Both sides have valid reasons for believing what they do about the christian life. True spirituality is knowing whats truth on both sides and bringing it to the center perfectly. Thats true discernment.
@mcawesomeytyo3312Ай бұрын
I have a problem with this. You are using a materialist assumption. The fact of the matter is that there is absolutely zero evidence that consciousness is created by the brain. Also in several cases like NDEs, deep meditation, and psychedelics, the brain activity is actually reduced and in some cases is undetectable by EEG machines. That is all despite the higher conscious experiences. All this debunks all your points.
@GrisAnikАй бұрын
Thank you for the comment but lets be patient for part 2 and 3 so we can combine entire story, and I will welcome if you can make me believe in what is your point of view.
@brokoryfoodsАй бұрын
Believing in afterlife or not is irrelevant. It doesn't change our lives in any way, shape or form. So far science does not need put a soul in the equation to understand how the brain works.
@sumitdutta70432 ай бұрын
Why don't you watch Swami Sarvapriyananda's lectures or Swami Samarpananda or Swami Medhananda on Hinduism to understand it correctly, rather than what you think it is.
@don285972 ай бұрын
Jeremiah 1:5 😊
@sammyshreds2 ай бұрын
So God isn't capable of turning hearts towards him and redeeming lives?
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
So, what is the point of free will if God does everything for you ? Haven't you got a map, instruction and path what you need to do? What else you need and why aren't you doing it? What prevents you?
@carlcisc17062 ай бұрын
Following Christ is a spiritual walk….the physical is illusion meant to deceive…we are to believe and trust God…. We deal with the enemy in the meantime, no worry no anger and no fear. Our Father will provide what is needed, when it is needed. GOD has never been about quantity but of quality. God works with the insignificant not the proud.
@user-yp2oc2mv8m2 ай бұрын
You are soooooo wrong! Christians do fight back. Martyrs died not because they didn’t fight. They died because they didn’t deny Christ. Who do you think you are to interpret the Bible???? Have some humility!!!!!!! You need humility! The example you are giving is not about not having money. It’s about having unhealthy attachments. There is nothing wrong with being super wealthy like King David, for example. What’s wrong is the unhealthy attachment to the things you accumulate. It’s making the idols of those things. You need to humble yourself and ask yourself why you are making these videos.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
1. Who is more humble beggar or rich person? 2. You realize that king David lived 1000 years before Christ? 3. Did first followers of Christ had any priest to interpret Christ words for them?
@shadowwhisperer96872 ай бұрын
Since you are asking for more explaination and less criticism I'll try and explain a bit. Hinduism is not beleiving a few concepts that sound alien to westerners, but a various forms of interpretations of ideas that were developped gradually with time. So dharmic religions are very different to each person you talk to. As a buddhist from birth but who is also interested in 'hinduism' or sanatana dharma, i can explain my idea of karma, but it's different to different people. Karma means action and it is associated with phala which means fruits, basically results of the action. Karmic system is not a universal justice system, but a reaction to actions. In buddhism skillful actions will result in good conditions and bad vice versa. My idea is actions will have several results, but that's just mine. I do not personally beleive in reincarnation (because we have the freedom to beleive so), but for those who do, in buddhism, you are not given justice for your actions but your birth is determined by the nature of your viñana or consciousness, because in most forms of buddhism there is no self(anatta) which is different from hinduism. Consciousness is not a soul and it is not the mind either, but it's it's basically something like perceiving. In hinduism, atman and brahman is the same but different forms may beleive different things. Like dualistic purusha and prakrti, etc. So as i was saying, it is not justice but your qualification and nature that determines birth. So you cannot compare western judicial system, which unfortunately is the judicial system in almost all countries right now, with paticcasamuppada or the karma-phala system. But again sime people might beleive it is a judicial system too..but it is for them to defend their own veiws. Also, nirvana is a buddhist concept not hindu, so i will explain that too. Nirvana is also different in different forms of buddhism. In theravada buddhism, nirvana does mean blowing out. It comes from beleiving in endless reincarnation without stopping. Nirvana in theravada buddhism is to end the attachment with rebirth so we stop this endless cycle of suffering. Again, this is not hinduism but buddhism and this is the monastic practice of buddhism and not lay practice, if you compare it to western culture, this is the same as christian monastic practice so you can attack christian monastic practices in the same way. In mahayana buddhism nirvana is not exactly blowing off, and it depends on which form as well, for example, in pure land buddhism you get reborn in purelands with infinite bliss and no suffering. I do not beleive these, I am saying what different people of dharmic faiths beleive. Most dharmic faiths are about improving ourselves and giving life direction. The cult of the Buddha is not much different from the cult of Jesus, or Muhammad S.A.W. So when you point such fingers you point several at yourself. So, you cannot basically say with little research that this is the problem with hinduism/buddhism because it doesn't show the clearer picture of the complexity.
@woffydo2 ай бұрын
In the *Bhagavad Gita*, Lord Krishna imparts wisdom to Arjuna, delineating three tiers of knowledge: the superior [18.20], the intermediate [18.21], and the inferior [18.22]. Krishna discusses the concept of reincarnation [2.13], tailoring his teachings to Arjuna's intermediate understanding, as Arjuna's role necessitated discernment for his participation in the battle. This pedagogical approach is akin to simplifying complex concepts for a novice; one wouldn't introduce algebra to a toddler but rather engage at their developmental level. Contrastingly, in the *Bhagavatam*, there is a statement suggesting that the soul's transmigration, while perceived as real, is fundamentally an illusion born of ignorance [11.11.2]. This presents an apparent contradiction to the teachings in the *Gita* where reincarnation is presented as factual. Here, Arjuna was provided with a basic truth (akin to 1+1=2) to prepare him for battle, whereas the deeper metaphysical truth might be more akin to an algebraic equation (x+y=2), indicating a layered complexity in spiritual understanding.
@woffydo2 ай бұрын
Faith, often considered an emotional construct, emerges from the human psyche, out of fear of the unknown. This notion is reflected in the Kena Upanishad (2.3), which states, "It is not known by those who [say they] know It; It is known by those who [say they] do not know It." This passage advocates for intellectual honesty over blind faith. Similarly, the Rig Veda (10:129) questions the origins of existence with "Who really knows?" This rhetorical inquiry underscores a profound acceptance of the limits of human understanding. Thus, at its philosophical zenith, Hinduism encourages a quest for truth grounded in reality, admitting the allegorical nature of its gods, heavens, and narratives, which serve as symbolic teachings for the less philosophically inclined masses. This approach champions a form of spiritual inquiry that values skepticism and honesty over unexamined belief. The primacy of one's own conscience is elevated above the adherence to mere tradition, beliefs, or customary practices. Gita 18:63, along with Section 132 of the Santi Parva from the Mahabharata, serves as compelling evidence of this principle
@cosmosyt35992 ай бұрын
there is not 330million gods this show the person has no idea about hinduism and its not polytheistic some give this person a book to read not wikipedia please 🥲🙄 our culture about amenisia for us in this world for us every deed has a reason to happen without reason nothing literally nothing happens without a reason about what you said nirvana and moksa you need translation right about where you said like blowing up the minds needs and thought and everything to attain the moksha bla bla its is said that people here in earth cannot go in the heaven we can never but some souls that came here as curse go back its not some of us in special will go this is why i said a person from outside our culture will not understand this simple thing we humans cannot go to heaven its just some cursed ones came here vishnu for this 10 avatars is a also a curse same way many cursed people will come to earth for some deed which they can rectify for themselves or to teach the people here something about the god its as simple as that and about attaining moksha is of not repeating the cycle of death and rebirth and here not to attain depression without any greed or any other wishes that a different thing you mixed everything मोक्ष - संसार से मुक्ति moksha means to get out of the cycle by completeing our deeds here as per gods wish and our karma in failing we come again in loop do the same thing until perfection निर्वाण - nirvana is going back to brahman not extinguish or finish ourselves by the way hinduism is not polytheistic its only having one god but differnt forms of worship as individual likes they can take a idol as a form for manifestation they are one single entity who is eternal say worshiping any form does lead to same many roads reaching same destination and we have this cause we dont need to fight about who is great who is not about the religious dogma of what you said to a person where you cannot see gods for thousand years so do you believe so i am asking a question on simple basis you have not seen you great great great grand father does that mean he was not there or something if someone says that i would say you are stupid or ignorant about gods coming is those days were common because we have the cycle of life which is explained breify in our books puranas and upanishad espcially garuda purana which explains every cycle what is to happen in this age or yuga gods will not come here its evident as the last yuga ended krishna had said that all heavenly powers will be gone from the humans heads in the next generation and i will leave this world from this form of avatars also predicted Kali Yuga is associated with the demon Kali. The "Kali" of Kali Yuga means "strife", "discord", "quarre According to Puranic sources, Krishna's departure marks the end of Dvapara Yuga and the start of Kali Yuga, which is dated to 17/18 February 3102 BCE.l" or "contention" Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.1) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.2) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.3) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.4) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.5) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.6) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.7) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.9) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.10) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.2.11) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.3.42) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.3.41) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.3.38) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.3.36) (Srimad Bhagavatam 12.3.32)
@woffydo2 ай бұрын
The essence of truth is singular, yet the enlightened ones refer to it through a multiplicity of denominations," as is intimated in Rig Veda 1.164.46. From this maxim, a plethora of philosophical doctrines has emanated. The journey towards truth is perceived as one devoid of any prescribed path, thereby encapsulating the very core of the matter. It would be a profound disservice to my principles to commit exclusively to any singular course of action. However, for those individuals who are predominantly swayed by the tumults of emotion, swayed by the pendulum of fear and hope, perhaps the adoption of a delineated path is advisable. Thus, texts like certain Hindu scriptures have outlined a route of devotion. This is merely intended as a scaffold for those whose minds are besieged by a plethora of fanciful sentiments.
@unknownuser63482 ай бұрын
Flat earth is fact. Wearing shawl doesn't make you literate.
@SmartfoolGB2 ай бұрын
I'm sorry that you wasted your time bro.
@selfimprovements23982 ай бұрын
Discrimination and practices of untouchability within Hinduism on the oppressed caste Is it a Good Karma? If no then why still these things are practiced by Castiest Hindus. Saying everyone is Hindu and dividing them into different castes is it a good Karma?
@nandans25062 ай бұрын
Abrahamic heaven is way more stupider than rebirth. Theologically i think dharmic concepts are more consistent and defendable
@hoonhwang47782 ай бұрын
In the view of Abrahamic religion where living itself is blessig and God is the authority of afterlife and eternal death, the idea of reincarnation should look like blasphemy, but here, the ultimate goal is not to reincarnate but getting out of that circle of vicious limited existences and reach the shore of eternal peace. Maybe this is the point of misunderstanding?😮
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
But my question was: isn't that eternal peace, atheistic non-existence, for which you do not need any of the religions,, basically it is "salvation" without any effort?
@hoonhwang47782 ай бұрын
@GrisAnik At the risk of overstepping my pay scale, I'd rather put it as ego death than atheistic non-existence. As for the matter of belief or faith, my understanding is that Buddhist follow the teaching of the Buddha with deep reverence and Hindus, understanding feeble nature of human mind, developed the free style techniques of worshipping many imaginary gods for convenience sake, with proper and sincere dedications.
@Alien-_-ゝ2 ай бұрын
its like you are trying to look at red colour using your blue lens and all you see is black and you believe it
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Is afterlife objective or whatever you believe in?
@millennialmind95072 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnikit’s certainly not what you think it is
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Why do you think that different opinion is better than mine, what is your evidence in this case, your opinion?
@shashankshukla88112 ай бұрын
I don’t know what’s about religion and how is it related to religion but reincarnation is very real and true several documented cases all around the world from veterans of ww2 confirming details about 2 years old child claim to far north where lama predicted their death and rebirth it’s a matter of great interest for psychologists and scientists who up till now study the old and new cases of rebirth. It’s an official subject at world famous colleges meant for psychology even neuroscientist study this phenomenon, again not saying it’s anything religious but it’s fact it exists.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
How plausible would be that those cases are just wild imagination or hoax for the sake of money and attention?
@kuro7582 ай бұрын
03:54 It's funny you say that, because throughout my life here I've witnessed zero hindus arguing about "my god is stronger than your god". Neighbors or even people in the same family will worship different deities with absolutely no issues at all. There have been zero religious wars in this land. ON THE OTHER HAND, look at the history of Abrahamic religions. Chaos, wars, conquest, heresy, disbelief, blasphemy etc. My dude, none of these things exist in the Hindu culture. You can't look at a fundamentally different ideology from the lens of your own ideology and expect to understand it. And to make content with such misguided knowledge is honestly quite disgraceful.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Dear friend before you next time feel urge to comment, at least watch video till the end and also learn your history. No wars in India you say? except that small split of India & Pakistan, except Kashmir, except problems with British Empire, except that brawl you have with China, except your own scripture Mahabharata, I guess you are familiar with that one :) describing wars wars and more wars.... And then there is this list in Wiki: "List of wars involving India" so yes
@kuro7582 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik I've watched the entire thing. Perhaps you should read better since I clearly said "religious wars". Good job trying to deflect the obviously baseless assumption of yours. I've only pointed out one misunderstanding you made but I suggest you learn from the other comments who have explained in detail why you don't quite know what you're talking about.
@@GrisAnik bro its useless to say in india there is religious war look at europe and everywhere the main person having problem with other religion is muslims .we dont have any problem with christians or jews
@cosmosyt35992 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik India had wars but i guess you need to understand the indian wars were not how you think its was different they killed people to claim land and everything ok i get it but didnt fight for god but one small change there with buddhism that spead over also peacefully and sanata dhrma also spead same not like christanity or islam which came down killing or by greed,and forceful conversion till date
@roshankhan32232 ай бұрын
Evil 😈 people maybe more courageous
@abhiiyenger12942 ай бұрын
Badly mistaken my friend. Mind is more profound than just your thoughts. Thinking part of you mind is just one small layer. So is karma. It is not punishment or reward but just consequence of your action/inaction on the world around. You simply come back to the world you left behind in different forms subjected to chance. There are 64 layers to mind everything is derrivative this.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Do you have any proof or is it just a religious dogma that should not be questioned?
@abhirj872 ай бұрын
Questioning is the essence of knowledge. Sanatana dharma roughly translates to eternal flow. Other religions are belief systems that can't be questioned.
@roshankhan32232 ай бұрын
Well explained ❤
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Thank you, just trying to ask questions but is seems people are keen to give me heat more than logical explanation.
@cosmosyt35992 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik he is muslim so he willl say well explained they are close minded people
@roshankhan32232 ай бұрын
@@cosmosyt3599 when your belief is targeted you cannt bear criticism....if he even criticize Islam i would support his explanation becoz i accept logic more than dogma.
@cosmosyt35992 ай бұрын
@@roshankhan3223 if a muslim accepts criticism the world will be peaceful as per criticism i never said that the said is right or wrong but without have proof or reference or any knowledge from books which were from our culture but for you i said you say which muslim in the world is accepting criticism is blashphemy
@roshankhan32232 ай бұрын
@@cosmosyt3599 i know in islam criticism is considered as blasphemy which I totally not agreed with....that is why most of muslim are silent and couldn't ask any question from their mullas.
@swayambhurashtra2 ай бұрын
You are under a grave misapprehension my guy! Let the flow carry on....
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Care to elaborate?
@loureed75182 ай бұрын
You do not know man Whether it is true or not, how are you saying that it doesn't exist? Whether it exists or not, you really do not know. Reading books, gita, vedas, upanishads ...even if you read all the books, you still do not have direct experience and here you project your own illusion
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Did you have direct experience? Can you share it?
@loureed75182 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik reading books or listening to others doesn't mean one is closer to truth..even if it is true for others, the listener can only believe it or disbelieve it , agree or disagree. These are all cheap psychiatry..Only under direct experience,is it true to oneself. Even if someone really tells u all about it , even when they are genuine, as far as you are concerned, you will only be believing or disbelieving or agreeing or disagreeing.. But it doesn't mean anything existentially cos even after listening, you are still the same as before.. this fake understanding need to go and realise that we truly do not know. Or else , inevitable conflict will naturally come . But you and me will face the inevitable moment of death. I don't think we need to hurry at this for direct experience cos no one can escape this even if one tries .please understand.❤🙏
@crazy_for_kpop5622 ай бұрын
When people of book try to understand outside world 😂
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
So, we can find people like you who do not read and can share their wisdom, care to explain the world for me?
@crazy_for_kpop5622 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik I am no one to explain the world to anyone. Self realisation is what we need. Moksha, nirvana, mukti, all happens when we seek ourselves. For that we need gurus, common person who is busy in school colleges, can't reply these.
@zammonster64132 ай бұрын
Have u done vamachara sadhana after getting guru diksha?
@harshraj62192 ай бұрын
1. KARMA is not punishment but a reaction to your previous actions. If you do bad things no one is punishing you but you are punishing yourself. Even though the mind and memory are diffrent but your soul is the same. Karma will pass to your next life only if you die before going through the reactions of your actions. 2.MOKSHA or liberation is not limited to special people everyone can acchive it through certain practices when you realize or understand the truth that creator=creation and you are a part of him in the process of Moksha people loose their materialistic desires.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
So you would punish people with full amnesia?
@killer69692 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik if the amnesiac's soul had, irrespective of their birth, performed an unforgivable evil action (or at least a clearly evil one), according punishment is acceptable. im not a devout hindu, but this is a bad retort to the hindu doctine which assumes that one part of you (soul) stays constant as you shift bodies, making you reprehensible to any actions from a previous life. unless u rephrased the question to punishing someone with a different soul, the counter-argument doesnt work.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
I was not asking about soul, in real life, so if person had amnesia, permanently lost memory, let say it is like a baby, due to head trauma, but committed murder before head trauma and before judge, and 100% not faking, would you still punish that person?
@killer69692 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik I mean that is the problem. Hinduism is so deeply tied to this idea of Maya or that the physical world is an illusion that a question on ethics after removing the idea of a soul is meaningless. But putting the relation to Hinduism aside and approaching with a materialist perspective, it is an interesting question - is the person with amnesia the same murderer, or different? Is nature or nurture the cause of murderous tendencies? A ship of Theseus-esque paradox but replacing the memories of an individual instead. I'd probably say that assuming extremely certain amnesia, no soul and even a pure malicious murder, the individual should not be punished. Once a soul is removed, a person's identity is boiled down into consciousness and the body - if consciousness is altered through amnesia, the person is completely different - hence, not liable to be punished for the crimes of a different self.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
@@killer6969 I am asking the same how did we get to point that in all religious we deny this beautiful reality over some pie in the sky. Although I acknowledge that those who live in poverty and suffer more are probably more prone. Being prepared to blow up entire world because that was said in some book.
@harshraj62192 ай бұрын
In Sanatn Dharm( or Hinduism) "GOD" is one(Param Brahma) but shows himself in different forms(which can be interpreted by humans). The term Hinduism was coined as a religion by the British before that it was used for most communities in India. Sanatan Dharm the word Dharm also misspelled as Dharma stands for duties and not for religion. Hindus as you call it practice different methods of worship and can have different ideas of God, like in 'Nirgun Bhakti'(devotion of the formless) the people pray to Param Brahma. You probably don't know this but unlike most religions Christianity and Islam people have freedom of choice you can be a 'Hindu and an an Atheist' at the same time. If you want to know Sanatn Dharm you should read the scriptures and not the biased article!!! Hope you read my comment...Have a great day!!!!
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Isn't it strange that for more than thousand years no one has seen gods which were so often seen before? Isn't that little bit odd to you?
@harshraj62192 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik ●Not a thousand years yet passed without people seeing God, Tulsidas a great devotee of Shree Ram and Hanuman had seen Hanuman.(read Ramayan) ●There is a park in Vrinda Vnn(place where Krishna was raised) which is closed during night time for everyone since Krishna comes there and people who have went inside during night time went insane since the couldn't handle his Aura or Presence. ●Look for ritual for changing idol for Jaganath(Vishnu) at Jaganathpuri. ●People aren't showing the devotion and goodness they used to its the Kaliyuga one of four yugas(time period) the 'Yuga of Kali(a demon or monster)'. This yuga is the most impure and filled with evil. Also the tolerance of God's aura decreased in every Yuga.
@harshraj62192 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik Mathematician Ramanujan said God comes in his dream and recites him formulas and he finds God in Mathematics
2 ай бұрын
Many are leaving your shallow Christianity. Listen to Mythvision podcasts by Derek Lambert; he exposes all the fakeness of Jesus and Christianity!
2 ай бұрын
Man- this guy needs to be more knowledgeable. There is plenty of evidence for rebirth. Recently, a Boy in Sri Lanka who could recount his previous birth to Kalpana Chawla. Stop referring to "BC" and use BCE, as there is zero archeological evidence for Jesus. Christianity and Islam are shallow and lack any knowledge. Stick to your cadaver God.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Is there objective evidence or it is just your belief that makes that story truth?
2 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik as for your true God, etc., read Dr. Bart Ehrman’s books, listen to Mythvision where the entire history of Christianity is exposed. Bible was written and modified by many people based on stories with no archeological evidence. No evidence for Moses, the exodus; when we have plenty of evidence for Buddha, Cleopatra, Alexander, etc. Bible needs serious editing- many mistakes, listen to ‘ Friendly Atheist’ podcasts who reads the Bible verbatim and points out to all the mistakes! No science in that book either, the Genesis chapter is replete with mistakes! Be critical of everything is my advice to you, don’t just believe due to fear.
@harshraj62192 ай бұрын
Hinduism was never founded it simply existed
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
I know, in some part of World there are people think first there were Amoeba and then them, which makes them having ability to put a claim on all the lands on this planet, isn't that fun?
@harshraj62192 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik The Kalpa Vigraha idol of Shiva is often claimed to be 28,500 years old based on radiocarbon (C14) dating conducted at the University of California on the heavy 9-inch thick timber sides and lid of the chest in which it was discovered
@fdhsb-i1h2 ай бұрын
Hindism is a later construct but adopting 90% of buddhist philosophy and calling it hindusm. During the time of buddha , thwir were only vedic philosophy which the buddha rejected as it taught caste
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Interesting about Buddhism is also that denies all gods, it just says you do not need any of that, what I tried to say is what Sadhguru saying, maybe we actually like being on this planet
@cosmosyt35992 ай бұрын
very nice self contradiction 90% adopted but saying vedic philsophy is copied what is the name is it vedic then or is it like buddhism came from which part of the world and who started it just fact check from book refernce not from wiki or google please During the time of buddha , thwir were only vedic philosophy which the buddha rejected as it taught caste where is this mentioned also dont say then it is vedic its something else cause vedic is hindu veda is hindu what do you mean if a word is from my dictionary then you one day say i have copied from yours but the word you use is stilll mine i am not against buddha but i am against people like you how dont understand what buddha taught and came forward and gave the world fake narrative is spread from you people
@zepto59452 ай бұрын
1:44 Talking about Hinduism and showing a gurudwara 😂
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
Yes I know lack of royalty free footage, architecture is similar to some of the temples I visited in Thailand , but I acknowledge that it could offend some people.
@shadowwhisperer96872 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik dude a gurudwara is Sikh not hindu or buddhist. Also this vid is not a thorough researched one. Hinduism is not one way of thinking. You can be hindu while being monotheistic, polytheistic, aetheistic, monistic, etc. I am not even hindu and I know this. Shame on you for not doing enough research before making this. Do more research next time.
@Indianfreek1192 ай бұрын
The issue of your perception of Hinduism is that it was something that was a product of thought. Thought itself has many layers, the consciousness that is able to self-realize its thoughts feelings and emotions is what Hindus focus on. Hinduism in its early stages wasn't actually created from trying to explain concepts of thought, that's just one part of many things that influence each other in the material body. The name of the God isn't what one should be focusing on, but rather what the vibrations of the name or mantra associated with the deity invoke in a person. But due to the tempting and distracting effects of the material world, the mind, from birth is constantly pulled in all directions, absorbing knowledge devoid of its truth and being constantly tempted. This causes the mind to be sporadic, full of useless thoughts, to the point one is not able to sit still and have no thoughts at all. Once you reach this state of being thoughtless, you awaken senses your mind wasn't able to recognize before, just like how dormant muscles are activated when one works out for the first time. Do the opposite of action (which leads to temptation) and you will awaken dormant senses, this will then allow one to be able to sense and feel the vibrations of the universe much more. And this is when the actual Hinduism starts. Where one chooses to go the route of attaining Shiva consciousness, Krishna consciousness or even Christ consciousness. You try to attain these individuals' conscious state because they were known to have connected with Brahman, the supreme reality. Once you are able to fully recognize the self realizing consciousness, you will realize that it is the Atma (soul), and once you learn to stay in that state you have access to past life memories and even access to the universal record of knowledge the Akashic records.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
I am not saying that there are no benefits in those philosophies, when you have ADHD mind or too many attachments, many of those teachings can be beneficial, same as eating and exercising practices ...
@TrinityCircus2 ай бұрын
So he is basically trying to proof that his dad is better than your dad.
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
No, just asking question that maybe all the things we believe about afterlife are not worth it, as they often used as tools of submission to the ruling class/caste
@RakhalKincaid2 ай бұрын
Most Hominids are confused on why the soul took birth as an ape.
@bunjijumper53452 ай бұрын
Do you know that even Jews believe in reincarnation?
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
If Jews do something is that then objective truth, if they jump of the cliff are you going to follow?
@bunjijumper53452 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik Certainly not, I am making the point that some monotheists believe in reincarnation. I only respect religions where people are not violent. Any religion that allows people to hurt animals and kill them today, to me is full of sickos.
@shantibhaskaran14042 ай бұрын
😁Hinduism is not a religion & Buddhism is part of Hinduism . Sanathana Dharma is a PURE SCIENCE . It won’t fail you.😁
@pgl992 ай бұрын
'Pure Science' might be stretching it a bit.
@vaibhavsingh81222 ай бұрын
Bruh not pure science, some aspects are scientific but not all, its not all science. The methods used for tracking sun, moon and other planets is very accurately described, but the implication of that is not true. Some parts of ayurveda is also true, but "some" not all. Similarly with many things, I love that we are very inclusive, opposite to what abrahamic religion teaches. Our books have information and what they thought could be closer to the truth. We have great stories to teach what's good or bad in a very entertaining way, but again they are stories. Our scriptures say Hell and Heaven is based on our karma, and it doesn't even matter whether we believe in any faith. It teaches love, relation and bonding not PURE SCIENCE.
@arsh_arora102 ай бұрын
As a sanatan dharm believer I am gonna ask u are Puranik stories real?
@arsh_arora102 ай бұрын
The question I asked will test your knowledge of dharma
@jeyarajshankar2 ай бұрын
@@pgl99 why?
@luisposada70502 ай бұрын
Every thing you said is worng, very bad interpretation of hinduism. Ignorance is what you need to work on instead of believing youre a smart person. You need to read a lot and find a person to guide you and teach you how to integrate all this wisdom from hinduism. I've never saw a hindu fighting another hindu because of whos god is better like in abrhamic. Theres only one supreme reality called Brhaman, thats diferent from brhama the creator, every god is a manifestation of this one supreme reality Brhaman. The abrhamic religions are not called like that because of Abraham, is a sancrit word where the A represents a negation of something, abrhamic means "not brhaman" theyre ignorant of the one supreme reality called Brhaman everything is brhaman. its a shame you dare to post a video so poor, so ignorant about these topics you think you understand. It takes a life time to really understand and realize the knowledge of hinduism. First of all Sanatan dharma the real name of the so called hinduism is not a religion, not an institution whith one leader or one messiah, its a life style, the acumulation of knowledge of many rishis and wise people through the centuries and there are different interpretations of this one supreme reality and many different schools that teaches different technics and philosofies to reach the real wisdom and they never fight on whos right, they respect one another. Hope you get to a better understanding of it.
@LewWhite102 ай бұрын
Yahusha is Yahuah. The word LORD is the translation of BEL (H1167). The form "JESUS" is no older than the 17th century. The J-man is a false name referring to Yahusha (H3091), the Hebrew Name meaning "I am your Deliverer." Don't call Yahusha by another name; use the one Name given among men by which we must be delivered (Acts 4:12). There has always been only one Deliverer, the King of Yisharal, aka known by His title, Melkitsedek. His only Name is Hebrew, and He does not give His esteem to another. "Pour out Your wrath on the nations that do not acknowledge You, on the peoples that do not call on Your Name." - (Ps. 79:6, YirmeYahu / Jer. 10:25).
@send2gokul2 ай бұрын
This is what happens when a christian or a Muslim looks at Hinduism and tries to interpret it. You are just a book, we are a library. You think by reading a book on Hinduism you figured it all? Let me see if I can answer you: 1. You are not thinking at the vastness of life itself. You cannot look at punishment in one birth. Just becaz you cannot remember doesn't mean what you did in one birth nullify you on the actions and damages done. You are still responsible. Yes it's God's mercy that you can forget and just concentrate on what needs to be done. That way there is redemption. 2. There are many texts in which even liberation or moksha is limited. In the 5000+ year cycle your moksha or liberation is counted. Could be for 1 year or 4999 years. That's it. But you have to come down to play your part. 3. Your analogy of the Amusement park is also stemming from your deep rooted Abrahamic background. In Hinduism / Buddhism its more like go to the most amazing amusement park and have a ball of a ride without attaching yourself emotionally. I know it's difficult for an Abrahamic follower to grasp it, but think of it like this - you are happy no matter what, you have to stand in line, you are happy. You got to get the last seat in the ride, you are happy. The ride breaks down in the middle, you are happy. You have to go and stand in another long queue for another ride, you are happy. I think you can now understand the power in it. 4. Again getting into Nirvana is not becoming super dumb, I think the best option would be for me to recommend you a movie called "Lucy" (released in 2014). You will know what Nirvana can be. ...any way I couldn't get to the end of your video as it was exhausting trying to nit pick every mistake you are making. There are so many mistakes that it's exhausting for me.
@bunjijumper53452 ай бұрын
Hinduism is the only religion that makes rational sense. Abrahamic faiths are all based on stories that were told thousands of years before. Judaism which is the oldest of the Abrahamic faiths used to believe in polytheism. Then Jews changed into monotheism. The more I learn about Hinduism the more truth there is. I
@deepanshutrivedi25362 ай бұрын
very well said bro. These narrow minded people would never get Sanatana Dharma because they are slaves according to their god. There is no free will and rationality in any other faiths except Sanatana Dharma.
@sayanbhadra23712 ай бұрын
No wonder why your video doesn't have any likes
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
it has likes as I can see, but I am not seeking likes but answers but all I get is your emotional response as you feel that you are being attacked personally while I am just saying that concepts we believe on this planets are flawed. Hence we have caste systems and submission to the ruling elite.
@sayanbhadra23712 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik the problem is, if you say science is just shit talking logic with no spiritual explanation, scientists will get fuckin mad. That's exactly what you did in the video, shit talked without any understanding. Obviously people will get mad.
@sayanbhadra23712 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik did yoi notice, my comment has more likes that you video?
@sayanbhadra23712 ай бұрын
@@GrisAnik did you notice, my comment has more likes than your video
@GrisAnik2 ай бұрын
@@sayanbhadra2371 Number of people agreeing with your view does not mean your are right, if you think that Earth is flat you will also have many likes. You are getting triggered because you think I am attacking you, I am not, I am pointing why I am finding those stories unbelievable. Your emotional response confirms my claims.
@siddykay2 ай бұрын
You are badly mistaken.
@hubertbaldes92822 ай бұрын
I noticed you are reading out of a NIV bible. It's definitely not a King James Bible. The 1611KJV Bible is the true Word of God. All others are false bibles. NIV Bibles changed some 50,000 words in it and the Bible is very clear about changing God's Word. If you are reading this NIV bible you are serving another master and not God. Read for yourself in Revelation 22: 18 - 19 and Deuteronomy 4:2 in the KJV for the truth and your salvation . You must be born again and born of the Spirit John 3: 6 to enter into the kingdom of heaven.
@barryjeter2 ай бұрын
Hubert,I am born-again believerI am a born-again believer.I have a question for you The king James version is the only true Word What was the true word of God before 1611?What it have been the Greek ??
@hubertbaldes92822 ай бұрын
@@barryjeter Before the 1611 the word was written in Hebrew, Greek ,Latin and English. God through King James gathered 47 translators with the most knowledge of the word that knew Greek, Hebrew, Latin and English to write the finished Word of God in the 1611 KJB. In John 3:5 “Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” You need to be born of the Spirit
@theofulk56362 ай бұрын
The "MONEY" is hidden in open view, on the wall of BABYLON, and it has hanged there for 2000 years. It is the 'writing ' that has been the mystery of the DIVIDED KINGDOM, found lacking, in IDOLATRY OF THE MASSES, like a "CAUSE WITHOUT A REBEL" ! The GOD MONEY is the crucifix, render unto CAESAR the things that are CAESAR'S, and unto GOD the THANKSGIVING OF BEING EXCOMMUNICATED from APOSTASY ! !
@goblintown2 ай бұрын
This is sadly hilarious.
@MikeMcKenzie-y4y2 ай бұрын
You are right but wrong.. you are saying perfection . Then why did Jesus die . No one , not 1, but him lived purely for GOD . Why did he come then at all , because we fall short of GODs glory . One thought is all it takes . If he only accepted the pure, then his death and suffering would be in vain, trying to get to him. Trying to live for him is how you get to him . Never giving up trying to please him is all he ask . For he did not give up on us . Only when we die will we learn if we are accepted or not . His mercy is just .
@IAm1InTheIAm2 ай бұрын
James 4:1-4 NIV - What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you? You desire but do not have, so you kill. You covet but you cannot get what you want, so you quarrel and fight. You do not have because you do not ask God. When you ask, you do not receive, because you ask with wrong motives, that you may spend what you get on your pleasures. You adulterous people, don’t you know that friendship with the world means enmity against God? Therefore, anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God. Mark 10:18 NIV - “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good-except God alone." We are either objects of wrath, or objects of Righteousness- depending on Whom we Contain and manifest. So, Whom do YOU Contain, Gris?