All scientists say we going forward But realistically we going backwards

Manufacturing should have a complete recall on these cars and convert them to chains.

Wet belt is suicide 🥰🥰🥰

Excellent video. 😎👍

Wet belts or belt-in oil systems are a horrible idea! Use a chain or dry timing belt.

Worst design ever! All because "environmentalists" are forcing ludicrous and completely unnecessary emissions and MPG standards. They hate private cars and want to make cars unaffordable for all but the elite.

too stupid for words. In this day and age the things people and companies get away with, and the audacity to implement things that are clearly designed to fail, is breath taking. Why aren't there massive class action lawsuits going on worldwide?

Belts in oil to me are no good!.

We were always taught oil rots rubber components then manufacturers go and make this abortion of an engine with a belt constantly running in oil hopefully someone makes a retrofit chain upgrade eventually!

I'll only buy a car with this system if the entire thing can be changed in less than 10 minutes, including all cleaning needed.

It says the belt is made in China..........wtf????

A chain, every time. There is not a single advantage with wet belts, and many, many problems. Wel belt?. No thanks

Just run a Jessel belt drive that is clearly visible, runs in air and doesn’t dump rubber in your oil system. This is nothing more than backwards engineering☹️

If you follow the recommended service intervals from Ford, that belt will fail long before it. There's no belt or rubber on this planet that can cope with the stress and oil temperature of an engine. It's a stupid idea that will hopefully, bankrupt Ford. I'm shocked Ford are still in business, this is a scam.

Gates of hell for your car!

no no no, bad idea

How exactly does this belt in oil system improve fuel efficiency and reduce emissions? Where is your data? I'll tell you what this reduces: Manufacturing costs. I'll tell you what it increases: Maintenance costs. Extra oil changes will involve more environmental impact form oil extraction, refining and disposal. You're lying to our faces. Oh wait I got it! When the vehicle experiences a completely grenaded engine and pukes it's vitals all over the ground, it will to consume any fuel or produce any more emissions. Is that what you mean?

Was soll das nervige Gedudel?

It is hard to believe that an engine company could come up with such a stupid design. A high school student would know better.

66 M6

Classic Information

Bonjour je voulais demander au sujet de vos constructions de batterie je pense que c'est un foutaient de gueule j'ai acheté une batterie optima pour un pt ruiner même pas 1 ans et demi la batterie lâche et la on me dit que c'est pas pri en garantie

I'm embarrassed i didn't know about this before buying my connect. What an absolute peice of rubbish.

ES ISO 9653, NO 9563

And don't forget the usage of the correct oil!

I don't get it why can't they do the chain? Why in the world what is submerged rubber in oil beyond stupid

who the hell designed such stupid system? These engineers like to design stuffs that torture people..

Vos kits sont en rupture de stock ?

Now I have no doubt that this was designed to fail and to fail soon....

So what you’re saying is get rid of my wet belt car asap?

The automotive industry should be ashamed of introducing this technology. Bring back chains.

These things should never have made it off the drawing board. No end of problems for ford and PSA group cars with their customers thrown under a bus!😡

A si es pero lamentablemente la gente es dejada se coge a los kilometros que marca las revisiones o del ordenador del veiculo, esos motores 10.000 kilometros o el año cambiar el aceite si o si, pero cualquiera es asi mejo,r y da igual el que es un dejad@ el motor sera malo el que sea....

So why are your parts better?

Hyundai i10

Pasek w oleju jest tak chamskim pokazaniem celowego postarzania produktu że to jest niepojęte

Such instances underscore the importance of ensuring knowledgeable individuals are engaged in technical discussions. It is evident when misinformation is disseminated, as exemplified by an individual's misidentification of essential components and misalignment of technical terminology. Specifically, referencing a cambelt submerged in oil alongside visuals of an engine equipped with a timing chain demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of automotive mechanics. To put it simply, this guy is a knobwasher and from now on I will only buy Continental cambelts.

I'm curious to know what the emissions delta is between simply running a chain drive and having to make and replace all of those components.

they dont work, they swell the belt irrespective of what oil is used, they cause the belt to degrade, we dont want them. ford is ditching them for their ecoboom engine that had major problems destroying the engine because of this. go away and stop talking about belt-in-oil. They say "lifetime of the engine" but "lifetime" means how long the belt will last. This is an utter scam by belt / engine manufacturers

Whoever came up with this system should be a billionaire I don't think there's ever been a more terrible system that's been so lucrative for a manufacturer out there

Garbage.

What a dreadful engine design

This is the dumbest engineering in the history of the automobile. Just more maintenance costs for consumers before the car reaches 100k miles. I'm considering buying a restored 1970 4x4 and owning it for the remainder of my life. These new cars are built like crap and you need mechanics to do everything but oil changes.

save 2% fuel but causes claustrophobic failures in 1% of engine ? Pretty good tradeoff . I am sure the consumer will love it in their cars so will the Workshop operators

GATES Производит сам насосы или упаковщик? Буду рад ответу с уважением Александр.

How do you get the shaft out?

useless video

Buena marca en banda auto motriz

beautiful demonstration

Devo de dizer que infelizmente não é uma distribuição que vá montar num Vag, prefiro como estava mais seguro e viável. Assim não.