@@GaryGraham-q5j Look at his career playoff stats and tell me if he did his job. He didn't really play well when it really mattered. He was good mostly just in regular season

@@andrewjones2133 What you should be saying is that it's a damn shame that Marino was not good enough to win the Superbowl. That's a fact

Amen.

@@DanielFrost21 I guess God forgot to show him how to win a Superbowl

@@marckellough529 It's a team game.

How is he going to win the Super Bowl with the worst defense in the league ; he would help them get 35 points but his defense would let the other offense get 40 points !

Instead it only led to 1 Conference Championship win. What an underachiever in the playoffs.Overall, Dan ended up 1-3 in championship games throughout his career. He ended up with the unofficial Record of 10 playoff games with 2 or more INT's until Brady finally broke it after his thirty seventh ?? game in the playoffs. Dan set the Record in only 18 games.

How did Dan play in his 3 championship game LOSSES---he had 4 TD's but 6 INT's and 2 fumbles, a Passer Rating UNDER 60, and he led his offense to an avg. of only 12 p.p.g. How can a TEAM win championships when their QB is playing like that ?? What an underachiever in the playoffs !!

What prevented Marino from winning multiple Super Bowls---his mediocre to bad passing in a big majority of his championship games. In his 3 championship game LOSSES he had 4 TD's but 6 INT's and 2 fumbles, a Passer Rating UNDER 60, and he led his offense to an avg. of only 12 p.p.g. How can a TEAM win championships when their QB is playing like that ?? What an underachiever in the playoffs.

If only Dan would have been a better passer in his biggest games in the playoffs, when his teammates were counting on him more than ever to be a good passer---but he wasn't. And those 3 championship game losses represent 75% of his biggest games. No other Top 20 All-Time QB was that bad that often in his biggest games.

Prolly the biggest choke artist in sports history. Never could perform on the big stage.

Namath did. But the rules were different..QBs and receivers were hardly protected at all. Namath would thread the needle on long downfield bombs and often got picked off. But even with all that, he was still the first QB to throw for over 4,000 yards in a season (a shorter season). All that said, Marino was the best there ever was. There were more rules in place to protect the QB and wideouts than during Namath's era, but not nearly as many as today. If Marino played today, his totals would dwarf Manning, Brady, Brees et al.

@@toddfrank3344 Dan Marino couldn't carry Tom Brady's jockstrap.How can a quarterback with ZERO Superbowls be better than Brady?? You got to be kidding.

@@marckellough529 OK zoomer.

Lies lies lies I been watching flim they old college offense in 1950s was slinging the rock 🪨 They all pass back then

i need the math

@@brandocalrissian3294 I don't want to hear about his regular season accomplishments. What did he do in the playoffs?? I bet that will be a short conversation.

@@marckellough529 It would be..because his teams generally weren't very good.

@@chrisschaeffer9661 You are so delusional I won't even bother to respond to your BS!!

@@SpareRoomFilm I tell you one thing at least Aaron Rodgers won a Superbowl which is more than Marino can say.

@@marckellough529 No player wins one alone Marc. Can’t help fins management only spent $$ on Dan and not a Cobb Or others around him.

@@davep1103 But he couldn't buy a Superbowl ring

NOT EVEN CLOSE ! # 13 !

​@@davep1103 OVERRATED!!!!

I mean to the current generation

@@TylerTempe true they Even think LeBron is better then Jordan, Jordan would have tore him up

​@pointgod2001 what do you mean underrated?? If anything Dan Marino is criminally overrated. He's an all time great but he's not even close to being in the 🐐 conversation at the QB position if we're being completely honest and objective.

​@@TylerTempeDan Marino had defenses too....these are just some of his scoring defenses in terms of rankings: #1 #1 #4 #7 #10 Too many people ignore objective evidence with these players and go off of what they or analysts feel they should be.....even when presented with facts they tend to ignore....I try and base my opinion on real information. Most people like to troll or spew nonsensical rhetoric. I don't have time for bush league lazy analysis perpetrated by casuals and fanboys.

​@@TylerTempeOf course championships aren't everything but they matter and do weigh a lot when it comes to ranking all time great and elite QBS. Anybody who has an IQ above salad dressing knows that Joe Flacco, Brad Johnson, and Trent Dilfer aren't in the same league as Dan Marino when it comes to playing the QB position. That's why you can't just look at championships. Just like statistics aren't everything bc they can be extremely misleading. I look at talent, strong arm, accuracy, decision making, high football IQ, clutch play, leadership, performance, ability, and success. Putting your team in the best possible position to win games and ultimately winning games. It's just hard to quantify eras bc of the rule changes but you can only play and dominate the era in which you played. Brady and Manning were the best of their era, Marino and Montana, Staubach and Bradshaw of their era, Unitas and Starr, etc. That’s why I think comparing how you did to the average player of your era is the only way to do it fairly. Like having a 105 rating when the league average is a 93 rating isn’t as impressive as say a 101 rating when the league average is an 80 rating. If that makes sense.

Prolly the biggest choke artist in sports history. Never could perform on the big stage.

​@happyevelyn big facts bro 💯

I totally agree with you!