thanks it is so important explanation. keep it up!😍😍😍
@zazakh7804Күн бұрын
I completely understand it! Thank you so much.
@711mak6Күн бұрын
shukriya bro <3
@711mak6Күн бұрын
thanks very well explained
@haniyeanishe3 күн бұрын
Hello. thanks. we will be so glad to see more videos from you about Beysian estimators and MAP. Better explaining than my professor. thanks again.
@ngananhtruongha58303 күн бұрын
This video is very easy to understand. Thank you so much
@BillHaug7 күн бұрын
This is very helpful thank you
@spyzom43839 күн бұрын
W video man, gotta love it when somebody knows what they are talking about!
@vishrutpandya32579 күн бұрын
You made it soo simple to understand. Thanks!!!!
@ShubhamPlays11 күн бұрын
wow such a great perspective , that is really a good video. i loved how you explained with different scenarios that how removing outliers would affect. the only small issue was your pace please try to speak a little slow rest everything was really good.
@noobgaming884315 күн бұрын
Love you!
@noobgaming884315 күн бұрын
Thank you so much one of the greatest videos!
@chief418015 күн бұрын
I failed statistics course twice and I'm studying for my third final exam. This is the first time ever I completely understand this concept. Very very helpful video. Thanks a lot.
@soubhagyaghosh855816 күн бұрын
Excellent! Can you provide an example of an estimator that is both biased and inconsistent? My thoughts - if we consider a sample X1,...,Xn and set 𝜇^ = max{X1,...,Xn} as an estimator for the population mean then it will be biased and inconsistent; do clarify.
@statswithbrian16 күн бұрын
For sure, almost any bad idea you can come up with will almost certainly be both biased and inconsistent. The estimator you just came up with would be both for almost any distribution.
@soubhagyaghosh855816 күн бұрын
@@statswithbrian thanks; in short better not fall for the baddies, haha!
@Heisenberg-pr1hk17 күн бұрын
We learnt this concept in Probab. And Random Signal Princ. lecture and now I am trying to use it on the antennas, good explanation thanks
@tathaztu17 күн бұрын
Thank you for this! Very helpful. Good content and a nicely structured.
@Betleyman_718 күн бұрын
I have watched three videos on this subject. I am still non the wiser, just better informed!
@kr15w19 күн бұрын
imagine the power of this man with manim
@statswithbrian19 күн бұрын
You are in for a treat very soon.
@robertarvanitis885219 күн бұрын
There is only one flip of a coin, just as there is only one election. It makes sense for an F to say "given two sides, it's 50% probability the NEXT flip will be a head. It makes sense for a B to say "given the mood of the country, I'd wager even money the NEXT election will see X win." Our two punters, F and B, are using different forms and sources of data and related factors, but both are willing to wager at odds. That's the test of sincerity, willing to bet on risk vs. reward. Answer Darwin's question: is that ripe fruit worth the risk of a predator?
@statswithbrian19 күн бұрын
Amen brother.
@衮雪20 күн бұрын
crystal clear explaination
@gabrielleveque761322 күн бұрын
People in China like pasta too tho..
@statswithbrian22 күн бұрын
I know, even this completely made-up problem admits that over 100 million people in China love pasta.
@gourangvats876325 күн бұрын
Sir, your videos are amazing!! Thank you Please keep on uploading more
@ata.iskecman25 күн бұрын
This complex topic could only be explained this easily and with such simple examples.
@shibandevi986528 күн бұрын
This was the best explanation of the MLE on youtube.
@devangaaravinda348728 күн бұрын
Excellent Explanation
@manasmehra320329 күн бұрын
this video is so well made marry me
@AatmikJain-td6sxАй бұрын
thanks for lecture
@MarcoBovaАй бұрын
Hey brian, neat video as always! Could you made some videos on hypothesis testing, the neyman pearson's lemma, UMP test and Generalised likelihood ratio test? Thankyou in advance
@statswithbrianАй бұрын
The most recent video besides this one is likelihood ratio tests and I talk about all those things.
@sabihasultana8002Ай бұрын
most simple yet in depth analysis found so far, very intuitive..thanks a lot, because of you all my doubts got cleared
@zendruoflynstin8275Ай бұрын
Thanks. Never thought it would be that easy.
@LebuAckermannАй бұрын
You explained nicely, great job
@andi-w6pАй бұрын
If the one explaining truly understands the concept well, his explanation will be easy to understand. So, if I haven't been able to grasp my professor's convoluted explanations all this time, it could be because he doesn't actually understand the concept very well.
@vanessawertheimАй бұрын
thank you so much! this helped a lot 😊
@nocontextnikhilАй бұрын
awesome explanation.
@Jonathan-cn6xzАй бұрын
9:42 Is the log(0.8) meant to be log(1.8)? Nice video btw.
@statswithbrianАй бұрын
Yes, exactly, good catch.
@brazilfootballАй бұрын
Thank you, but one thing I still don't get about about the Bayesian way of thinking: if one is supposed to constantly update a belief via data, then where did the prior come from? How does one quantify a belief based on zero data?
@IndioharpАй бұрын
Great explanation Brian! I have a small question, though. If the response variable has to be normal (in a normal linear regression), why do you think most statistics articles insist that only the residuals have to be normal and not the variable? What tests do you think should be done before a GLM, besides residual plots?
@statswithbrianАй бұрын
Saying the response is normal and the residuals are normal means the same thing basically. The response is normal (around the mean for that X value), which just means the response’s distance from the mean (residual) is normal with mean 0. If we want to evaluate normality of residuals, it’s then easier to look at a graph of residual since they all have the same mean so we can easily visualize if they seem normally distributed.
@Indioharp29 күн бұрын
@@statswithbrian Thank you.
@jingngo8727Ай бұрын
Amazing. Enlightening
@nimalannagendiranАй бұрын
Love the video. These concepts are explained very nicely and in a easy to understand manner.
@TalgatOmarov-y9zАй бұрын
Very clear explanation. Thanks.
@st8k490Ай бұрын
great content, keep it up
@carlosazevedo5079Ай бұрын
Is there any reason to have two different ways of solving it? One at 5:43 and another at the end. Which one do you think is better and why ?
@statswithbrianАй бұрын
They are the same way, least squares. The last part is just a little extra justification on “why” - least squares is very related to normal distributions.
@kates-createsАй бұрын
you have great videos !! thank you so much <3
@statswithbrianАй бұрын
Thank you! :)
@JuhiMaurya-ym3udАй бұрын
perfect and easiest explanation in utube....thanku so much sir it is really helpful
@udayteja6595Ай бұрын
Great Content
@Kwintessential2Ай бұрын
Good examples
@Moment12378Ай бұрын
❤
@alaataktokani8884Ай бұрын
if I can i will give a 100 likes, best explanation that i have found for this topic so far
@Rotte-o5eАй бұрын
Excellent video! It really explains this concept in a simple manner!