Intellectually conceived work not at all photographic
@evanmeyers9802 Жыл бұрын
where is naked man????!
@eastxeast Жыл бұрын
Delightful version .. thanks guys 😊
@Irisphotojournal Жыл бұрын
It took years for me to understand the photography of Eggleston and Parr but it gave me the freedom i needed to take pictures and not care what anyone thinks, now it feels like I wasted half a life although I probably didn't.
@PeakOrama2 жыл бұрын
I really loved watching this!!! Genious
@sl26082 жыл бұрын
Photography skills aside . . . in his personal life he sounds like a true narcissist.
@royhobbs7852 жыл бұрын
A treasure he is.
@rajsingharora263 жыл бұрын
Happy Birthday William Eggleston.
@redspotaquashrimps3 жыл бұрын
Is he on drugs and alcohol? Cause he looks pretty weirdo high.
@BRAISEDCONFUSED3 жыл бұрын
Servants and Great House Hold.... Sounds Racist.
@Satya-unknown3 жыл бұрын
Pure
@SocialmotionMedia3 жыл бұрын
He's got a character actor's face, voice and body language potency.
@jane_flowers_4 жыл бұрын
Now for Sale on Amazon! The True Legacy of Dr Tom Boring, An Unsolved Murder Mystery Biography by Jane Flowers I speak about Photographer William Eggleston & Director David Lynch in my blog t.co/PmIbPegJA1
@jane_flowers_4 жыл бұрын
Now for Sale on Amazon! The True Legacy of Dr Tom Boring, An Unsolved Murder Mystery Biography by Jane Flowers I speak about Photographer William Eggleston & Director David Lynch in my blog t.co/PmIbPegJA1
@jane_flowers_4 жыл бұрын
Now for Sale on Amazon! The True Legacy of Dr Tom Boring, An Unsolved Murder Mystery Biography by Jane Flowers I speak about Photographer William Eggleston & Director David Lynch in my blog t.co/PmIbPegJA1
@a373464 жыл бұрын
Very good
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
Saying that Szarkowski "discovered" Eggleston in 1976 and that the photographer was first shown at MoMA then is another error. Eggleston had started meeting Szarkowski in the late 1960s/early 1970s, meeting and discussing with Friedlander, Meyerowitz, Winogrand. He had already participated and been shown in two group shows at MoMA in 1970 (April 15-July 5) and 1971 (April-July; in this case a photograph he had gifted to the museum).
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
Another over enthusiastic comment: 1-Eggleston never printed his dye-transfers, 2-color saturation is not that typical of dye-transfers either (carbo or Cibachrome / later, Ilfochrome prints gave far more color saturation), 3-as far as conservation is concerned dye-transfer do fade (next time please Alan Yentob, do some research before broadcasting inexactitudes; just check Dr Henry Wilhelm's research (Wilhelm Imaging Research) for instance, easily searchable on the net, the results of which he has been very gracefully sharing since the late 1970s). What is more, Eliot Porter, far before Eggleston, learnt how to print his dye-transfer prints (which he did), and he was not a "commercial" photographer working for the advertising world, in fact he was shown in art institutions (MoMA, Metropolitan Museum, George Eastman House, etc. ...) and published by the Sierra Club. Ignorance is definitely not bliss).
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
Another error here (Eggleston's) the dye-transfer process HE was using was not that old, just over 20 years (first commercialised by Kodak in 1946). Other photographers among whom Eliot Porter, Ernst Haas ans Syl Labrot in the 1950s, Mary Consindas in the 1960s had used the Kodak dye-transfer process for art purposes.
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
Please, without taking away any credit from Eggleston for is unique vision, saying that he took color "kicking and screaming into the world of art photography" is just ignorance and BS, just repeating Szarkowski's words, word for word, without doing any serious research! Has anyone looked at the work of Eliot Porter (shown at MoMA and the Met far before Eggleston), or Ernst Haas, or even Joel Meyerowitz.... PGMAB !
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
His unique vision [sorry, just a little frustrated to hear the same myths again and again].
@bruceweiss37284 жыл бұрын
Agree! His work is like a mistake . Please explain to me what his work is?
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
@@bruceweiss3728 He has a very idiosyncratic vision that expresses itself best in color.
@jane_flowers_4 жыл бұрын
If you are a fine of William Eggleston then you will want to read about his photography on my blog page at www.truelegacydrtomboring.worpress.com
@MrHenriet4 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/j2Hbl6FohJiLmZo
@lordoftheflings4 жыл бұрын
if Eggleston's photos only lived on the web, on Flickr, or some other photosharing platform they would be wholly unremarkable. What sets his apart is that he prints them, turns them into books, thus exalting them and whatever you exalt, the world takes your word for it.
@maxsungwd3 жыл бұрын
Posting photos on the web is a joke, they are not photos until you print them
@Raevenswood2 жыл бұрын
That's the magic of photographs they take on a greater meaning when they are sequenced. Book form is the ultimate delivery system for photography in my opinion. People think of photography as a singular image way too much.
@shkumbin.limani4 жыл бұрын
There are millions of teenagers that are taking kinda same pictures with their phones,and as usuall ppl ignore them. So..you gotta be 150+ years old to get some credit. What a world...
@andrewlarking74922 жыл бұрын
What they are missing is intent and consistency. It’s nothing to do with his age. His intent has stayed the same, although matured as you’d expect, since the start. There is something wonderful about his body of work.
@TheCampbellseth5 жыл бұрын
The Emperors new clothes are so beautiful
@markgriffinphoto5 жыл бұрын
Absolutely brilliant. Thanks for sharing.
@udomatthiasdrums53226 жыл бұрын
Like it!!
@MyRammy17 жыл бұрын
Captures the essence of the original nicely. Scottish accent adds something.
@AbdulSalam-ek3vj8 жыл бұрын
i like his discipline, "one picture of one thing, not two".
@robertbutts98354 жыл бұрын
I am a Canadian documentary photographer in Santiago , DR . I could not even imagine 1 shot only of each what that would be like . I always shoot 2-3 just in case
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, as he explains it, it is only the consequence of him later not being able to figure out which one would be the best frame (which is honest but also helps us reconsider the statement under this light)... so I would be cautious about validating this strategy that may work for him but may not always be the best technique/approach for successful photography (one that matches the photographer's intuition/intentions best.
@johnwakefield73734 жыл бұрын
I couldn't do that myself.
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
He did not apply it all the time. His photography is more a particular if not peculiar atmosphere.
@nathanwabre3 жыл бұрын
He’s a Gee’
@pjloveten8 жыл бұрын
Waiting for Kevin Spacey to play him...
@stevekim41627 жыл бұрын
you made my day.. im in stitches lol...he does look like kevin or vice versa,, they even sound the same
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
;o)
@ABELLZSH8 жыл бұрын
Does anybody know about the music at the beginning ?
@richardanderson63769 жыл бұрын
Just great
@firehorse749 жыл бұрын
anyone know the book martin parr is looking at?
@firehorse747 жыл бұрын
No lol
@jordywilliams9 жыл бұрын
hunter thompson?
@ianboys10009 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for uploading these
@donnahimpler66493 жыл бұрын
Lot of work on this it incredible .
@EnosEverything9 жыл бұрын
Love the track Steam Comes Off Our House so I thought I'd see what else De Rosa have to offer and this track is bloody excellent also.
@hendrikvorster476610 жыл бұрын
does someone know which camera he is using in this documentary? thanks
@LGCooper17 жыл бұрын
Looks like a Leica M6 (maybe M7) with an autowinder on the bottom
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
He used many cameras but mostly Leicas (starting with an M3).
@BrunoChalifour4 жыл бұрын
Yes it is definitely an M6 or an M7 with a motor drive. I would vote for an M7 because I do not see him adjusting the exposure at any moment.
@bigsurhippy263910 жыл бұрын
fabulous.
@kathrynbutterworth575210 жыл бұрын
have you still got the shirley valentine film on your videos x
@fabienbalandreaud701710 жыл бұрын
A remix by mogwai exists ! Listen the Two :)
@canturgan10 жыл бұрын
Nope.
@alexandermourant206810 жыл бұрын
do you not think you learn composition at photography school?
@Raevenswood2 жыл бұрын
it depends on what kind of "photography school" you are talking about. a real art school focuses on conceptual art and how to create a body of work. Having perfect compositional or technical skill plays very little into the process. Some artists have made sucessful bodies of work using point and shoot cameras, iPhones, or even images from national archives that weren't even shot by them. in the art world people don't really give a shit if you know all of the technicals of the camera or even what process you use because none of that matters without a solid concept behind your chosen medium.
@YIMMA996TT10 жыл бұрын
Easy there petey
@Conversus11 жыл бұрын
what focal length does Eggelston use? Kind Regards from Berlin.
@drkujavec6 жыл бұрын
From 7:17he seems to be using a Voigtlander 35mm f1.2 I version, chrome color limited versionr with the original black Voigtlander hood. Very rare lens, more info here cameraseven.blogspot.jp/2008/07/voigtlander-3512-nokton-aspherical.html The perspetive on his shots and this lens make me think he likes the 35mm fl.
@riagnol11 жыл бұрын
Super effort from the great De Rosa frontman.
@GoldenRatio211 жыл бұрын
1:05: Is it possible to photograph nothing?
@canturgan11 жыл бұрын
If you want to be a photographer don't go to photo school, go to art school and learn the rules of composition and design.
@canturgan11 жыл бұрын
I have just realised that my best pictures were thrown away.
@normankleinberg55255 жыл бұрын
I know your post is five years old, but that was my reaction as well. I'm not arguing with anyone who likes his work, but for me, I would be embarrassed to post some of those shots on FLICKR (or 500 px or pBase). I've taken shots like that but it was when I was testing a camera I'd just bought. Interesting he doesn't seem to be fussing with the camera settings, looks like he's on "full auto", just brings the camera up to his face, clicks and then down again and walks away. Brings to mind something my mother used to say: "Every mop has a handle".
@Mikesht5 жыл бұрын
@@normankleinberg5525 Have you heard of Dunning-Kruger effect? Look it up.
@robertbutts98354 жыл бұрын
How sad 😥 ...
@robertbutts98354 жыл бұрын
@@normankleinberg5525 I shoot on preset and quickly focus which takes about 13 seconds . And I don't know about the posting 😬 thing , or the point and shoot thing . I would interested in seeing some of your work .
@bruceweiss37284 жыл бұрын
@@normankleinberg5525 True!
@canturgan11 жыл бұрын
Why do we need to see Alan Yentob?
@curiousnomad11 жыл бұрын
I want to be able to photograph "nothing" and have it look so good.