How I expose Black & White Film
16:50
Tips for Better PORTRAITS
25:12
3 жыл бұрын
On-Location Portrait walkthrough
15:56
Making my first Hand-Painted backdrop
13:04
HASSELBLAD 40mm CF FLE Review
13:14
3 жыл бұрын
Hasselblad CF lenses : 40mm VS 50mm
10:04
A Portrait Photographer's Summer
8:16
Photography tips collection : vol. 1
8:17
Пікірлер
@user-tn1bv1dx2w
@user-tn1bv1dx2w Күн бұрын
Really awesome shots
@buyaport
@buyaport 4 күн бұрын
The first questions should be: What format do you want to scan and how large should your resulting files be? For medium and large format negatives a flatbed scanner still beats most fullframe cameras. But cameras are better for 35mm film. If you don't need more than 14 megapixels in the resulting picture a micro four thirds camera is best, because it offers more depth of field and macro lenses for this system can get closer with magnifications up to 2.5x. For higher resolutions a fullframe camera is needed but you will need extension tubes or bellows as demonstrated in the video (because even macro lenses cannot get close enough to fill the frame with the negative) and the whole set-up is more fiddly because of the very shallow depth of field even with f11.
@marlonsouza9224
@marlonsouza9224 8 күн бұрын
Incredible! So much insight!! This is a masterclass! Thank you so much!!
@jean-claudemuller3199
@jean-claudemuller3199 19 күн бұрын
Hi Nico Rodinal doesn't shine for sensitivities above 100 ISO, You should definitely try liquid T-Max or x-Tol developpers with this film. A nice solution (but expensive) is Portra 400 color negative converted in B&W during scan. My own choice for long years is Tri-X exposed at 200 ISO developped in over-diluted HC110 ( Ansel Adams recipe in his book The Negative)
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 8 күн бұрын
@@jean-claudemuller3199 Hi Jean Claude! Thank you for stopping by! I have a couple bottles of x-tol clone (from Bellini) that I picked up while travelling. Haven’t gotten around to using them yet, if I ever shoot a large amount of fast film for a project I’ll definitely give that a shot. I standardised on Rodinal because it’s not that easy to have access to everything in Norway. I wanted a developer that I can walk into a shop and buy a bottle of. Ordering online doesn’t always work due to shipping restrictions on some chemicals. common developer like D76 can sometimes be out of stock for weeks until the importer gets a new shipment… With time, I have become very dependant on the compensating aspect of Rodinal. I can use it 1:25 to bring some punch to flat scenes, or 1:50 to tame the contrast of bright sunny days. I even have a recipe at 1:100 for extreme flattening of the curve, for example if I've shot indoors and i want detail both inside and outside the windows… This took me to a place where i'd rather find a film that plays well with Rodinal rather than choose any film and then figure out which developer is good for it. so far i like : 80iso : FP4 100iso : Tmax100 200iso : Tri-x 400iso : Tmax400
@jimlafferty
@jimlafferty 26 күн бұрын
This is a great video, goes down easy on a summer day like a citrus seltzer, just enough of a suggestion of things to think about. I like your idea of presence, and I would suggest another: participation, as in, the subject displaying an engagement with the process of being photographed, a connection with and an ability to be vulnerable in the presence of the photographer; an awareness that a photo is being made, and how they work to subvert the obvious contrivance to make something sincere :D
@raumnachoben8256
@raumnachoben8256 Ай бұрын
Hi Nicolas, I find your videos are really good quality input for someone starting out in Photography. I`m gonna try to stick to deliberate Topics on my next rolls.
@tompaste387
@tompaste387 Ай бұрын
NO, its the fastest lens in the line up
@illitrait
@illitrait Ай бұрын
...love this isht. And you get extra points for the bird. Subscribed.
@kikevigp
@kikevigp Ай бұрын
Hey Nico, just discovered your channel and after a couple of very good old videos I watched this one and you blew my mind. I'm not used to this kind of "philosophical" approach to photography and I love it. It makes me think about my own work. Thank you very much and pleas keep the videos coming. Un saludo
@AlessioFalascaZamponi
@AlessioFalascaZamponi 2 ай бұрын
Much inspiring! thank you very much!
@salmorreale7900
@salmorreale7900 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for posting, very informative. An unrelated side note. Thank you for showing your parakeet.
@paulhenry7
@paulhenry7 2 ай бұрын
The mainstay of many pro photographers doing weddings and portraits, for decades, was the 80mm Planar and the 150mm Sonnar.
@richardsimms251
@richardsimms251 2 ай бұрын
Great discussion
@darrelltheriault5793
@darrelltheriault5793 2 ай бұрын
Great video and a very clear presentation of the topic. Can’t wait to see what’s next.
@Renzsu
@Renzsu 2 ай бұрын
More verbal tools to express meaning and intent! Very nice video Nicolas!
@george9615
@george9615 2 ай бұрын
Super interesting
@FF-ii6ly
@FF-ii6ly 2 ай бұрын
Great video once again, thanks for the useful thoughts and content! :)
@fabricetranzerphotographer
@fabricetranzerphotographer 2 ай бұрын
This is such a central topic. Thank you Nico for being so eloquent. Absolutely on point!
@IM-Silviu
@IM-Silviu 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for posting and glad to see you well.
@antoniorussell9893
@antoniorussell9893 2 ай бұрын
Superb explanation. Thank you!
@hansolhwang-su3sc
@hansolhwang-su3sc 2 ай бұрын
Long time no see 😂
@marcels.6514
@marcels.6514 2 ай бұрын
Wow Nico, wow! Very thoughtful, very helpful. Thank you very much for that. Looking forward to another time when you talk about something else. Compliments!!
@joshuacarlson3405
@joshuacarlson3405 2 ай бұрын
I really appreciate your content. It is helpful toward growth in my own expressions. I wish more channels were “focused” on discussions like this instead of gear reviews. Well done, thank you for being my teacher today.
@matthewjeffries4621
@matthewjeffries4621 2 ай бұрын
Nicolas, I absolutely love your channel! I have watched every video (at least once) and was curious if there are any other channels you like or would recommend? Thank you for making all of these I have watched A LOT of photography videos on here and they pale in comparison.
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 2 ай бұрын
Thank you Matthew you are too kind! 😅 I have the script for the next two videos ready, so they should come soon. On KZbin I have enjoyed and revisited several times : “Wrong side of the lens” A talk by Sam Abell called “The Life of a photograph” (several versions are online, he has given that talk a few times over the years and the content evolves slightly) I follow the Louisiana Channel, it’s not only photography but the videos are well made and always inspire me in some way. I don’t follow any of the one-video-a-week photography guys, but I do watch Nick Carver and Bryan Birks on and off. “Walkie Talkie” is also a great series, but I don’t watch every video all the way through. You usually know within the first 5min if there’s something to learn or not. I try to be mindful of not spending too much time on KZbin, so I keep a sparse diet on purpose.
@AI-Hallucination
@AI-Hallucination 2 ай бұрын
Rays a laugh not sure people outside of Birmingham understand that book sorry
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 2 ай бұрын
Gatekeeping a photobook lol
@peinmilan
@peinmilan 2 ай бұрын
Repeat the test with correct development times. Until that any discussion is pointless.
@Batou_73
@Batou_73 3 ай бұрын
Nicolas I absolutly adore your channel. Your videos always give inspiration and add to technical knowledge. The photos in this video are exceptional. A lot of the panoramic stuff I see feels somewhat dead or sterile to me. But this feels so alive and in the moment. You can really feel that you handheld some of those shots. I really like the fall off of light in the corners it puts a highlight on your subject and adds character and weight to the center. The shot of the yellow surfboard with the surfer is surreal. I could feel the salty cold water in my faces just wonderful! One of your best shots in my opinion. And the last picture were your son is looking back to you perfectly exposed you see the expression while still shooting into the sun with such a fantastic backdrop. Fantastic!
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 3 ай бұрын
Hi! Thank you so much for the kind words!
@jean-claudemuller3199
@jean-claudemuller3199 3 ай бұрын
In the Hasselblad compendium documented NASA Hasselblad lenses are: 38 Biogon (SWC), non reflex 50 f:0.7 Planar (only 10 built), special NASA lens, non reflex 60 Biogon special NASA only lens for moon surface, non reflex 80 Planar 100 Planar 105 UV Sonnar 250m Sonnar 250mm SA Sonnar, engineered on NASA request 500 Tele Tessar The 180 Sonnar was specially engineered for NASA but never used by them. some 150 Sonnar and 50 Distagon were prepared in NASA versions but never used by them
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 3 ай бұрын
TIL! Wow I had no idea. Obviously I haven’t been on the moon myself to check what kind of lens the Apollo missions left behind. I was repeating stuff I’ve read online… thank you for setting the record straight! 🙏🏻
@dylanhill1640
@dylanhill1640 3 ай бұрын
How do you feel about the Hasselblad 100mm 3.4 lens for portraits?
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 3 ай бұрын
Hi Dylan. I actually just bought that lens so it’s a bit too early to have an opinion. In general, I know from using the 120mm that anything wider than the 150mm is gonna have you very close to the sitter for closeup portraits. I imagine with a 100mm you’d get quite a bit of a « big nose-tiny ears » effect going on if you’re framing a head an shoulders portrait. On the other hand 100mm is ideal for environmental portrait, when you step back a little and include some detail around the sitter.
@dylanhill1640
@dylanhill1640 3 ай бұрын
@@nicolaslevy2657 Thanks Nicholas.
@jbezerk
@jbezerk 3 ай бұрын
Incredibly informative video. Thank you!
@jbezerk
@jbezerk 3 ай бұрын
Im trying to educate myself further exposing film and this is an amazingly instructive video. The tip of metering facing up, and the concept of second most lit spot are very practical. Thanks for your content!
@benny2109
@benny2109 3 ай бұрын
What a gread video and some gread work to handle a scene. But there is one or two qestions left for me. First... how do you handle your meter? I think its importent if your dome light (kalotte) is facing the light source or straight to the camera (half light source half shadowed)!?! How do you handle it? And only to understand.... if i want more contrast in the negative i can only metering the first light zone? Cheers Benny
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 3 ай бұрын
Hi Benny! Yes you got it. Metering for the brightest light source will give darker shadows, which can lead to more contrast. I always point the dome straight at the light source. Wherever you decide to point the dome, what’s important is to be consistent, so you get repeatable results.🤓
@SS-jt9ex
@SS-jt9ex 3 ай бұрын
You failed to say that you need to shoot the whole roll at the same iso.
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 3 ай бұрын
Hi. Yes, that felt obvious to me, but I should’ve mentioned it for the beginners out there. ✌🏻
@huitebos8867
@huitebos8867 3 ай бұрын
No. Please no
@Renzsu
@Renzsu 4 ай бұрын
Hey Nicolas, I miss your videos man, even if it's just showing some of your recent work. Hope all is good!
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 3 ай бұрын
Hi, thanks for reaching out! I’m good. I haven’t given up on the channel, but there’s been obstacles to me making one. Loud birds. Two of them. They are the obstacle. Thanks for the encouragement, I’m gonna drop something soon. Just have to move the birds out of the room for a day. 😅
@Renzsu
@Renzsu 3 ай бұрын
@@nicolaslevy2657 The birds are funny, but probably not ideal for recording :) Take your time!
@drewsleyy3836
@drewsleyy3836 4 ай бұрын
Wonderful video, I’ve been trying to grasp this concept and this was super helpful! I’m still a little bit confused about one thing though - the idea of how this concept combines with pushing or pulling the film. Pulling makes more sense to me, but pushing…I get confused. If I’m shooting a low contrast scene with film normally rated for 400 at 1600, and exposing for open shade, you’re saying if I then push two stops in development it won’t blow the highlights because I’m (1) underexposing, and (2) the highlights are fairly close to the open shade values?
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 4 ай бұрын
Hi Drew. I think you got it : when you’re pushing 2 stops and still metering for open shade, you bump the contrast but should still retain highlight detail if the scene was flat. I’d say considering the dynamic range distribution of most films, a 2 stops push for a flat scene is more likely to yield blocked shadows than clipped highlights. But of course the final word is down to you, with your specific film, developer and technique… That’s why some photographers take notes. Try to push 2 stops on the next cloudy day and see how that works.
@drewsleyy3836
@drewsleyy3836 4 ай бұрын
@@nicolaslevy2657 Thank you for responding! That makes sense and lines up with what I was thinking, excellent and good to know. Appreciate you 🙏🏻
@matthewjeffries4621
@matthewjeffries4621 4 ай бұрын
Just stumbled upon your channel. Thank you for this content! Nice to learn from someone who knows what they are talking about!
@TheRoamingtexan
@TheRoamingtexan 4 ай бұрын
I don’t think getting rid of 80mm is necessary but I do think that you should move in closer with the 50mm. Work on having a tighter composition especially with people.
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 4 ай бұрын
Hi! Thanks for the tip! Since that video was posted I acquired a Mamiya 6 with a 50mm and shot about 100 rolls through it. So my endorsement of 50mm as a walk around lens for 6x6 is stronger than ever!
@TheRoamingtexan
@TheRoamingtexan 4 ай бұрын
@@nicolaslevy2657 Good to hear I’m glad everything is working out. I have a newly acquired 503 CW with an 80mm lens. But I have not had the opportunity yet to get out and shoot with it. Having cataracts has been keeping me home bound so far. I’m hoping that will change by next month, keep your fingers crossed.
@letmebereal
@letmebereal 5 ай бұрын
Lots of good info
@kevin-parratt-artist
@kevin-parratt-artist 5 ай бұрын
The SWC with 38mm Biogon was produced for exacting work where distortion is unacceptable. It is best for photogrammetry and architecture. The distortion displayed with the 40 mm Distagon is acceptable in landscape, but NOT architecture.
@twosents
@twosents 5 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@hansolhwang-su3sc
@hansolhwang-su3sc 5 ай бұрын
Hi thanks for good video. What’s your favorite lens when shooting portrait??
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 5 ай бұрын
Hi thanks! I just rewatched that video and I really want to strangle that bird! 😂 Thanks for sticking around. I have a couple favourite lenses, but before I get into that, let me say that a lot of times I simply choose the lens based on how much stuff I want to include in (or desperately keep out of) the frame. For example for the guy in his house with all the artifacts, I used the 35mm because I wanted all that stuff in the frame. When I take a portrait in an office or a room where I cannot control the furniture or what’s on the walls, I’ll use a 85mm or 100mm to minimise the amount of distracting things in the frame. For the picture where the light “cuts” across the face of the girl, I used a 180mm on Hasselblad because I had a very small black backdrop, and any wider lens would’ve shown the edges of the backdrop. Sadly that means that if you want the amount of control that I like to have, you can’t really use one lens for everything 😅 But I totally understand that some photographers can do it all with just one lens. You just accept that whatever is in your frame is here to stay, and you compose to the best of your ability to make it all make sense. 🤓 Anyway, favourite portrait lenses : On 135 : 85mm On 120 : 150mm On 4x5 : 210mm If I had to keep just one : the 4/150mm CFi on a Hasselblad.
@joshmcdzz6925
@joshmcdzz6925 5 ай бұрын
I love this picture kzbin.info/www/bejne/j4K4hIeGYpyBlZI .. this is what I want my B&W to look like...
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 5 ай бұрын
Thanks! I love the tones in that picture too. Just a basic tip, before worrying about film choice or exposure/development, consider the light and contrast levels of whatever pic you want to emulate. Too often do I see people who wonder how to get the same look as other people’s images, and their inspiration is shot at golden hour under beautiful sunlight while they’re trying to emulate it on the greyest day of the year… No film or treatment can make a sunny day look like moody fog, or a grey morning look like a sunset 🤓
@joshmcdzz6925
@joshmcdzz6925 5 ай бұрын
@@nicolaslevy2657 You're absolutely right.. The light matters..
@hansolhwang-su3sc
@hansolhwang-su3sc 5 ай бұрын
Very good information !
@user-lf9lm9mq8s
@user-lf9lm9mq8s 6 ай бұрын
after Many years of hobby photography, metering has always been something of a mystery. This excellent video helped me so much. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and approach.
@Renzsu
@Renzsu 6 ай бұрын
I like wider lenses myself, just bought the CB 60mm Distagon as my first lens. I remember when I had my first Hasselblad with the 80mm that I always wished for something a little wider. Have you ever tried it?
@joseuribe430
@joseuribe430 6 ай бұрын
great info, thanks for sharing your knowledge. Perhaps you can help me with my b&w film development. I primarily shoot Tri-x 400 @1600. I like the grain, edginess, contrast. Contrary to the norm, I meter for the highlights to get deep shadows as if it was digital. However, as you can imagine the shadows are a little deeper than what I'd like. My developer of choice is xtol and push development two stops. What do you recommend in development to get a little more detail in the shadows? Thanks by the way
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 6 ай бұрын
Hi, thanks for stopping by! If you haven’t seen the video I posted about “Expose for the shadows, develop for highlights”, I recommend you give that a watch 😎 Short answer is : there is nothing you can do about those shadows in development. What you need is simply to expose more at capture. BTW, if one normalises around metering for open shadows, like I do, what you’re doing by metering for highlights is underexposing by 2 stops. So if it were me I’d call what you’re doing rating your film at 6400. As for the ISO standard for film speed (ISO 6:93) they describe metering as “an average of the scene” so again, by metering for highlights rather than an average, you’re underexposing by at least a stop. So according to the ISO standard you’re really shooting at 3200 if not faster. So I’d advise this : set your meter to 800 and keep your metering technique and development unchanged. You’ll be closer to an effective ISO1600. Cheers!
@joseuribe430
@joseuribe430 6 ай бұрын
@@nicolaslevy2657 thank you very much for sharing
@joseuribe430
@joseuribe430 6 ай бұрын
I'll give that a try! Thank you for your suggestion @@nicolaslevy2657
@GLL-Ratnik
@GLL-Ratnik 6 ай бұрын
Do you support the genocide?
@nathantw
@nathantw 6 ай бұрын
Thank you for showing the filter thread parts. That was always a mystery to me. Now I need to figure out how to take the front part with the white lettering off without damaging the ring.
@mhc2b
@mhc2b 6 ай бұрын
Enjoyed your perspective. FYI - I have owned & used a 500 series camera since 1972. I have owned and used every Zeiss lens except the 500mm & 105 ultraviolet. However, I would not consider the 50 lens (28mm equiv) as an alternative to the 80 (45mm equiv). Too much of a focal distance, IMO. If you want an alternative to the 50, I would consider either the 60/3.5 Distagon (35mm equiv) if you want a slightly wider view, or the 100/3.5 Planar (55-60mm equiv) if you want a slightly longer view. Or both!! In fact, IMO again, a well-balanced "kit" would be either the 50+80 lenses, or the 40+60+100 combination. If money were no object, the latter would be the most ideal. In the 1990's my "kit" was the 40, 60, 100, 180. Today (2024) my kit is the "Ansel Adams" tetralogy - 50, 80, 150, 250. In addition, I do also have the CF 40 FLE. Also - I use a B60-77mm adapter plus 77mm lens cap on all my lenses (except the 40 of course), to accommodate larger 77mm filters, which insures no vignetting.
@nicolaslevy2657
@nicolaslevy2657 6 ай бұрын
Hi Mickael! Thanks for sharing your experience. I had a 65mm on the Mamiya 7 back in 2009. I was happy with it but in the end I sold it and kept the 80mm. Never used the 65mm on 6x6 but I’m sure it would work fine too. Since that video I haven’t changed my mind about the 50mm. I even bought a Mamiya 6 with a 50mm so I can more easily walk around with that focal length. It works for me, doesn’t mean it has to work for everybody else… I guess I like to get close, and I like a little bit more depth of field :) I’ll share the 50mm pictures I’ve been taking with the Mamiya at some point. It’s an ongoing series that I’m kinda proud of.