I wouldn't see it as a prison but rather the opposite, the ability to experience all the possibilities in life that you missed out on this life. You could be living different lives. In some lives, you may be the US president, in some a billionaire, in some you may be the first explorer of another planet or galaxy, etc. In order for your identity to be re- born, you just need a body physically identical to yours. There could emerge a universe where there's a completely different planet but where an identical version of you is born. Also you won't have any memories of your past life, so you won't ever feel trapped. Also even if the universe expands forever, quantum fluctuations allow a universe to form out of nothing. So in like a googolplexian years or something, you can expect an identical version of our universe to form out of chance.

This is some of the best content that I have seen on KZbin and its stopped please carry on.

An 8 deck shoe can be counted just as easily as a 2 deck shoe. Hardly any difference, unless the deck penetration is bad.

You mean how physics broke the stock market mathematicians and physicist designed the destructive Mortgage-backed securities and CDO s

So did anyone found out the correlation between any natural phenomena to stock market to trade?

You say that for throwing the dice, in the long run it will be +- zero. But what is the long run? How many tosses of the dice? 1 000? 10 000? 1 000 000?

The analogy of buying 2 iPhones is not successful as an example of chaos theory

He’s doesn’t win because he’s continued working. The goal is to win enough to stop at list working

What about the chaos theory?

Great video!! I will investigate more about Sornette... thanks!

I doubt you can justify their returns with 51% winning rate

Are you italian?

You guys didn’t crack anything, mathematicians did THAT.

very god. i'm statistics, i do ECL in baks, and now i transfer knowlenger economics in phisics. congratulations!

THANK YOU !!!!!

Sure, but what happened to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-Term_Capital_Management ? they went bust.

Make more such videos please

Damn. This cross-discipline application of concepts is so fascinating!

Time Series Analysis Student here.

I'm physics engineer and I want to apply my analytical skills to market science. Thanks for you contents, you have a new subscriber.

Stocks go up. That’s not random.

Realistically, the economic system is closer to non-cooperatively optimized tolerance structure in general.

Bullllllllshiet. Its a black endless void.

Would we also live our lives over and over again but in different ways?

One comment from a physicist: The conditions stated in the video are somehow vaguely explained (as one would hope from a youtube video). What the theorem really says, technically, : if you have a limited set D (i.e, finite measure) and an one-to-one mapping inside that system that preserves the measure, then the set of points of a given subset of D whose repeated image in the function only goes back to the subset a finite number of times, this set of points has measure equals to zero (this more precise formulation is due to Caratheodory, who proved it 7 years after Poincare death). For those who do not understand the math, it basically says that almost every point in the original system goes back to any given neighbourhood of its starting configuration infinite times (no matter how small this neighbourhood is). It is a purely topological theorem, but can easily be extended to classical or even quantum mechanics, since, by Liouville Theorem, time evolution is a mapping that preserves volume (which is a kind of a measure) inside the phase space (whose dynamics respects Hamilton equations of motion). This is actually one of the few generally true statements about all kinds of motions. So, yes, it is true that if you have a limited system (take Earth, for example) and any set of particles inside it, those will eventually be in any possible configuration available, including spontaneously getting back to the very specific arrangement take makes an specific human body, making the so called "reincarnation" be theoretically possible. BUT DO NOT GET TOO EXCITED. Thermodynamics second law forbids those situations from being anything that could be called often. Even the "but can it happen?" question loses its meaning when dealing with such small odds. Boltzmann famously calculated that, if you have a gas of 10^(18) particles inside a 1cm^(3) box, the average time for this gas to go back to its initial configurations is about 10^(10^(78)) seconds. This is a number with 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 (78 zeros) digits. The age of the universe (about 15 billion years), when measured in seconds, is only 17 digits long. So the time required for such an odd event like atoms confined to Earth atmosphere spontaneously gather to form Michael Jackson's body is so goddamn long that it is just not happening in any realistic cenário, unless, of course, you happen to have Douglas Adam's Infinite Improbability Drive.

Good video but you are incorrect about multiple decks making card counting impossible, this is simply not true.

Somehow I dont think Schroedinger looks like that

This explanation is awesome! Finally brownian motion is being de-mystified a little for me, thank you.

Reincarnation is impossible : sooner or later there will be a big rip, on top of that, we all die.

If you think this is stupid, you are not wrong. This is a non-sequiturtur argument.

We won't. There are other things to consider.

Am I the only one in the audience who has read Sornette‘s two books on critical phenomena? That’s a pity.

I just discovered your channel today and would like to congratulate you on your excellent teaching abilities. You successfully manage to explain quite complex mathematical and scientific concepts in layman terms; well done!!! Please keep up the good work and thank you!

Surprised by how much my brain needed this. Just wonderful to thread the needle of entropy across all of these disciplines. Fascinating the themes that emerge across different levels of organizational complexity. For example, in Boltzmann's statistical mechanics, even distribution of all particles in the system is the highest entropy state; in an economy, a perfectly equal level of income distribution across economic participants is the highest entropy state, implying that there is some kind of analogous relationship (with regards to entropy) between the position of particles in one system and the distribution of wealth in another.

Can you expand on the tiers of mathematicians mentioned at 4:40? I’m having trouble finding information about what those terms mean.

Thanks for the video.

What would it be the expected value of a random hand for example if they shouffle the deck every hand and every card has equal probability of appearing?

Please do more finance videos

I have the bell notification switched on for this channel. Great content.

Yes I have, and mathematics seems to be applicable to numerous disciplines.

Hi everybody! In today's video, we're diving into the incredible story of Jim Simons, a math genius who turned their numerical prowess into billions. No business or finance background needed. What do you think? If being a math genius equals being smart, why aren't all mathematicians rolling in cash just like Simons? ;)

I love this channel

This is incredible!

Fantastic!!

If space is given by an three dimensional real (uncountable set) coordinates is it true that events would still necessarily recur? That ideas seems not necessary because at each "interaction of recurrence" the "atoms" may change its positions each time smaller fractions just like fractals. To be honest I am not a mathematician (nor a physicists) and I do believe real numbers are not real at all. I am an finitist like Wittingstein. I do know some quantum physics theories do imply space is not infitely dividable and eletrons do orbit atom nucleous on quantized steps.

By imagining that one day the universe returns to its initial situation, does that automatically mean that it will behave the next time exactly as it did the previous time?

Thank you for this wonderful video. I could feel my mind expanding watching that!

Hey, finally a video after a really long time. I like all of your videos so far. I would love to connect with you over email. Let me know if that's possible.

this makes no sense to me. what if you have two molecules moving towards each other, which collide and cancel out each others force? those molecules will never magically go back to their starting positions.

Welcome back. I was hoping you'll be able to make content again. hopefully you'll be able to be consistent.