@@josefsa666 your comment leads me to suspect that you are not familiar with the technology of ID.me. It is used by governmental agencies because it is literally multiple levels deep in observation of your data. It’s the only way social media is going to survive in the future.

@@Nalim69420 your comment tells me you know nothing about technology. Enjoy your ban.

It’s actually coming faster than you’d think. Check out the entire episode where he explains what he’s working on and it is much more than an LLM. Cool stuff! Thanks for watching!

How long has it been since you’ve used it? It works really well now. No kore messy code.

@@gtleshow I dont use it too often, and Im glad it has improved. But I agree its very handy and quick and easy to setup basic HTML components

@@BrainworkFramework thank you so much for watching and for your very kind comment!

What about it?

@@ItsMisterBOBToYou yes the same would be said for people in China. Blocking assumes the person understands that they are seeing/reading toxic information or severe information. What if they don’t know that?

@@gtleshow My apologies, the Chinese comment was rhetorical, they already have this system implemented and the government has control over it. My underlying point was who would be in control of this information, how would it be verified and how would it be protected from hackers/illegitimate use? I mean social security numbers were just leaked and those are about as important as it gets, so I wouldn't trust the government to verify. So, who else? I can also agree that toxicity can be missed, but that presumes at least one of two things; the toxicity was so small to be negligible, or the person themselves is either too young or incapable of differentiating between right and wrong such as children. There would be an incredibly small portion of the population that would fall into this category that are not children, making the whole system not worthwhile. If they ARE children, then should the content they access not be monitored or controlled by their parents or caregivers?

Absolutely culture is a huge part of a successful tech business.

Why?

@@Alex-ih9lc do you have better advice than the guy doing more than $20 million a year on Amazon? He’s not saying don’t experiment, he’s saying not to try to compete with people uniquely positioned to destroy you on sales. A dentist can recommend his own product to all his patients who in turn recommend it to family and friends. You wouldn’t open up a new professional basketball league because you’d be crushed by the NBA and Amazon isn’t that much different. So let’s hear your ideas so we can all learn.

@@dandaril4318 Did you watch the video? We were discussing Netsuite and why it doesn’t allow certain approaches to development because of the shared environment. We discussed how clients buy into Netsuite without checking to see if what they wanted to do is allowed by the system. Thanks for watching!

@@Mr.ratttt it sure is! Thanks for watching!

Glad to hear it! Thanks for watching!

@@Maren-k5e that’s outside my area of knowledge.

@@josreginald9096 it’s the origin story of how she transitioned to a COO. Sorry you think she said “nothing”.

I don’t see responsible use of an advanced technology as a problem, no. The data he speaks of is already available from satellites. The drone data would just update more frequently, making it far more accurate. Of course, governments will regulate who and what can be accessed.

Clearly

It seems that AGI managed by DAOs is the way to go. DAOs can help us understand what's going on behind the scenes.

As a chess player, I don’t agree with this comment. Even the former world champion, Magnus Carlson, says he learned from AlphaZero, an AI chess engine. Chess engines don’t simply “play the same moves” so as to create a predictable game.

Thanks for sharing your knowledge with the audience.

Many companies “silo” their work force. It’s a bad way to manage teams. A more decentralized approach is necessary for success. This is what she’s referring to.

Ok thank you.