Pizza Man Joe

Пікірлер

@Smdvjgv 4 ай бұрын

Is that on the end of the map or on the middle. In the graveyard I mean

@Auxik 5 ай бұрын

How do you have so many scrolls?

@Pyrofromteamfortress2o 6 ай бұрын

100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.ain't this the biggest number?

@xorvrGTAG1 7 ай бұрын

10 quintillion to the power of 6223 million

@sergefiedyt 7 ай бұрын

Love this more the fact that this is actually a school project. Kudos! Very entertaining and thought-provoking.

@bigpharts 7 ай бұрын

Best I could think of was 26, boy was I shocked!

@alehin2021 7 ай бұрын

8:19 *SSCG(3)*

@interbeamproductions 7 ай бұрын

6:48 the 5th and 6th trees have a copy of the 3rd tree

@IamExeller 7 ай бұрын

Utter Oblivion Aka: Rayo's number but a lot, lot, *BETTER*

@martiribapons 7 ай бұрын

Amazing video!

@vesellin 7 ай бұрын

My answer to the question was repeating tree of... until the timer ran out! I was correct!

@haifahalleb5707 7 ай бұрын

Oh he doesn't involve rayo number 😢😢😢😢 the daddy of big numbers

@tavianl5423 7 ай бұрын

1:58 nice waves

@Jamblox-nm5er 7 ай бұрын

ln(0.5-10^-260)/ln(1-10^-260) is the biggest number i can think of it is the amount of time in planck time it would take for there to be a 50% chance of a brain forming into existance

@nikhilbontha1621 7 ай бұрын

The second cheer number is equal to 599040000.

@QuangKhue-qs6wb 7 ай бұрын

Absolute infinity tier 5000

@Maxplusarts 7 ай бұрын

wow this was actually incredible pls keep doing more videos

@Gustavo_-gs4op 7 ай бұрын

What about RAYO(10^100)

@WackoMcGoose 7 ай бұрын

Okay but... at what point do you cross over from Countably Finite, to Countably _Infinite?_ What point does math itself say "you're done counting, it's sideways eight time baybee"...

@bloxninjagaming6577 7 ай бұрын

By definition never

@Prxsh_09 7 ай бұрын

NO WAY THIS IS A SCHOOL PROJECT??? Dude you have huge potential!! Pursue youtube and see how it goes.

@re4p3r32 7 ай бұрын

i dont really understand what is the number of possible combinations of trees in TREE(3). If grahams number is G64, then this is G (187196 amount of Arrows of 3s)?

@Mushroooooooooooooooooom 7 ай бұрын

∞^∞^∞^∞......^∞

@maxdabski9362 7 ай бұрын

Imagine if this video cut off at 0:04.

@austinlincoln3414 7 ай бұрын

TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(…(3) With “TREE” being used TREE(3) times

@Arebze 7 ай бұрын

simplify TREE(3)/TREE(4) 💀

@austinlincoln3414 7 ай бұрын

approximately 0

@yoseflowy958 7 ай бұрын

What software did you use for this video?

@ILikeTC 7 ай бұрын

WHAT only 342 subs?!?!

@nunyabiznis3595 7 ай бұрын

how in the world do you come up with "graums number"?

@randomperson5579 7 ай бұрын

This is the first time i've ever heard of a low bound for TREE(3), and it looks like that's an extremely weak lower bound, like how the lower bound for the grahams number theory thingy is like 14 or something. as far as i've heard TREE(3) most likely outgrows Conway chained arrow notation, as far as mathematicians know, and grahams number which is g64 not g63, can be represented as fitting somewhere between 3→3→64→2 and 3→3→65→2

@Tob_JJJJ 7 ай бұрын

G64 (Graham's number) < G65 < G66 ... < GG64 < GGGG...GGGG64 with G64 G's < Godgahlah < Gridgahlah < Kubikahlah < Terossol < Godgathor < Godtothol < Godtertol < Godtopol < Godhathor < Godheptol <<< Tethrathoth < Tethrathor < Monster-Giant < Tethriterator < Tethracross < Tethracubor < Tethrateron < Tethrapeton < Tethrahexon < Tethrahepton < Tethra-ogdon < Tethrennon Tethratope < Pentacthulhum < Pentacthulcross < Pentacthulcubor < Pentacthulteron < Pentacthulhexon < Pentacthul-ogdon < Pentacthultope < Hexacthulhum < Heptacthulhum < Ogdacthulhum < Ennacthulhum < Dekacthulhum < Goliath < Godsgodgulus < Grand Godsgodgulus < Terrible Godsgodgulus < Horrible Godsgodgulus < Godsgodeugulus < Godsgodguliterator < Grievous Godsgodgulus < Godsgodgulcross < Godsgodarxitri < Greedgodgulus < Greedgodeulus < Greedgoqualus < Godsgodeus < Godsgotreus < Godsgoquadus < Squariardúm < Va’cross Squariardúm < Squariarvenus < Squarekisecundúm < Cubiardúm < Teroiardúm < The Centurion < Super Centurion < Ohmygosh-ohmygosh-ohmygoosh < Centuicenturion < Godsgodgultaxitri < Blashphemorgulus < Blashphemorguliterator < Blasphemordeugulus < Blasphemorgultruce < General Gogulus < Demagogue < Ominongulus < Ominonguldeus <<< Lower bound of TREE(3) There are hundreds, thousands, trillions, more than a graham's number of levels of recursion between each of these numbers. The lower bound of TREE(3) is nowhere near as small as g(64) or g(g64) or 10 --> 10 --> 10 --> 10 --> 10 --> 10... repeated g(g64) times.

@spageen 7 ай бұрын

Infinity minus 1

@steamed_dodo 7 ай бұрын

Love this video! Keep it up 👍👍

@xyz3524 7 ай бұрын

10/10 video, this is the quality I expect form channels with millions of subscribers, not hundreds.

@el-3omda476 7 ай бұрын

This video is underrated , GJ man hope you make it one day <3 <3

@Xnoob545 7 ай бұрын

3:46 *pentation, not "pentration"

@haipingcao2212_. 7 ай бұрын

my own notation of addition: a[1]b n level notation (my own): a[n]b packed a[b[n]a]b: a[1][n]b packed a[b[n]a]b (different notation): a[1,n]b packed a[b[a[...[n]...×k]a]b: a[k,n]b Notation(k)=notation k a[b,a[b,a[b,a[...×k]]]]b (packed notation): a[k,[↓]]b

@alt_meta3077 7 ай бұрын

BEAF ahh ripoff that's ill-defined past e0.

@henrystewart6856 7 ай бұрын

(Bizzy Beaver)what about BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(52!)))))))) or ryos number or ryo(BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(52!)))))))))

@alt_meta3077 7 ай бұрын

BB is uncomputable, Rayo is ill-defined. Also why 52! of all numbers?

@ToanPham-wr7xe 7 ай бұрын

😮

@david-melekh-ysroel 7 ай бұрын

SCG(N) is crazier than TREE(N), same applies for SSCG(N) But the craziest is Rayo's Number

@Andrewbert109 7 ай бұрын

18 Edit - wait no. 218 Edit 2 - wow I was way off, you know about a lot more numbers than me. Amazing video btw, hopefully you'll get enough likes for a part II but I'm not sure how many that is I'm still working on what comes after 218 Edit 3 - breakthrough! 219. I'm catching up

@daniel.sandberg.5298 7 ай бұрын

If you know fast growing hiarchy, f(w^2) is the graham sequence. For TREE (3) however, none of the ordinals are powerful enough with function f. We need theta as a function, with omega as a value power by w. That is TREE(3). So its way bigger

@Xnoob545 7 ай бұрын

Most of the stuff you said is wrong and nonsensical

@alt_meta3077 7 ай бұрын

All of that is wrong. f_{w^2}(64) is *far* larger than G64. It's not even close. The upper bound for G64 is f_{w+1}(64). Furthermore, TREE(n) has no official bounds. Though, it's supposedly not meant to exceed a growth rate of f_{LVO}(some reasonably large n). Finally, you did not even attempt to clarify "Theta", which I believe you are referencing feferman's theta function, and th(w^w) doesn't make any sense without a diagonalising function.

@xXJ4FARGAMERXx 7 ай бұрын

This is a comment about LaTeX If you want to continue making videos with manim which has the classic "maths" font, then I want you to research some conventions about when to use which symbols. For example, f(x) is usually written with an italic f and an italic x, which is the default, why? Because of the general rule of thumb "variables/changing things are in italics" This rule also makes standard text non-italic That's why I felt a bit odd when I saw you write 100 to the googol but with googol in italics. This rule applies most commonly to stuff like the sine and cosine and log functions, so sin(x) is written with an upright "sin" and an italic "x" But there's some debate when it comes to other common constants, like "e"; Euler's number, "π", "i"; the imaginary constant which is the(?) solution of i² = -1 Some write them upright because they are defined just like sin and cos and log But some write them in italics because there's many 'e's and 'π's and 'i's in formulas This comment is over.

@steadlexfrizzle7693 7 ай бұрын

the reading of the stacking exponents is not quite right, 10^(10^10) and (10^10)^10 are totally different numbers and the former is read "ten to the ten to the tenth power power" and the latter "ten to the tenth power to the tenth power"

@alt_meta3077 7 ай бұрын

nobody reads like this. brackets would be specified if necessary.

@melwin2251 7 ай бұрын

this is, in fact, very nice.

@stayhappy-forever 7 ай бұрын

this is insane, the edittings very nice, good work brotha!

@plu-ex7oj 7 ай бұрын

Crazy cool content. If you’re looking for concepts or topics, try covering something more cosmic! Like string theory or something like that. Topology is cool too!

@littlebitfix4511 7 ай бұрын

2:05 i was not prepared for that 👂

@DailyDoseOfTop 7 ай бұрын

bro straight copied an already made video

@melwin2251 7 ай бұрын

which video is that, exactly?

@alt_meta3077 7 ай бұрын

@@melwin2251 It's mostly rehashed information from Numberphile and the likes. TREE and Graham's sequence are relatively useless in googology.

@Tob_JJJJ 7 ай бұрын

Largest number is Large Number Garden Number defined by pibot

@quinny-bn4jw 7 ай бұрын

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique KZbin video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 3118.

@vagarisaster 7 ай бұрын

Cackling at the last citation in the bibliography being the dancing skeletons. '😭'

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер