if you're familiar with the Krylov complexity business then this is an exceptionally clear talk - many thanks for the upload!

of course it is incorrect. I can't imagine how arrogant one has to be to believe our current understanding of the universe is correct. we may be not even wrong.

상서해서 가후위기해결해보자재안해도 아무반웅없는것이 지배계급입니다, 자료출판하자해도 이다지도무반응 한것이 정부가있는 사람서는 국가닙니다 권력가진 자도지위에있는 자들이적극적으로 행동해야하는데 무슨생각을하는지 이해가안됩니다,

이 영상이 왜 안뜰까요 ㅠㅠㅠ

Beautiful talk!

This may be the single greatest video on KZbin

Joel Scherk said supegravity naturally predicted antigravity!

Gerard is the smartest person on earth.

잘보았습니다 감사합니다 ^^

Thank you !

I feel like this free will argument was resolved by Hume. Determinism is not only compatible with free will, it is required by free will. In short, if a person's actions are not determined, then those actions are not determined by the person. We are a part of the universe, us determining an action is the same as the universe determining the action.

Are there any qft on fractal models ( instead of lattice models)?

Pranam a lots ❤

't Hooft claims to show how quantum states evolve into classical (deterministic) state. His cellular automata mimics Stephen Wolfram theory (never peers reviewed) with the self admitted failure to prove anything. His and Stephen's ideas may have some clues to reality but they are tragically out of focus.

Here too, as is often the case with science presentations, you can admire the sloppiness of the accompanying graphics. The right rectangle is shorter than the left, although there is no reason for it to be different. I count six weak points at locations on the graphic where lines don't meet properly, even though they should do exactly that at their intended points of contact. An example 1:08:00 To be clear, it does not question Maldacena's genius.

hello Gerard... yes countable finite clocks makes near perfect quantum sense ......but ....in the timer clock replace base N with Pn where (Pn is an n^th prime number).....and....then the clock base(Pn) becomes a field clock with a 'non-degenerate' subfield base that always ticks a prime subfield that has no zero divisors.....else if ...N equals composite ....the timer clock becomes a 'degenerate' ring clock with zero divisors......and then like magic a field clock will satisfy both the fundamental theorem of arithmetic and the prime number theorem...without hidden variable contradiction

The questions during the presentation were extremely disruptive. Questions, except for short clarifying questions, should be made after the presentation.

So I understand from this that Quantum Mechanics should be seen as a program and the "cosmic computer" has no other property but being a clock...and underlying it all is the quantum randomness brushed under the rug at the basement of the house instead of on display on the "for sale" sign in the garden as in current Quantum Mechanics. I find it exciting that I can follow this lecture, hope one day he can give the complete story uninterrupted somewhere So as a sidenote I guess he agrees with Lee Smolin that time is fundamental! Very interesting

“Chaos is defined not so much by its disorder as by the infinite speed with which every form taking shape in it vanishes. It is a void that is not a nothingness but a virtual, containing all possible particles and drawing out all possible forms, which spring up only to disappear immediately.” -Gilles Deleuzee and Felix Guattari, What Is Philosophy?

Very cool! Thanks!

Another important point he made, that from the questions asked may have been missed, is the following. He stated that the evolution of the cellular automaton model is classical in nature using an evolution matrix, but made clear that classical does mean that is obeys the same laws that familiar classical things obey, like Newtonian mechanics, etc.

The central point of his theory is that superposition states are NOT ontological states, and things that are at any point in time in an ontological state can only evolve into or occupy ontological states in the future. He showed in one of his earlier slides that a deterministic harmonic oscillator can be represented mathematically using QM terminology as an entity in a superposition state, but that's nothing more than a mathematical description of convenience, and not an ontological state. In my view, that's the clearer interpretation of QM that I have ever heard, which clears all the nonsense and folklore interpretations of QM, even by serious physicists. His theory is obviously a start but a start on solid footing.

'PromoSM'

재미있는 토론 핵융합은 우주만물의 시작이고 초전도는 우주가 허상이라는 증명.

Nice.

You are my hero

Prof ‘t Hooft’s fascinating theory seems to be a form of thermodynamic theory, where thermodynamics is invoked to restrict to his low energy states. The emergent quantum theory is an instrumental aggregate ensemble model used to approximate the full deterministic reality, in the same way that the macroscopic models in classical thermodynamics model a microscopic system. This emergent behaviour is a way that those disturbed by the philosophical consequences of determinism can comfort themselves. As Einstein’s favourite philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer said “A man can surely do what he wills to do, but he cannot determine what he wills.’

Promo'SM 🤔

I read a paper which claimed the separation of scales is of the order 10^60, another one claimed 10^120. LNH states the order is 10^40.

꺄악~~~ 압둘 작가님!!!❤❤

Thank you for being clear on why Bob and Alice's actions do not support Bell's inequality -- their decisions cannot be in a state of superposition. In fact, there is no such thing as superposition.

Abbot and Wise showed, that fractal dimension of qm path equals 2. Can this be the path of a *fracton* on a holographic screen? My feeling is that, the analogous process to UV/IR mixing happens in mathematical fractals and is called self-similarity.

Why can't we follow the fast variables? 52:00 Is it a limitation of our instruments(that are constructed out of slow variables)? "Bandlimited continuous quantum fields are isomorphic to lattice theories, yet without requiring a fixed lattice." "In this work, we explore the consequences of this isomorphism, including the emergence of effectively continuous symmetries in quantum lattice theories." Symmetries 1:18:03 1) I wonder if rotation symmetry can also emerge at low energy. Circles and relativity from Taxicab geometry - kzbin.info/www/bejne/jqGkkHaZgNWLrdUm37s 2,3) Lorentz & gauge symmetries emerge at low energy - kzbin.info/www/bejne/rprCY6usg7-NgNE, kzbin.info/www/bejne/jqGkkHaZgNWLrdU 4) I think it is interesting to know how BEH mechanism works in the same model(might be helpful) kzbin.info/www/bejne/rprCY6usg7-NgNE 5) I encountered some paper in which effective gravity was recovered from the lattice. The lattice was dubbed "concreton". Also in Kleinert crystal model. I hypothesise, *Fast-slow variables interactions* is an indication of self-similarity. Slow variables could be the same fast variables, but "rescaled". Dirac *Large number hypothesis* and *IR/UV mixing* also point towards this, it appears. Koide formula and Fibonacci numbers 47:39 (a hint at mass generation principle?) " If we take the sectoral (90 degrees) area of the logarithmic (golden) spiral as the lepton mass, then in the limit we get that three successive sectors of the logarithmic (golden) spiral satisfy a condition very similar to the Koide formula"

16:15

Great lectures

He has to be right. The idea of an infinite number of other universes (and outcomes) serves only to assure us that we have free will. That idea is preposterous and we don’t.

🎉

I understand from Maldacena's words that entanglement and a wormhole are the same. Entanglement talks about the absolute statistical correlation between 2 or more particles while wormholes talk about the absolute statistical correlation between 2 or more regions of space-time.

Here is some problem with his model. He's not taking on account that the harmonic oscillator is deformed. (Duffing harmonic oscillator). When the oscillator is deformed especially when the harmonic oscillator is a 2 component system with time reversal symmetry, he eventually mixing the 2 partition. It's the same when you replace the harmonic oscillator with a spin or represent it as a potential spin state. Instead of up and down states you get a frustrated spin. When you put this on a lattice you get a spin glass/ time crystal problem, where the entire system spin states represents energy barriers the system has to climb in order to change configuration = butterfly effect. He need to work with string theorists because they do the same with 2 fixed point saddle on genus expansion. Its essentially the riemann hypothesis in a nutshell because the zeta function is a deformed symmetry with the stripe represents an area with inertia effect

Legend

You have to inverse the genus

Very nice

Well done, nice presentation

Also the majorana modes on the low eneegy spectrum and the positron electron pairs on the high energies has the same description in a sense

There are null states or zero modes cancels

미국사람이 아니라 한국사람이군요~ 껄껄껄~

Wish there were an English translation of these lectures. The content looks really interesting as a first exposition to Condensed Matter Physics.

it was a neutron star

박재용 선생님 훌륭하십니다. V

박재용 작가님 우주의 역사책 듣고 있습니다. 훌륭하십니다.