🙏🏻❤️

❤️🙏🏻

Great ❤❤❤

Very powerful, love it! ❤ Thanks very much!!!

Your videos have become the staple of my daily Sadhana. I listen to your videos every day. Like others, i want to express my deepest gratitude for your work in brining Robert to our presence. This is such a huge gift. Robert was a true Jnani. This is self evident. His teachings are golden and grace emanating through Robert. Namaste!

.Mind I vs Heart I... In end Heart wins Mind I merging with Heart I❤

Thank you for sharing these audios. ❤

just sayin..wonder what he's say different if he were born a female..just sayin..

pure truth

The silent treatment is powerful.

In the end, it is enough to do this. Thy will be done 🤍

Thank you thank you so much🙏💝

❤ You are doing a really really good job. Keep it up. For us, seekers, hearing Robert's voice (though AI) is real bliss. Reading is not the same as hearing. Thank you.

This pointing is powerful and resonates mightily in my being! 🙏🏽 Thanks for sharing your wisdom in all of these videos. ✨️🕉

❤ thank you

Hallo. I appreciate your videos so much. I been enjoying R .Adams videos for 20 years , I am happy other people can enjoy this beautiful Jnani. Thank you from all my heart ❤

This may be helpful to some: "Every time there is a reaction, whether it is a thought or an emotion, we stop it. As soon as we catch it, we stop it. We do not think about it. We do not judge it. We stop it and we come back to the field of awareness" Lincoln (higher self)

Very powerful, thank you

Thank you so very much.

♥♥♥♥♥

Great message but…The AI is a turn off.

I'm not my body I'm not my mind only awareness when I realise I am that I am and not I' am this or that with labels and ego you then start to awaken

That lady talked to an enlightened being in the park every day... she is so lucky!!!

Thank you so much for making Robert’s lectures easier to listen to. This is truly a blessing. ❤😊

This talk alone says it all ♥️

If you read the sermons of the 14th century Christian mystic, Meister Eckhart, you will come across the same ideas but expressed in the idioms of his day. He talks about having to 'go through' the various Catholic rituals, the mass, the theology, the idea of Jesus as the Son of God, indeed even the idea of God itself. All these things and ideas are necessary because people are at different stages in the understanding of that which cannot be understood. Many need things which can be seen and grasped. He points to the danger of clinging onto these things. 'Those who seek the Ways of God, find the Ways, but lose God'. As the individual progresses they move from the material forms of worship into the Great Silence. Once this Silence truly arises, the 'Ground of Being', or 'Godhead' is revealed, of which nothing can be said since it is beyond all forms of expression. Although there are those who believe this can be sought for, they are wrong. For this arises only when nothing is sought. The seeker ceases to be a seeker and simply is. In Advaita terms, the Godhead is the true state beyond all states - not Oneness (which is still a dualistic term) but Non-Duality.

😍❤🎈

The swan at the end… what timing…. so beautiful! 🙏🏼

Wonderful 🙏

Thanks to this channel for introducing me to Robt Adams. My long story short, is that a forum post made by a participant at a retreat I attended this summer referenced a JOHN WHEELER book as the most direct and most clear message that’s out there. I actually had his digital books in my library and upon my first reading a few chapters I agreed wholeheartedly. I blew off the balance of the retreat and devoured every J.W. online talk and interview that’s available. During this study-time, so much dross burned away as I abandoned seeking and finally experienced the bliss I’d heard so much about. The J.W. talks on this channel were the last I’ve found. Afterwards, your Robt Adams videos started showing up in my feed. I did not know this name and what I found about is his bio was he made claims but there’s no proof he was with Ramana Maharshi yadda yadda. For the longest while I didn’t open a video. But eventually I did. All I can say is: what a perfect teacher to learn from after J. W.! Robert is soooo relatable and I love that he teaches WHAT an aspirant’s daily life might look like for those determined to WAKE 🆙 I used to be jealous of people who grew up focused upon a career/life/travel path that informed their decision making along the way. I never had that focus, though there seemed to be a yellow brick road that I was following indirectly. I say indirectly because my path was guided by Neti-Neti decisions about what I felt wasn’t right or that I know I didn’t want. From where I stand now, I can see that my meandering path has indeed been perfect for me as I embrace a self-inquiry discipline in what feels like the final stretch toward fully divesting of the body-mind idea, transcending I-Thought and becoming radiant with the bliss of that which is absolute. 😊 Many, many thanks 🙏🏽 and May this channel ignite many, many spirits toward “🔥 🎉 🔥” Awakening and Sat•Chit•Ananda. 😮

Though metaphysical solipsism inescapably is problematic, transcendental solipsism inescapably is apodeictic. It is common to argue for the reality of a plurality of minds on the basis of apparent intersubjective agreement, but this is an appeal to the stone à la Dr. Samuel Johnson. In the same way that Johnson kicked the stone to show, against Berkeley, that mind-independent matter exists (but failed, because Berkeley does not deny that the perception of stones or pain is real), appealing to apparent intersubjective agreement is an appeal to the stone against solipsism: the solipsist does not deny that there is immanent regulative intersubjective agreement, he only doubts (problematic solipsism) or denies (dogmatic solipsism) that other minds have constitutive transcendental reality. I distinguish between two types of solipsism, metaphysical and transcendental (or critical): metaphysical solipsism entails that only one mind (oneself) exhausts existence (metaphysical solipsism is problematic, never assertoric, never apodeictic); transcendental (or critical) solipsism entails that, even if a plurality of minds exists, no one possible mind could ever possibly interact with any other possible mind (transcendental solipsism is apodeictic). Incidentally, it is worthwhile to mention David Hume’s statement, as he writes in the Treatise of Human Nature, that “To begin with the senses, ’tis evident these faculties are incapable of giving rise to the notion of the continu’d existence of their objects, after they no longer appear to the senses. For that is a contradiction in terms, and supposes that the senses continue to operate, even after they have ceas’d all manner of operation”. And, as he writes in his first Enquiry, “It is a question of fact, whether the perceptions of the senses be produced by external objects, resembling them: How shall this question be determined? By experience surely; as all other questions of a like nature. But here experience is, and must be entirely silent. The mind has never any thing present to it but the perceptions, and cannot possibly reach any experience of their connexion with objects. The supposition of such a connexion is, therefore, without any foundation in reasoning”. Transcendental solipsism (that is, critical solipsism) is apodeictic because it entails a contradiction to say that the mind can extend beyond its own limits; viz., transcendental solipsism is not merely an empirical observation about the limitations of mind, but rather follows necessarily from what mind is. The very concept of mind transcending its own sphere of immanent representations (perceptions, ideas, judgments, etc.) is self-contradictory, such that transcendental solipsism inevitably is apodeictic, even if metaphysical solipsism is problematic (metaphysical solipsism is never assertoric, never apodeictic). The distinction between the apodeictic nature of transcendental solipsism and the problematic nature of metaphysical solipsism thus emerges from the same logical principle: the impossibility of mind transcending its own sphere. In the case of transcendental solipsism, this impossibility establishes its truth with logical necessity; in the case of metaphysical solipsism, this same impossibility ensures the question of the transcendental reality of other minds must remain perpetually undecidable. Transcendental solipsism must be apodeictic: the very concept of mind transcending its sphere of immanent representations is self-contradictory, and even any conception or judgment of such transcendence would itself be an immanent representation in mind; in fact, any perception, idea, judgment, belief, conviction, feeling, sensation, and literally everything that constitutes one’s mental life is an immanent representation, such that transcendental (or critical) solipsism is inescapably apodeictic. There is no mental content or activity whatsoever that escapes being an immanent representation. The very concept of mind transcending its sphere of immanent representations is therefore necessarily self-contradictory: any attempt to even conceive of such transcendence would itself be an immanent representation. This makes transcendental solipsism inescapably apodeictic: it is not just that one happens to be unable to transcend one’s representations, but rather that the very idea of doing so is self-contradictory, since any such idea would itself be an immanent representation. The impossibility follows from the very nature of mind and representation. And of course, this realization itself - including my current understanding of why transcendental solipsism is apodeictic - is itself an immanent representation: every thought, every judgment, every perception, every belief, every aspect of one’s metal life is immanent representation, such that transcendental solipsism must be apodeictic. Eo ipso, any metaphysical position which asserts the transcendental reality of things-in-themselves, of other-minds-in-themselves, object permanence (continued existence of objects after they no longer appear to the senses), etc., is what Kant called “transcendental illusion”. The transcendental illusion inheres in supposing we can somehow reach beyond our immanent representations to grasp or make claims about transcendental reality. But any such supposed “reaching beyond” would itself be an immanent representation. This is why Kant identified it as an illusion: it involves taking what are necessarily immanent representations and mistaking them for knowledge of transcendental reality. This ties back to why metaphysical solipsism must remain problematic while transcendental solipsism is necessarily the case. The transcendental illusion involves forgetting that all our mental contents (perceptions, ideas, judgments, private language arguments, transcendental deductions, degrees of confidence, etc.) are necessarily immanent representations and can never establish claims about transcendental reality. Of course, even if transcendental solipsism is apodeictic, it does not follow that one cannot uphold the regulative validity of the idea of other minds: even if one agrees that the constitutive transcendental reality of other minds is problematic, practical reason still allows the regulative validity of the idea of other minds (even if granting regulative validity amounts to an immanent representation too).

Lovely soooo wise thoughts. Wu Wei …just let go, the river will go where it wants and take you along. Welcome what comes as it changes all by itself. Don’t worry, be happy 🙏🏽🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽

My heart bows to you! 🌹🙏🌹

1. Be aware of *I am* sense of I am 2. Understand the transience of I am. 3. Dis identify from the Body and mind 4. Observe consciousness as a phenomenon after stabilization 5. Transcend all concepts including I am. 6. Rest in absolute

💜🕉️💜 ❣️ 🙏🙏🙏

❤

The highest truth is Jesus Christ!

There's no good, no bad, but lots of stupid in this world. (i dont think Robert would mind the observation). If so, im sorry.

Yesss 💓 we're in this world but not of this world 🙏 Amen

💖✨💎immense gratitude de nous partager cet enseignement! ✨💎🙏💝

Is this actually Robert Adam’s voice and words or is this AI generated?

This is so beautiful ❤

his best so far...

I find listening to this AI version of Robert speaking is much easier at .75 playback speed. 😊

Everything is divinely orchestrated!!!! EVEN the election. Let go of what you cannot change. Stay in the present, be in the present. Trust the unfolding. Only you can make the choices for you life. You can ask others what you should do, but ultimately, you make the decisions what feels right for you.

Beautiful ❤🙏

🙏🏻❤️

My heart and mine are experiencing a Great Disappointment over the 2024 U. S. Elections a few days ago. It was so deep that my thoughts just hit a brick wall and I couldn’t even ask how and why things turned out the way they did. I signed up for an online weekend meditation retreat. Thank you so much for this reading of Robert Adams! A wonderful wake up, call as I was deep in the dream gone nightmare!

Thank you for sharing 🥰 So true ❤