Its perfect on my end, I am always careful about the sound quality. 😊🙏

You are most welcome! Vectornator has a long way since then 😊🙏

Great to hear that, thank you! 🙏👋🏼

Thank you so very much for your feedback! 🙏😊

Yes, we can NOT use expressions unless we bake them but that is another tutorial Benjamin. 😊👋🏼

So happy to hear that, thank you for your feedback! 😊 🙏

You're very welcome! 😊🙏

Thanks, glad you found it helpful! 🙏 Pen tool can be challenging at times. 😊

Great to hear that! 😊🙏

Hi there, thank you for reaching out! Personally I have not seen the Wrap tool in the old Vectonator, using the Pen tool is your best guess. Anything else I can help you with? 😊👍

@ thanks for the response. Thinking the app might be too advanced for my needs, I’m not a graphic designer 🥲

So great to hear that and thank you for your feedback! 🙏😊🎄

Thank you so much for your kind words! 🙏😊🎄

Glad you enjoyed it! 😊🎄

You are very welcome! 😊🙏

That's great to hear, thank you! 🙏🏼😊

Thank you so much, it's great to hear it was helpful! 😊👋

I hear you but its industry's standard. 😊👋🏼

@@EliasSarantopoulos Then it's one SAD industry 🤮

@ For decades we had and still have Maya as a 3D application, real hassle in my opinion. Then Blender finally was developed as an open source and it's such a pleasant environment to work. Just another example Maya having one of the complex interfaces.

@EliasSarantopoulos I'm 3dStudioMax guy, never had complaints.

@ and I am AE guy 😀 Whatever works!

You are most welcome! 😊🙏

I am sorry to hear that, I guess things have changed since then but thank you for the feedback! 😊👍

Thank you! 😊🙏

Much appreciated! 👍😊

You are very welcome, çok teşekkür ederim 😊🙏

Thank you so very much for your king comment and feedback! 😀 🙏

You are most welcome! 🙏😊

You are most welcome and thank you for your constructive feedback! 😊🙏

You are most welcome and thank you for your constructive feedback! 😊🙏

You are most welcome! 😊👋

I am glad to ehar that, thank you! 😊👋

Thank you Sir! 😊👋

You are most welcome and thank you for taking the time for a constructve comment! 😊🙏

Thank you so much for your feedback, one of my favorite tutorials on my channel. 🙏👋

Hi there and sorry to hear you are getting stuck! Is there a possibilty to email me a part of your project to better understand the issue since it is hard for me to picture it? 😊

@@EliasSarantopoulos Hi! Thank you so much for your reply. Sorry for the delay in response. Someone on the Adobe forum helped me. It is a glitch in InDesign. When it happens (Go Back on Roll Off is checked and greyed out), you have to delete your InDesign preferences. They explained to hold down shift-option-control-command (mac) and open InDesign. It will then ask if you want to delete preferences. It fixed the issue. Thank you for the reply sir! You have very good and insightful videos, btw.

I do have another separate issue for which hopefully you have a better and more comprehensive solution. And I'm hoping maybe our comments/replies will help others as well. You're welcome to make a video of the issue, as long as it's with different artwork. Below is a long winded explanation of: When I try to use "Roll Over" and "Click" button states with "Go To State" and "Show/Hide Buttons and Forms", some buttons that should hide upon tap/release won't actually hide until roll off. I also tried using "Click" event instead, but still the same issue. I know a partial solution, but eventually it has to happen. Below explains why, though I hope you can offer a complete solution: Now that I have Object States working, I made a set of Forward and Backward buttons. I used "Show/Hide Buttons & Forms" to show/hide all except the Forward & Backward button needed to be shown on that State. For my situation, this works, as long as I don't create "Roll Over" and/or "Click" states for the buttons. But if I try to use "Roll Over" and/or "Click" states which I prefer to do, sometimes the button doesn't hide until I hover off the button (if the buttons are layered a certain way). I noticed if I arrange my buttons in the layers, it fixes most times this happens. But of course eventually, it has to cycle to the lower layer buttons again. Normally, I would just use "Go To Next State" and "Go To Previous State". But in this situation, I have to use "Go To State" because each state is a video of a ring binder design that either plays a short video flipping forward, or an alternate video flipping backward, from any given page spread. If I use "Go To Next State, I won't be able to use the alternate videos that show the pages flipping backwards. I would only be able to flip forward, and a "Backward" button wouldn't visually work. I could of course just disable "Stop at last state", and cycle back to the beginning, but I would like the viewer to have the option to go back a page without cycling through all pages again. Any ideas? I could share the link to the presentation with you in a private message if you would like, if you will keep it private since it's for my employer. Hope you are well! And thank you in advance! 😊

The exercise files are available under the video description as a Dropbox link. Let me know if there is an issue with that. Thank you! 😊👋

@@0cho8cho72 Thank you so very much for your feedback 🙏😀

@@DorifutoRabbit Thank you for your feedback! 🙏😀

Transitioning is always about Easing In & Easing Out keyframes and the Graph Editor is there for that. So, in the Timelin, click on the current keyframe and you can adjust the Velocity with the Graph Editor (Shift + F3). I hope this helps. 😊👋

@@EliasSarantopoulos Yes, it helps! A lot! Thank You! (I am coming from Autocad Architecture, Rhino, Revit, etc, and a little bit of Ae. This is like a whole other world.)

@@VidarrKerr It always is with software but similarities do exist. 😀👋

@@FrankBarrabeitg When paring the camera with a null object, you have much, much more control. You can animate both the camera and the paired null object, something you can be hard with just a camera. When moving the camera alone, both the Position for example moves and the Point of Interest and that it's hard to control it. Using the null prevents that. Hope that helps 😀👋

@@DaDaDaDesigner I am glad you enjoyed, thank you for your feedback! 😀 👋

@@EliasSarantopoulosyou are welcome, enjoyed a lot

@@razimahdavi5962 Thank you for your feedback! 😀 👋

@@arungaud_02 I am glad you found it useful, thank you! 😀 👋

@@Motivasyonmucizesi Thank you for your constructive feedback, I am glad you found it helpful! 🙏 👋

@@jeevanjyotisundaray Thank you for your feedback, I really appreciate it! 🙏😀

@@cliffordsharpe9464 Thank you for your constructive feedback, much appreciated! 🙏 😀

@@pixpusher Thank you for your constructive feedback, much appreciated! 🙏 👋

@@estherramiro1266 You are very welcome, I am glad you enjoyed it! 😀 👋

@@rehami6708 I thank you for your constructive feedback, much appreciated! 🙏 😀

@@VladikaeIn the tutorial I use a null to rotate but use the camera for the position, try the opposite. You can mix and match movements and see where it takes you. 😀

@@EliasSarantopoulos but if I want to overlap some keyframes, I can't do it only on the camera right?

@@Vladikae I am not so sure I understand the animation you have on mind. I believe if you go further into the tutorial, I use multiple nulls to achieve that, it just easier to get better animations. Have a look and see. 😀