Thanks for uploading all this content. I am about to begin my masters in data science soon and I was trying to grasp some math theory which is hard for me coming from a CS Background. Your videos make it so simple to digest all these topics.
@TheErgunPascu2 күн бұрын
The clarity you provide--as in, what the zero or 1 on the x-axis of the normal distribution represent but more importantly what they don't represent, which has been a source of confusion (and a drag) for me, is now more clear and finally validates a hunch/H-sub-A I've held; too many terms in statistics which I've encountered have been near-tautologies and a gigantic obstacle for me. In my humble and quasi-researched opinion about learning, cognitive transfer, linguistics, and abstraction, I postulate that for a new subject, especially those often found as hardly intuitive (clearly as a function of many factors), require the most clarity and for me an exhaustive list of features and areas of overlap, as well as an explicit articulation of the areas or features an idea does not connect with. THANK YOU for the excellent presentation!
@briangreco27182 күн бұрын
Thank you, absolutely!
@LayLenChing2 күн бұрын
Great video!
@ninuuh4 күн бұрын
I have questions about statistical inference. Can you help me solve them?
@briangreco27184 күн бұрын
If you have a question related to the video, I may be able to help. If it’s not related to the video, I probably can’t help.
@ninuuh4 күн бұрын
@@briangreco2718 It is about statistical inference, unbiased estimator and sufficient statistic
@ninuuh4 күн бұрын
It is related to statistical inference, adequate statistics and an unbiased estimator@@briangreco2718
@ninuuh4 күн бұрын
It is about statistical inference, unbiased estimator and sufficient statistic@@briangreco2718
@ninuuh4 күн бұрын
@@briangreco2718 Yes, related to the video
@charlesSTATS6 күн бұрын
I love how you put the context of sufficiency in real life chance events. Thank you for this gold video!
@rafaelhadi63427 күн бұрын
this is very helpful, thank you so much ❤
@avadhsavsani11487 күн бұрын
After ages of scrolling through the internet to understand what probability means, I finally reach my destination. I always felt that the analogy of 'Probability of flipping a coin' has different interpretations, one being where we can confirm our beliefs after something has happened for a large frequency of time ( Now I can confirm that it is officially called as the FREQUENTIST APPROACH ) and other one where we just know that it is equally likely. Wrapping my head around these concepts and confirming my beliefs was really a painful one. I finally feel satisfied. Thanks Brian for this video.
@MoneerGhanem11 күн бұрын
I freaking love you
@conceptualprogress12 күн бұрын
AWESOME VIDEO
@ops42814 күн бұрын
I'm glad I found your channel. I have never seen a better explanation of mathematical statistics, nobody else is even close! You are doing an amazing job there
@briangreco271814 күн бұрын
Thanks for the kind words :)
@jwbpark14 күн бұрын
you are a genius
@sabinaharding199015 күн бұрын
This is a great explanation. I love the visuals showing how they are all related. Thank you.
@santiagodm348319 күн бұрын
Nice videos. I'm now preparing for my masters and it will be quite useful; the connection between CRLW and the standard error of the estimates by MLE makes this very nice.
@kevinbreckman532120 күн бұрын
Thank you! You made this make total intuitive sense in less than 2 minutes where other videos were taking 10+ minutes and I still didn't have that intuitive understanding
@briangreco271820 күн бұрын
So glad it helped! I agree, it is usually presented in a way that hides the very simple intuition behind the idea.
@olaoluwaodeyemi405926 күн бұрын
Well done! Thanks for the vid, however the video is a bit too complicated for me.
@phillipmunkhuwa543527 күн бұрын
Great explanation
@severed_toastАй бұрын
insane explanation
@jann4249Ай бұрын
wow Thankyou Brian, very clear explaination
@jwbparkАй бұрын
Please upload more of these videos so helpful
@TousibAhmedBPSO-kq1nkАй бұрын
Ain't no one teaches statistics like you ❤ Thankyou soo much for giving such elaborative explanations.. And your illustrations regarding these inequalities made them very simple to understand
@TousibAhmedBPSO-kq1nkАй бұрын
Its giving a hint of Heisenberg uncertainty principle
@existentialrap521Ай бұрын
Thx, brother. Making this sht feel like 5th grade math. Ez PZ. wazzup then edit: no diddy, cute eyes brother. go get em
@JL-vg5yjАй бұрын
truly fantastic video, watched this and immediately popped off on my homework question. shoutout!
@trolltoll440Ай бұрын
7:26 would have been easier to use the variance formula for uniform: (b-a)^2/12 and rearrange for E(X^2) = var(X)+E(X)
@briangreco2718Ай бұрын
Yeah, that’s what I probably would’ve done myself to save some calculus too - for the video I just wanted to emphasize the idea rather than the most efficient method. Thanks for watching!
@trolltoll440Ай бұрын
these are perfect! dumbs it down really well while retaining all the info
@pfile1Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@pfile1Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@pfile1Ай бұрын
Thanks for the straightforward explanation!! Now I can understand why "sufficient" is sufficient!
@LuksYangАй бұрын
Send love to U! Your Mic is getting better
@briangreco2718Ай бұрын
Thanks, I got a new microphone so the only video with the old microphone is the Markov's inequality one :) All other current videos and future ones should have very good audio!
@dariofabian8819Ай бұрын
What if you don't know what's the data distribution?
@briangreco2718Ай бұрын
Maximum likelihood basically requires that you assume something about the distribution, otherwise you get those extreme examples that I mention throughout the video.
@dariofabian8819Ай бұрын
@@briangreco2718 thank you for the answer
@shreyanshchouhan3097Ай бұрын
Finally understood what it means when we say intervals are random in frequentist paradigm.
@ifeanyianene6770Ай бұрын
By God what an absolutely amazing video.
@aldenc.9461Ай бұрын
Really impressed with your videos, keep on making more!
@briangreco2718Ай бұрын
Thank you, many more to come!
@sushantgarudkar108Ай бұрын
I discovered this channel in youtube search and guess what it burnt all my frustration and I love the way to make people understand topic in this video!
@psycheguy503Ай бұрын
Thank you so much! this is so intuitive and funny
@SarahR8677Ай бұрын
A bring me the horizon music video led me here in a series of coincidental events LOL 😅😂 enjoyed this video though
@yasamanboroon-zn2luАй бұрын
It was awesome please continue 🔥
@maryziperman4410Ай бұрын
thank you soooooo much. this was so helpful for my college final in mathematical statistics at Texas a&m!!!! you are incredibly gifted!
@briangreco2718Ай бұрын
Thanks, Mary, I'm glad it helped!
@raltonkistnasamy6599Ай бұрын
thank u thank u thank u
@raltonkistnasamy6599Ай бұрын
thank u so much man u explained it so so well
@briangreco2718Ай бұрын
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!
@sarthjoshi6325Ай бұрын
Thanks
@terryliu3635Ай бұрын
The best explanation on Likelihood ever!!
@briangreco2718Ай бұрын
Thanks Terry!
@jayp123Ай бұрын
cheers
@pandando27512 ай бұрын
Those examples are really good! Gj
@briangreco27182 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@economicswithhannah2 ай бұрын
thank you so much!
@homies45792 ай бұрын
Amazing one! Can we get a video about consistent estimators?
@briangreco27182 ай бұрын
It’s on the list, will definitely happen in next few months.
@jimwinchester3392 ай бұрын
I once flipped a nickel onto the floor, near a wall. It bounced off the floor, one-hopped the wall, and landed on the EDGE of the nickel.
@briangreco27182 ай бұрын
Such acts of God are being the tools of probability.
@oraz.2 ай бұрын
Can you do coupling some time? I know it's important to the earth mover problem.
@briangreco27182 ай бұрын
I don't know much about it, sorry!
@oraz.2 ай бұрын
@@briangreco2718 Ok me neither :)
@bazoo5132 ай бұрын
A Very nice explanation. We poor experimental physicists (and any other scientists whose discipline is base on observations) deal almost exclusively with likelihoods - we use observations to draw conclusions about the (a priori unknown) properties on the actual universe. Theoretical physicists, OTOH, postulate those properties and calculate probabilities of what we _should_ observe. Then we compare the two.
@walterstevens38742 ай бұрын
So good! Combined with your video on probability and likelihood, I understand likelihood and MLE so much better now.
@briangreco27182 ай бұрын
Thanks Walter!
@walterstevens38742 ай бұрын
I’ve had 7 statistics courses at the graduate level, and no one has ever explained what likelihood is. Thank you.