21 күн бұрын
3 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
7 күн бұрын
Cool demo! But quick question: why not using js files for the code instead of putting it all in the html page?
@highlevelbitcoin 6 күн бұрын
Two reasons: (1) it's annoying to test with multiple files because my browsers cache separate js files, and I have to remember to clear my cache before every test, otherwise my code changes don't take effect (2) shareware is easier to deploy as a single file rather than a folder
@bitmiami4766 14 күн бұрын
Sold! Take my money!
@highlevelbitcoin 14 күн бұрын
I'll be glad to! Buy a ticket or a recording here: supertestnet.org/workshops.html
@CeeCrazzy 14 күн бұрын
Funny!
@trevorsmith7753 15 күн бұрын
Always trust a guy in a T-shirt with sanpaku eyes.
@patrickkells53 16 күн бұрын
Ooh my favorite part is all the chatter in the room🙄
@Daniel-xaogjeyh 19 күн бұрын
If it fully Turing complete (because of the CPU), then how are you planning to solve the halting problem? Gas metering would be a BTC fork, no?
@highlevelbitcoin 19 күн бұрын
it's not "fully turing complete" because there is a limit on how many cpu cycles this cpu can run for. It's a large limit, somewhere on the order of 2^128 cycles, which is far more cycles than any cpu has ever run. But it is technically a limit, so this cpu is not "fully turing complete" and is guaranteed to halt eventually. Just long after the death of the universe.
@highlevelbitcoin 19 күн бұрын
Besides every program being guaranteed to halt eventually, another factor is this: the two parties agree on the program up front, and the challenge period limits how long the prover has to run it. So if the prover for some wild reason agrees to run a program that doesn't halt quickly, the verifier can initiate a challenge to prove the end state, and then the prover will simply lose his money when he can't get the program to terminate before the challenge period expires.
@Daniel-xaogjeyh 19 күн бұрын
Brilliant!
@marvinmaali4019 27 күн бұрын
I will be following this channel closely for more content. Great stuff 👌 I had this idea to create a 24/7 BTC charity /daily orange-pilling service where some few sats are "streamed" to users freely every day Hoping to implement it using hedgehog sometimes this year. Side note: I was also hoping to build a system that tracks the value of BTC nodes using the value of Lost BTC. I think lost BTC gives BTC nodes intrinsic value and they can be traded based on the average value of lost BTC represented by each node.
@adrianlopez3373 29 күн бұрын
Nice work!
@CJCastellanos Ай бұрын
Beautiful!
@edu3393 Ай бұрын
Hope to not get arrested for liking this video
@disuye Ай бұрын
Excellent work - and the video explanation is much appreciated.
@karozagorus Ай бұрын
Love the name.
@foxbox2879 Ай бұрын
:)
@davidsparks1181 Ай бұрын
Sweet. I love bitcoin developers ❤
@nathanpen Ай бұрын
Thanks for this. We must have open source coon join solutions all over.
@napper422 Ай бұрын
Thank you for this video. I’ve been looking for info on cashu.
@varlam_volkov Ай бұрын
Thank you! 👍👍👍👍👍
@varlam_volkov Ай бұрын
Super!!! Thank you!!! 👍👍👍👍👍
@ammokha Ай бұрын
Awesome, can't wait for this to be in the hands of the average user like myself. :D
@Incoghs102 Ай бұрын
Based. Cant stop the signal.
@haha-hk9tx Ай бұрын
Will this CPU be used to DDOS the BTC network 😂😂😂. Nvm there probably is a timeout for the execution of bitcoin scripts on the mempool or something.
@abengkris Ай бұрын
Thanks man
@MrCoreyTexas Ай бұрын
OK, so I guess the problem is, you need 3 transactions to open and close a Hedgehog channel, whereas in Lightning you only need 2. Just a question on what you want to tradeoff.
@MrCoreyTexas Ай бұрын
Just started watching this video, it sounds like it could be a lightning killer at first glance. I think the fact that the recipient has to be online to receive the payments is a huge disadvantage for Lightning. I saw a recent article, we're seeing lightning nodes actually go offline, and they were trying to spin it as positive somehow (seems like a cope).
@MrCoreyTexas Ай бұрын
isn't "colored coins" kind of racist?
@MrCoreyTexas Ай бұрын
As far as I can tell, only 1 person deposited 0.25 BTC into the smart contract to begin with, ideally each one would deposit 0.125 BTC, but then they'd have to use partially signed bitcoin transactions, right? Another thing is teams usually aren't 50/50 to win, there's a favorite and an underdog, so Alice and Bob would have to agree on the odds as well
@highlevelbitcoin Ай бұрын
If I was building this out in real life I would probably use partially signed bitcoin transactions to ensure both parties deposit funds, though another option would be to use an atomic swap so that Alice pays Bob to put the total into the contract in such a way that he only collects her payment if he does so. Also, yes, the two parties would need to agree on payout terms such that both are happy with whatever the terms are
@MrCoreyTexas Ай бұрын
At about 46:00, I think you're being unfair to satoshi. Bitcoin core needs to know how long the script is in advance, so it's prefixed by a length of script. Otherwise, you'd have to have some kind of 'end of script' opcode, but let's say that it was 0xFF for argument's sake - but then 0xFF can also be part of a hash or preimage, so that would confuse Bitcoin Core. Perhaps there's a better Javascript bitcoin library out there?
@MrCoreyTexas Ай бұрын
His presentation at 16:00 can be found at docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vwWUP6PyDgZ4xh72fUouf5iBEZGuFLIF9-O5z5GUshs/edit#slide=id.p
@MrCoreyTexas Ай бұрын
show bobs and vagene
@MrCoreyTexas Ай бұрын
I can only imagine how many combinations you'd have for games like checkers, chess, and go!
@jb9433 2 ай бұрын
Could you put the links in the description?
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
done!
@ZQ1995fly 2 ай бұрын
Cool stuff. Let's implement it now?
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
Yes, let's
@EmilioAttardo 2 ай бұрын
Great video thanks! Where can i find the other videos in this course?
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
www.udemy.com/user/car-gonzalez/
@EmilioAttardo 2 ай бұрын
Thank you!@@highlevelbitcoin
@antonionevesdasilva8032 2 ай бұрын
Seems impressive. 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
@freezyAndHaze 2 ай бұрын
Very cool. Thanks for your work. How much sooner can I get Lambo due to this? :3
@Lunaticoin 2 ай бұрын
Great idea! I suppose no payment routing would be complicated right?
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
I think you could route payments the same way lightning routes them, with a chain of htlcs that ends at your destination. Only difference is, your recipient could be offline. You send him or her the data he or she needs to redeem his htlc, and he or she collects it the next time he or she gets online
@PhilKingstonByron 2 ай бұрын
Great Work! Well Done.
@BITC0IN 2 ай бұрын
cool @ Me in the whitepaper 😂
@varlam_volkov 2 ай бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍💫💫💫💫
@holmybeer 2 ай бұрын
The idea of connectors is pretty cool. I've heard people talking about conditions like: do X iff UTXO A exists. But we can't do this in script, and it would be a horrible idea do sf in. But a solution that doesn't involve arbitrary UTXO set introspection is awesome! I'll take a further look at the payment protocol, it seems really promising. Thanks for sharing
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
but we *can* do it in script OP_CHECKSIG is a script opcode and any signature it checks must commit to at least one input. When you use OP_CHECKSIG on a signature that commits to input utxo A, your transaction will fire iff utxo A exists
@JK-dx7ex 2 ай бұрын
Man you are building some awesome functions, ? Could this be used with a BlockStream Satellite base station for the online account, then to allow multiple offline accounts to do transaction? No need for internet. And can a seed signer be used for this ?
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
A seed signer can be used for this I don't know much about the blockstream satellite but if you're just using it to get block data, that should work
@bitcoinheiro 2 ай бұрын
Nice, maybe good for private channels on the edge, connected to LSPs... Reduces burden to end-user at the edge of the network
@globalmerchantio 2 ай бұрын
Excellent thank you very much anything for potential B2B use is much appreciated.
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
Happy to be of service
@atulyadav4722 2 ай бұрын
Great work bro
@jaonoctus21 2 ай бұрын
Bro chill
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
can't stop won't stop
@MiguelMedeiros 2 ай бұрын
@@highlevelbitcoin never give up, never surrender!
@ThesGt 2 ай бұрын
Great stuff ! So this is not LN right? This is another new L2 that works similar to LN?
@highlevelbitcoin 2 ай бұрын
exactly correct a hedgehog wallet could be fully backward compatible with lightning though, so in some sense hedgehog is like a lightning extension or plugin
@louferlou8752 2 ай бұрын
But are you casually just saying that you solved asynch payment for LN ? 🤣@@highlevelbitcoin
@ThesGt 2 ай бұрын
@@highlevelbitcoin excellent, great accomplishment love it
@steemium 2 ай бұрын
🙌🙌
@steemium 3 ай бұрын
Incredible
@gleleylo 3 ай бұрын
How many transactions for a whole game should be done on chain in a worst case?
@highlevelbitcoin 3 ай бұрын
1 deposit transaction 9 while each player takes a turn marking the board 1 withdrawal transaction So there are 11 transactions in the most expensive case The middle 9 transactions are skipped if there is no dispute, leaving only 2 transactions, a deposit and a withdrawal
@gleleylo 3 ай бұрын
@@highlevelbitcoinisn't "accept" transactions are also needed for each turn?