Duchamp- An Introduction
10:51
2 жыл бұрын
Jasper Johns: An Introduction
10:46
3 жыл бұрын
Painting the Bible
9:30
3 жыл бұрын
Story of Porcelain
9:31
3 жыл бұрын
Portraits with a Purpose
9:46
3 жыл бұрын
American Landscapes
9:08
3 жыл бұрын
Dutch Art 1600s
9:56
3 жыл бұрын
Medieval to Renaissance
31:36
4 жыл бұрын
Rodin Sculptures
9:58
4 жыл бұрын
Annunciation
9:29
4 жыл бұрын
FEET IN ART
8:29
4 жыл бұрын
What is Impressionism?
8:48
4 жыл бұрын
Hands in Art
7:56
4 жыл бұрын
Constantine Tapestries
8:07
4 жыл бұрын
Bronzino and the Medici Court
8:16
4 жыл бұрын
Cy Twombly Fifty Days at Iliam
9:28
4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@jeanhess1317
@jeanhess1317 Күн бұрын
Thank you for this truly bracing presentation. Twombly is and always will be my favorite artist and I have never felt the need for verbal explanations -- I can lose myself in his marks and colors and the way he incorporates words as gestures that sort of slip by any one meaning. And yet here Immerwahr provides an infrastructure of sound and story that actually adds another dimension of pleasure.
@ramshankarsivakumar3620
@ramshankarsivakumar3620 14 күн бұрын
I enjoyed this video! Thanks for putting this together!
@carlajones-ji9gc
@carlajones-ji9gc 27 күн бұрын
Adoro Vermeer,que luz!!!!❤
@Liz-gr6tz
@Liz-gr6tz Ай бұрын
Thank you for the informative interpretation! I couldn't help but notice something that was similar in Botticelli's Birth of Venus. Taking the PG audience into account, I'm thinking that the top of the instrument in his left hand looks like something that correlates with what he's holding in his right hand. As for the Botticelli painting, I've always wondered why the woman on the far right has something in her right hand that looks similar. Could that be a clue as well?
@johnimmerwahr1194
@johnimmerwahr1194 Ай бұрын
Yup. I entirely agree with your interpretation of the Bronzino painting.
@lemonpie9761
@lemonpie9761 Ай бұрын
Thank you very much.
@cindyoverall8139
@cindyoverall8139 4 ай бұрын
Both of those were probably done by his daughter, Elizabeth. Look at the hand of those compared to The Music Lesson. The latter is obviously done by the master, Vermeer. These two look like “paint by number” in comparison. He taught his daughter his method of using mirrors. Tim is correct in his acclimation. Vermeer’s style had a soft and highly detailed stroke using chiaroscuro even akin to Leonardo. The Milkmaid is phenomenal to that of the guitar players.. no comparison. The worst is The Girl in Front of the Pianoforte. The model is the same girl at the same age that is the other portrait of a young girl.. Anne, his other daughter. This proves that there was another painter in his studio. That person did the leg work of preparation. The Girl With The Flute is definitely by Vermeer because of its masterly style, despite the ground being different. The curator of the National Gallery should listen to the greatest authority of Vermeer, the newly retired head of the Rijks Museum. His swan song was the greatest exhibition in the history of art and we should all bow down in gratitude.
@johnimmerwahr1194
@johnimmerwahr1194 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for this interesting comment. All of this is way above my pay grade (I am a volunteer) but I am so glad my little video is prompting serious discussion.
@paulwoodford1984
@paulwoodford1984 5 ай бұрын
that’s my work
@danielschmock6338
@danielschmock6338 5 ай бұрын
The Kenwood house painting looking at it with the right eye and the other looking at that with the left eye combining them makes the background picture sink back, the figure pull forward and the knee pop forward. There's a nice 3D effect happening.
@jon780249
@jon780249 5 ай бұрын
Far fetched to think that is a Vermeer. It simply lacks the quality one sees in authenticated Vermeers. In addition it is highly unlikely Vermeer would have copied his own painting, but changed various details. A non issue.
@johnimmerwahr1194
@johnimmerwahr1194 5 ай бұрын
Thanks. I really am not qualified to have an opinion about who painted this. However, the argument that it is Vermeer requires a lot of assumptions. None seems to me unreasonable in itself, but how likely is it that they are all true?
@christianegonbarnthaler1426
@christianegonbarnthaler1426 5 ай бұрын
super art
@bobeveringham4018
@bobeveringham4018 7 ай бұрын
My 5 year old could also do this if I had a 5 year old.
@rays7805
@rays7805 7 ай бұрын
This video took infinitely more effort to produce than Cy Twombly's aimless scribbles.
@floradjan150614
@floradjan150614 8 ай бұрын
rubbish work… i saw it in royal academy gallery show, they are really big canvas, but to me such rubbish work, the mind is an interesting thing, simply madness..
@Drbob369
@Drbob369 10 ай бұрын
quark gluon plasma images lol
@christianfrommuslim
@christianfrommuslim 10 ай бұрын
This is actually a very good short overview of a complex subject: where science, commerce, intrigue and art overlapped to the max!
@bessielee9595
@bessielee9595 11 ай бұрын
thank you for the great storytelling... I saw the exhibit in Paris- so amazing...
@gerrylk9
@gerrylk9 11 ай бұрын
Turn down the volume and look. Then it would make sense. Oh, nevermind
@thundergrace
@thundergrace 11 ай бұрын
the armory show was historical!
@thundergrace
@thundergrace 11 ай бұрын
art history has many inconsistencies in it...
@silvanacuni9661
@silvanacuni9661 Жыл бұрын
I had to write a comment. The reading of these canvases is brilliant. I couldn't have done better myself😅. But I just wanted to ask a question. I always keep in mind my first reading of a painting or in this case, paintings. I thought it was a study of an attack of a man out of control on a vegetable garden. And please allow me to express what I saw in these paintings. The tomatoes seemed to have got the worst blow by the angy carrots.
@ShelleyHannaArt
@ShelleyHannaArt Жыл бұрын
It really makes sense that the velatura layer was scrubbed away. That final layer is the magic layer.
@andybaker1844
@andybaker1844 Жыл бұрын
His name is Albert Bierstadt.
@johnimmerwahr1194
@johnimmerwahr1194 Жыл бұрын
Whoops. Thanks for the correction. Unfortunately, once a KZbin is posted, one can't change it. There are a couple of other problems in some of my other KZbins but I just have to live with it.
@reference2592
@reference2592 Жыл бұрын
No. Solved it for you.
@robertdufour2456
@robertdufour2456 Жыл бұрын
Thank You for this magnificent presentation! You have given me much to think about.
@jamesmortimer4405
@jamesmortimer4405 Жыл бұрын
There’s no way that is a Vermeer … notwithstanding possible damage, it just lacks the subtlety and refinement of his work. Also, there’s no other examples of Vermeer duplicating one of his compositions
@paulwoodford1984
@paulwoodford1984 5 ай бұрын
yeah i painted that
@cindyoverall8139
@cindyoverall8139 4 ай бұрын
Yes.. You are correct. That painting is no where near his ability. What has always amazed me is that faker of Vermeer having any credence whatsoever. Vermeer is one of the world's top masters and that should be always be so.
@gailweigl5696
@gailweigl5696 Жыл бұрын
As always John, you pack so much information into a short video--you are a master teacher. I've never loved the Kenwood painting, and actually like the Philadelphoia painting more. Here the suggestions seems to be that she is indeed playing for an udience of one, a lover. Music was commonly a symbol of love, illicit and otherwise. This is certainly a most interesting painting, and how sad that the overcleaning has impacted a definitive attribution.
@marthajohnson300
@marthajohnson300 Жыл бұрын
Such a fascinating discussion of this intriguing possibility -- a Vermeer at the Philadelphia Museum. Wow!
@dennismcclellan7504
@dennismcclellan7504 Жыл бұрын
Appreciate the brief course on 'reading' a painting. Have got to visit the Museum again on my next visit back home from Florida. Been too long.
@msbyrnes218
@msbyrnes218 Жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@russellgs2
@russellgs2 Жыл бұрын
This is amazing. I learned so much about the question and about Vermeer.
@HoboSmutt
@HoboSmutt Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤❤
@darylcumming7119
@darylcumming7119 Жыл бұрын
The attempt to question the loss of child innocence and questioning everything. That occurs on the journey to adulthood.
@Pandoradow
@Pandoradow Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great narration. Personally I think the music is not necessary. it's a little distracting to the efforts getting into the details of the paintings.
@fifthavenue8505
@fifthavenue8505 Жыл бұрын
Wonderful explanation! Thank-you! You truly make Duchamp understandable.
@fifthavenue8505
@fifthavenue8505 Жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation! Thank-you!
@richardclaraval7213
@richardclaraval7213 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant, great clarity in both the text and images.
@marialuizasaboiasaddi2160
@marialuizasaboiasaddi2160 Жыл бұрын
Registro das marcas dos gestos e movimentos. Interferências .Entre acaso e intenção. Prazer, experiência, descoberta e invenção. Liberdade de criação.
@uchennasunday7037
@uchennasunday7037 Жыл бұрын
The Israelites were dark-skinned people.
@pabloportillo9501
@pabloportillo9501 Жыл бұрын
Muchas gracias, muy buen vídeo!
@nikhilbrahma4134
@nikhilbrahma4134 Жыл бұрын
Nice narration
@bossjoy3470
@bossjoy3470 Жыл бұрын
Ang galing talaga sa marketing ng amerikano. Parang mansanas lang yan na pinaniwala tayo pinaka espesyal na prutas. Kung titingnan ko c Twombly ay para syang sicko at isip bata. Kayo lang naman ang nagbigay ng malalim na kahulugan sa masterpiece ng isip bata
@somerandomkid8414
@somerandomkid8414 Жыл бұрын
Doin this for a quiz
@LearningandGrowing47
@LearningandGrowing47 Жыл бұрын
Bro just fail the quiz school is for nerddddddds 🤓
@MrZabao
@MrZabao Жыл бұрын
Hi is eventually abstract or narrative … I like it but somehow not as a story
@sohe3880
@sohe3880 Жыл бұрын
The black slave story is fake.. Nice video
@ilsinco
@ilsinco Жыл бұрын
Warning!! this is for the gullible and/or those who believe this shallow pretentious crap should be considered great art! wise up.
@dasmowilkins
@dasmowilkins Жыл бұрын
art is subjective and not everyone is into figurative art
@ilsinco
@ilsinco Жыл бұрын
@@dasmowilkins since they changed the meaning of the word 'art', then anything can be called art - that, in fact, means the word 'art' itself has become redundant. You seem to be an 'anything' lover.
@dasmowilkins
@dasmowilkins Жыл бұрын
@@ilsinco whos they lmao art has always been subjective. beauty is in the eye of the beholder. what you're describing has always been the case because anything can be art.
@ilsinco
@ilsinco Жыл бұрын
@@dasmowilkins do your homework - art was always subjective in whether you like it or not, as in, whether it's to your taste. BUT, what 'art' was, wasn't always subjective. The actual dictionary definition of art changed. Once it was 'a skill or craft (esp one involving chemicals)', then with the ideologies of Kant and Hegel this led to a different perspective on what an 'art' and an 'artist' actually should be. Modernism adopted these philosophies which has led to scribbles, blank canvases and shit in a can all being called great 'art'. People aren't to judge art themselves on merit, but are now told what art is and how good it is. Sorry if I don't allow my opinions to be spoon fed to me by 'experts'.
@dasmowilkins
@dasmowilkins Жыл бұрын
@@ilsinco words and their definitions are also subjective. i don't care what a dictionary thinks about art. ;let me ask you a question g what do you think about trans people?
@bassoonspoon
@bassoonspoon 2 жыл бұрын
I love watching these. Makes me feel like I'm back in ACS class...so many great memories! :-)
@johnimmerwahr1194
@johnimmerwahr1194 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Who is this? I'm so glad you enjoyed it.
@bassoonspoon
@bassoonspoon Жыл бұрын
It's Sarah Gross, hello!! :)
@jayphleming5816
@jayphleming5816 2 жыл бұрын
Please don’t stop posting. Its good good stuff
@monicanudelman
@monicanudelman 2 жыл бұрын
👏👏👏👏
@BenjaminOrthodox
@BenjaminOrthodox 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing!