6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@endereren4224 5 күн бұрын
İran'la girilmez savaşa Allah güç versin
@LaurieSmith-p9j 6 күн бұрын
Can the Patroller carry weapons?The Safran website does not mention this.
@MadComputerScientist 20 күн бұрын
My left ear learned a lot about tactical radar capabilities. Also why are birds kinetic threats? WHAT DON'T I KNOW??
@Dovahkiin520 24 күн бұрын
Ah, the M-84A, Russia's inspiration for the T-90A lol
@shann3290-v4m Ай бұрын
Thankyou for the insights. . ..
@Matty_ant Ай бұрын
WOW h170
@DarkClow220 Ай бұрын
If you want this to field-tested against real drones, then send it to Ukraine.
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm 2 ай бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩10000000000000000000000000
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm 2 ай бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩100000000000000000000000000
@Lucifer-r7e5x 2 ай бұрын
Private Companies Are Doing Amazing Job World-class Products 🙏 And Its Better To Not Talk About Govt Companies 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@hartiyantichannel4924 2 ай бұрын
diem allah keturunan itu tuh apanya.
@earlygail 2 ай бұрын
Wow, get a load of this guy. He could sell Claymore mines as kids birthday party favors.
@MbisonBalrog 2 ай бұрын
Is there a bathroom onboard?
@Holeyguagaamoley 3 ай бұрын
Hindsight tells us it would cut the T90 in half and the BMP would dissolve like a firecracker
@amunra5330 4 ай бұрын
China seeks partners while the US demands subjects.
@TheBlueberry606 4 ай бұрын
You could have showed us the damn tanks instead of watching you bable on about stuff we can't refrence. Are you our intelligence or not?
@nedzadridjic789 4 ай бұрын
You are taking garbage, T 84 is built in Sarajevo and its one of the best thank build in that time.
@uilliamjungbluth 4 ай бұрын
Criptografia abaixo
@uilliamjungbluth 4 ай бұрын
O radar é 100 % excelente. Mas 120 % de eficiência.. um capacitor 2 pra 1 processador com 100 w por segundo resfriado por 3 cooler e um chip de galium metal, precisaria de 100 nós aquáticos de rastreio em eficiência.. em outras palavras " um processador requer 100 w energia por segundo."
@Get_YT_Views_768 4 ай бұрын
I'm not crying; it's just been raining on my face.
@MpireAngel 5 ай бұрын
Thats so kool!
@vicentegeorge2160 5 ай бұрын
Sovereign space infrastructure? Why not? Each nation, each sovereign country deserves its own piece of cake in space communications. I am glad Intelsat understands this yearning and is willing to work with countries all over the world.
@americanpatriot412 5 ай бұрын
What in the screaming eagle is this? God Bless America 🇺🇸
@charlottewalsh1030 5 ай бұрын
#ADF ,, Need this ASAP ! #Pat Conroy? 💯🙏👀
@oddball1999 5 ай бұрын
I'm from the uk and I don't understand why kuwait didn't just buy a bradley (maybe they wasn't for sale to them?) and 2 why didn't britain adopt this superior design on the warrior....
@randominternetguy8735 2 ай бұрын
The Warrior was designed to be non-reliant on electronics in the event of an EMP strike.
@oddball1999 2 ай бұрын
@@randominternetguy8735 i know and how often would there or has there been a emp strike compared to not. So the warrior has been lacking for all these years just in case of something. Seems very British way of designing something and I should know. It's dumb
@randominternetguy8735 2 ай бұрын
@@oddball1999 You see, less electronics means less frequent and less expensive maintenance. Kuwait operates Warriors instead of Bradleys for the same reason many poorer nations operate T series MBTs instead of more advanced Western vehicles. They're just cheaper and require less money and manpower to keep running.
@oddball1999 2 ай бұрын
@@randominternetguy8735 yes I completely understand that and is a good concept for countries with little money to spend on military vehicles but if you can afford and maintain something like a bradley then that will be more affective in combat than a warrior
@randominternetguy8735 2 ай бұрын
@@oddball1999 The Warrior is perfectly adequate.
@eclypsical 6 ай бұрын
why no comments?
@aiguesvives30 6 ай бұрын
Si ça se trouve c'est lui qui parle le mieux anglais de toute l'équipe, j'ai peur que ce ne soit une torture pour les anglophones
@GlenCychosz 6 ай бұрын
Why was there no videos for the last 6 months?
@TheBongReyes 6 ай бұрын
2024…. Skyhunter is nonexistent. In the US Army’s brilliant foresight, they decided not to implement the system. Instead, relying solely on C-Ram to defend bases and posts. Adequate system but, shown in Syria & Iraq, not nearly as effective as Iron Dome. As Skyhunter is literally Iron Dome equipped with AIM-9X instead of Israeli Tamir missiles. If the geniuses in the Pentagon can learn anything from the current Israeli-Hamas conflict & Russo-Ukrainian War, a system like Skyhunter isn’t needed…. It’s a necessity.
@HarryCriswell-ky5xt 6 ай бұрын
Damn..... Look at that.
@johnschwartz8015 7 ай бұрын
Fascinating! Thank You! Go Free World...☮️👍🌈🎉🇺🇸
@capt.imanuddinyunusshmh.6549 7 ай бұрын
Fantastic... Thanks for sharing
@aramisone7198 8 ай бұрын
They bought it because the abrahams in 89/90 had issues with the engine and Pakistan wss ready to buy 200 .
@Javidtreeclimber 8 ай бұрын
Hahaha our 313 battalion Beat your carrier in world Technology is not power Power is iemaan. Of Muslims What are you thinking
@secondson4680 2 ай бұрын
Haniyeh used to say that
@io9883 9 ай бұрын
Le développement de chars intelligents autonomes et à chargement automatique devrait être accéléré et au moins 3 000 véhicules devraient être produits en série dès que possible.
@nicholasmaude6906 9 ай бұрын
The US would never sell, give or lend any of its nuclear-weapons to Israel.
@dominikskledar5340 9 ай бұрын
M84 ...idejo za ukrajino trebajo jim
@Ima184mm 9 ай бұрын
Thunder brother 👊
@richardharrold4357 9 ай бұрын
Ah, heck. Just put it on our equipment. Better get the ammo manufacturing squared away to keep up with this thing. Dang!
@richardharrold4357 9 ай бұрын
That gun is seriously dangerous. Wow!
@gemo9561 10 ай бұрын
so 5 yrs later its being released to the public?
@freerbt4839 11 ай бұрын
This has not happened Dec 2023, sad.
@joebrenner4428 11 ай бұрын
An intermeshing synchropter version would have a much larger payload.Quadcopters are great for maneuverability but not so much for pulling.The Phenix Solution's Ultra 2XL uses the same RR300 turbine in a coaxial configuration but has twice the payload.An intermeshing synchropter should have even more.Each may have their desirable traits and purpose but hauling heavy cargo is not for a quadcopter.Swiss has a synchropter type drone but it's small.
@hildashaw302 Жыл бұрын
this moment will be very memorable for me
@mattiesanders5102 Жыл бұрын
Informative, correct and explained in the most simplified manner.
@virgillopez5889 Жыл бұрын
a video worth watching
@peterweller8583 Жыл бұрын
Tick tock
@peterweller8583 Жыл бұрын
Oh ho ho ever feel like you just can't catch a break? Well booby your day is at hand. Something for everyone and it is right there when you least want it there.
@markjmaxwell9819 Жыл бұрын
Some excellent digital beam forming and steering involved to allow the use of only three radar panels to get 100% radar coverage. The digital backend of the system must be excellent. The way it retracts the radar panels into the trailer ready for transport is also impressive. Obviously this radar is going to be teamed with an upgraded Patriot Air defence system which earns a big thumbs up from me. In the age of Hypersonic threats 100% radar coverage and quick reaction times are a necessity. I have heard Aegis ashore in Poland is also due for a radar and software upgrade if it hasn't had one already. Poland is getting treated to the best the US and it's allies have to offer but at a very substantial price. 😎🇦🇺👍
@XLV750RD01 Жыл бұрын
Potatohead operating the camera.