Robert Cruikshank

Пікірлер

@blancksyt5659 10 сағат бұрын

Thank you

@nafeesaahmed9074 Күн бұрын

This was so helpful thank you

@DevKumar-ik2hc 2 күн бұрын

Thanks you sir from india❤

@vihaanmodi2047 4 күн бұрын

Keep it up Sir Love from Inida 💓

@believersbelieved 5 күн бұрын

you pick a problem which is very basic but crucial to understand and no other channel make a video on this topic everyone is teaching only about the technical things, no one is worried about the basic concept. THANKS

@robertcruikshank4501 4 күн бұрын

There's clearly a need for videos like this. Not the entire subject or lecture, just the points that others don't cover well enough. Glad it helped. Thanks for watching!

@mrcreator1869 6 күн бұрын

thank you sir or bro whatever u saved my life from exams. Thanx from India

@ZakiaKhanomTisha 6 күн бұрын

So cool! Thanks

@todorantonijevic4833 8 күн бұрын

Good job. Clear and to the point!

@beninterlichia 9 күн бұрын

Thank you!! This explanation goes into the conceptual side of integrating over charge densities, and once I understand that, the math is so much easier!

@robertcruikshank4501 8 күн бұрын

I'm glad it was able to help!

@dlankesh 10 күн бұрын

Excellent

@Crescendo_12 10 күн бұрын

Thank you sir ❤ lots of love from India ❤

@Skitte46-f6k 16 күн бұрын

I finnally get it now sir thank you sir!!!!

@alitaha1200 16 күн бұрын

damn

@ROYGBIVphoto 16 күн бұрын

Great refresher. Thank you!

@kitchenswadisht 18 күн бұрын

Uploads videos

@Jamesmatromi 18 күн бұрын

this did not help

@alive4shizuku461 21 күн бұрын

Tyy

@RavindraBaror-m4r 22 күн бұрын

JEE and NEET students attendance ❤

@francissilhan254 26 күн бұрын

Bro as a man you should be a little more competent when doing things

@robertcruikshank4501 25 күн бұрын

That would be nice, but I'm generally busy with other things.

@francissilhan254 26 күн бұрын

There is literally nothing complicated about putting those panels back…… open ur eyes line up the bottom hooks and put it in…… the “delicate compnent” is called a thermocouple bro

@robertcruikshank4501 25 күн бұрын

I've put them in dozens of times and they're still tricky. Happy for you that you find it easy. Thanks for the info.

@elliotfullwood 26 күн бұрын

Where did the 23.76 torr come from?

@robertcruikshank4501 26 күн бұрын

It's a property of water. There's a whole table of numbers for the saturated vapor pressure of H2O at different temperatures. When the temp reaches 100 degrees celsius, the saturated vapor pressure is 760 torr, one atmosphere. Practically speaking, it's a number you have to look up for your specific temperature.

@elliotfullwood 25 күн бұрын

@@robertcruikshank4501Can I derive that data table from an adjusted PV=nRT? I’m trying to calibrate the “absolute humidity” on a sensor I have at home (gm⁻³). Presumably n=m/18 etc?

@elliotfullwood 25 күн бұрын

@ I found the Clausius-Clapeyron equation.

@zahrashukri4436 Ай бұрын

Wow, thank you

@hywelgriffiths5747 Ай бұрын

In Spivak's definitions of interior and exterior of a set A, he specifies x is in the interior (resp. exterior) if x is in an open subset of A (resp. complement of A). It follows immediately that these are open sets. In your definitions for interior and exterior, it seems you don't specify that the subset R needs to be open.

@robertcruikshank4501 Ай бұрын

Thanks for watching! The definition of R was that it was an open rectangle. Without that assumption the definitions of interior and exterior are incomplete. However, "It follows immediately" is one of those expressions that I take issue with wherever I find it. It follows immediately *for some people*, perhaps. I've always been good at math, but I struggled in HS geometry, because I never understood how much detail was required in the proofs. My homework was always five times longer than everyone else's. You're right, many people can see it immediately. Someone capable of skipping a lot of steps probably won't need my lemmas. I wrote them for people like me who need more steps spelled out. But the wonderful thing about lemmas is that you only have to prove them once! And with these, my horribly long proofs can get much shorter.

@surajmandal_567 12 күн бұрын

I have already proved these lemmas in my metric space and topology course.

@Mayank_xez Ай бұрын

What is potential on the bottom of charged ring if we brought down the particle

@robertcruikshank4501 Ай бұрын

Do you mean in the center? Set z = 0 in the formula, and you get V = kQ/R. There isn't actually a particle, the potential is a property of a location in space.

@Tyokok Ай бұрын

Wow, what a 2 min of gold! Thank you Professor!

@KevySTUDY Ай бұрын

thank you so much for clearing my doubts Mr. Robert. 💙

@Noname_1170 Ай бұрын

thank you sir, really helpful

@swaggy745 Ай бұрын

So, any estimator for theta is unique.. isn't this one of many consequences of a complete family of distributions.. or do you see it as the primary motivator? I am a student just learning this concept.

@robertcruikshank4501 Ай бұрын

I'm sorry, your statement didn't make sense to me: "any estimator for theta is unique" in what sense? Or were you only referring to a specific type of estimator, such as MLE, or complete?

@swaggy745 Ай бұрын

@robertcruikshank4501 a complete one! So.. a complete, unbiased estimator is always unique?

@The_Bored_ONE-YT Ай бұрын

Great video and Amazing explanation 🔥. Thankyou very much ❤

@GeorgeCarlin-gr2im Ай бұрын

Thank you sir

@msf559 Ай бұрын

thanks sir from pakistan...

@atharvneet-h7i Ай бұрын

had a hard time recognizing whether circuits were parallel or in series but you just explained it so easily.thanks i have 2questions in which i am having trouble to find answer if you can,can you please provide me your e-mail so that i can send you those questions........if possible please reply

@yonatanlivshitz9774 Ай бұрын

best explanation on the internet

@deambew Ай бұрын

Indeed helpful sir

@TakyiwaaMillicent-j5i Ай бұрын

Really appreciate your help

@anmolpardeshi3138 Ай бұрын

didnt quite capture how hazard is negative derivative (t) of log survival. ?!

@robertcruikshank4501 Ай бұрын

S = 1-F, so dS/dt = -f, and log S = log 1-F, so d/dt(logS) = 1/S * dS/dt = 1/S * -f. Therefore d/dt(-logS) = f/S = hazard rate. I hope that helps.

@KanhaiyalalGarg-l9j Ай бұрын

Great sir make more videos realtive satistical inference

@wandamiller5344 2 ай бұрын

I have 3 little holes in the bottom of my firepot. How do I clean those?

@robertcruikshank4501 2 ай бұрын

I just use the ash vacuum myself, but I don't know the official way. Maybe I'm not supposed to do that.

@rajimrpramod2546 2 ай бұрын

Sir thankyou for explaining the series and parallel combination in a very nice manner now i understand very well about this topic

@RahibulAzizAnam2002 2 ай бұрын

Thank you❤❤❤❤❤❤

@YusrinaNurDini 2 ай бұрын

The graph is really helpful to understand the concept. Thank you!

@XxSquishymanxX 2 ай бұрын

This was so helpful. Thank you!

@ranamuqattash4342 2 ай бұрын

Thanks, that’s really helpful

@huanranchen 2 ай бұрын

Thanks for the explanation! I wonder if they avoided defining the sufficient statistics by the posterior due to certain regularization conditions, like avoiding the marginal distribution is non-zero at certain points?

@robertcruikshank4501 2 ай бұрын

It's been pointed out to me that with a frequentist interpretation my description makes no sense. I'm not 100% sure of that, but my expertise is limited. I wasted ten hours wrapping my head around it so I wanted to spare everyone else those ten hours if I could.