So now you have these damn ads coming up on your videos as well. Not going to sit here and watch them. I'm here for the video.

Very helpful, very nice video! thanks!

#bullshit Antichrist

First of all, congratulations on your videos. Concerning the mosaic, with the asiair can we use the DSO stacking function to stack the photos of the mosaic? I have version (2.2.1). I didn't succeed, the result was terrible. Thank you and keep up the good work.

I would like to create a mosaic of the Triangulum Galaxy. I would like to add ha data using alp-t filter. Do I need calibration frames after each panel is taken? Also , do I need calibration frames for each panel of the HA data for each panel also?

Lewis Ronald Lewis Amy Lee Michelle

good presenttion. but near the end you make a slight adjustment of azimuth alone, but when you refresh the altitude reading also changes. I have this problem but even worse. i get azimuth under 1 min and clamp the bolts, but when i then improve the altitude, I see quite a large change in azimuth despite clamping, Is this because the mount isn't level?

what are the keystrokes for the boolan modifier you use to add ecentricty and median?

You ever get that Titan Submersible feeling when you look at the first moon landing? I understand that the majority of people who don't believe in the moon landing is completely unimportant in the big picture. I understand that we send these incredibly complex machines to Mars that run around for years, video included. I understand that after half a century, other countries have their own moon landings now. I understand that it is impossible to see any of these landings, which are numerous at this point, with a telescope. I literally understand the why's, the why not's, the how, when, who and where of the moon landings. I do. Why is it then that my mind will simply not believe it? I did and I want to be re-convinced. Is there anyone that can produce pictures of the surface taken by a satellite that orbits the moon? Does that exist? If not then the one "why" I have is why not? If anyone cares to answer please don't bother if you are going to explain the value of landing or orbiting mars versus the moon. If that were true then none of these other countries would have bothered. If you are going to point to past or recent pictures from every past or recent picture taken of the lunar surface, then again, don't bother. I can google those too which all look exactly the same. It's a real put your money where your mouth is question which seems fair. Otherwise, are we supposed to have blind faith in all of this? All of these scientific, non-religious, undertakings? Should I just believe? Anyone?

Never been there! How did we go there 60 years ago, advance 1000’s of time with technology and lost the technology to go to moon? Really

Thank you so much for this great and short video, I have a big question, how do you stick the 4 panels together ? or it wil be done by the Asiair ??? I will centanly need to put them together before star processing, otherwise I would never achieve consistance color and exposure in the four panels.

0:26 what happened to Pluto

I was looking for the Pocahontas song by searching “have you ever heard the wolf cry to the blue corn moon” 🌙

How they Get through the Radiation Belts?

Hot even the Hubble telescope because there are 0 flags in the moon. Apparently.

Thank you

8038 Schaden Highway

Nice scope. But, the ideal budget refractor is the SvBony 305 80mm ED refractor. My light go to mount can handle the weight.

Thank you, great info, did my first plan last night, works so well, am using a Sigma 102mm with the Zwo2600mc with a 4 panel mosaic of NGC7000 area that includes the Veil nebula :)

Thank you for your great explanation! How many different gain for dark library? 0-50-10-150 is a possibile right choice?

🧢

Has nasa or anyone else for that matter taken clear pictures of them since? With the tech they have now or even the spacestation could? Hmmm When they apparently went to the moon 😅 you never see the sun nevermind the stars! The most retarded people have fell for the most blatant hoax. Was a good job though by the nasa and its hollywood team. Oh and of course Stanley kubrick

Great thankyou

it still doesnt make sense! give me a break, these galaxies are billions of times further away and sure, much bigger but compared to galaxies the flag is right in front of the hubble. i know im missing something just dont know what.

The top holes are for the sv211 handlebar/dovetail.

Do u know if a iPhone could do a decent job

Hey, great video! I still have one thing unclear. There are numerous cheap dew heater bands with controllable *power* (not temperature) sold on Amazon. And then there are much much more expensive (like $50) bands and controllers ($100+) sold separately, which, when combined, give *temperature* control instead of power output control. I see you are using the *power* regulated band and seem happy about its astroimaging results. So is there any reason one should buy an expensive temperature regulating dew heater+controller instead of power regulating one?

I saw that an India satellite caught pictures of the flag on the moon . 😮

Do you answer questions from people viewing your clip, can you point me in the direction of someone who can help me determine if what I filmed on my oppo this morning is the android

guessing from the o ring and the outside temp changing fluid properties

who loves space (cause I do)

Enjoyed the video. Couple of questions. In preview mode the rotate icon is available but not in plan mode. Is there a way to rotate a mosaic plan? Next, when I creat a mosaic of pelican Nebula, if I get too close to ngc7000 but not in it, it changes the name to ngc7000 vs what’s really in the pane.

So your telling me they have telescope's that can see other galaxies close up in great detail in space but we don't have telescope's that can see the moon's surface in great detail !!! Excuse me while I laugh my testicles off !!! 😆😆😆 I'm calling total BS on that !!! There must be a reason then that they don't want us to see the moon's surface then obviously !!! there must be a way to see it I'm guessing there has to be !!!

I find this galaxy intriguing

You know this guy is trying so hard to make the answer seem reasonable when instead of saying "billions" says "millions" Google: "The Hubble Space Telescope can observe objects in the universe that are approximately 13.4 billion light-years away." 🤔

Hmm, i don't have the No rejection option listed in the Rejection algorithm dropdown.

😂😂😂 horrible lie conspiracy right 💯💯💯 they lie so much it's pathetic but tell tha truth in movies smh😂

Thanks for sharing... I am wondering if the RA axis auto rotation degree can be changed? I have a limited view and 60 degree will be too much...

I can fill the frame of my camera with the moon with a 1000mm lens. Youre telling me something 1000x more powerful cant see a flag up there? Idk

Thank you for the knowledge you shared about this telescope. I have been looking at this along with the Celestron model DX130AZ. For the more than $200.00 difference in price will I be getting a significant improvement of the night sky images? Also, do you know if the lens quality is better with the DX130AZ? Thank you again

No you can not because we never landed on the moon in the first place

Is this the same as the ASTRO-TECH AT102ED? They look the same.

Jo

Jo

This was andromeda like 200 million years ago. Who knows if andromeda exists now

correction, how to clean the FRONT glass on a SCT..

Dwayne chéri tu es le plus merveilleux mon amour ...

And so more Dwayne Elliot chéri like u love mon amour ...

Dwayne chéri je t'adore mon ange See u in Space u are my so shining blue star and my sweet Canadian lover Its so beautiful so brillant so fascinate so magic and especialy so moving like u Dwayne Elliot chéri ...

Right, we can view other planets with super good resolution, but god forbid we see the flag on the moon....what the actual fuck, this makes no sense