Right? What a dumbass. People have no brains anymore.

I've not been able to find that short. But it was funnt

@@theroachden6195 kzbin.infodEB8_gtY5ds?si=zs_ZLBoC8V7DJlR-

No that was an AMR(EMS) supervisor of some sort.

No. You're talking about the city maintenance vehicle, or the non-emergency medical vehicle. Stop gaslighting.

@@chriswagner1690 that's not what gaslighting means but you're right

just like cops. "first" responders in america are pathetic

Obviously, you don't know how they operate. Stop gaslighting. It only males you look like the fool. Not them.

Yeah,. What an idiot. He just had to get in the wat for no reason.

He’s thinking I shouldn’t go, yep let’s go… stupid.

If you read the DISCRIPTION, this is actually his third time he doing that! I'm not going to go through the details, just read it.

And yet here you are commenting on it LoL

1.) who are you to assume he didn’t call prior to filming? 2.) fire department was clearly already on their way

How do you know the color dipshit?

Nope. The water truck just happened to be close by

First, we do not know how far away the fire station is. Second, we need to know how many minutes ago before the person started recording the fire was reported.

Many factors for the reason that they took so long. Normally San Francisco respond times are within 3 to 4 minutes due to the proximity of fire houses so close to one another. Also, in this case engine 25 is way out in the outskirts of the city where response times are longer because there are fewer fire houses nearby. If engine 25 was doing a drill which the time of day is very likely or if they were shopping for lunch and dinner, which at this time would be very likely this would’ve put them at a disadvantage in their response time. The obvious would be they were just released from another call. These guys have a large area to cover as it is, so as a former driver and tiller for T6 and T12 in the SFFD, these guys just got their fun taken from them. No bad feelings, my only hope for this call was that the officers of E25 and probably T9 were professional and gracious to the water truck guy. Too many times before, our wildland firefighting crews and chiefs would rudely turn away farmers who have worked with wildland firefighters before and put fires out, but due to our ignorance, we would shut them down only to have to call them later.

One dude with a truck, lol

Not exactly, the water truck only extinguished the fire from one direction. That does not mean it extinguished every flame inside of the vehicle on the other side of the truck. There is also a chance it can catch on fire again because it is still hot. this means the fire department is still needed to extinguish every flame and cool it down so it won't catch fire again.

@@sedidandanazu535 cannot agree more!

Nope

@@doozledorf7036 been to the Bay Area lately? Due to high cost of rent, people have been living in garages, backyard sheds and vehicles parked on the streets for many years.

Actually that was his day1 on the job.

Useless* youtube commenter.

@@BouncyStickman If you mean yourself yeah lol. The fire had basically burnt itself mostly out before they even got there. They took so long to arrive that even when they did show up a civilian in a water tanker done their job for them by the time they even unrolled the hose ffs. In all honesty what use were they at all apart from cooling it down after the local done the job before them .

​@@BouncyStickmanbraindead replies as well

@@demonicgamer5124 Spoken like someone with truly little to no fire knowledge nor experience! Yes, the tanker truck had helped, however the smoldering fire still needs to be cooled rapidly and inspection of the area to ensure that other fires will not start. Smoldering fire is the most dangerous fire to be around without a proper SCBA, so think about the public that will past by and inhale that in. Don't say "done the job before them", if you don't know what the job even is. Do some actual research before commenting, this is coming from a firefighter.

@@smoke617 If you get pinned behind a wheel in a car accident, I bet you the "useless" firefighters wont be so useless after all huh.

Watch about 3:20 and beyond when he crosses the street, you'll see the cab. It's a box truck/van/whatever the hell you wanna call it, but not a trailer.

no way thats your takeaway from this video

You do know that they have to follow protocol right?

Private citizens don’t show up for the job most of the time..

@@72marshflower15 that’s because most citizens don’t have a water truck genius

i dont think that water truck could have put out a house fire, it just happened to be nearby, extremely rare situation, so lets not dunk on firefighters, they work 48 hour shifts just for us.

Keep to yourself old man

You say that but yet youtube is full of videos of people buying and repairing burnt out Chargers, Lamborghini's ect I've seen a good few on here.

@@hkva1859 keep it to yourself dumbass. Dont see you putting out fires loser.

They are

Most fire engines are actually just pumpers that need to hook up fire hydrant to get water.

You’ll find most pump and roll apparatus at airports and forestry services.

They carry 500 gallons. ​@@andyh4262

Actually, they should use the airport fire trucks everywhere. Excuse they use is that its "too heavy for the roads", but it would save time and energy.

​@@Annoyedspoon50smith they are too heavy, have you seen them when they go over grass? They sink into it

@Plane_Person Roads can be replaced. Yes, I've seen them in the grass get stuck. Also ,splash water

@@Annoyedspoon50smith then saving time and energy would be false

@Plane_Person Did you see how less time it took for him to put out the fire versus them to grab the hose ,put on gear, and actually start attacking the fire. Airport style trucks would save manpower and time, Also fatigue