how does that even make sense?

WSB no way Leary yeah

Yes I always re-read The Cat Inside a few times a year - my holy book!! 🏛🐾🏛 Also The Third Mind written with Gysin.

Ok I will , i kno nothing about him or keroauc or any beat writer I liked that tom Clancy who wrote that book that had tom cruise I. It The firm , that was really good But I’ll read naked lunch U can read the Firm 😊

i dont like the firm,so why should i read the firm,ill reread naked lunch,and i think i have to be misunderstood by you,dont you?..what? funny we both like Naked Lunch,but Burroughs has written alot that is bettter id say.

i dont admire AI

@@fleadoggreen9062 okay youre areal GOAT!!!

I knew a few who did

@@paulone805 wish I had been one

It's called social hypocrisy or moral bankruptcy, take your pick. The Piccadilly meat rack,and btw when he said boys, he meant boy,s, not youth, there was a ring of foster parents who brought boys from the age of 4 to the Wimpey Bar there. If your a inherited wealth wealthy sex tourist, write for left wing indie publications, not only will they stupidly ot see the contradictions of members of the elite class larping as revolutionaries they will be quietly impressed by any degree of child cruelty and modern day slavery and extreme sadism .and mental cruelty towards the vulnerable, .on the part of their heroes. This is why we have monsters amongst us. Brain dead sht eating hero worshippers.

One would imagine back in those days it was free love with everyone doing drugs being space cadets for NASA on a one way trip to Pluto partaking in orgies and dickie back rides boring each other new arseholes etc.

Yeah right.bollox course he did you think he checked rent boys ages

@@GavinCrossan probably the 60’s are to blame lots of people were experimenting with drugs , Acid LSD , thinking that they were space cadets for NASA on a one way trip to Pluto , free sex , orgies , sleeping around , girls together , boys together trying to bore each other new arseholes etc .

It was a different era, you could get cheap rooms in those places, now you can't get very cheap rooms anywhere, and the cost of living wasn't prohibitive to going out for dinner. London hadn't yet been turned into a ruthless, corrupt, money making machine. He lived where it made sense to because it was affordable. The photographs show a very basic, sparsely furnished set up, he wasn't living in luxury. If it was today he couldn't live in London at all. Decades of corruption, turning a blind eye to Russian, Chinese and Saudi money means nothing is affordable any more as it's all owned by dictators.

@@DenkyManner So morals that would be ... objecting to high rents and the wrong sort of Johnny foreigner. Sadistic pedophile sex tourists? Our sort of people, don't ya know!

probably got copyrighted because of the animations

@@lmn_godie2598 the animations themselves should be public domain, so i assume it was taken down by tuesday weld themselves when they remade this song

There's somewhere in wonderland that song has to be out there somewhere😊

Which is just what I was saying to Marie Kelly. In the 1920's there must be lots of relatives still alive. Some registrars must have mixed up the birth certificates. Because of the similarities between the surnames of Woods, and Wood. In my own family. The Birth registrar's messed up the surname.

Let It Be Mary . Wow that's fascinating. I'm some what obsessed with her and the sisters. My parents and mates say I was borin in the wrong century because of my love of her and music hall lol

@@fatjackjack5416 Oh, that's so sweet! I'm sure Marie and her sisters would be thrilled to know that they're still loved and remembered. You never know, perhaps you had a past life in Victorian London! :)

Really? I watched a film with Jessie Wallace (Cat from Eastenders), in the lead role.. She was brilliant in it! Are you really Marie Lloyd's G-g-niece?

​@@jankelly4933Surely there must be lots of people who can lay claim to being related to the Wood family. There must be lots of branches of the family connected by Marriage.

Wearing the same suit for all those occasions isn't nearly as positive as you make it out to be. For one, the modern suit and the culture around it largely strips you of your individuality and stunts sartorial expression. Most men today are scared to experiment and express themselves through their clothes, largely due to there only really being one socially acceptable option with at most some slight variation in small highlight colors. It's not really a matter of choice, men today are not socially allowed to deviate lest they have their entire identity, sexuality and/or even gender questioned by the world. It's definitely cheaper to only wear one thing sure but it's also harmfully restrictive.

P Orridge: No talent freak!

Ted Morgan’s biography was Literary Outlaw

@@GefiltaTed Morgan deserves a biography of his own - fascinating life. See Wikipedia entry.