope you are at AAD in September, as i was jobless for 2 months and can't afford a flight ticket and a B&B at the moment.
@devgru81976 жыл бұрын
Damn, nice avionics! Love the fuel quantity indicator on the EICAS.
@dataduck8116 жыл бұрын
Canada.. wake up n get a hold of this!
@matthewolivier28835 жыл бұрын
It would definitely be the best choice for Canada, more capable and easier and cheaper to maintain than both the f16 and the hornet.
@damyouggw3 жыл бұрын
@@matthewolivier2883 if we were to get a lot then I would say yes, but Canada is an extremely large country and we are only getting 88 new fighters, stealth is a force multiplier and unless we get several hundred new combat aircraft, we are going to need something with stealth, think about it this way, if Canada gets invaded, we are going to need to take land back and that involves bombing, we are not a small European country we are the second largest country on the planet