1. Failed sort list requirement 2. An exception would fire is the list only has 1 item.

Step 0: why do you need 10 billion elements?

If your task is find largest without sorting or some other ultra specific once in a lifetime use case, you could also find max, remove max from list and find max again. Or if no preprogrammed whatever you call those things is allowed, then instead of iterating through the list for one max value, you have max and previous max.

Shouldn't an integer only take up 32 bits or 4 bytes on a 64 bit system? Why 28 bytes?

Just build a backend at this point with the data

How can you now know how aliasing works if you've actually used python for more than textbook examples?

I'd rather have O(1) indexing than O(1) insertion. Linked lists have an O(n) time complexity for selection, which is less desirable in most cases.

who tf runs this channel, it consistently posts literally the worst python content out there

print(max(numbers.remove(max(numbers))))

Can easily be solved with two pointers

Wont that be O(2n)? Assuming we beed the employee list back as an array, making a deque shoukd be O(n) and making a list from it should also be O(n). Btw i might be wrong, just asking

"objects take up space in memory" So do integers 💀

def f(a,b): return a+b print = f this is actually replacing print

Only losers don’t know this. 😂

awesome, nice

Are you a clown? This is painful to watch.. I lasted 9 seconds... First import a new collection, then create a new structure, copy all elements there... Dude programming isn't your thing

You literally sorted the list tho. So you failed your own question.

thats a mistake rhat some people does without even knowing they did it because it has a very little error

Don't use eval() without guardrails It's not hard to do this without eval()

now you are using more memory and average access time to a random element has also increased. You must know how it would be used to say something is better or worse. If you insert only now and then, but access it way more frequently, then you have created a bottleneck. There is no free lunch.

use generator, silly

In a way, this function IS indeed super useful: if you spot any piece of code using this function, you know immediately who to fire and report to the feds 😂

hashmap?

"most programmers don't know this"... proceeds to show this

I have seen lot of video about python. But in your channel you teach everything in-depth it really helpful us for clear understanding

Day by day I like lists less and less 😊

this intern should be fired

pop max then max ?

This is not true for nested dictionaries, I believe its important to mention

This is so stupid

For this problem specifically, would you be able to reverse the list, append, and reverse again? What is time complexity of that?

manual says: Deques are a generalization of stacks and queues (the name is pronounced “deck” and is short for “double-ended queue”).

"Hey can you sort my data but only a little bit?"

How about joblib is it same ?

Why are there small bubbles 🫧 ig, or little bugs running around your screen?

Dictionary is in imutable datatype

Wtf is this shit?

if you need speed and efficiency, just use sth else

who the hell is using variable name as Exception ??

Negative

This is not useful.

You are unnecessarily creating a dictionary here. We can achieve it directly using a for loop by appending to a list and ignoring the already added entry. Or by using list comprehension checking the index with the original list.

Dont suggest this kind of things in your video. As per official python documentation: """ Warning: This function executes arbitrary code. Calling it with user-supplied input may lead to security vulnerabilities. """

Nice man, deque - i dont use for python, only for c++. Its interesting o(n) and o(1)

Two pointer would solve these in o(logn)

no intern will ever be tasked with something like this. theyll make a div red from blue at best

Hey hi everyone I am that new intern he's been talking about in every video .he ows me credits for that🙂‍↔️

When tf would I ever have to do this?

But you create new items?

It's a giant security hole. Beware.